Category: Research

Categories
Global stocks Shares

Deere’s Prospects for Fiscal 2022 Look Bright to Us, Given Strong End Market Demand

Business Strategy and Outlook

Deere’s strong brand is underpinned by its high-quality, extremely durable, and efficient products. Customers in developed markets also value Deere’s ability to reduce the total cost of ownership. The company’s strategy focuses on delivering a comprehensive solution for farmers. Deere’s innovative products target each phase of the farming process, which includes field preparation, planting and seeding, applying chemicals, and harvesting. The company also embeds technology in its products, from guidance systems to seed placement and spacing and customized spraying applications. Deere is committed to expanding customer offerings and providing value-added services. Additionally, we believe the management team will look to reduce the company’s cost structure as some markets have matured, providing an opportunity to rethink its footprint and create a leaner organization.

Financial Strength 

Deere maintains a sound balance sheet. On the industrial side, the net debt/adjusted EBITDA ratio was relatively low at the end of fiscal 2021, coming in at 0.4. Total outstanding debt, including both short- and long-term debt, was $10.4 billion. Deere’s strong balance sheet gives management the financial flexibility to run a balanced capital allocation strategy going forward that mostly favors organic growth and also returns cash to shareholders. The company’s cash position as of fiscal year-end 2021 stood at $7.2 billion on its industrial balance sheet. We also find comfort in Deere’s ability to tap into available lines of credit to meet any short-term needs. Deere has access to $5.7 billion in credit facilities.

Additionally, management is determined to rationalize its footprint by reducing the number of facilities in mature markets. If successful, this will put Deere on much better footing from a cost perspective, further supporting its ability to return cash to shareholders. The captive finance arm holds considerably more debt than the industrial business, but this is reasonable, given its status as a lender to both customers and dealers. Total debt stood at $38 billion in fiscal 2021, along with $38 billion in finance receivables and $829 million in cash. In our view, Deere enjoys a strong financial position supported by a clean balance sheet and strong free cash flow prospects.

Bulls Say’s

  • Higher crop prices encourage farmers to grow more crops and will lead to more farming equipment purchases, substantially boosting Deere’s revenue growth. 
  • Deere will benefit from strong replacement demand, as uncertainty around trade, weather, and agriculture commodity demand has eased, encouraging farmers to refresh their machine fleet. 
  • Increased infrastructure spending in the U.S. and emerging markets will lead to more construction equipment purchases, benefiting Deere.

Company Profile 

Deere is the world’s leading manufacturer of agricultural equipment, producing some of the most recognizable machines in the heavy machinery industry. The company is divided into four reportable segments: production and precision agriculture, small agriculture and turf, construction and forestry, and John Deere Capital. Its products are available through a robust dealer network, which includes over 1,900 dealer locations in North America and approximately 3,700 locations globally. John Deere Capital provides retail financing for machinery to its customers, in addition to wholesale financing for dealers, which increases the likelihood of Deere product sales.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
LICs LICs

Plato Income Maximiser Limited raises $139.5m

Plato Income is Financial Industry with sub- industry is Asset Management. Market Capitalization is 657.126m. Their 5 years Monthly Beta is 0.78. 

Plato Income’s NTA values shows below are before the dividend of $0.005 per share payable on 31 December 2021. The ex-date of the dividend is 16th December 2021. 

Plato Income Maximiser limited Pre – Tax NTA $1.101 while Post – tax NTA is 1.105. Per – tax NTA Includes tax on realised gains/losses and other earnings but excludes any provision from tax on unrealised gains/losses. Post – Tax NTA includes tax on realised and unrealised gains/losses and other earnings. 

During November, PL8 raised $139.5m in total through a Placement to wholesale investors and a Share Purchase Plan (SPP). The Placement to wholesale investors raised $71.3m with the issue of 64.3m fully paid ordinary shares at $1.11 per share. 

The SPP raised $68.2m through the issue of 62m new shares at $1.10 per share. The SPP was oversubscribed with the Company targeting $50m, however the Company decided not to scale back any applications.

The proceeds from the Placement and the SPP will be invested via the Plato Australian Shares Income Fund in accordance with the Company’s structure and investment strategy.

PL8 took the opportunity to raise capital when the Company was trading at a premium. The share price closed at $1.285 on 2 November, the day prior to the capital raising announcement, an 11.7% premium to the pre-tax NTA and a 15% premium to the post-tax NTA. 

The issue of new shares through the Placement and SPP has seen the share price decline to be trading closer to the pre-tax NTA at November-end.

Portfolio Performance as at 30th November 2021

PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE¹1M%3M%1YR% P.A.3YRS% P.A.INCEPTION% P.A.
Total return²-0.7-2.114.813.59.6
Income³0.61.66.08.37.4
Bench. total return²-0.4-2.017.014.010.1
Excess total return²-0.3-0.1-2.2-0.5-0.5
Excess Income³0.0-0.11.13.42.2
Excess franking³0.00.00.51.20.9

Company Profile 

Plato Income Maximiser Limited is a listed investment company incorporated in Australia. The Company has been established to provide investors with the opportunity to benefit from an investment in an actively managed, well-diversified portfolio of Australian listed equities by investing in an the unlisted scheme Plato Australian Shares Income Fund.

(Source: BanyanTree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
LICs LICs

Twilio’s Software Building Blocks Are Constructing a Cloud Communications Empire

Business Strategy and Outlook

Twilio is a cloud-based communication-platform-as-a-service, or CPaaS, company offering communication application programming interfaces, or APIs, and prebuilt solution applications aimed at improving customer engagement. Through these APIs, Twilio’s platform allows developers to integrate messaging, voice, and video functionality into business applications. In a go-to-market model that focuses on empowering developers to utilize the APIs to build products in a highly customized fashion, Twilio has been able to expand into use-cases that would be difficult to penetrate otherwise. For widely sought after use-cases, Twilio has developed solution applications, like Flex Contact Center, which combine various channel APIs into a unified interface to create use-case-specific solutions.

The communication channel APIs are deployed through the Programmable Communications Cloud and then are combined and expanded into application platforms in the Engagement Cloud to offer higher level functionality for specific use-cases. In this view full stack as best-in-breed in the CPaaS space, enabling deeply integrated, sticky communication solutions. Twilio has stellar customer metrics, with churn consistently below 5% and net dollar expansion in excess of 130% in recent years.

Financial Strength

Twilio is in a healthy financial position. Revenue is growing rapidly, and the company is beginning to scale, while the balance sheet is in good shape. As of September 2021, the company had cash and short-term investments of $5.4 billion and a debt balance of $985.5 million. In March 2021, Twilio issued $1.0 billion of senior notes, consisting of $500 million of 3.625% notes due 2029, and $500 million of 3.875% notes due 2031. In June 2021, the company redeemed its prior convertible notes, due March 2023, in their entirety. Since raising approximately $150 million in its IPO in 2016, Twilio has completed several secondary offerings, recently announcing a $1.8 billion offering of its Class A common stock in 2021. Twilio has yet to achieve GAAP profitability, as the company remains focused on reinvesting excess returns back into the company, both on an organic and inorganic basis, to build out the platform and enhance future growth prospects.

Our fair value estimate for Twilio is $356 per share, down from $388 as we model slightly more muted long-term growth. It is expected that Twilio to grow at a 38% CAGR through 2025 from the combination of an expanding customer base and increasing usage of the platform by existing customers, evidenced by a stellar 131% net dollar expansion rate in the third quarter. Investors are discouraged by the combination of the third-quarter slowdown in organic growth, which we still view as healthy at a 38% increase year over year, and the widening loss expected for full-year 2021 after management’s fourth-quarter guidance.

Bulls Say’s 

  • The addition of SI partnerships and solution APIs should lead to increasing success in winning enterprise customers, which not only offer a greater lifetime value for a proportionally smaller acquisition cost, but also tend to be stickier customers. 
  • Twilio has stellar user retention metrics, with churn consistently below 5% and net dollar retention north of 130% in recent years. 
  • As Twilio focuses on developing more solution APIs and growth shifts from usage-based messaging to SaaS-like priced solutions, there should be a natural uptick in both gross margins and recurring revenue.

Company Profile 

Twilio is a cloud-based communication platform-as-a-service company offering communication application programming interfaces, or APIs, and prebuilt solution applications aimed at improving customer engagement. Through these APIs, Twilio’s platform allows software developers to integrate messaging, voice, and video functionality into new or existing business applications. The company leverages its Super Network, Twilio’s global network of carrier relationships, to facilitate high speed cost-optimized global messaging and voice-based communications.

(Source: FN Arena)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

JP Morgan Investment Funds: A collection of top picks from diversified industries

He also tends to add and trim positions aggressively as they become more or less attractive according to analyst models, a tendency that benefits when stock prices mean revert. While Davis’ artful approach has some appeal, it doesn’t have a discernible edge relative to its competition.

Portfolio:

This portfolio finds a balance between differentiation and careful risk management. It held 51 stocks at the end of September 2021, significantly less than the 140-180 it used to have when it had three independently managed sleeves. However, manager Scott Davis’ desire to let stock selection drive results leads to only modest sector and industry tilts relative to its S&P 500 benchmark. Davis also considers factor exposure when building the portfolio. For instance, he increased the portfolio’s stake in financials companies toward the end of 2020 to bolster its exposure to cheaper, more cyclical stocks to help offset its lack of exposure to the energy sector.

The portfolio has historically leaned a bit more toward a growth style, and that still rings true. It displayed a slight growth bias relative to the benchmark as of October, sporting higher valuation metrics such as price/ sales and faster trailing revenue- and earnings-growth rates.

People:

This strategy continues to rely heavily on J.P. Morgan’s core research team, but it is now led exclusively by Scott Davis, who oversaw the strongest-performing sleeve of this formerly multi-managed offering. Davis became a named manager in August 2014, inheriting a 10% slice of the strategy, but quickly saw his share grow, most notably after manager Thomas Luddy stepped down at the end of 2017. Davis continues to leverage the ideas of J.P. Morgan’s core research team, which consists of 23 analysts with extensive industry experience.

Performance:

A good portion of the fund’s success came in 2020, which skews the trailing return figures a bit. Its 26.7% gain in 2020 outpaced the benchmark by over 8 percentage points, the best calendar year since Davis debuted. The fund’s case over other time periods is weaker: It outperformed the bogy about 51% of the time on a rolling one-year basis since Davis joined.

(Source: jpmorgan.com)

Price:

Analysts find it difficult to analyse expenses since it comes directly from the returns. Analysts expect that it would be able to generate positive alpha relative to its benchmark index.


(Source: Morningstar)                                                                      (Source: Morningstar)

About Funds:

The investment objective of this fund is to achieve a return in excess of the US equity market by investing primarily in US companies. It uses a research-driven investment process that is based on the fundamental analysis of companies and their future earnings and cash flows by a team of specialist sector analysts.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

JP Morgan Investment Funds- A collection of top picks from diversified industries

Process:

Davis maintains a relatively concentrated portfolio of 50-60 stocks but seeks to minimize the magnitude of sector or factor bets. He also tends to add and trim positions aggressively as they become more or less attractive according to analyst models, a tendency that benefits when stock prices mean revert. While Davis’ artful approach has some appeal, it doesn’t have a discernible edge relative to its competition.

Portfolio:

This portfolio finds a balance between differentiation and careful risk management. It held 51 stocks at the end of September 2021, significantly less than the 140-180 it used to have when it had three independently managed sleeves. However, manager Scott Davis’ desire to let stock selection drive results leads to only modest sector and industry tilts relative to its S&P 500 benchmark. Davis also considers factor exposure when building the portfolio. For instance, he increased the portfolio’s stake in financials companies toward the end of 2020 to bolster its exposure to cheaper, more cyclical stocks to help offset its lack of exposure to the energy sector.

The portfolio has historically leaned a bit more toward a growth style, and that still rings true. It displayed a slight growth bias relative to the benchmark as of October, sporting higher valuation metrics such as price/ sales and faster trailing revenue- and earnings-growth rates.

People:

This strategy continues to rely heavily on J.P. Morgan’s core research team, but it is now led exclusively by Scott Davis, who oversaw the strongest-performing sleeve of this formerly multi-managed offering. Davis became a named manager in August 2014, inheriting a 10% slice of the strategy, but quickly saw his share grow, most notably after manager Thomas Luddy stepped down at the end of 2017. Davis continues to leverage the ideas of J.P. Morgan’s core research team, which consists of 23 analysts with extensive industry experience.

Performance:

A good portion of the fund’s success came in 2020, which skews the trailing return figures a bit. Its 26.7% gain in 2020 outpaced the benchmark by over 8 percentage points, the best calendar year since Davis debuted. The fund’s case over other time periods is weaker: It outperformed the bogy about 51% of the time on a rolling one-year basis since Davis joined.

(Source: jpmorgan.com)

Price:

Analysts find it difficult to analyse expenses since it comes directly from the returns. Analysts expect that it would be able to generate positive alpha relative to its benchmark index.                                                              

                 
(Source: Morningstar)                                                                 

About Funds:

The investment objective of this fund is to achieve a return in excess of the US equity market by investing primarily in US companies. It uses a research-driven investment process that is based on the fundamental analysis of companies and their future earnings and cash flows by a team of specialist sector analysts.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

WCM Focused International Growth Fund Institutional Class: A promising option

Approach

The managers first generate ideas through a quality-growth screen, which includes companies with market caps of at least $3.5 billion, a good liquidity profile, and other metrics such as strong and improving margins. The team excludes non-growth industries such as utilities and looks for companies with solid returns on invested capital. Factors such as economies of scale, intellectual property, and legal or regulatory advantages are key. The team also places a heavy emphasis on culture, believing that culture drives certain companies forward and helps maintain their competitive edge. The team takes its best ideas and builds a relatively concentrated portfolio of roughly 30 to 40 international stocks. Because of their benchmark-agnostic approach, the portfolio may have extreme over- and underweighting to various sectors.

Portfolio

The managers use their best ideas to build a concentrated portfolio. . Coming out of the 2007-09 global financial crisis, the managers felt like their portfolio was too concentrated at about 20 holdings. They’ve gradually increased that count, and in July 2021 had 35 holdings. While still relatively concentrated (the typical foreign large-growth peer held 83 stocks in July), the expansion helps reduce individual stock risk. The managers take other prudent steps to minimize risk and remain relatively diverse. They avoid sectors that they believe offer little growth potential and as of July 2021, the fund had no exposure to energy, real estate, or utilities.

Portfolio Holdings .png

People

Co-CEO and manager Kurt Winrich’s upcoming retirement has been long in the works and the team will still have four capable managers to pick up the slack. Mike Trigg, who has been on the strategy since the fund’s 2011 inception, is the final decision-maker here. . Peter Hunkel, who has also managed since the fund’s inception, is responsible for portfolio construction. The team promoted Sanjay Ayer, also a former Morningstar equity analyst, to the management ranks in June 2019. Ayer joined WCM in 2007 and manages the WCM Global Growth Fund WCMGX and the WCM Emerging Markets Fund WCMEX, which have had success under him. Paul Black, co-CEO of WCM, is a named manager here but serves mainly as an advisor to the team. 

Performance 

Strong stock selection has fueled the fund’s outperformance. Picks in technology and industrials, in particular, have been among the biggest contributors to its performance. That helped the strategy weather 2020’s first-quarter coronavirus-driven slide. The fund held up slightly better than the index losing 29.4% from Jan. 18 to March 23, 2020, compared with the index’s 30.3% loss. The managers then opportunistically added MercadoLibre MELI and Ferrari RACE, which benefitted the strategy coming out of the bear market. In 2021, the fund has returned to its winning ways. Its 12.7% return handily beat the index’s 4.6% and the Morningstar Category’s 4.5%. That was good for the top decile in the category. Holdings such as ASML Holdings NV ADR ASML and Shopify SHOP were among the leading contributors in that period.

Performance .png

About the Fund

WCM Focused International Growth Fund seeks long term capital appreciation by investing in equity securities of non-U.S. domiciled companies or depository receipts of non-U.S. domiciled companies.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

Altius Sustainable Bond Fund- A fund that aims to provide a total return approach

The Altius Sustainable Bond Fund offers investors fixed interest investments, which are managed with the consideration of environment, social and corporate governance (ESG) principles. The Manager recently expanded its exclusion of companies engaged in thermal coal to all fossil fuels (or at least have revenue no greater than 10% sourced from these activities). The Fund is a credible offering. It is run by an investment team with strong credentials and lengthy investment experience in managed assets in the investment class (the team of six comprises three PMs all with at least 25 years’ experience and the remaining team members all with over 10 years’ experience).

Downside Risk: 

  • Interest rate risk (however the Fund’s total return focus should limit this). 
  • The Manager gets the thematic and top-down view wrong. 
  • Key man risk – Bill Bovingdon, Chris Dickman and Gavin Goodhand.

Investment Team:

The fund is managed by Australian Unity’s Cash and Fixed Interest team (Altius) consisting of experienced fixed interest investment professionals. The investment team is supported by a very experienced Investment Advisory Committee, which meet every quarter (formally). Below are the 

  • Bill Bovingdon – Executive Director, Chief Investment Officer 
  • Chris Dickman – Executive Director, Senior Portfolio Manager
  • Gavin Goodhand – Senior Portfolio Manager
  • Yen Wong – Head of Credit Research
  • Kirsten Lee – Credit Analyst.
  • Vincent Tang – Senior Portfolio Analyst

Performance:

(%)Fund  Benchmark**Out-performance
1-month-0.110.35-0.46
3-months0.390.77-0.38
1-year (p.a.)-0.550.32-0.23
3-years (p.a.1.422.49-1.07
5-year (p.a.)1.532.13-0.6
Since inception (p.a.)*2.262.65-0.39

Fees Structure:

The Fund has lowered its management fees 0.56% p.a. to 0.37%p.a. The Fund charges no performance fee.

Fund Positioning:

Sector Allocation:

Top 10 Holdings:

About the fund:

The Altius Sustainable Bond Fund is an Australian fixed interest fund that invests in companies which conduct their business and apply capital responsibly, considering a range of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. The Fund aims to provide a total return approach, offering duration exposure at appropriate points in the cycle, as well as positioning the portfolio defensively in a rising rate environment and invests only in domestic assets, thus avoiding importation of global risks (e.g. currency) and offering a different risk profile.

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Allspring Diversified Income Builder Fund – Class C: A fund providing high income

Fund Objective

The investment seeks long-term total return, consisting of current income and capital appreciation.

Approach

The strategy targets a yield of 4%-5% and allocates 60%-90% of assets in fixed income, with the remainder in stocks. The team may also employ tactical shifts, vetted by the firm’s tactical trading council, by trading currencies or equity sector indexes, but these can be difficult to execute well consistently. Since introducing a multisleeved approach in early 2018, this strategy has undergone three prospectus benchmark shifts that signal it continues to experiment with its profile. The most recent adjustment (February 2020) decreased the equity exposure by 10 percentage points to 25% in order to make room for a more diversified bond sleeve. Other adjustments include the removal of a REITs sleeve in September 2018, the addition of a securitized bond sleeve in March 2019, and the introduction of an options sleeve in January 2020.

Portfolio 

As fixed-income markets have proved richly priced, the portfolio managers cited more attractive capital appreciation and dividends in the equity space, prompting an uptick in the equity holdings to roughly 38% here by September 2021. Within that equity sleeve, technology stocks (Microsoft MSFT is a holding) and healthcare stocks (such as Bausch Health Companies BHC, DaVita DVA, and AbbeVie ABBV) occupied roughly 27% and 17% of assets, respectively. 

High-yield bonds dominate the fixed-income portion of the strategy (59% of the portfolio as of September 2021), and it is worth noting that these are more sensitive to equity markets than the investment-grade fare employed by many peers for downside protection in stressed markets. Other bond sleeves here are modest but diversifying relative to the portfolio’s historical profile and include municipal bonds (3%) and securitized bonds (2%).

People

Kandarp Acharya as co manager alongside Margie Patel, who was the sole manager since 2007 but is departing this strategy (though she remains on Allspring Diversified Capital Builder EKBYX) as of Dec. 13, 2021. This move is accompanied by the arrival of quantitative researcher Petros Bocray, a 15-year firm veteran and Acharya’s collaborator on Allspring Asset Allocation EAAIX.

Performance

Over the strategy’s short tenure with its new contours (January 2018 through November 2021), the 5.5% annualized return of its R6 share class modestly outpaced the 5.3% return of the Morningstar Conservative. Target Risk Index and trailed the 6.7% return of its custom benchmark (60% ICE BoA U.S. Cash Pay HY Index, 25% MSCI ACWI, and 15% Barclays Aggregate Index). From an absolute return perspective, the strategy also generated a higher return than the 5.0% median of its typical allocation–15% to 30% equity Morningstar Category peer.This strategy has a riskier profile than many strategies in the category, particularly during stress periods, resulting in risk-adjusted returns (as measured by the Sharpe ratio) that trail all comparative points (typical category peer and benchmark as well as custom benchmark) over the aforementioned period. In three recent stress periods (when energy prices plummeted from June 2015 to February 2016, the 2018 fourth-quarter high-yield sell-off, and the coronavirus-driven market panic of Feb. 20-March 23, 2020), the fund lagged its category index by more than double and trailed its typical peer.

Top 10 Holdings

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\Screenshot 2021-12-10 121827.png

About the fund

The Fund seeks high current income from investments in income-producing securities. The Fund will normally invest at least 80% of its assets in income producing securities, including debt securities of any quality, dividend paying common and preferred stocks, convertible bonds, and  

derivatives. The strategy targets a yield of 4%-5% and allocates 60%-90% of assets in fixed income, with the remainder in stocks. The team may also employ tactical shifts, vetted by the firm’s tactical trading council, by trading currencies or equity sector indexes, but these can be difficult to execute well consistently.

(Source:Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Bank of Queensland brings forward cost savings to offset margin pressure

Business Strategy and Outlook

Bank of Queensland is one of Australia’s top-10 largest banks, but is considerably smaller than the four major Australian banks. Preceding the global financial crisis, the bank grew aggressively via acquisitions and the rollout of its distinctive owner-manager branch franchise model. However, expanding the branch network and diversifying away from traditional residential lending came at a cost, with additional equity required to fund growth, significantly increased bad debts, and multiple banking systems, which resulted in deteriorating cost/income and returns on equity. 

The aim is to ensure the bank is more competitive, particularly in the home loan market, but this investment giving the bank any competitive edge. At best, it can narrow the gap to peers, but with the big investment budgets of the majors, those innovations are likely to be hard to keep up with. Bank of Queensland has branches owned by branch managers and corporate branches. The model has the potential for the bank to outperform its peers on customer service, with owner branch managers building relationships with local customers, and niche business lending specialists with an understanding of borrower needs and industry.

Financial Strength

The capital structure and balance sheet provide comfort that the bank can manage a large increase in loan losses associated with COVID-19, but it remains the greatest threat to the bank’s capital position. Common equity Tier 1 capital was 9.8% as at August 2021, well above APRA’s 8.5% minimum capital benchmark for standardised banks. It is expected that the bank will pay out around 60% to 65% of earnings given the credit growth outlook, elevated investment in the banking platform, and integration of ME Bank. Our fair value estimate for no-moat rated Bank of Queensland is unchanged at AUD 8.50.

With the elevated savings rate in 2020, the bank has been able to increase its share of funding from customer deposits to 70% as at Aug. 31, 2021, up from pre-COVID-19 levels of 64% as at Aug. 31, 2019. In March 2020 the RBA announced the Term Funding Facility, or TFF, which provided three-year funding at 0.25%. From Nov. 4, 2020, new drawdowns would pay 0.1%. The initial funding available via the TFF was set at 3% of the bank’s outstanding loan balance, with an additional 2% of balances announced in November.

Bulls Say’s

  • The appointment of new senior executives and a clean out of the troubled commercial loan portfolio has ensured a more risk-conscious culture. 
  • Substantial capital raisings bolstered the balance sheet, ensuring that the bank satisfies capital rules and can still fund investments in technology and expand loan balances. 
  • Productivity improvements not only lead to improved operating margins, but a more streamlined loan approval process lifts mortgage growth rates. 
  • Management extract greater cost and revenue synergies from the acquisition of ME Bank.

Company Profile 

Bank of Queensland, or BOQ, is an Australia-based bank offering home loans, personal finance, and commercial loans. BOQ operates both owner-managed and corporate branches, and is the owner of Virgin Money Australia. Its BOQ business includes the BOQ branded commercial lending activity, BOQ Finance and BOQ Specialist businesses. The division provides tailored business banking solutions including commercial lending, equipment finance and leasing, cashflow finance, foreign exchange, interest rate hedging, transaction banking, and deposit solutions for commercial customers

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research

Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor Share: A fund providing outstanding diversification with ultralow fee

Investment Objective 

The Fund seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of stocks issued by companies located in developed and emerging markets, excluding the United States.

Approach

Vanguard’s portfolio managers use full replication to track the FTSE Global All Cap ex U.S. Index. This benchmark starts with all stocks listed outside of the United States and sorts them by their free-float adjusted market cap. It targets firms that land in the top 98% of each country’s market capitalization. The index uses buffer rules around the cutoff point to keep turnover low, and it applies some additional liquidity requirements to ensure that its holdings are investable. The index weights its final constituents by market cap, which helps further mitigate turnover and trading costs. It reconstitutes semiannually in March and September.

Portfolio 

This fund captures the entire foreign stock market. Its comprehensive portfolio effectively diversifies stockspecific risk, with only 9% of assets in its 10 largest holdings. . Sector weightings are comparable, with financial and industrial stocks collectively representing almost one third of the portfolio. Eurozone stocks represent the largest regional allocation, at 20% of the portfolio, while Japan and the United Kingdom make up an additional 16% and 9.4%, respectively. The fund does not hedge its currency risk, so its exposure to currencies like the euro, yen, and pound can add to its volatility. Stocks listed on emerging-markets exchanges account for a little more than 28% of this fund. Allocating to these companies improves the fund’s reach and shouldn’t materially impact its risk or performance. The fund includes small caps but weights its holdings by market cap. So, it leans toward large-cap multinationals, with companies like Taiwan Semiconductor, Nestle, and Samsung among its biggest names.

People

The portfolio managers on this fund are part of Vanguard’s Equity Index Group. Christine Franquin and Michael Perre share responsibility for this fund. They are both principals at Vanguard and captain some of Vanguard’s largest index-tracking funds listed in North America. This duo not only oversees the portfolio but also executes trades on a day-to-day basis

Performance

This fund’s category-relative performance has not stood out from its competitors in the foreign large-blend category. The Admiral share class managed to slightly edge out the average of its peers by 18 basis points annualized over the 10 years through November 2021. The fund’s larger-than-average stake in emerging- markets stocks was a drag during the first few years of that period and partially explains its mediocre showing. The fund’s composition looks a lot like the category average, and it remains fully invested in order to tightly track its target index. That means it tends to post average performance during volatile periods like the coronavirusdriven sell-off in the first quarter of 2020. The fund’s 24% decline was comparable to the loss incurred by the category norm over those three months.

Recent category-relative performance has been stronger. The portfolio led the category average by 67 basis points per year over the trailing three years through November 2021, landing just outside the top third of the category. Poor stock selection in the financials and information technology sectors on the part of some active managers hurt their category-relative performance and boosted the fund’s standing.

Top holdings of the fund

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\vanguard portfolio.png

About the fund

The fund tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex U.S. Index, which includes stocks of all sizes from foreign developed and emerging markets. It weights them by market cap, an approach that benefits investors by capturing the market’s collective opinion of each stock’s value while keeping turnover low. This is one of the broadest portfolios in the foreign large-blend category. Its exceptional diversification mitigates the impact of holding the worst-performing names. It holds more than 7,000 stocks and has only 9% of assets in its 10 largest positions. Its regional composition looks modestly different from a typical fund in the category because it has a larger dose of emerging-markets stocks. But their weight in the portfolio isn’t large enough to materially increase the fund’s risk or compromise its category relative performance.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.