Author: lvc-admin

Categories
Shares Technology Stocks

Despite a rise in earnings, the share price of Nine Entertainment has dropped.

20025825 - closeup image of businessman drawing 3d graphics

Investment Thesis

  • Upside potential to NEC’s share price from investors ascribing a higher value for Stan, NEC’s subscription video of demand (SVOD). Stan is now cash flow positive and profitable, with margins having the potential to surprise on the upside. 
  • Relatively attractive dividend yield of ~4%. 
  • NEC is a now a much more diversified business, with revenue not dominated by traditional FTA TV but also attractive digital platforms and assets. 
  • Cost out strategy – looking to remove $230m in structural costs.  
  • Corporate activity given NEC’s strategic assets.
  • Trading below our valuation.

Key Risks

We see the following key risks to our investment thesis:

  • Competitive pressure in Free to Air (FTA) TV and SVOD. 
  • Stan growth (subscriber numbers or breakeven point) disappoints market expectations. 
  • Structural decline in TV audiences continues to impact sentiment towards the stock. 
  • Deterioration in advertising markets.
  • Cost blowouts in obtaining new programming/content.
  • Increased competition from Netflix and Disney.

FY21 Results Highlights. Relative to the pcp: 

  • Revenue of $2,331.5, up +8%. 
  • Group EBITDA of $564.7m, was up +43%. 
  • NPAT of $277.5m, was up +76%, which translates to fully diluted EPS of 15.3%, up +83%.
  • The Board declared a final dividend per share of 5.5cps which brings full year total dividends to 10.5cps, up +50%, and equates to a payout ratio of ~69% (in line with management’s policy of paying ~60-80% through the cycle).

Current trading environment and outlook

NEC did not provide specific quantitative FY22 earnings guidance but did provide significant colour: 

  • “Nine started the new financial year strongly, well supported across our platforms by advertisers from all categories. In the current quarter, Nine’s metro FTA ad revenue is expected to be up almost 20% on the same quarter last year. Forward bookings remain ahead of same day last year, with positive market momentum continuing into Q2, notwithstanding more difficult comparables, including timing of the NRL. The FTA ad market has recovered more quickly and convincingly than previously expected. FY22 will see the return of some cyclical costs – Nine currently expects FTA costs in FY22 to be ~3% higher than FY21”. 
  • 9Now: “continues its strong growth trajectory, with around 70% revenue growth in July (on pcp). Nine expects positive momentum to continue through the rest of FY22, as 9Now establishes its place in the broader digital video market”.
  • Nine Radio: “Notwithstanding the short-term impact of the lockdown on the radio market, Nine Radio’s Q1 ad revenues are expected to grow in the double-digits (%), with further share improvement across both agency and local ad sales. Coupled with Nine Radio’s restructured cost base, this is expected to underpin strong profit leverage as the ad market recovers”. 
  • Stan: “Total costs for Stan Sport in FY22 are now expected to be at the lower end of the $70-90m range previously cited. Whilst this investment will reduce Stan’s overall EBITDA in the short term (in FY22 combined EBITDA for Stan Entertainment and Stan Sport is expected to be in the low double-digit millions of dollars), over the medium and longer term, it is expected to significantly grow earnings”. 
  • Publishing: “As previously announced, Nine expects growth of $30-40m in Publishing EBITDA in FY22 on FY21”.

Company Description  

Nine Entertainment Co (NEC), through its subsidiaries, broadcast news and current affairs, sporting events, comedy, entertainment and lifestyle programs. Nine Entertainment serves customers throughout Australia. NEC has repositioned itself from a linear free-to-air broadcaster, to a creator and distributor of cross-platform, premium content. While the channel Nine Network remains core, it is now complemented by subscription video on demand (SVOD) provider Stan, a live streaming and catch-up service 9Now, digital network nine.com.au and array of digital content.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Adbri’s stock price drops but building boom raises profits

Investment Thesis

  • Macro conditions remains uncertain in key regions.
  • Strong pipeline of infrastructure projects over the next 2 years is a positive but timing and execution is a risk. 
  • Solid balance sheet position provides some flexibility to the Company to pursue growth. 
  • Leading positions as a lime producer, concrete products producer and cement and clinker supplier.
  • Outlook for lime looks relatively positive with higher infrastructure projects and resource sector activity
  • Cost-out and vertical integration (cement) programs expected to deliver cost benefits that exceed cost headwinds of $10m in FY21.

Key Risks

We see the following key risks to our investment thesis:

  • Softer sales volume than expected.
  • Loss of market share to competitors or imports and pressure on pricing. 
  • Softer than expected pricing increases.
  • Higher than expected energy prices.
  • Execution risk in relation to Company’s cost-out and vertical integration strategies.
  • Deterioration of A$ relative to other currencies.
  • Unfavorable weather impacts. 

1H21 results summary

  • Revenue was up +7.4% over pcp to $752.3m with robust demand, particularly on the eastern seaboard, driving higher volumes across all products. Lime pricing declined in accordance with contractual arrangements, while average cement price increased marginally, and concrete and aggregate prices were stable overall. 
  • Underlying EBITDA increased +8.7% over pcp to $133.1m with margins improving +20bps to 17.7%, benefitting from disciplined implementation of cost efficiencies across the Group. 
  • Underlying NPAT of $55m was up +15.5% over pcp driven by improved demand for construction materials supported by increased residential housing activity and infrastructure spending. 
  • Operating cash flow of $76.8m declined -34% over pcp, largely due to the one-off benefit in the prior year of Covid-19 stimulus measures with the temporary deferral of GST and PAYG payments that boosted 1H20 cash flow by circa $30m (measures reversed in 2H20 following payment of the deferred liabilities and were not repeated in 1H21). 
  • Capex declined -8% over pcp to $67.6m and was split between stay-in-business capital of $51.8m and development capital of $15.8m. 

Company Description  

Adbri Ltd (ABC) is an Australia listed construction materials and liming producing company. ABC is Australia’s leading (1) lime producer in the minerals processing industry; (2) concrete products producer; and (3) cement and clinker importer. ABC is Australia’s number two cement and clinker supplier to the Australian construction industry and number four concrete and aggregates producer.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Global stocks Shares

The share price of Pointsbet has dropped as a result of the FY21 performance.

Investment Thesis

  • U.S. growth opportunity – the U.S. online sports betting market continues to open following the 2018 supreme court ruling which legalise the industry. Market growth estimates forecast the industry to grow to US$51bn by 2033.  
  • Strong management team with a solid track record – the ability to grow market share in a competitive and mature market of Australia gives us some confidence the management team have the right strategy in place to build share in the U.S. 
  • Proprietary technology stack – The speed and useability are key differentiating factors. PBH operates proprietary technology, which it developed inhouse. This means new modifications and updates are easier to implement (i.e., more control) with inhouse tech versus outsourced (i.e., having to go to an external provider each time with an update). 
  • Cross sell opportunities with iGaming – PBH’s recently launched iGaming product (online casino) is already highlighting cross-sell opportunities to its customers.

Key Risks

We see the following key risks to our investment thesis:

  • Rising competitive pressures.
  • Adverse regulatory change in key operating jurisdictions (Australia / U.S.). 
  • Loss of market share in key regions or growth rate fails to meet market expectations. 
  • Higher than expected costs – especially around investment in sales & marketing to drive market share. 
  • Trading on high PE-multiples / valuations means the Company is more prone to share price volatility. 
  • Cyber-attack on PBH’s platform. 

FY21 headline results. 

  • PBH group revenue of $194.7m was up +159% YoY. 
  • Gross profit of $87.6m was up +129% YoY. 
  • PBH made heavy investment in sales and marketing over the year, with S&M expense of $170.7m significantly above the $38.2m in pcp. The Australian segment accounted for $51.4m (higher due to brand campaign with Shaquille O’Neal). However, the U.S. accounted for most of the uplift in marketing spend (total $119.2m) given the increased number of operating jurisdictions. As the footprint in the U.S. continues to expand, management noted the market spend will continue to increase. 
  • At the end of the period, Australia has 196,585 cash active clients (vs. 90,422 in pcp) and the U.S had 159.321 cash active clients (vs 20,939 in pcp). 
  • Group normalised EBITDA for the year was a loss of $156.1m vs loss of $37.6m in the pcp, as PBH continues to invest in the business to scale the U.S. business and invests in its technology stack.
  • Australian Trading segment reported revenue of $150.7m (vs $68.2m in pcp) and EBITDA of $9.2m (vs $6.9m in the pcp). A solid result given the significant increase in marketing spend over the year. 
  • USA segment reported revenue of $42.3m (vs $7.0m in pcp) and EBITDA loss of $149.6m (vs loss of $38.2m in pcp). During the year, PBH operational in six U.S. states: New Jersey, Iowa, Indiana, Illinois, Colorado, and Michigan. 
  • Balance sheet is in a good position to support investment in growth, with pro forma cash balance of $665.2m (post the July 21 capital raising).

Company Description  

PointsBet Holdings Ltd (PBH), founded in 2015, is a corporate bookmaker with operations in Australia and the United States (New Jersey, Iowa, Illinois and Indiana). PointsBet has developed a scalable cloud-based wagering platform which offers customers sports and racing wagering products. PBH’s key products include fixed odds sports, fixed odds racing and PointsBetting.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Fixed Income Fixed Income

Suncorp’s stock is in the spotlight following the announcement of a $350 million capital round.

final margin set at 2.90%. The margin is also in line with the recent issuances from Westpac Capital Notes 8 (WBCPK) and Macquarie Capital Notes 3 (MBLPD) (MBPLD are trading largely in line with par value since listing). We note this is a new issuance and therefore has no rollover or reinvestment plan attached to it. The underlying issuer, Suncorp Group, is a strong business and a regular issuer of debt in the market. We would have liked to have seen the final margin at the upper end of the indicative range (3.1% above BBSW). However, the demand for this relatively small issuance ($375m market cap) is also likely to be high given the issuer is someone other than the big 4 banks (although the sector exposure is the same, therefore we are not fully convinced of the diversification benefits here). Our positive view on these is a relative call.

Security Description: 

SUNPI securities are fully paid, subordinated, perpetual, redeemable, convertible, unsecured, non-cumulative, subject to a capital trigger event and non-viability trigger event, listed securities. The securities are scheduled to convert into ordinary shares on 17 Dec 2030 (subject to the conversion conditions being satisfied). 

Issuer Description: 

Suncorp is an ASX-listed company and financial services provider in Australia and New Zealand, and the ultimate parent company of the Suncorp Group, with a market capitalisation of approximately $16 billion as at 27 August 2021. The Suncorp Group offers insurance and banking products and services in Australia and New Zealand. 

KEY RISKS

  • The market price of SUNPI may fluctuate due to various factors that affect financial market conditions. It is possible that SUNPI may trade at a market price below their Issue Price of $100. Interest Rate will fluctuate with changes in the market rate.
  • Significant economic shock to the Australian economy, including a severe and prolonged downturn in the Australian economy. These capital notes are not deposit liabilities or protected accounts.
  • There is a risk that Distributions will not be paid given they are discretionary.
  • Unless exchanged on or before that date, SUNPI are expected to Convert into Ordinary Shares on the Mandatory Conversion Date. However, there is a risk that Conversion will not occur on the Mandatory Conversion Date because the Scheduled Conversion Conditions are not satisfied due to a large fall in the Ordinary Share price relative to the Issue Date VWAP, or if Ordinary Shares cease to be quoted on ASX or have been suspended from trading for a certain period. Mandatory Conversion may therefore not occur when scheduled or at all. The Ordinary Share Price may be affected by transactions affecting the share capital of Suncorp Group, such as rights issues.
  • The market price of SUNPI (and the Ordinary Shares into which they are expected to Convert) may be affected by Suncorp Group’s financial performance and position.

Interest Rate: Margin of 2.9% above the 90day BBSW rate. 

Interest / Distribution Payments: Discretionary, Non-cumulative and subject to following conditions: (1) Distributions will be paid if Suncorp’s capital requirements are sufficient as required by APRA. (2) Distributions will not cause Suncorp to become insolvent. (3) APRA not objecting to distributions being paid. Distributions are expected to be fully franked but not guaranteed.

Mandatory Conversion: On 17 Dec 2030, SUNPI Holders will receive ordinary shares worth $101 per note. Conversion may not occur on 17 Dec June 2030, being the first possible Mandatory Conversion Date, or at all if the Conversion Conditions are not satisfied.  Holders have no right to request that their Notes be Converted, Redeemed or Transferred.  Holders would need to sell their Notes on ASX at the prevailing market price to realise their investment. That price may be less than the Face Value (initially $100 per Note) and there may be no liquid market in the Notes.

Non-Viability Trigger Event:  In case of the event that APRA considers Suncorp non-viable, these notes will be written off (in all or in part) or Converted into Ordinary Shares and Holders will hold Ordinary Shares and rank equally with other holders of Ordinary Shares in a subsequent Winding Up of the Bank. Following a Non-Viability Trigger Event, if Conversion does not occur within five Business Days for any reason, those Capital Notes 4 that are required to be Converted will be Written-Off and Holders will not receive any Ordinary Shares with respect to those Capital Notes 4.

Ranking: In the event of a Winding Up, if the Notes are still on issue and have not been Redeemed or Converted, they will rank ahead of Ordinary Shares, equally among themselves and with all Equal Ranking Capital Securities and behind Senior Creditors (including depositors and holders of Westpac’s senior or less subordinated debt). This means that if there is a shortfall of funds on a Winding Up to pay all amounts ranking senior to, and equally with, the Notes, Holders will lose all or some of their investment.

The above is a brief summary of the terms and risks. Investors should read the PDS for more information.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Global stocks Shares

Wesfarmers reported solid revenue in FY 21

Global network and financial technology concept.

Investment Thesis:

  • Ongoing momentum in discretionary spending, fueled by rising property values.
  • Diversified asset base with core assets continuing to grow.
  • Expect improved performance from Target and Industrials business.
  • Continued emphasis on shareholder return, including a high yield.
  • A capable management team.
  • A strong sense of balance allows to seize opportunities as they emerge.
  • Potential  Capital management initiatives.

Key Risks:

  • Due to competitive pressures, margins are eroding.
  • Bunnings earnings have been disappointing.
  • The macro picture is deteriorating, resulting in decreasing retail sales activity and volumes.
  • Metrics on the balance sheet have deteriorated.
  • Adverse movements in AUD/USD.

Key highlights of FY21: Relative to the pcp:

  • During the year WES revenue rose by 10% to $33.9bn relative to previous year.
  • During the year 2020, WES revenue from continuing operation arises broadly from the following segment : 62% from Bunnings,19 % from kmart group, 11% from WesCEF , 6%from Office work  and 2% from Industrial and safety.
  • Bunnings delivered a 15% increase in revenue to $16,871m. Kmart Group revenue increased by 8.3% to $9,982m. Officeworks revenue increased by  8.7% to $3,029m . Wesfarmers Chemicals, Energy &Fertilisers (WesCEF) revenue increased by 2.9% to $2,146m.  Industrial and Safety saw revenue increased by 6.3% to $1,855m
  • NPAT from continuing operations increased by 16.2 % to $2.4 billion (excluding major items).
  • Operating cash flows of $3,383m were 25.6% lower over pcp as strong earnings growth businesses was offset by the normalisation in working capital positions across the retail combined with gross capex of $896m (+3.3% higher over pcp) due to increased investment in data and digital initiatives across all divisions, the conversion of Target stores to Kmart stores, as well as the ongoing development of the Mt Holland lithium project .
  • The company announced a $2.3 billion capital return in the form of a $2 per share payment on top of a final dividend of 90 cents per share, bringing the total payout for the year to $3.78 per share.
  • The Board declared a fully franked final dividend of 90cps, taking the full-year dividend to 178cps (up by 17.1% over pcp) and recommended a return of capital of 200cps, equating to total shareholder return for the year of 378cps.
  • The Company maintained significant balance sheet flexibility, ending the year with a net cash position of $109m.

Company Profile

Wesfarmers Limited (WES) operates convenience stores, home improvement stores, office supply stores, and department stores, among other businesses. Chemicals and fertilisers, industrial and safety items, and coal are all part of the industrial sector of the corporation. Wesfarmers has a workforce of about 220,000 workers.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks Expert Insights

PepsiCo Inc Prioritizes Spending to Support Its Brands and Its Advantaged Platform

cola cans and advertisements praising the brand’s taste superiority over Coke. While, as of now PepsiCo is not only considered as beverage behemoth but its its business now extends beyond this industry, with Frito-Lay and Quaker products accounting for over half of sales and over 65% of profits. A diversified portfolio across snacks and beverages can be considered as competitive edge of PepsiCo.

After years of sluggish sales growth and underinvestment, Pepsi has committed to reinvigorating its top line. To that end, it has made significant investments in manufacturing capacity (for example, production lines to meet demand for reformulated packaging), system capacity (route optimization and sales technology), and productivity (harmonization and automation.

These investments can be considered as prudent as they will allow the company to strengthen its key trademarks such as Mountain Dew and Gatorade while deepening its presence in growth markets like sub-Saharan Africa, and also yielding enough cost savings to reinvest and widen profits. Pepsi’s growth trajectory is not without risk, as the company faces secular headwinds such as shifts in consumer behavior. Additionally, changing go-to-market dynamics, such as online commerce that encourages real-time price comparisons and obviates the extent of Pepsi’s retail distribution advantage, allow for more nimble and aggressive competition.

Financial Strength

Pepsi’s financial health can be considered as excellent. While leverage has ticked up due to recent acquisitions the company still has a strong balance sheet with manageable debt levels and robust free cash flow generation. Strong interest coverage ratios also lend credence to the firm’s health in this regard. For the year2020, PespiCo has reported revenue of USD Mil 70,372 while its estimated revenue for the year 2021 is USD Mil 76,632 which is up by 8.9% compared to the previous year. The firm in the year 20220 has reported EBIT of USD Mil 10,080 while its estimated EBIT in the year 2021 is USD Mil 11,746 which is 16.5% up compare to the previous year.The firm has reported free cash flow USD Mil 584 which is 83.8% down compared to the previous year. The major reason for the same is PepsiCo has ramped up strategic investments across the business and booked a slew of nonrecurring cash charge.

Bulls Say

  • In still beverages- a category facing fewer secular challenges, particularly in the U.S.-Pepsi is a much more formidable competitor to Coca-Cola.
  • Pepsi’s global dominance in salty snacks may be underappreciated; with volume share more than 10 times that of the next-largest competitor, the firm benefits from unparalleled unit economics and go-to market optionality.
  • The firm’s consolidated beverage and snack distribution operations, combined with its direct store delivery capabilities, allow for better execution in merchandising.

Company Profile

PepsiCo is one of the largest food and beverage companies globally. It makes, markets, and sells a slew of brands across the beverage and snack categories, including Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Gatorade, Doritos, Lays, and Ruffles. The firm uses a largely integrated go-to-market model, though it does leverage third-party bottlers, contract manufacturers, and distributors in certain markets. In addition to company-owned trademarks, Pepsi manufactures and distributes other brands through partnerships and joint ventures with companies such as Starbucks. The firm segments its operations into five primary geographies, with North America (comprising Frito-Lay North America, Quaker Foods North America, and North America beverages) constituting over 60% of consolidated revenue

 (Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Fortescue Metals has established an industry-leading cost position

Investment Thesis

  • FMG’s price discount to the market benchmark Platts 62 percent CFR Index should continue to narrow as its sales mix shifts toward higher grade products.
  • Global stimulus policies, both fiscal and monetary, are beneficial to global growth and FMG’s products.
  • Capital management initiatives include increased dividends and potential share buybacks given the balance sheet’s strength.
  • Exceptional cash flow generation.
  • Management team for quality.
  • Continues to be on the lower end of the cost curve in comparison to peers; with a continued focus on C1 cost reductions, earnings should be supported.

Key Risks

  • Iron ore prices are falling.
  • Cost overruns/production disruptions
  • The cost-cutting strategy is ineffective.
  • The company does not carry out adequate capital management initiatives.
  • There is the possibility of regulatory changes.
  • Vale SA supply returns to the market sooner than expected.
  • Growth initiatives are being postponed.

Operational Performance Highlights 

  • Ore Mined of 226.9m tones, was up by 11 percent.
  • FMG shipped a record 182.2m tones, up +2 percent and sold 181.1m tones up by 2 percent.
  • The average revenue of US$135.32/dmt was increased by +72 percent.
  • FMG saw C1 cost of US$13.93/wmt, increase by 8 percent but remains industry leading.
  • Iron ore Shipment is 180 to 185m tone.
  • C1 cost of US$15.00 to US$15.50/wmt.
  • Capex (excluding FFI) of US$2.8 – US$3.2 billion (down from US$3,633 billion in FY21), including: US$1.1 billion in sustaining capital; US$200 million in hub development; US$250 – US$300 million in operational development; US$180 million in exploration and studies; and US$1.1 – US$1.4 billion in major projects (Iron Bridge and PEC). 

Company Profile 

Fortescue Metals Group Ltd (FMG) engages in the exploration, development, production, processing, and sale of iron ore in Australia, China, and internationally. It owns and operates the Chichester Hub that consists of the Cloudbreak and Christmas Creek mines located in the Chichester Ranges in the Pilbara, Western Australia; and the Solomon Hub comprising the Firetail and Kings Valley mines located in the Hamersley Ranges in the Pilbara, Western Australia. The Company was founded in 2003 and is based in East Perth, Australia.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Global stocks Shares

IDP Education reported low earnings due to pandemic

Investment Thesis:

  • Global re-open and vaccine roll-out acts as leverage for IDP Education.
  • The company is expected to be benefitted from margin expansion (computer- based IELTS), network expansion (latest inclusion of IELTS test centres in Ireland, Poland, Chile and Peru and student placement offices in Pakistan and Canada).
  • IDP’s English Language Testing stream (IELTS) has a strong reputation as the world’s most trusted English language test for study, work and migration.  
  • Solid margin and strong earnings/revenue growth/strong cashflow generation is maintained by IDP.
  • Strong management team.
  • Growth opportunities at global level due to international student population and education industry. 
  • Introduction and planned roll out of online IELTS delivery to provide opportunities for stronger growth.
  • Strong balance sheet, with high liquidity. 
  • Substantial margin opportunity is unlocked by potential restructuring with British Council  

Key Risks:

  • Periodic growth cannot be predicted with IDP’s business model 
  • Future economic lock-downs to Covid-19
  • Risk of currency conversion
  • In order to justify the valuations, high growth rate should be met  
  • Threat of a new entrant or competition from the existing players

Key Highlights:

  • FY21 Earnings were impacted by the pandemic, with adjusted EBIT of $71.8m, which was down by 31% over the pcp (previous corresponding period).
  • IELTS volumes were up 5% despite ongoing disruptions at the operational level due to the on-going pandemic and government-imposed restrictions.
  • The placement volumes of students to countries except Australia reduced by 12% relative to FY20 in spite of the uncertainties that were associated with travel and physical learning
  • Digital Marketing revenue jumped 8% to $30m driven by institutional clients looking up to IDP’s global digital platform for marketing and data insights.
  • Strategic acquisition in a growth market in British Council’s IELTS operation in India for £130m, which is highly strategic for IDP and provides several benefits like increased exposure to the high-growth Indian IELTS market; simplified distribution arrangements providing the opportunity to simplify and improve the delivery of IELTS to test takers in India.
  • The highlights by segments are stated as below:
  • English Language Testing: Revenue of $325.6m, which was up by 8%
  • Student Placement: Revenue of $143.3, was 22% lower; for Australia, revenue was 34% weaker at $59.7m, due to border closures relating to Covid-19. For Multi-destination, revenue was -17% weaker at $83.5m.
  • English Language Teaching: Revenue of $20.2m, which is -23% lower
  • Digital Marketing and Events: Revenue of $36.4m, which is -2% lower
  • Others: Revenue of $3.2m was -20% weaker

Company Profile:

IDP Education Ltd (IEL) offers: (i) Student placement: student recruitment/placement in 93 offices across 30 countries into  approximately 600 universities, schools and colleges globally in 5 destination countries; and (ii) co-owner of IELTS, an English language proficiency test which foreigners must pass in order to obtain certain visas and permanent residency in Australia. IEL is 50% owned by Education Australia Ltd – a business in which 38 Australian universities own a 50.1% stake.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

Afterpay on rapid growth with stagnant loss in fiscal year 2021

Investment Thesis:

  • With over 16 million customers and over 98,000 retail partnerships, Afterpay have the benefit of being the first mover .
  • APT and clients can profit from their data (potentially introduce data mining services).
  • Vertical expansion.
  • New revenue streams and new opportunities to drive revenue – Afterpay Money.
  • International expansion – both the U.S. and the UK are off to a solid start. The addressable market for online shopping in the United States is $630 billion dollars, whereas the market in the United Kingdom is $130 billion dollars. 
  • Additional opportunities are anticipated to arise as a result of the recently announced partnerships with Visa, Squarespace, and Stripe.
  • Strong management team.

Key Risks:

  • High valuation will lead to de-rating and thereby creating miss expectation in growth rates.
  • Expansion into new verticals disappoints management and market expectations.
  • Execution risk with international expansion.
  • Increased competition from major player(s).
  •  Increased regulation. 
  • Significant data breach.
  •  Deal with Square Inc fails to complete.

Key highlights of FY21:  Relative to the pcp:( The abbreviation for p.c.p is previous corresponding period . Herein, the year 2020 is considered as p.c.p)

  • Group total income was up by 78% to $924.7m, consisting of Afterpay up by 90% to $822.3m, Pay Now down by 16% to $13.8m and Other income up +29% to $88.6m.
  • The gross loss of Afterpay as % of underlying sales unchanged at 0.9%in the year 2021.
  • Group reported net margin of $443.3m which was up by 70%.
  • Afterpay reported net margin of $434.1m up by 74 % while its net transaction loss margin was 0.6 % (up from 0.4 percent), and net margin as a percentage of underlying sales was 2.1 percent (down from 2.3 percent), impacted by lower margin from newer international regions that are still in the early stages of their lifecycle.
  • Despite increased underlying sales and contribution from new territories, the Afterpay income margin of 3.9 percent remained steady over the pcp, with merchant income margins largely stable across all regions.
  • Due to increased marketing and talent expenditure, the group’s underlying operating profitability (EBITDA) fell by 13 % to $38.7 million. The loss after tax increased to $159.4 million from $22.9 million owing principally to an increase in the valuation of the ClearPay UK minority investment.
  • Management continues to invest heavily in the company in order to expand into new markets and raise brand awareness. Employment expenses increased by 75% year over year to $150.9 million, while operational expenses increased by 104 percent to $298.6 million.
  • APT has plenty of cash, with management claiming that it has the capacity to support an additional $40 billion in underlying sales on top of its existing annualised run rate of $24 billion.

 APT and Square Inc announced a Scheme Implementation Deed on August 2nd, under which Square Inc will purchase all of APT’s outstanding shares in a transaction valued at $39 billion at the time. . The deal is expected to finalise in the first quarter of FY22.

Company Profile

Afterpay Ltd (APT) is an Australian-based technology-driven payments company. The Afterpay and Touch products and businesses are part of APT. The company’s business model is “purchase now, take now, pay later.” Merchants sign up for Afterpay, which allows their retail customers to pay in four equal instalments, interest-free. APT pays merchants up front and assumes the credit and fraud risk upon themselves. Customers can pay with a debit or credit card (Visa/Mastercard) — as a result, APT views banks and credit card companies as collaborators rather than rivals. Merchants benefit because they may increase sales to customers who would otherwise be unable to afford large purchases in one go.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.