Tag: Top Stocks

Categories
Dividend Stocks Philosophy Technical Picks

La Nina and Investment Markets Wipe Out Profits, but Suncorp Inches Closer to Management Targets

Business Strategy and Outlook

Suncorp is a well-capitalised financial services business with a dominant market position in the Australian and New Zealand general insurance industry and a regional banking franchise headquartered in Queensland. In addition to offering insurance under the parent name, key brands in Australia include AAMI, GIO, bingle, Apia, Shannons and Terri Scheer. In New Zealand key brands include Vero, AA Insurance and Asteron Life. Some brands are specific to certain states, but at a group level, the insurer carries concentrated weather and earthquake risk in Australia and New Zealand, and in particular Queensland which makes up around 25% of gross written premiums in Australia. 

The group’s exposure to the Queensland market, where large natural peril events have tended to be larger and more frequent, heightens the risks. Reinsurance protection mitigates risks to some extent, but can be expensive, particularly following large events. Suncorp’s regional banking franchise is more concentrated than the major banks, with home loans making up around 80% of the loan book and Queensland accounting for more than half of total lending. Suncorp Bank’s smaller operating presence, higher funding and operational costs, and relatively limited product offerings have all led to lower margins relative to the majors.

Financial Strength 

Suncorp Group is in good financial health. As at Dec. 31, 2021, Suncorp Insurance had a prescribed capital amount, or PCA, multiple of 1.71 times the regulatory minimum. Following the payment of the final dividend, a special dividend, and AUD 250 million buyback, at a group level that leaves Suncorp with AUD 492 million of capital in excess of its common equity Tier 1 target. This excess capital provides a buffer for unforeseen insurance and bad debt events. The common equity Tier 1 ratio for the insurance business was 1.28 times post the final dividend payment, within the target range of 1.08-1.28 times the PCA, and well above the regulatory minimum of 0.6 times. The bank’s common equity Tier 1 ratio as at Dec. 31, 2021 was 9.9%, above Suncorp’s 9% to 9.5% target range. Suncorp targets a dividend payout of 60-80% cash earnings (excluding special dividends).

Bulls Say’s

  • Suncorp owns a portfolio of well-known insurance brands and a regional bank that lacks switching or cost advantages. A focus on processes and systems, largely digitising customer interactions, should support underlying earnings growth. 
  • General insurance is inherently risky, with factors such as weather, natural disasters, and investment markets affecting earnings and capital adequacy. 
  • Brand recognition and confidence claims will be paid are helpful in acquiring and retaining customers, but customers are price sensitive.

Company Profile 

Suncorp is a Queensland-based financial services conglomerate offering retail and business banking, general insurance, superannuation, and investment products in Australia and New Zealand. It also operates a life insurance business in New Zealand. The core businesses include personal insurance, commercial insurance, Vero New Zealand, and Suncorp Bank. Suncorp and competitors IAG Insurance and QBE Insurance dominate the Australian and New Zealand insurance markets.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks Shares

Capable Hands Remain at the Helm of Magellan; Valuation Upside High as Shares Lose Steam

Business Strategy and Outlook

Magellan is an active manager of listed equities and infrastructure. The firm has a fundamental, high-conviction investment approach. Its flagship Global strategy has historically tilted toward IT, e-commerce platforms, and consumer franchises; preferring large, developed market multinationals. FUM have been attracted by consistently achieving excess returns with lower volatility and drawdowns relative to peers.

Magellan’s products are well-distributed. Its funds are featured across platforms.There is a focus on targeting retail investors, with product expansion an increasingly common driver of growth. After pioneering the first active ETF in Australia in 2015, Magellan has worked on attracting new FUM via its partnership initiatives, launching its own low-cost active ETFs, and introducing a new equity fund that caters to retirees seeking predictable income.

Morningstar analysts think Magellan has built the foundations for ongoing earnings growth, supported by its economic moat, product variety, and historically strong track record. Regardless, the potential earnings upside from these positive traits will take time to manifest. In light of Magellan’s recent underperformance, Mornigstars analysts believe a sustained improved track record will be the precursor to stronger fund inflows.

Morningstar analysts anticipate fee margin compression from investors trading down from Magellan’s core funds in preference for its low-cost ETFs, mix shift to other asset classes, and industry wide fee pressure. Continued strong performance is key to sustaining margins, as future FUM growth is likely to hinge more on market movements rather than net inflows given Magellan’s maturity and scale.

Capable Hands Remain at the Helm of Magellan; Valuation Upside High as Shares Lose Steam

Magellan has historically delivered above market returns with relatively low drawdowns. This has allowed it to rapidly scale in FUM to over AUD 93 billion and provides the foundation for continued earnings growth. While Morningstar analysts don’t believe it will be immune from the structural trend of investors moving to passive investments, ongoing competition among fund managers and major institutions in-housing their asset management, and is better placed than most active managers to address these headwinds. Magellan is moving beyond just managing money, to implementing new initiatives such as product expansion to attract new money. Morningstar analysts  believe shares are undervalued, but concur there are limited near-term earnings and share price catalysts due to recent underperformance. 

Chairman and CIO Hamish Douglass’ indefinite leave from Magellan . But morningstar analysts  don’t believe this is overly value-destructive for shareholders. In the interim, Chris Mackay and Nikki Thomas will work with Magellan’s investment team to manage its flagship Global Equity strategies. The strategies are in good hands. Mackay is Magellan’s co-founder, and was its chairman and CIO until 2012. Despite analysts’ conviction in Magellan, Morningstar’s analyst concern is not all investors may be willing to ride out this storm. Thus Morningstar analysts have lowered its fair value estimate to AUD 34.50 per share from AUD 38, after factoring in 3% more net outflows than before and further trimming our retail fee forecasts.

Financial Strength 

Magellan is in sound financial health. The firm has a conservative balance sheet with no debt, with its financial position also boosted by solid operating cash flows. As of June 30, 2021, Magellan had cash and equivalents of about AUD 212 million and financial investments with a net fair value of around AUD 453 million mainly invested in its own unlisted funds and listed shares. This should provide it with enough liquidity to cope with most market conditions. Its high dividend payout ratio of: (1) 90%-95% of the net profit after tax of its core funds management business before performance fees; and (2) annual performance fee dividend in the range of 90%-95% of net crystallised performance fees after tax reflects the capital-light nature of asset management.

Bulls Say

  • Magellan retains an intangible brand, supported by historically strong performance, which it has leveraged to hold on to client funds, attract new money and charge premium fees. 
  • Due to structural market trends and product expansion initiatives, the prospects for organic FUM growth is strong, notably from investors seeking to diversify exposure to international equities or gain a steady retirement income stream. 
  • Aside from domestic tailwinds from superannuation, Magellan’s distribution relationships in the much larger offshore markets of the U.K. and the U.S. should support growth.

Company Profile

Magellan Financial Group is an Australia-based niche funds manager. Established in 2006, the firm specialises in the management of equity and infrastructure funds for domestic retail and institutional investors. Magellan has been particularly successful in winning mandates from global institutional investors. Current FUM is split across global equities, infrastructure and Australian equities.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Virgin Money Margins on the Rise, but the Loan Books a Little Lighter

Business Strategy and Outlook

Virgin Money UK consists of the CYBG business (demerged from National Australia Bank, or NAB), and the more recently acquired Virgin Money UK. In 2016, NAB demerged its U.K.-based operations in Clydesdale Bank and Yorkshire Bank, collectively known as CYBG. The CYBG merger with Virgin Money UK virtually doubled the size of the bank’s loan book and provided a foothold in the larger and faster growing London region. The bank’s loan book is split 80% mortgages, 12% business loans, and 8% personal (including cards) as at September 2021. 

Acquiring Virgin Money in 2018 was transformative for CYBG. A larger and more geographically diverse mortgage book lowers risk and presents cost saving opportunities, but also presents the opportunity to grow its business loan book under the Virgin Money banner. Aiming to maintain its share of the mortgage market, the bank wants to reduce its weighting to mortgages to 75% as it grows its business loan book.

Financial Strength

The capital structure and balance sheet are sound. Common equity Tier 1 capital was 15.2% as at Dec. 31, 2021, well above the 9.5% minimum capital benchmark. The bank has a longer-term dividend payout goal of up to 50%. The percentage of funding sourced by customer deposits was 83% as at Sept. 30, 2021, the elevated savings rate in 2021 helped the bank increase the weight of funds to cheaper business and personal current accounts materially. These current accounts and linked savings increased 19% in the fiscal 2021, making up 38% of funding as at Sept. 30, 2021 and up from 31% at end of fiscal 2020. Virgin Money UK received internal ratings-based, or IRB, accreditation from the U.K. regulator for its mortgage and SME/corporate loan portfolios mid-October 2018. Virgin Money UK is now authorised to use its own risk models in determining risk weighted assets, resulting in a reduction in risk weighted assets for the two portfolios and thereby improving its capacity to grow share.

Bulls Say’s 

  • Virgin Money UK is a well-capitalised and well-funded retail and small-business bank with long-established franchises in core regional markets. 
  • Management’s ability to successfully integrate the merger with Virgin Money is critical to our thesis. 
  • Legacy conduct issues have caused pain for shareholders despite balance sheet provisions and conduct indemnities provided by National Australia Bank. It have made no allowance for large penalties or customer remediation in our forecasts.

Company Profile 

Virgin Money UK was formed through the merger between CYBG PLC and Virgin Money. After being divested by National Australia Bank in 2016, CYBG went through a restructuring and recapitalisation process, with mortgages accounting for around 75% of its loan book. Following CYBG’s merger with Virgin Money, the loan book has been reshaped again, with mortgages now accounting for more than 81% of total loans, personal loans around 7%, and SME and business loans around 12%. The merger with Virgin Money does provide upside earnings potential, but operating conditions are tough, with business momentum slowing. An upturn in the earnings outlook is needed after several years of disappointment.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Fixed Income Fixed Income

Schroder Fixed Income Fund – Client Class: Above par on multiple counts

Fund Objective

To outperform the Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+Yr Index after fees over the medium term.

Approach 

Schroders begins by formulating long-term (10-year) risk/reward forecasts using a building-block approach that includes current yield, long-cycle economic growth, and inflation. These figures are adjusted to shorter term forecasts (three years) based on a proprietary three-factor model that considers valuation, cycle, and liquidity characteristics to identify best- and worst-case risk-adjusted opportunities. Broad risk allocations between cash, bonds, and credit are consequently generated. The team then determines the appropriate trades and physical securities. Risk/reward forecasts dictate positions in duration and curve (domestic and other yield curves), cross-market trades (spread compression between assets in varying geographies), and credit selection (investment-grade, securitised, high yield, and emerging markets). Credit assessment focuses on market position, management quality, firm profitability, and capital structure. The strategy is mostly process-driven, and the long-term capital preservation mindset is a point of differentiation.

Portfolio 

A wide remit of securities can be held, including government, semigovernment securities, investment-grade credit, high-yield, emerging-markets bonds. Derivatives can be used to express credit, rate, and curve views. The team’s caution over valuations saw it hold more cash than most of its cohorts with a short duration bias through most of 2010-18, sizeable at times. Schroders has long held an underweighting in government and government-related securities in lieu of corporate credit, inflation-linked bonds, and cash. As spreads compressed, investment-grade credit fell steadily to 12% in April 2017 from 42% in August 2010. Schroders waded back in to capitalise on more-attractive valuations as global policy support followed in early 2020. It shortened interest-rate duration significantly in early 2021 as concerns over inflationary pressures bubbled to the surface, before softening this stance amid questions over its persistence. By the third quarter of the year, Schroders’ view that higher inflation was more structural saw it re-enter a more-entrenched short-duration stance. Holdings in non-Australian bonds has tended to be about 10%-15%. This vehicle can be used as a core exposure given it mostly holds high-grade bonds. Schroders managed about AUD 2.8 billion in this strategy at 30 June 2021

Performance 

The strategy has had its share of ups and downs over the years, with strong results during 2019-20 offsetting a fallow run that preceded it. The absolute return focus and cautious posture cost relative performance as yields and spreads broadly tightened during 2014-18, notably its short-duration position particularly in the US and preference for cash. An average cash weight of about 20% from 2009 to 2019 was a major drag, though this weighting declined noticeably after 2016. By contrast, the move to a long-duration position in early 2019 helped as yields declined and Schroders handled the volatile conditions in 2020 adeptly. Its long duration position in early 2020 helped it navigate the initial phase of the pandemic, supported by a reduction in credit risk. Its quick reallocation to credit as spreads widened helped sustain outperformance through the rest of the year. An indexlike result over the majority of 2021 saw the team navigate the choppy moves in yields particularly well over the first half of the year before being stung as shorter-maturity yields leapt exponentially higher after the RBA suddenly decided to exit yield-curve control in the third quarter. The strategy has done well in down markets because of the higher-quality portfolio and focus on downside protection. Its high-conviction approach can contribute to meaningful and lengthy deviations from its cohort.

Top Holdings

About the fund

The Fund is an actively managed, low volatility strategy that invests in a range of domestic and international fixed income assets with the objective of outperforming the Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0 Yr Index, whilst delivering stable absolute returns over time. The Fund adopts a Core-Plus investment approach whereby a core portfolio comprising Australian investment grade bonds is complemented by investments in a diverse range of global and domestic fixed income securities.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Returning to Truist After Q4 Earnings; Increasing Our Fair Value Estimate to $66 From $63

Business Strategy and Outlook

Truist (the combination of BB&T and SunTrust), is set for its next step up in profitability, as merger-related costs are essentially cut in half in 2022 and then fall out completely in 2023. The combination has formed one of the better regionals in the U.S. from a competitive standpoint.Morningstar analysts like Truist’s insurance growth engine, and the bank has only been adding to its strength here with the acquisition of Regions Insurance Group in 2018, multiple smaller acquisitions in 2020, and Constellation Partners in 2021.Morningstar analyst also like the strength of the bank’s investment banking group, as well as its growing wealth business, and believe Truist will have room to increase non interest revenue over time. 

Morningstar analysts view the bank’s latest push into the Point of Sale consumer financing space with the acquisition of Service Finance in late 2021 as another positive. We expect the unit will drive multiple billions of dollars of loan originations for years to come, with solid yields on these loans, although expect competition to increase over time, as Truist is not the only bank making major moves in this space. 

Truist has made steady progress on its integration efforts (the acquisition closed in late 2019), with much of the remaining work set to be completed in 2022. The financials still remain a bit complex due to PAA and PPP related NII, one-time expenses, and additional bolt-on acquisitions taking place. Once the dust settles in 2023, we believe management’s goal of becoming a top-tier bank from the standpoint of efficiency and return on tangible equity is realistic.

After updating projections with the latest quarterly results, Morningstar analyst increased its fair value estimate to $66 per share from $63. This values Truist at roughly 2.6 times tangible book value as of December.

Financial Strength

Morningstar analysts think Truist is in good financial health and also do not have significant concerns about capital, and the bank had a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 9.6% as of the fourth quarter of 2021, roughly in line with management’s expectations.

Bulls Say 

  • A strong economy and higher rates are all positives for the banking sector and should propel revenue even higher. 
  • Truist’s now combined operations will allow the bank to reach new levels of operating efficiency and profitability, previously out of reach when BB&T and SunTrust were separate franchises. 
  • Truist keeps growing its insurance operations at an above market rate. Additional bolt-on acquisitions, higher interest rates, and the falling out of acquisition related expenses means Truist will see uniquely strong core revenue growth along with falling expenses.

Company Profile

Based in Charlotte, North Carolina, Truist is the combination of BB&T and SunTrust. Truist is a regional bank with a presence primarily in the Southeastern United States. In addition to commercial banking, retail banking, and investment banking operations, the company operates several nonbank segments, the primary one being its insurance brokerage business.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

Spirit AeroSystems Reports Improved Fourth Quarter and Is Confident in Pandemic Efficiency Gains

Business Strategy and Outlook

Spirit AeroSystems is the largest independent aerostructures manufacturer. The firm produces fuselages, wing structures, as well as structures that house and connect engines to aircraft. Spirit’s revenue has traditionally been almost entirely connected to the original production of commercial aircraft, but Spirit has a growing defense segment and recently acquired Bombardier’s maintenance, repair, and overhaul business. As commercial aerospace manufacturing is highly consolidated, it is unsurprising that Spirit has customer concentration. Historically, 80% of the company’s sales have been to Boeing and 15% have been to Airbus. Management targets a 40% commercial aerospace, 40% defense, and 20% commercial aftermarket revenue exposure. The firm acquired Fiber Materials, a specialty composite manufacturer focused on defense end markets, and Bombardier’s aftermarket business in 2020 to diversify revenue.

Financial Strength

Spirit AeroSystems has raised and maintained a considerable amount of debt since the grounding of the 737 MAX began in 2019. The company has $1.9 billion of cash on the balance sheet and about $3.9 billion of debt at the end of 2020, and access to another $950 million of debt if it so needs. The firm has $300 million debt coming due in 2021 and 2023, as well as $1.7 billion of debt coming due in 2025, and $700 million of debt coming due in 2028. Revenue of $1.1 billion and adjusted loss per share of $0.84 beat FactSet consensus by 0.1% and missed the same estimates by 29.9%, respectively, though much of the earnings miss was due to a forward loss associated with 787 production. 

Revenue increased 22.1%, primarily due to increased 737 MAX production increasing OE production-related revenue. Although we slightly lowered our long-term outlook for 737 MAX production in the third quarter, we continue to expect that increasing 737 MAX production will be the primary value driver for the firm. Management continues to expect it can generate 16.5% gross margins (including depreciation) at 737 MAX production of 42 per month from efficiencies achieved during the pandemic.

Bulls Say’s 

  • Commercial aerospace manufacturing has a highly visible revenue runway, despite COVID-19, from increasing flights per capita as the emerging market middle class grows wealthier. 
  • Spirit has restructured to become more efficient when aircraft manufacturing recovers. 
  • Spirit is diversifying its customer base, which we anticipate will make it less susceptible to customer specific risk.

Company Profile 

Spirit AeroSystems designs and manufactures aerostructures, particularly fuselages, for commercial and military aircraft. The company was spun out of Boeing in 2005, and the firm is the largest independent supplier of aerostructures. Boeing and Airbus are the firms and its primary customers, Boeing composes roughly 80% of annual revenue and Airbus composes roughly 15% of revenue. The company is highly exposed to Boeing’s 737 program, which generally accounts for about half of the company’s revenue.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Westpac Grinds Through Another Tough Quarter as Margins Continue to Shrink

Business Strategy and Outlook

Westpac Bank Corporation is the second-largest of Australia’s four major banks. The bank provides a range of banking and financial services to retail and business customers, including mortgages, consumer finance, credit cards, business loans, and term deposits. 

Westpac’s strategy is anchored in its commitment to conservatively manage risk across all business areas, following its near-death experience in the early 1990s. The multibrand, customer-focused strategy aims to capture an increasing share of business from its Australian and New Zealand banking and wealth management customer base.The main current influences on earnings growth are modest credit growth, with regulators likely to cool credit demand due to rising house prices and increased household leverage, and delays to business plans for capital expenditure. Intense competition is constraining interest margins with opportunities to lower funding costs largely exhausted. Operating expenses are increasing due to increased provisions for regulatory and compliance project spend.

 Bad and doubtful debt expenses peaked in first-half fiscal 2009 and remained at decade lows until provisions for the coronavirus impact were taken in first-half fiscal 2020. Morningstar analysts expect loan impairment expenses to average under 0.2% of loans over the long term.

Westpac Grinds Through Another Tough Quarter as Margins Continue to Shrink

Westpac’s first-quarter 2022 profit of AUD 1.58 billion was up modestly from the quarterly average of second-half fiscal 2021. A 2% increase in net interest income and 7% fall in operating expenses lifted earnings pre-impairments by around 10%. Unlike last year, the bottom line is no longer being boosted by loan impairment provision releases. Impairments were still modest, and credit quality remains sound, with loans in arrears as a percentage of loans falling 10 basis points to 0.58%.

Loan growth was soft in a strong market, and net interest margins, or NIM, fell to 1.91% in the quarter from 1.98% in the second half of fiscal 2021. The squeeze from chasing loan growth in a competitive environment, an ongoing drag from more fixed-rate loans, plus holding more liquid assets which earn no interest, was a little more severe than Morningstar analyst expected. Morningstar analysts lower  fiscal 2022 NIM forecast to 1.85% from 1.90% previously. The 7% reduction to fiscal 2022 profit forecast is not material enough to move to A$29 fair value estimate. 

Financial Strength 

Westpac comfortably meets APRA’s common equity Tier 1 ratio benchmark of 10.25%. The bank’s common equity Tier 1 ratio was 12.2% as at Dec. 31, 2021. This is based on APRA’s globally conservative methodology and a top-quartile internationally comparable 18%. We see the risk of higher loan losses and credit stress inflating risk-weighted assets as the greatest threat to the bank’s capital position in the near term. In the past three years, the proportion of customer deposits to total funding is about 60% to 65%, reducing exposure to volatile funding markets. Westpac has AUD 8.6 billion in excess capital as at Dec. 31, 2021. Assuming completion of the AUD 3.5 billion share buyback announced in November 2021, this surplus falls to around AUD 5 billion. The bank expects divestments to add roughly AUD 2 billion to this position in fiscal 2022.

Bulls Say

  • Improving economic conditions underpin profit growth from fiscal 2021. Productivity improvements are likely from fiscal 2023. 
  • Cost and capital advantages over regional banks and neo-banks provide a strong platform to drive credit growth. 
  • Consumer banking provides earnings diversity to complement the more volatile returns generated from business and wholesale banking activities. 
  • The withdrawal of personal financial advice by Westpac salaried financial advisors reduces compliance and regulatory risk.

Company Profile

Westpac is Australia’s oldest bank and financial services group, with a significant franchise in Australia and New Zealand in the consumer, small business, corporate, and institutional sectors, in addition to its major presence in wealth management. Westpac is among a handful of banks around the globe currently retaining very high credit ratings. The bank benefits from a large national branch network and significant market share, particularly in home loans and retail deposits.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund Investor Class

Process:

This strategy’s distinctive approach remains in place under its new leader, earning it an Above Average Process rating. Former lead manager Benjamin Segal said he favoured the mid-cap universe because firms of that size–along with those in the smaller part of the large-cap range–tend to be well-enough established that they can withstand some setbacks but remain less familiar to many global investors and thus often sell at attractive prices. They can also be takeover targets. Former comanager Elias Cohen, who became lead manager upon Segal’s departure on June 30, 2021, follows the same approach. This team wants steadily growing firms, but it also focuses on the quality of company management. The team is willing to own firms without hefty margins if other traits are impressive. The strategy has a 15% limit on emerging-markets exposure, but the portfolio has been far below that for a long time. The turnover rate tends to be moderate. Ideas can come from Cohen, comanager Tom Hogan, or the analysts, and decision-making is collaborative, though the lead manager has final authority for portfolio decisions.

Portfolio:

Portfolio shows that this fund makes fuller use of the market-cap spectrum than most peers and its chosen benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. The fund had about 33% of its assets in midcaps and another 4% in small caps (as classified by Morningstar), versus just 10% in mid-caps and almost nothing in small caps for the index and just slightly higher figures for the foreign large-growth and foreign large-blend category averages. The portfolio’s figures are nearly identical to those from one year earlier, showing that new lead manager Elias Cohen has maintained the strategy’s broad market-cap approach even as he traded several stocks into and out of the portfolio. Cohen, like former manager Benjamin Segal, favours the mid-cap and smaller large-cap universes. The portfolio often lies on the border between the growth and blend portions of the style box, but the latest portfolio is fully in the blend region. The strategy continues to spread its assets widely, with none of the 78 stocks receiving more than 2.6% of assets. Emerging-markets exposure remains below 5% and is limited to China and India.

People:

This strategy’s long-tenured lead manager, Benjamin Segal, left Neuberger Berman on June 30, 2021, to become a high school math teacher. Replacing him as lead manager was former comanager Elias Cohen. The firm had earlier promoted Thomas Hogan from the analyst ranks to comanager on Jan. 20, 2021. Cohen had worked with Segal for almost 20 years, most recently as comanager–for two years on this strategy and four years on sibling Neuberger Berman International Select NILIX. The analyst staff remained intact including one addition in March 2021. Three of the six members of the analyst team have been in place since 2008 or earlier. They and the managers also talk with the members of Neuberger Berman’s emerging-markets team. Cohen and Hogan each have more than $1 million invested in this strategy.

Performance:

It’s a bit complicated assessing this fund’s performance, but all in all, the fund has a solid record as a core international equity choice. This fund launched in 2005 and was known until late 2012 as Neuberger Berman International Institutional. But an identical fund that was merged into it in January 2013 posted a strong 10-year record prior to the merger, using the same strategy, under recently departed lead manager Benjamin Segal. Another complication is that although this fund’s growth leanings result in its placement in the foreign large-growth category, it is not very aggressive in that direction, with its portfolio often landing around the border between growth and blend or, as currently, in the blend box. That’s typically been a disadvantage versus growthier rivals for a long time. The managers aim to outperform when markets tumble; although it did not do so in the bear market of early 2020, it did hold up well during the 2014 sell-off and the 2015-16 bear market.

(Source: Morningstar)

Price:

It’s critical to evaluate expenses, as they come directly out of returns. The share class on this report levies a fee that ranks in its Morningstar category’s second-costliest quintile. That’s poor, but based on our assessment of the fund’s People, Process and Parent pillars in the context of these fees, we still think this share class will be able to overcome its high fees and deliver positive alpha relative to the category benchmark index, explaining its Morningstar Analyst Rating of Bronze.

Top Portfolio Holdings:  
Asset Allocation:  

 


(Source: Morningstar)                                                                     (Source: Morningstar)

About Funds:

A growing conviction in the duo that manages JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus and its Luxembourg resided sibling JPM U.S. Select Equity Plus, and the considerable resources they have effectively utilised, lead to an upgrade of the strategy’s People Pillar rating to Above Average from Average. The strategy looks sensible and is designed to fully exploit the analyst recommendations by taking long positions in top-ranked companies while shorting stocks disliked by the analysts. Classic fundamental bottom-up research should give the fund an informational advantage. The portfolio is quite diversified, holding 250-350 stocks in total with modest deviations from the category index in the long leg. The 30/30 extension is broadly sector-, style-, and beta-neutral. Here the managers are cognizant of the risks of shorting stocks, where they select stocks on company-specific grounds or as part of a secular theme. For example, the team prefers semiconductors, digital advertising, and e-commerce offset by shorts in legacy hardware, media, and network providers. Short exposure generally stands at 20%-30%, with the portfolio’s net exposure to the market kept at 100%. The strategy’s performance since inception, which still has some relevance given Bao’s involvement, has been outstanding.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Low-cost diversified ESG-focused Australian equity exposure

Young woman trading stock market by touching.

Investment Objective

Vanguard Ethically Conscious Australian Shares Fund seeks to track the return of the FTSE Australia 300 Choice Index before taking into account fees, expenses and tax.

Approach

This fund seeks to provide broad ESG-focused Australian share market exposure in a passively managed, taxefficient vehicle. To achieve that goal, it uses an index-replication approach to track the FTSE Australia 300 Choice Index, a derivative of the FTSE Australia 300 Index. The index is arrived at by excluding companies that deal significantly in business activities involving fossil fuels, nuclear power, alcohol, tobacco, gambling, weapons, and adult entertainment. Additionally, a screen is also applied to filter out names embroiled in severe controversies. Vanguard holds all the securities that make up the index with industry-level exposure limit set at 5 percentage points relative to the parent index. Security weights are approximately the same proportion as the index’s weights. However, the portfolio will deviate from the index when the managers believe such deviations are necessary to minimize transaction costs. The fund may also be exposed to securities that have been removed from or are expected to be included in the index.

Portfolio

The portfolio is top-heavy, with about half of the index in the top 10 companies. The concentration in banks skews the fund’s sector weights, with financial services forming around 34.5% of the portfolio (versus 26.8% for the Morningstar Category average). The basic material is the second-largest sector exposure, but it is meaningfully lower than the category index because of the ESG screening. The industry capping of 5 percentage points further adds to the portfolio diversification. VETH’s market cap does not deviate materially from the category average or index. As such, the average market of the strategy is AUD 25.3 billion versus AUD 29.2 billion for the S&P/ ASX 200 Index category benchmark. Broadly, the portfolio is diversified and offers exposure to almost the entire opportunity set of the domestic equity market. As a result, it has significant overlap with Vanguard’s other broad-based domestic equity products like VAS, both in terms of style and exposure, making it suitable as a core holding.

Performance

Launched in October 2020, the strategy has a very short track record. The trailing nine-month period has been eventful for the domestic equity market with yields moving up and value factor rotation. As such, the fund’s performance has been eventful as well in tandem with broader market movements. From its inception through July 2021, the strategy has closely mirrored the underlying index but trailed the S&P/ASX 200 category benchmark by 87 basis points. As the materials, energy, and commodity sectors rallied during this period, the fund’s relative underweighting in these sectors has hurt performance. As the value factor rebounded toward the end of last year through the first half of 2021, the modest growth tilt of the strategy relative to the category index detracted. Growth names like A2 Milk have been the major contributor to underperformance during this period. Investors should be cautious and not extrapolate this performance, however. Based on the past attributes, investors may expect similar cyclicality in performance tied to the broader domestic economic activities and value/growth factor rotation.

Top 10 Holdings of the fund

About the fund

The Fund provides low cost exposure to stocks listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and excludes companies with significant business activities involving fossil fuels, nuclear power, alcohol, tobacco, gambling, weapons, adult entertainment and a conduct related screen based on severe controversies. Diversification requirements are applied to restrict the proportion of the index invested in any one industry to +/-5% of the industry weights of the FTSE Australia 300 Index, subject to any limitation issues resulting from the exclusionary screening.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

J.B. Hunt’s Intermodal Rate Backdrop Holding Strong, Comfortably Offsetting Volume Constraints

Business Strategy and Outlook

At its core, J.B. Hunt is an intermodal marketing company; it contracts with the Class I railroads for the line-haul movement of its domestic containers. It was one of the first for-hire truckload carriers to venture into intermodal shipping, forming a partnership with Burlington Northern Santa Fe in the West in 1990. Years later, it struck an agreement with Norfolk Southern in the East. Hunt has established a clear leadership position in intermodal shipping, with a 20%-plus share of a $22 billion-plus industry. The next-largest competitor is Hub Group, followed by Schneider National’s intermodal division and XPO Logistics’ intermodal unit. Intermodal made up slightly less than half of Hunt’s total revenue in 2021.

Hunt isn’t immune to downturns, but over the past decade-plus it’s reduced its exposure to the more capital-intensive truckload-shipping sector, which represents about 28% of sales (including for-hire and dedicated-contract business) versus 60% in 2005. Hunt is also shifting its for-hire truckload division to more of an asset-light model via its drop-trailer offering while investing meaningfully in asset-light truck brokerage and final-mile delivery. 

Rates in the competing truckload market corrected in 2019, driving down intermodal’s value proposition relative to trucking. Thus, 2019 was a hangover year and fallout from pandemic lockdowns pressured container volume into early 2020. However, truckload capacity has since tightened drastically, contract pricing is rising nicely across all modes, and underlying intermodal demand has rebounded sharply on the spike in retail goods consumption (intermodal cargo is mostly consumer goods) and heavy retailer restocking. Hunt is grappling with near-term rail network congestion that’s constraining volume growth, but the firm is working diligently with the rails and customers to minimize the issue. It is  expected that 2.5%-3.0% U.S. retail sales growth and conversion trends to support 3.0%-3.5% industry container volume expansion longer term, with 2.0%-2.5% pricing gains on average, though Hunt’s intermodal unit should modestly outperform those trends given its favorable competitive positioning.

Financial Strength

J.B. Hunt enjoys a strong balance sheet and is not highly leveraged. It had total debt near $1.3 billion and debt/EBITDA of about 1 times at the end of 2021, roughly in line with the five-year average. EBITDA covered interest expense by a very comfortable 35 times in 2021, and we expect Hunt will have no problems making interest or principal payments during our forecast period. Hunt posted more than $350 million in cash at the end of 2021, up from $313 million at the end of 2020. Historically, Hunt has held modest levels of cash, in part because of share-repurchase activity and its preference for organic growth (including investment in new containers and chassis, for example) over acquisitions. For reference, it posted $7.6 million in cash and equivalents at the end of 2018 and $14.5 million in 2017. The company generates consistent cash flow, which has historically been more than sufficient to fund capital expenditures for equipment and dividends, as well as a portion of share-repurchase activity. It is expected that the trend will persist. Net capital expenditures will jump to $1.5 billion in 2022 as the firm completes its intermodal container expansion efforts, but after that it should also have ample room for debt reduction in the years ahead, depending on its preference for share buybacks. Overall,  Hunt will mostly deploy cash to grow organically, while taking advantage of opportunistic tuck-in acquisitions (a deal in dedicated or truck brokerage isn’t out of the question, but it is  suspected that the final mile delivery niche is most likely near term). 

Bulls Say’s

  • Intermodal shipping enjoys favorable long-term trends, including secular constraints on truckload capacity growth and shippers’ efforts to minimize transportation costs through mode conversions (truck to rail). 
  • It is believed intermodal market share in the Eastern U. S. still has room for expansion, suggesting growth potential via share gains from shorter-haul trucking. 
  • J.B. Hunt’s asset-light truck brokerage unit is benefiting from strong execution, deep capacity access, and tight market capacity. It’s also moved quickly in terms of boosting back-office and carrier sourcing automation.

Company Profile 

J.B. Hunt Transport Services ranks among the top surface transportation companies in North America by revenue. Its primary operating segments are intermodal delivery, which uses the Class I rail carriers for the underlying line-haul movement of its owned containers (45% of sales in 2021); dedicated trucking services that provide customer-specific fleet needs (21%); for-hire truckload (7%); heavy goods final-mile delivery (6%), and asset-light truck brokerage (21%).

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.