Category: Small Cap

Companies that are listed on a stock exchange like the ASX can be categorized according to their size, which is most frequently measured by market capitalization, or market cap. The S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries index represents ‘small caps’, those members of the S&P/ASX 300 Index that sit outside the S&P/ASX 100 index. It is a benchmark for small cap Australian shares.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

SkyCity’s Business to Sit on the Sidelines Amid Travel Restrictions

buoyed by the recovery from current coronavirus-induced lows and solid performance from its core assets in Auckland and Adelaide. SkyCity’s Auckland and Adelaide properties underpin the firm’s narrow economic moat. SkyCity is the monopoly operator in both jurisdictions, with long-dated licences (exclusive licence for Auckland expires in 2048, and Adelaide licence expires in 2085 with exclusivity guaranteed until 2035). The quality of these assets, particularly SkyCity Auckland, has helped build the firm’s VIP gaming business.

SkyCity’s exposure to the volatile VIP gaming market is smaller than that of Australian rivals Crown Resorts and Star Entertainment. VIP revenue typically represents over 20% of Crown’s and Star’s sales, compared with SkyCity’s typical 10%-15%. While high rollers have no alternatives when in Auckland or Adelaide, SkyCity effectively competes as a destination casino on a global scale against locations such as The Star in Sydney and Crown Melbourne. This includes a NZD 750 million upgrade to SkyCity Auckland to be completed by the end of calendar 2024 and a AUD 330 million expansion for SkyCity Adelaide, a transformational project completed in fiscal 2021.

Financial Strength 

Despite near-term earnings weakness, SkyCity’s balance sheet remains robust, bolstered by a NZD 230 million capital raise completed at the end of fiscal 2020 and extensions to new and existing debt facilities. As expected, SkyCity declared a final dividend in the second half of fiscal 2021, following the June 30, 2021 covenant testing date. We expect SkyCity’s balance sheet to continue to improve over coming years as earnings recover, with net debt/EBITDA dropping below 1.0 in fiscal 2024 as expansionary projects roll off and earnings recover. 

Our fair value for SkyCity to NZD 3.80, from NZD 3.50, following the release of fiscal 2021 results. The raise on our fair value estimate is principally due to a more positive outlook on capital expenditure as SkyCity’s major expansion projects roll off and insurance payments are set to cover the majority of growth expenditure earmarked for the next three years. Despite New Zealand recently shifting back into stage 4 lockdown, SkyCity’s longdated and exclusive licences in Auckland and Adelaide create a regulatory barrier to entry, underpinning the firm’s narrow moat, and position the business well to participate in the recovery as restrictions ease. 

The payout ratio is well-supported by SkyCity’s balance sheet. The completion of the NZD 330 million Adelaide expansion in fiscal 2021 takes some pressure off cash flows, and of the further NZD 500 million in capital expenditure flagged for the NZICC project, around NZD 380 million will be funded by insurance payments to be received following the NZICC fire. The NZD 750 million NZICC/Horizon Hotel project (which helped secure licensed exclusivity at the core Auckland casino) has been delayed by a fire, with completion now expected in late calendar 2024.

Bulls Say’s 

  • Long-dated exclusive licences to operate the only casino in Auckland and Adelaide allow SkyCity to enjoy economic returns in a regulated environment.
  • We expect transformative capital expenditure at SkyCity’s Auckland and Adelaide casinos will lead to a sizable step-up in earnings.
  • SkyCity is well positioned to benefit from the emerging middle and upper class in China.

Company Profile 

SkyCity Entertainment operates a number of casino-hotel complexes across Australia and New Zealand. The flagship property is SkyCity Auckland, the holder and operator of an exclusive casino licence (expiring in 2048) in New Zealand’s most populous city. The company also owns smaller casinos in Hamilton and Queenstown. In Australia, the company operates SkyCity Adelaide (exclusive licence expiring in 2035).

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Improvements in occupancy to be the major driver for driving up G8 revenues

Investment Thesis

  • Trading at a discount to our valuation.
  • With a growing population, the long-term outlook for childcare demand remains positive (organic and net immigration).
  • Increased emphasis on both organic and acquired growth.
  • Increasing exposure to international markets (Asia).
  • Strategic investor China First Capital Group (12.45% stake in GEM) may see a collaborative expansion into the Chinese market.
  • The Company’s national footprint enables it to scale more effectively than competitors and mom and pop shops.
  • A global operator could be interested in acquiring the company.
  • Improve occupancy levels by leveraging – (rough estimates) A 1% increase in occupancy equates to $10-11 million in revenue and a $3 million EBIT benefit.

Key Risks 

  • The company faces execution risk in meeting its FY19 earnings per share (EPS) target.
  • Pricing pressure is being exerted as a result of increased competition.
  • Increased supply in some areas has resulted in lower occupancy rates.
  • Acquisition with a negative impact on value (s).
  • Execution risk associated with offshore expansion.
  • Childcare funding cuts or adverse regulatory changes
  • Australia is experiencing a recession.
  • Dividend reduction

FY21 Result Highlights

  • Revenue of $421.5 million (vs. $308.2 million in CY20 H1 and $429.9 million in CY19 H1) reflects occupancy recovery and the effects of greenfield growth, Victorian Government Covid-19 payments, and the February fee review, offset by divestments.
  • GEM saw an increase in national Core average occupancy to 68.0 percent (from 65.1 percent in CY20 H1), but it remains below pre-Covid levels of 70.4 percent in CY19 H1.
  • Operating EBIT (after lease interest) of $38.9m was up from $19.7m in CY20 H1 (restated) and in line with $38.8m in CY19 H1 (restated), owing to the “benefits of the Improvement Process, February fee review, and greenfield growth being invested in increasing system support and quality.” 
  • The statutory NPAT of $25.1 million was an improvement over the net loss after tax of $244 million.
  • GEM’s balance sheet remains strong, with a net cash position.
  • GEM did not pay an interim dividend, but the Board “expects dividend payments to resume with a full-year CY21 dividend to be paid in CY22.”
  • GEM’s employee remediation programme is well-advanced, with a provision of $80 million pre-tax ($57 million after tax), less costs incurred to date.

Company Profile 

G8 Education Limited (GEM) owns and operates care and education services in Australia and Singapore through a range of brands. The Company initially listed on the ASX in December 2007 under the name of Early Learning Services, but later merged with Payce Child Care to become G8 Education.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Expert Insights Shares Small Cap

Ampol the Latest to Join the Energy M&A Frenzy with Bid for No-Moat Z Energy

Word equity under magnifying glass --- Image by © Image Source/Corbis

in line with the Ampol’s bid. The decline in value is in accord with the terms of a proposed merger and our prior standalone fair value estimates. Merger and acquisition activity continues at a frenetic pace in the Australasian fossil fuel space, coronavirus fragility and carbon concerns marking some as prey. Ampol is proposing an NZD 3.78 per share cash offer for Z Energy via scheme of arrangement. Australia’s largest refined fuel retailer has been granted a four week-exclusivity period in which to undertake due diligence prior to formalising the offer for its smaller New Zealand counterpart.

The equity issuance may take the form of partial share consideration to Z shareholders. Or Ampol may simply conducting a pro rata entitlement offer to its own shareholders, which would be done following regulatory approval and nearer the date of completion. Ampol may have to sell-down some NZ assets to meet NZ competition guidelines. This could include its Gull network. With Ampol shares falling on the bid news, and Z Energy shares rising but not meeting the bid price, the implication is the market on balance thinks Ampol is paying too much, or at least that the bid won’t succeed. The natural question is how do we reconcile this with our much higher standalone valuation for Z.

Company’s Future Outlook 

Despite there being no certainty that discussions will result in a binding agreement, we think the chance of success is high. The latest is apparently the fourth in a series of nonbinding offers from Ampol, including at NZD 3.35, NZD 3.50, and NZD 3.60 along the way. And there is logic to a merger– Ampol and Z have very similar business models. Z Energy’s board wouldn’t have opened the books if the chance of a deal proceeding was low. At NZD 3.78 Ampol will be getting Z Energy at a material 33% discount to our NZD 5.60 standalone fair value. 

Our formal recommendation for Z shareholders is don’t accept, based solely upon the offer’s material discount to our NZD 5.60 standalone fair value. However, we suspect that advice is likely to prove academic. Z shares rose just over 14% on the day to NZD 3.48, though still 8% below the proposed bid level. They have moved just into 4-star territory from 3-star prior. Z Energy shares have been in the doldrums for over two years given intense retail fuel competition in New Zealand, more recently exacerbated by COVID-19 disruption.

The shares have fallen from a peak of NZD 8.65 and have only recently show signs of life from NZD 2.56 lows. Ampol’s most recent offer price represents a 24% premium to the last NZD 3.04 close. We suspect there is Z Energy shareholder fatigue that might help Ampol’s offer along. However, if Ampol’s bid were to fall over, our stand-alone Z Energy fair value estimate is unchanged at NZD 5.60.

Company Profile 

Z Energy was born of the purchase of Shell New Zealand’s downstream operations by Infratil and the New Zealand Superannuation Fund in 2010. It has since transitioned to New Zealand’s largest stand-alone retailer of refined petroleum products and meets close to half of the nation’s transport fuel requirements, serving both retail and commercial customers. The principal activities of Z Energy are importing, distributing and selling transport fuel and related products. The business has scale and sells a full range of transport fuels.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Philosophy Shares Small Cap Technical Picks

Pact Group’s stock price has risen as a result of a 100% dividend increase.

Investment thesis

  • Strong market share in Australia, with a strong influence in Asia. As a result, it offers appealing exposure to the growth of both developed and emerging markets.
  • The corporation’s newly appointed CEO brings a fresh perspective on company strategy, which can restructure the company for strong volume growth.
  • Based on our projections, the valuation is reasonable.
  • Going forwards, management appears to be less centred on acquired growth, implying that the Company is less likely to make a value-destroying acquisition.
  • The reintroduction of the dividend is a positive sign that management is optimistic about future earnings growth.
  • In an environmentally friendly market, focusing on sustainable packaging.

Key Risks

The following are the key challenges to the investment thesis:

  • Increased competitive pressures, resulting in further margin erosion.
  • Cost pressures on inputs that the corporation would be unable to pass on to users.
  • A worsening in Australia’s and Asia’s economic conditions.
  • The risk of emerging markets.
  • Poor acquisitions or failure to meet synergy targets as PGH shifts away from packaging for food, dairy, and beverage clients and towards more high-growth sectors such as healthcare.
  • Negative currency movements (purchased raw materials in U.S. dollars)

Highlights of key FY21 results

  • Revenue fell -3 percent to $1,762 million, while underlying EBITDA increased by 4% to $315 million, underlying EBIT increased by 10% to $183 million (EBIT margin increased by 120 basis points to 10.4 percent), and underlying NPAT increased by 28% to $94 million. The positive motivational drivers of group EBIT growth over the year were: margin improvement (+$10m) as a result of disciplined raw material input cost management; volume growth in Packaging & Sustainability (+$9m); and volume increase in Materials Handling & Pooling (+$15m).
  • As a result of strong operating performance and working capital management, cash flow performance improved, with free cashflow increasing by +44 percent to $104 million. 
  • Balance sheet gearing decreased slightly year on year, working to improve to 2.4x (within the targeted range of 3.0x) from 2.6x. The company has $317 million in liquid assets (undrawn debt capacity). 
  • Strong capital returns, with a +120bps increase in ROIC to 11.8 percent. The Board declared a final dividend of 6cps (65 percent franked), helping to bring the year’s total dividends to 11cps (vs 3cps in the pcp).

Company Description  

Pact Group Holdings Ltd (PGH) was established by Raphael Geminder in 2002 (Mr. Geminder remains a major shareholder with ~44% and is the brother in law of Anthony Pratt, Chairman of competitor Visy). Pact has operations throughout Australia, New Zealand and Asia and conceives, designs and manufactures packaging (plastic resin and steel) for many productsin the food (especially dairy and beverage), chemical, agricultural, industrial and other sectors. 

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Inghams delivered a strong result in spite of national lockdowns in Australia and NZ

Investment Thesis 

  • The pricing condition is improving.
  • The largest integrated poultry producer in Australia and New Zealand.
  • Additional asset sales are planned.
  • Project Accelerate has proven to be effective in increasing labor productivity and automation, resulting in increased earnings despite lower revenue.
  • Procurement measures are being executed, and the results are meeting expectations.
  • Investing in Australia and New Zealand plants to boost capacity and capabilities across the board.
  • With a healthy balance sheet, capital management measures are high on the agenda.

Key Risks

  • Re-negotiation of important contracts with significant clients on less favourable terms.
  • Increased feed and electricity costs, which could be passed on to customers through market price hikes, lowering competitiveness.
  • Uncertainty arises from the lack of information on the appointment of a new CEO.
  • In QSRs (Quick Service Restaurants) and supermarkets, there is a risk of customer concentration.
  • Exotic disease outbreaks are a risk, limiting ING’s ability to produce poultry goods.
  • From the parent stock provider, there has been a significant decline in volume and quality.
  • Material disruptions in ING’s intricate and interconnected supply chain.

Key FY21 group results 

Despite the impact of Covid-19, ING delivered solid FY21 results that were in line with management’s recent guidance (EBITDA & NPAT) issued on May-21. In comparison to the previous year, group revenue increased by +4.4 percent (with Core Poultry volumes increasing by +4.2 percent, with volume growth in NZ exceedingly strong at +6.3 percent), underlying EBITDA increased by +9.6 percent, and underlying NPAT increased by +57.4 percent. Coverage expansion in wholesale and recovery in the QSR and food service channels drove top-line growth. Total dividends increased +17.9 percent year on year to 16.5cps, representing a payout ratio of 71 percent after earnings growth (in line with policy targets of 60 – 80 percent of underlying NPAT post AASB 16 adjustments). The balance sheet is in excellent shape, with net debt falling by -23.7 percent to $240.2 million in the last year. Group leverage fell from 1.8x to 1.2x, well within management’s 1.0–2.0x target range.

Company Description  

Inghams Group Ltd (ING) is Australia and New Zealand’s largest integrated poultry producer. The Company produces and sells chicken, turkey and stock feed that are used by the poultry, pig, dairy and equine industries. Over one quarantine facility, over ten feed mills, over 74 breeder farms, over 11 hatcheries, over 225 predominantly contracted broiler farms, over seven primary processing plants, over seven further processing plants, over one protein conversion plant, and over nine distribution centres are among the Company’s operations in Australia and New Zealand. Ingham’s and Waitoa are two of the company’s brands.

Source: (BanayanTree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

HT&E Limited (ASX: HT1)

  • Additional cost savings, notably a large reduction in corporate overhead expenditures.
  • The ATO and HT1 are anticipated to reach an agreement in the near future.
  • Changes in media ownership rules could lead to more corporate activity. Upside to the valuation of Soprano (25% interest) 
  • Initiatives for capital management that are still in progress.
  • A solid financial statement.

Key Risks

  • Decline in advertising dollars (radio and outdoor), particularly if Australia’s retail industry is under stress.
  • The structure of radio is being disrupted.
  • Increased tender competition from large players.
  • With worldwide expansion, there is a danger of poor execution.
  • The tax liabilities of the Australian Taxation Office materialize at a higher level than expected by the market.
  • Hong Kong could detract from the group’s performance (Corona virus or protests escalate).
  • Lockdowns relating to Covid-19 are being reintroduced around the country.

1H CY21 group results 

HT1 had a great first half of the year, owing to a solid market recovery. Core revenue increased by 18.2 percent to $109.9 million, underlying EBITDA increased by 55.9% to $30.4 million, underlying EBIT increased by 139.5 percent to $23.7 million, and NPAT increased by 352.8 percent to $16.3 million. On a like-for-like basis, group sales increased by 21%, owing to higher consumer confidence and advertising spend in Australia and Hong Kong. Higher cost of sales (ongoing investment in digital audio capability) and the resumption of marketing and certain discretionary spending that were deferred to the pandemic in the pcp drove up operating costs (up +9% vs pcp, or up +12% on a similar basis). The Board reinstated the dividend and announced a fully franked interim dividend of 3.5cps vs. zero in the PCP due to strengthening market circumstances.

Company Description  

HT&E Limited (HT1) is a media and entertainment company with operations in Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong. The Company operates the following key segments: (1) Australian Radio Network (ARN) – metropolitan radio networks including KIIS Network, The Edge96.One and Mix106.3 Canberra; (2) Hong KongOutdoor (Cody) – Billboard, transit and other outdoor advertising in Hong Kong, with over 300 outdoor advertising panels and in-bus multimedia advertising across 1,200 buses; and (3) Digital Investments – digital assets including iHeartRadio, Emotive and Conversant Media.   

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Oversupply Issues Are Behind Inghams, but Mix Shift to Drag in the Near Term

competition in poultry is intense. Poultry is largely commoditised, and Inghams possesses limited opportunity to differentiate its products, leading to our view that the firm lacks a sustainable competitive advantage required to award an economic moat. Further, Inghams’ customer base is highly concentrated, with the majority of its total sales comprising five customers, including supermarket giants Woolworths and Coles, and quick-service restaurant KFC. Population growth, relative affordability, and changes in consumer preferences have driven chicken consumption to all-time highs in Australia and New Zealand. 

Per capita chicken meat consumption in both Australia and New Zealand has steadily grown at a low-single-digit CAGR over the last decade. Chicken remains the cheapest meat by a significant margin, with the per-kilo retail price of chicken less than half that of pork, lamb, and beef. This price advantage is supported by favourable production dynamics, notably chicken’s superior food conversion ratio, or FCR. The chicken industry remains highly efficient in translating feed into live weight for production, with producers able to convert feed at a rate that is about 1.5 times more efficient than pork and 4 times more efficient than beef. The chicken FCR, measured by kilograms of feed required to produce one kilogram of meat, has fallen from over 2.5 in 1975 to less than 1.8 today.

Financial Strength 

Given relatively high lease-adjusted leverage, and slim operating margins, we rate Inghams’ balance sheet as weak–stronger than poor as we do not see risk of a dilutive capital raising. Net debt/EBITDA improved in fiscal 2020 to 1.2 at June 30, 2021, due principally to earnings recovery and tighter capital expenditure amid COVID-19 uncertainty over the year. This is down from 1.8 in fiscal 2020 and 1.3 in fiscal 2019 following the capital return and share buyback over fiscal 2019. Given heavy investment into automation and operational efficiency, capital expenditure requirements have been elevated, peaking at AUD 106 million during fiscal 2019 at 4% of revenue. 

Our fair value estimate for Inghams to AUD 3.70 from AUD 3.60 due to the time value of money boost to our financial model. Inghams’ fiscal 2021 underlying net profit of AUD 87 million matched our estimates and was at the top end of management’s guidance range. Inghams declared a fully franked final dividend of AUD 9 cents, bringing the full-year distribution to AUD 16.5 cents per share, implying a payout ratio of 71% of underlying EPS. Government-imposed shutdowns shift poultry demand from restaurants to retail, creating inefficiencies as Inghams is forced to adjust production lines. 

Poultry producers struggled to keep up with pantry-stocking and panic buying in March and April 2020, but this sales momentum was not maintained, and the poultry industry entered fiscal 2021 in oversupply. The chicken industry remains highly efficient in translating feed into live weight for production, with producers able to convert feed at a rate that is about 1.5 times more efficient than pork and 4 times more efficient than beef–leading to cost-efficient processing and a smaller environmental footprint. We expect low-single-digit growth in annual per capita chicken meat consumption to 53kg by fiscal 2026, before moderating as chicken consumption approaches saturation.

Bulls Say’s 

  • Inghams benefits from a consumer trend toward protein-rich, fresh, easy-to-prepare meals.
  • Per-capita chicken meat consumption continues to rise as chicken enjoys a relative affordability advantage compared with other meats, such as beef.
  • A shift in Inghams’ sales mix to value-added products could enhance margins.

Company Profile 

Inghams is the largest vertically integrated poultry producer in Australia and New Zealand. The firm enjoys a number-one position in Australia with approximately 40% market share and a number-two position in New Zealand with around 35% share. Inghams supplies poultry products, notably to major Australian supermarkets Woolworths and Coles, and quick-service restaurants McDonalds and KFC. Sales are heavily skewed toward poultry, which includes the production and sale of chicken and turkey products.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Philosophy Small Cap Technical Picks

Groupon (NAS: GRPN) Outperforms Expectations in Q2; EBITDA Outlook Improved Due to One-Time Benefit; FVE Maintain

Groupon provides daily deals (in the form of online vouchers) from local merchants to consumers. Groupon’s online discounts cover a variety of services including restaurants, health, beauty and fitness, and home and garden. Groupon’s average take rate on the purchase and/or usage of the vouchers is between 30% and 35%.

Customers can make one-time voucher purchases without guaranteeing repeat business with either the merchant or Groupon in general. This dynamic has led to lackluster revenue growth and consistently high customer acquisition costs that pressure margins. Groupon’s revenue growth has been decelerating and gross margins have been declining since the company went public in 2011.

Additionally, the firm is implementing a more aggressive customer acquisition strategy that requires higher marketing expenses. Although a restructuring plan is in place for a turnaround, we remain concerned about future revenue growth and gross margin compression, both of which may prevent Groupon from yielding excess returns on capital in the long run.

Financial Strength

Groupon ended 2020 with net cash of $421 million. The firm has $250 million in 3.25% convertible notes, which were issued in April 2016 and are due in April 2022. Groupon also has $200 million in revolver borrowings. Groupon burned $63.6 million in cash from operations in 2020. The company’s very high accrued merchants payable balance (nearly 25% of cost of revenue) has a positive impact on cash from operations. Groupon’s free cash flow to equity/revenue ratio has been negative the past three years, but we project this ratio to hit the teens in 2025 as a result of a return to revenue growth in 2022 and margin expansion throughout our explicit forecast period.

Total revenue declined 33% year over year to $266 million, as 86% growth in local was more than offset by the expected 75% decline in goods. Local revenue reached 71% of the prepandemic 2019 levels. Groupon’s gross profit increased 41% to $194 million, resulting in a 73% gross margin, as the lower-margin goods revenue continued to decline. In addition, unredeemed vouchers (mainly in international markets) added $10 million to gross profits. Operating loss of nearly $2 million was a significant improvement from losses of $72 million last year and $7 million in 2019.

In addition, gross profit per North America active user was 10% above the 2019 level. International customer count declined 37% year over year, but the firm generated 10% more gross profit from each than in 2020. Total gross profit per active user increased year over year (17%) and sequentially (13%). Purchases per active user increased 11% year over year but declined 3% sequentially. The firm expects full-year adjusted EBITDA between $115 million and $125 million (up from previous guidance of $110 million- $120 million). The increase is less than the $10 million benefit in the second quarter as the firm is planning to continue its aggressive marketing during the second half of this year. Groupon maintained its $950 million-$990 million full-year revenue guidance.

Bulls Say

Groupon should maintain its first-mover advantage as it leverages its current relationships with local merchants to provide more attractive offerings for consumers.
As more local businesses become more tech-savvy, they may need less hand-holding from Groupon’s salesforce, which could lead to lower costs for Groupon.

Company Profile

Groupon acts as the middleman between consumers and merchants, offering a variety of products and services at discounts via its online store. It offers consumers daily deals (in the form of online vouchers) from local merchants. Groupon also sells products directly to consumers. It generates revenue from the take rate on the purchase and/or usage of the vouchers (40% of total revenue) and from direct sales (60% of total revenue). More than 65% of Groupon’s revenue comes from North America.

(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Bega Cheese’s Strength isn’t Strong Enough to Justify a Financial Moat

Competitive pressures from branded peers, niche operators, and private label products and a reliance on powerful supermarket customers will weigh on Bega’s ability to increase prices, leading to potential market share and margin deterioration. Despite the firm’s strategic shift toward a more diverse product offering, we expect dairy products to continue to represent the majority of Bega’s sales over the next decade, exposing the firm to commodity pricing and volatile input costs.

In November 2020, Bega entered an agreement to acquire Lion Dairy and Drinks from Kirin Group for AUD 534 million with the deal expected to be finalized in January 2021. Revenue from the branded segment, which includes spreads and grocery products and Lion’s Dairy and Drinks portfolio, to expand at a CAGR of 7.4% to fiscal 2025, underpinned by new product innovation and bolt-on acquisitions. Historically, Bega Cheese has made limited investment in its brands, particularly in Australia where Fonterra is the licensee of the Bega brand, however since acquiring the spreads and grocery business in 2018, marketing spend as proportion of revenue has increased to 3% from 1% and it to remain the higher level.

Bega Cheese’s Supply Chain and Manufacturing

At least 70% of Bega’s energy consumption is from fossil fuel generation. But these risks are immaterial to our unchanged AUD 5.00 per share fair value estimate and high uncertainty rating. Bega Cheese already operates in a highly competitive market, with a largely commoditized product offering and high private label penetration in key categories. Bega Cheese’s supply chain and manufacturing is heavily reliant on water, exposing the company to increased water costs and community backlash from inefficient water use.As pressure mounts to reduce global carbon emissions, there is the potential for a reintroduction of regulated carbon pricing in Australia, however, this is not factored into our base case. Extreme weather events such as droughts and bushfires may result in higher input costs, margin deterioration from reduced production volumes, disruptions to the supply chain and increased scrutiny on resource use. Climate change risk may lead to extreme weather in the short term or changing climate patterns longer-term impacting its supply chain and input costs. Management is certainly diversifying Bega Cheese’s product offering and building out the branded business through acquisitive growth in recent years

Financial Strength

Bega’s balance sheet will be stretched following the acquisition of Lion Dairy and Drinks, with pro forma net debt/EBITDA on a post AASB 16 basis deteriorating to 3.3 (from 2.3 pre-acquisition). Bega funded the acquisition through a AUD 401 million equity raising and AUD 267 million of new and extended debt facilities. The balance sheet to gradually deleverage as synergies are delivered, earnings improve and noncore assets are divested, with net debt/EBITDA falling to below the firm’s target of 2 by fiscal 2024. Bega will continue to explore potential bolt on acquisitions and partake in industry rationalisation. While the timing and scale of further acquisitions is uncertain, Bega has the capacity to pursue smaller acquisitions while maintaining a dividend payout ratio of 50% normalised EPS.

Changing Consumer Trends

  • Bega is shifting investment to the spreads and grocery business, which we view as less commoditised and higher margin than dairy, with strong niche positions in Vegemite and peanut butter
  • External factors outside of Bega’s control, such as the weather, can adversely impact supply and demand dynamics. This can impact commodity prices, inputs costs and the firm’s supply chain and lead to volatile earnings
  • Changing consumer trends toward dairy-free and vegan diets could lead to declines in per-capita dairy and cheese consumption, weighing on the majority of Bega’s earnings

Company Profile

Bega Cheese is an Australian based dairy processor and food manufacturer of well-known brands including Bega Cheese and Vegemite. On a pre-acquisition of Lion’s Dairy and Drink’s basis, the firm generated approximately 70% of sales from its domestic market, with the remainder from exports to over 40 countries, predominately in Asia. Bega Cheese operates two segments: the branded segment which produces consumer packaged goods primarily sold through the supermarket and foodservice channels and the bulk segment which produces commodity dairy ingredients primarily sold through the business-to-business channel.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Genworth will find it Challenging to Grow its LMI Business In the face of Slow Credit growth and Increased Competition

Arch Capital Group received Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, or APRA, approval to enter the market in 2019 and announced it would acquire Westpac’s LMI business in 2021. This marked increased competition for Genworth and QBE in Australia.

LMI protects a lender against a potential gap between the outstanding loan amount plus costs and the sale proceeds from the mortgaged property. While it’s the lender who is protected and decides whether to purchase LMI, the premium is paid by the borrower. Low growth in high loan/value ratio, or HLVR loans, due to low system wide home loan growth, as well as banks being more risk-averse after the Royal Commission and tightening of lending standards is expected. An economic backdrop where Australians are holding historically high levels of home-loan debt, and wage growth is low, makes strong credit growth and a significantly stronger appetite for loans with higher LVRs unlikely.

Key Investment Considerations

  • Higher-risk home loan exposure means Genworth is very sensitive to the Australian economy, particularly employment and house prices. In a downturn, it faces the likely lower premiums, higher claims and reduced investment returns.
  • The full-recourse nature of Australia’s home loans reduces potential claims risks and in a benign economy it has proved profitable, earning profits in all but two years of its roughly 50-year history.
  • A sound balance sheet means there is the prospect of further capital-management initiatives.

Financial strength

Genworth is regulated by APRA to maintain a certain prescribed capital level, or PCA. Genworth’s PCA is driven primarily by its LMI concentration risk charge (which is mainly based on its probable maximum loss based on a three-year economic or property downturn of an APRA determined 1-in-200 year severity level) and insurance risk charge (the risk that net insurance liabilities are greater than the value determined by the actuary). Genworth targets a regulatory capital base of 1.32 times-1.44 times its PCA, which it has been consistently above. The PCA as at March 31, 2021, is a healthy 1.63 times.

Bulls Say

  • Fiscal and monetary stimulus cushion the economic downturn in Australia, resulting in a rise in

delinquencies but allows Genworth to remain profitable and continue to generate profits over the longer term.

  • A sound balance sheet provides the capacity to continue to institute capital management initiatives, including special dividends and buying back more shares.
  • The recent relaxation of some macro-prudential measures and low cash rates may spur lenders to issue more investor and HLVR home loans, which Genworth is well positioned to benefit from.

Company Profile

Genworth Mortgage Insurance Australia listed on the Australian Securities Exchange in 2014 after its U.S.-based parent, Genworth Financial Inc. (NYSE: GNW), sold down its stake. It has since exited. With a history spanning over 50 years, Genworth Australia is a provider of lenders’ mortgage insurance, or LMI, in Australia. In Australia, LMI is predominantly purchased on loans with a loan/value ratio, or LVR, above 80%. LMI protects a lender against a potential loss (gap) between the outstanding loan amount and sale proceeds on a delinquent loan property. LMI does not protect the borrower, however the premium is paid by the borrower. It’s regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, or APRA, which requires it to meet minimum regulatory capital requirements.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.