Categories
Global stocks Shares

Rapid Deployment of Ships Set Buoying Royal Caribbean Outlook for Positive Profitability in Early 2022

 while COVID-19 remains pervasive. With a return to sail underway, cruise operators are now utilzing updated health protocols to ensure the safety of cruising as paying customers return onboard. As virus mitigation tactics prove successful, we expect Royal to see modest pricing gains as it digests bookings paid for with future cruise credits, limiting near-term yield gains. On the cost side, stringent health protocols and cruise resumption costs should inflate spending, factors that will aggravate profitability through 2022.

Royal took quick action to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures as a result of the coronavirus (we forecast capital expenditures of $2.2 billion in 2021, down from $3 billion in prepandemic 2019). Also, since the beginning of the pandemic, the firm accessed around $13 billion to enhance its liquidity cushion. Further, as of June 30, $2.4 billion in customer deposits were still available for use. Although we believe Royal’s cash burn should remain between $300 million-$350 million a month (as it restaff the fleet), it should be able to navigate a graduated return to sailing over the next six months. While Royal is set to return to positive profitability over the next year, the prior 20>25 by 2025 target (EPS to $20 by 2025) is virtually impossible to reach as a result of secular changes in demand due to COVID-19.

Financial Strength 

Royal has taken numerous steps to ensure it remains a going concern after COVID-19. In March 2020, Royal noted it was taking actions to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures by the tune of $1.7 billion to improve liquidity. Additionally, since the beginning of the pandemic, the firm secured around $13 billion in liquidity through various debt and equity issuances (resulting in our estimate for $1.1 billion in debt service costs in 2021, up from around $400 million in 2019). 

Furthermore, as of June 30, $2.4 billion in customer deposits were still available for use, although industry commentary suggests about half of canceled bookings have been refunded in cash rather than future cruise credits during the pandemic. And in April 2020, Royal announced it was laying off or furloughing more than 25% of its 5,000 shoreside employees. The cash burn for Royal every month while restaffing and redeployng its ships should be between $300 million-$350 million.

Bulls Say’s 

  • If COVID-19’s delta variant recedes quickly, yields could recover faster than we currently anticipate.
  • Lower fuel prices could help benefit the cost structure to a greater degree than initially expected, thanks to Royal’s floating energy prices (with only about 50% of fuel costs historically hedged).
  • The nascent Asia-Pacific market should remain promising post-COVID-19, as the four largest operators previously had capacity for nearly 4 million passengers at the beginning of 2020, which provides an opportunity for long-term growth with a new consumer when cruising fully resumes.

Company Profile 

Royal Caribbean is the world’s second-largest cruise company, operating 60 ships across five global and partner brands in the cruise vacation industry. Brands the company operates include Royal Caribbean International, Celebrity Cruises, and Silversea. The company also has a 50% investment in a joint venture that operates TUI Cruises and Hapag-Lloyd Cruises, allowing it to compete on the basis of innovation, quality of ships and service, variety of itineraries, choice of destinations, and price. The company is completed the divestiture of its Azamara brand in the first quarter of 2021.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

Marvell Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: MRVL) Maintains FVE $40 & Aiming to take the Cloud and 5G Markets

Marvell is the leader in DPUs and PAM-4 optics, and the clear second in the enterprise and cloud Ethernet markets. Marvell’s recent financial history has been choppy, as result of CEO Matt Murphy’s aggressive overhaul of the business’ focus. Marvell has emerged as a strong competitor in the networking chip market, following a multiyear business pivot to acquisitions, divestitures, and organic development to focus on high-growth cloud, 5G, and automotive markets.

Between data processing units, or DPUs, optical interconnect, and Ethernet solutions, Marvell has one of the broadest networking silicon portfolios in the world, and we think it is primed to steal market share from incumbent Broadcom with bleeding-edge technology. Marvell has the right portfolio to invest aggressively in organic growth going forward, but don’t rule out further acquisitions to bolster its competitiveness and enter adjacent markets.

Company’s Future outlook
Marvell’s 2021 acquisitions of In phi and Innovium will give it a path to robust and sustained top-line growth in the cloud market and expect significant margin expansion over our 10-year forecast even as it invests to compete with larger rivals. Nevertheless, the market is assuming nearly immediate operating synergies from these two acquisitions, which take some time and the shares are significantly overvalued at this point and caution investors to await a greater margin of safety. The reorganization is squarely in the firm’s rearview mirror now, and forecast mid-teens sales growth and immense margin expansion over the next 10 years. The combination of 2021 acquisitions In phi and Innovium under Marvell’s umbrella will create a dangerous combination to Broadcom in the high-performance switching arena and enable share gains.

Company Profile
Marvell Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: MRVL) is a leading fables chipmaker focused on networking and storage applications. Marvell serves the data center, carrier, enterprise, automotive, and consumer end markets with processors, optical interconnections, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and merchant silicon for Ethernet applications. The firm is an active acquirer, with five large acquisitions since 2017 helping it pivot out of legacy consumer applications to focus on the cloud and 5G markets.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Global stocks Shares

Monster Beverage Glass Is Half-Full as Its Tremendous Commercial Success Is Offset by Inflation Headwinds

 Monster continues to extract outsize growth and stella profitability from this market. Crucial to Monster’s positioning in the market is its partnership with Coca-Cola. Being able to rely on the widest moat in beverages for distribution, merchandising, and retailer negotiation reinforces and perpetuates the benefits of its resonant brand, in our view. With its entire U.S. footprint and most international territories fully incorporated into the Coke system, strategic and logistic planning should become more seamless, allowing products to be scaled more quickly, particularly in international markets (over 35% of sales). Despite the inevitable complexity of appealing to distinct local palates, we believe Monster’s continued geographic diversification should augment its positioning.

Given the importance of the Coke relationship, the launch of Coke Energy products following arbitration between the two parties was a significant development. Still, it has proved to be far from an existential threat, garnering trivial share in the markets where it launched (and recently discontinued in the U.S.). In addition to a seemingly more tenuous Coke relationship, Monster must contend with an intense competitive environment. While Red Bull remains the most formidable rival, Monster is also beleaguered by a number of both established and upstart firms looking to carve out niches in the energy space. Nevertheless, structural advantages and an experienced management team should allow the firm to navigate an evolving competitive landscape.

Financial Strength 

Moreover, the business churns out healthy free cash flow, with over $1.1 billion generated on average over the past three years (high-20s as a percentage of sales). The company’s free cash flow has historically supported persistent share repurchases, and the company’s ability to continue buying back shares amid market disruptions like the coronavirus pandemic is a poignant illustration of its financial health, in our view. As of June 2021, Monster had over $1.5 billion in cash and short-term investments on its balance sheet, with no long-term debt to speak of. 

Still, general liquidity is not a concern. In addition to its healthy cash balance and an untapped revolver, Monster has implemented certain nontraditional means of financing, such as a working capital line of credit that is similar to an interest-bearing liability but not treated as leverage for accounting purposes. 

Bulls Say’s

  • Monster is a leading pure-play incumbent in a secularly advantaged beverage category that is growing in the high single digits, meaningfully above the broader industry average (low single digits).
  • Monster’s strategic partnership with Coca-Cola aligns its fortunes with the widest moat in nonalcoholic beverages, affording it top-tier store positioning and merchandising.
  • International expansion through Coke’s bottlingsystem offers material runway for growth.

Company Profile

Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors its portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster’s largest shareholder (roughly 19%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster’s revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Global stocks

Softbank Group Reports Solid Quarter of Vision Fund Growth

as expected with the company reporting strong performance from the Vision Fund in line with stock market rises and generally strong recent IPOs.

Softbank fair value estimate of JPY 9200 is mainly due to a 4% downgrade in our valuation for Alibaba following its June quarter result, offset by increased valuation for Vision Fund 2 in line with valuation improvement over the quarter. The stock price is now below our fair value estimate with the main difference likely to be due to our valuation of Alibaba which is around 55% above the current stock price.

The Vision Funds and Latin America Fund held 221 investments at the end of June 2021. SFV1 reported a net realized gain of JPY 310 billion due mainly to selling some shares in Door Dash, Uber, and Guardant Health. The net unrealized gain of JPY 3.5 billion was much lower with strong share price performances of DiDi and Door Dash partially offset by weaker share price performance of some listed portfolio companies, particularly Coupang. In terms of sectors, the investments are also well diversified with 28% in consumer, 20% in transportation, 17% in logistics, and 10% in frontier tech 10%, 7% in proptech, 7% in fintech, and 3% in health tech.

Company’s Future Outlook

Softbank’s 40.2%-owned domestic telecom business, Softbank Corp, reported a fourth-quarter result in line with our estimates with revenue increasing by 0.7%, operating income increasing by 4.1% and net profit down 0.8%. Management estimated the first-quarter mobile price cuts negatively impacted the first quarter by around JPY 10 billion with a JPY 70 billion impact factored into unchanged full-year fiscal 2021 guidance for revenue of JPY 5.5 trillion (5.7% growth), operating income of JPY 975 billion (0.4% growth), and net income of JPY 500 billion (1.8% growth). A further price cut has been introduced for low end customers in July which looks likely to continue to put pressure on mobile pricing. The fair value estimated of JPY 1450 per share which is slightly below where the stock is trading.

Company Profile

Softbank Group Corporation’s (JPY: 9984)  is a Japan-based telecom and e-commerce conglomerate that has expanded mainly through acquisitions, and its key assets include a 28% stake in Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba and a 40% owned mobile and fixed broadband telecom operator business in Japan. It also owns 75% of semiconductor chip designer ARM Holdings although has agreed to sell this and is waiting on regulatory approvals, and has a vast portfolio of mainly Internet- and e-commerce-focused early stage investments. It is also general partner of the $100 billion Softbank Vision Fund 1 and sole investor in Softbank Vision Fund 2, both of which primarily invest in pre-IPO Internet companies.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
LICs LICs

Mirrabooka Investments Ltd (ASX: MIR) Maintains Its Final Dividend & Declares A Special Dividend

Categories
ETFs ETFs

Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF

 The benchmark leans toward the highest-dividend payers, excluding property trusts. The index provider ranks all dividend-paying stocks based on their dividend yield forecast for the next year and constructs the index using stocks that make up the top 50% of the floatadjusted market capitalization. Industries are capped at 40% and individual stocks at 10%. The index is rebalanced semiannually, and in 2018, it changed its rules around buying and selling so that stocks are added or removed more gradually. This should increase the portfolio to around 55 names from 45 and reduce stock turnover, though it will likely remain higher than market-cap-weighted index funds. Vanguard’s global presence allows the Australian team to leverage the U.S. team’s extensive indextracking experience.

Portfolio

The FTSE Australia High Dividend Yield Index is a real-time, market-cap-weighted index comprising companies with higher-than-average forecast dividends. The biggest sector exposure is financial services, at around 39%-40% of the portfolio. The fund’s exposure to materials has historically been volatile. Following dividend cuts in the sector, exposure dropped to 4% in 2016 from 20%. However, a fall in Rio Tinto’s share price and corresponding increase in yield saw the stock return to the portfolio in June 2017, increasing the fund’s exposure to the sector to 21%. That came at the expense of industrials exposure, which fell to zero. As of 30 June 2021, materials exposure was at 23%. This highlights the risk of “dividend traps” in a rules-based strategy. The portfolio has an underweighting in the high-growth sectors of technology and healthcare, as these companies typically reinvest a large proportion of their cash flow into research and development to drive future earnings growth rather than focusing on high dividend payouts. Real estate investment trusts are excluded. More than half the portfolio is in giant caps, with the balance mostly in large and medium caps. The portfolio’s exposure to cyclical/sensitive names has increased over the years and currently stands at 93%, implying high dependence on the domestic economic cycle.

Performance

Vanguard has fared relatively well over the long term, but short- and medium-term results have been a drag. Moreover, the annual return track of the strategy is visibly inconsistent as compared with its category index. In 2012 and 2013, the strategy delivered 24.5% and 26.5%, respectively–incredible relative and absolute returns. But investors should be cautiously optimistic about a repeat of such performance as the fund delivered equally subdued relative performance in 2014, followed by a 4.22% decline in 2015 and category benchmark relative underperformance of negative 1.2% in 2016. Poorly timed buys into materials such as BHP and Rio Tinto hurt in 2016. Vanguard recouped some of these losses in 2017, though this was curtailed as exposure to Telstra took a bite out of returns. As the banking industry came under pressure because of falling property prices and the focus of the Royal Commission in 2018, returns were again below the broader market.

Source: Morning star

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Vanguard High Yield Australian Shares

Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield is a compelling and efficient option. The cost-value balance of the strategy is a solid strength. At 0.35% per year, it is currently one of the cheapest unlisted products offering domestic high-yield equity exposure. Vanguard aims to own every stock in the FTSE Australia High Dividend Yield Index, an index Vanguard has exclusive rights to replicate. Vanguard choose to keep the some of the index’s construction rules undisclosed to ward off speculative market participants looking to capitalize on the semiannual index changes before they have been completed within the strategy.

A well-managed, close replication of the FTSE Australia High Dividend Index

Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield replicates the FTSE Australia High Dividend Index, offering investors an above-average yield in a passive, tax-efficient vehicle. The benchmark leans toward the highest-dividend payers, excluding property trusts. The index provider ranks all dividend-paying stocks based on their dividend yield forecast for the next year and constructs the index using stocks that make up the top 50% of the float-adjusted market capitalization. Industries are capped at 40% and individual stocks at 10%. The index is rebalanced semiannually, and in 2018, it changed its rules around buying and selling so that stocks are added or removed more gradually.

This should increase the portfolio to around 55 names from 45 and reduce stock turnover, though it will likely remain higher than market-cap-weighted index funds. Vanguard’s global presence allows the Australian team to leverage the U.S. team’s extensive index-tracking experience. It is worth noting the risk of dividend traps may be exacerbated in a portfolio that has an automated bias to high dividend-payers. The index attempts to minimize this risk primarily through sector and stock caps that enforce a minimum level of diversification by incorporating consensus yield forecasts and by excluding companies not forecast to pay dividends in the next 12 months.

A top-heavy portfolio with large sector and company biases

The biggest sector exposure is financial services, at around 39%-40% of the portfolio. The fund’s exposure to materials has historically been volatile. Following dividend cuts in the sector, exposure dropped to 4% in 2016 from 20%. However, a fall in Rio Tinto’s share price and corresponding increase in yield saw the stock return to the portfolio in June 2017, increasing the fund’s exposure to the sector to 21%. That came at the expense of industrials exposure, which fell to zero. As of 30 June 2021, materials exposure was at 23%. 

Mixed results over the long term

Vanguard has fared relatively well over the long term, but short- and medium-term results have been a drag. Moreover, the annual return track of the strategy is visibly inconsistent as compared with its category index. In 2012 and 2013, the strategy delivered 24.5% and 26.5%, respectively–incredible relative and absolute returns. But investors should be cautiously optimistic about a repeat of such performance as the fund delivered equally subdued relative performance in 2014, followed by a 4.22% decline in 2015 and category benchmark relative underperformance of negative 1.2% in 2016.

Source: Morning star

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
LICs LICs

Mirrabooka Investments Maintains Its Final Dividend & Declares A Special Dividend

Mirrabooka Investments Ltd (ASX: MIR) declared a final dividend of 6.5 cents per share, fully franked, for FY21, in line with the preceding final dividend.

In addition to the final dividend, the company declared a special dividend of 2 cents per share, fully franked, bringing the total dividends for FY21 to 12 cents per share.

The full dividend (final and special) will be collected from capital gains on which the Company is or will be taxed. 

The pre-tax attributable gain (“LIC capital gain”) associated with the dividend is 12.14 cents.

The dividend will trade ex-dividend on July 28, 2021, and will be paid on August 17, 2021.

Mirrabooka Investments Ltd NTA (NET TANGIBLE ASSETS) per share is currently marked at $2.96, dividend yield at 2.40% and PE at 106.92 for the year 2021. 

The current price is $4.16 per share of Mirrabooka investments Ltd.

Company Profile

Mirrabooka Investments Ltd (ASX: MIR) was founded in 1980 by Mr. Robert Mark Freeman and is an Australian based company. Mirrabooka Investments Ltd is a publicly traded investment company that focuses on small and medium-sized businesses in Australia and New Zealand. The company has been in operation since April 1999 and debuted on the ASX on June 28, 2001. Mirrabooka seeks to offer shareholders with medium- to long-term benefits, including strong dividend yields, by making core investments in chosen small and mid-sized businesses. It invests in 50-70 companies outside of the S&P/ASX 50 Leaders Index. 

 (Source: FactSet)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks Philosophy Technical Picks

Heady (ASX: JHX) Raw Materials Inflation Offering Little Challenge to Hardie in Early Fiscal 2022

After patenting cellulose-reinforced fibre cement in the late 1980s, the Australian company entered the North American market in 1990, establishing its business with the benefit of patent protection. In doing so, the company’s product line has become synonymous with the product category. The firm now enjoys 90% share in fibre cement siding in North America, its largest and most important market, with similar positions in Australia and New Zealand. Fibre cement siding possesses durability advantages and superior aesthetics over vinyl cladding, leading to vinyl’s market share eroding to about 26% today from around 39% in 2003. At this same time, fibre cement’s share has increased to 19%, almost entirely due to increased penetration for Hardie’s product.

Hardie’s siding product range is now in its seventh iteration of product innovation, known as HardieZone, under which the product formulation is tailored to the different climatic zones within North America, increasing durability. Meanwhile, the company assesses its competitors’ product as equivalent to somewhere near its second generation of product, which Hardie released in the mid-1990s. The continued reinvestment in R&D supports Hardie’s strong brand equity and thus perpetuates the price premium that Hardie’s range attracts. 

Financial Strength 

Balance sheet flexibility has improved markedly in early fiscal 2021 despite the economic shock delivered by the coronavirus pandemic. Hardie will return to its regular dividend policy from fiscal 2022 after regular dividends were suspended in early fiscal 2021 in response to the pandemic. Leverage–defined as net debt/EBITDA–stood at 1.0 times at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2022.Hardie runs a conservative balance sheet with leverage typically within a targeted range of 1-2 net debt/EBITDA. With net debt/EBITDA of 1.0 at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2022, significant headroom exists relative to Hardie’s leverage covenant, calibrated at a net debt/EBITDA of 3. 

Therefore, Hardie has significant capacity to return surplus capital to shareholders.Hardie’s asbestos-related liability—the AICF trust–has a gross carrying value at fiscal 2021 year-end of USD 1.135 billion and remains an overhang. However, payments to fund the liability are capped at 35% of trailing free cash flow. Narrow-moat James Hardie is off to a flying start in early fiscal 2022 despite substantial inflationary pressures in raw materials and freight which, year-to-date, have shown little sign of abating. Our revised forecast sits slightly above the midpoint of Hardie’s upwardly revised full-year fiscal 2022 net income guidance range of USD 550 million-USD 590 million. Hardie continues to execute impeccably. 

Hardie’s Growth 

First-quarter North American fibre cement volumes rose 21%, tracking significantly above the broader market for exterior wall siding. Reflecting the year-to-date momentum in Hardie’s market share gains, we upgrade our full-year expectations for Hardie’s growth above the North American market index, or PDG, to 9.6% from a prior 7.9%. We lift per share our fair value estimate by 8% to AUD 34.20/USD 25.00, due to the recent depreciation of the Australian dollar. Accordingly, the North American softwood pulp price increased 23% in Hardie’s first quarter to USD 1,598 per tonne. Hardie continues to make progress against its cost savings targets under its ongoing lean manufacturing programme. We continue to expect achievement of USD 340 million in cumulative savings under the lean manufacturing programme by fiscal 2024, a USD 233 million increment over the USD 107 million in incremental cost-out achieved through to the end of fiscal 2021.

Bulls Say’s 

  • James Hardie’s clear leadership in the fibre cement category should drive growth in market share in the North American siding market. We forecast the company retaining its 90% share of the category, while fibre cement climbs to 28% of the total housing market.
  • Hardie’s strong brand equity translates into pricing power, allowing for inflation in manufacturing costs to be easily passed on, thus protecting profitability in the face of imminent input cost inflation.
  • The Fermacell acquisition could finally unlock Europe as an avenue of significant growth following market saturation in North America.

Company Profile 

James Hardie is the world leader in fibre cement products, accounting for roughly 90% of all fibre cement building materials sold in the U.S. It has nine manufacturing plants in eight U.S. states and five across Asia-Pacific. Fibre cement competes with vinyl, wood, and engineered wood products with superior durability and moisture-, fire-, and termite-resistant qualities. The firm is a highly focused single-product company based on primary demand growth, cost-efficient production, and continual innovation of its differentiated range. With saturation of the North American market in sight, the acquisition of Fermacell in early 2018, Europe’s leading fibre gypsum manufacturer, will provide Hardie with a subsequent avenue of growth.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

Nvidia’s (NASDAQ NVDA) Revenue Continues To Rise, Despite Concerns about Cryptocurrency Demand

The firm had record showings in both gaming and data center segments, but we are concerned with the surge of demand for Nvidia’s gaming GPUs used in cryptocurrency mining (specifically Ethereal), as we view this application as a volatile one that could lead to lower GPU sales if crypto prices trend down.

Nvidia continues to execute well in growing its data center business thanks to its A100 GPU for Artificial Intelligence and networking products from its 2020 Mellanox acquisition. Nvidia is paying a high multiple for ARM’s earnings. The Fair value estimate of Nvidia is $515 per share. First-quarter sales grew 84% year over year to $5.7 billion, with gaming and data center revenue up 106% and 79%, respectively. Data center sales benefitted from the inclusion of Mellanox and continued adoption of Nvidia’s A100 GPUs. Gross margins during the first quarter grew 100 basis points sequentially thanks to a more favorable product mix. Nvidia’s gaming’s GPUs are receiving an artificial boost from crypto mining that could be difficult to sustain.

The chief growth drivers are expected to be gaming; data center, and crypto mining processors, or CMPs. CMPs are optimized for crypto mining power efficiency and will provide Nvidia’s management some visibility into the contribution of crypto mining to total revenue.

Company’s Future Outlook
We estimate crypto mining related demand contributed around $400 million to $500 million in GPU sales during the quarter. It is expected that the firm’s automotive segment to resume growth in the coming years as its autonomous solutions are adopted and its legacy infotainment business is ramped down. Specifically, Nvidia’s automotive design win pipeline exceeds $8 billion through fiscal 2027. Management expects second-quarter sales to be at a midpoint of $6.3 billion, which implies 63% year-over-year growth and was also ahead of our estimates. For the second quarter, CMP sales are expected to be $400 million. Nvidia’s channel inventories remain lean, and management expects the firm to be supply constrained into the second half of the year. While we anticipate strong growth for Nvidia in the coming quarters, we remain vigilant of signs of weaker crypto-mining demand for its GPUs should crypto prices fall.

Company Profile
Nvidia Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA) is the leading designer of graphics processing units that enhance the experience on computing platforms. The firm’s chips are used in a variety of end markets, including high-end PCs for gaming, data centers, and automotive infotainment systems. In recent years, the firm has broadened its focus from traditional PC graphics applications such as gaming to more complex and favorable opportunities, including artificial intelligence and autonomous driving, which leverage the high-performance capabilities of the firm’s graphics processing units.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.