Categories
Funds Funds

Kotak Bond Direct Growth: Stable team supports the process and has the potential to outperform in the long term with its active duration positioning

Kotak Bond is actively managed and run by an experienced team with a robust investment strategy. The fund has delivered consistent returns, and we believe it is a strong choice for investors who seek a quality portfolio and are willing to occasionally take a higher investment risk for higher returns.

Approach 

The strategy is run using a team-based approach and has a strong fundamental process in place. The fund is more focused towards taking active duration bets and invests primarily in high-quality credits. Credit analysis is divided into banking, nonbanking financial companies, and manufacturing debt, further demarcated into three buckets based on the strength of the business, management, and corporate governance standards. The qualitative assessment is then followed by rigourous quantitative analysis wherein financial ratios such as leverage, coverage, and solvency ratios are considered.

Portfolio

In 2021, the manager maintained a high allocation to government securities mainly towards the medium and long end because of attractive yields. He is overweight at the medium end because he believes that, regardless of whether the yield went up or down, the middle of the segment would provide a good level of carry and roll-down advantage. At the same time, the steepness of the curve made the longer end of the curve look appealing. However, because of the uncertainty surrounding the rate hike, he kept a limited the fund avoids investing in anything below AAA segment and intermittently holds higher cash/money market instruments to take opportunistic trading calls when markets are bumpy.

People

Abhishek Bisen is an experienced manager who has been with the fund house since October 2006. He took over this fund in April 2008 along with Deepak Agrawal. From July 2015, Bisen has been sole manager after Agrawal moved out to manage credit and shorter-maturity funds. Bisen is well-engrained in Kotak’s philosophy, and his skills complement the investment process. The fixed-income strategies are run using a team-based approach that follows an inclusive culture. It fosters the collective input of the investment specialists closest to the source of investment information.

Performance

Abhishek Bisen has delivered robust returns during his tenure from April 2008 to November 2021. It ranked in the first quartile by outperforming 82% of its peers, delivering returns of 8.19% versus the category average of 7.39%. In 2021, he maintained a higher exposure to medium-duration bonds and government securities. This resulted in superior risk-adjusted returns for the fund. We believe the fund has the potential to outperform with its active investment strategy across interest-rate cycle. 

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

HDFC Corporate Bond Growth: A fund focused to generate optimise return by investing in high credit rated instruments

Approach 

The investment philosophy is to optimise returns without taking excessive duration or credit risk. with most performance is driven by selecting securities offering attractive yields within the AAA rated segment. Expectedly, the investment approach relies on fundamental research. It entails combining qualitative aspects with quantitative analysis. This in turn helps the managers to determine issuer exposure they can take, thereby acting as a risk-management tool for the individual portfolio and the fund company. The investment team lays more emphasis on risk control, thereby focusing on balancing safety, liquidity, and return.

Portfolio 

The fund’s investment mandate is to invest at least 80% of assets in corporate bonds having a rating of AA+ and above. Anupam Joshi’s emphasis on liquidity and risk control is borne out by the fund’s portfolio, where almost 100% of assets are invested in AAA or equivalent rated securities. Papers issued by public-sector undertakings such as NABARD, PFC, and REC continue to find a place in the portfolio. From the private sector, established names such as HDFC and Tata Sons, in which the manager has confidence, feature in the portfolio. On the duration front, the team believes interest rates will move up from where they are currently, but it will be a more gradual increase. In line with the same, the modified duration of the fund has been reduced in the past year to 2.72 years in November 2021 from 3.35 years in October 2020. Finally, Joshi will build cash when there aren’t attractive investment opportunities and to ride out periods of volatility and uncertainty.

People

Anupam Joshi joined HDFC Mutual Fund in October 2015 and has been managing this fund since then. Earlier, he was associated with IDFC Mutual fund as portfolio manager from 2008 till his exit from the fund house.

Performance

Under Anupam Joshi (October 2015-November 2021) the fund’s direct share class has clocked an annualised return of 8.45%, outperforming the category average (6.51%) and featuring in the top performance quartile. Under the difficult environment of 2020, the fund clocked a return of 12.09%, outperforming the category average of 9.10%. In 2021, too, the fund’s direct share class has delivered a top-quartile performance. The fund is also a top-quartile performer over the trailing one-, three- and five-year periods.

About the fund  

The scheme seeks to generate income/capital appreciation through investments predominantly in AA+ and above rated corporate bonds. Its benchmark against NIFTY Corporate Bond Index. The investment strategy is well-defined for this fund, which also paves way for its effective and predictable execution. It’s a low-risk, short- to medium-duration strategy that works on the philosophy of optimising returns for investors without exposing them to excessive duration or credit risk. Therefore, investments are made only in AAA rated securities and the duration is maintained within a range of 1.0 to 4.0 years.

Joshi brings in his own style of investing while managing this fund. For instance, earlier the fund was managed with an approach of holding majority of investments till maturity, thus allowing a linear roll-down in its average maturity. Joshi prefers managing the fund more actively. The strategy has its limitations: In times when credit markets are buoyant, the fund may find it hard to match peers that, within the defined mandate of the category, can go down the credit curve. The fund may also struggle against peers that follow a more dynamic approach to duration management, compared with Joshi’s measured approach, during fast changing interest-rate scenarios.

 (Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

UBS Property Securities Fund: The fund which aims to outperform the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index

Investment strategy 

The Fund uses a multi-step investment process for constructing the Fund’s investment portfolio that combines top-down sector allocation with bottom-up individual stock selection. Top-down sector allocation is determined through a systematic evaluation of listed and direct property market trends and conditions. Bottom-up stock selection is driven by proprietary analytical techniques to conduct fundamental company analysis, which provides a framework for security selection through an analysis of individual securities independently and relative to each other. Investment return objective The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling three year periods.

Investment return objective 

The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling three year periods.

 Downside Risks

  • Deterioration in the Australian economy especially the property market (fundamentals deteriorate). Rising bond yields negatively impacting pricing. 
  • The Portfolio Manager/analysts miss-calculate their bottom-up valuation 
  • Key person risks in Mr. Pica (however, the CBRE investment team is relatively large and capable of succession planning). 

Fund Performance (as at 31 May 2021)

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\Screenshot 2021-12-23 163325.png

(Source: UBS)

Fund Positioning: Top 5 Holdings – Overweights & Underweights (as at 31 May 2021)

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\Screenshot 2021-12-23 164000.png

(Source: UBS)

Investment Process

The Fund uses an investment process that combines in-depth top-down and bottom- up fundamental market research with a disciplined and systematic approach to portfolio construction and risk management. The Portfolio Manager’s bottom-up approach integrates both quantitative and qualitative research to identify individual securities where the real estate is undervalued and represents the most compelling investment opportunities. The securities research process incorporates several factors including: 

  • Property visits – the Portfolio Manager utilises its local presence to gauge the quality and location of the real estate, assessing properties and capital expenditure needs at the property level. 
  • Management meetings – the Portfolio Manager assesses the management team’s alignment with shareholders; determines the depth and experience of the team; and judges their ability to articulate and execute their strategy. 
  •  Modelling – the Portfolio Manager generates cash flow earnings projections; performs net asset value analysis; and analyses the capital structure. 

About the fund

The UBS Property Securities Fund (portfolio managed by CBRE while Distributed by UBS) is a portfolio of mainly Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts that the investment team believes are being undervalued by the market, based on the in-house assessment of the company’s future cashflows. The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling five-year periods 

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

UBS Property Securities Fund: The fund which aims to outperform the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index

Investment strategy 

The Fund uses a multi-step investment process for constructing the Fund’s investment portfolio that combines top-down sector allocation with bottom-up individual stock selection. Top-down sector allocation is determined through a systematic evaluation of listed and direct property market trends and conditions. Bottom-up stock selection is driven by proprietary analytical techniques to conduct fundamental company analysis, which provides a framework for security selection through an analysis of individual securities independently and relative to each other. Investment return objective The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling three year periods.

Investment return objective 

The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling three year periods.

 Downside Risks

  • Deterioration in the Australian economy especially the property market (fundamentals deteriorate). Rising bond yields negatively impacting pricing. 
  • The Portfolio Manager/analysts miss-calculate their bottom-up valuation 
  • Key person risks in Mr. Pica (however, the CBRE investment team is relatively large and capable of succession planning). 

Fund Performance (as at 31 May 2021)

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\Screenshot 2021-12-23 163325.png

(Source: UBS)

Fund Positioning: Top 5 Holdings – Overweights & Underweights (as at 31 May 2021)

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\Screenshot 2021-12-23 164000.png

(Source: UBS)

Investment Process

The Fund uses an investment process that combines in-depth top-down and bottom- up fundamental market research with a disciplined and systematic approach to portfolio construction and risk management. The Portfolio Manager’s bottom-up approach integrates both quantitative and qualitative research to identify individual securities where the real estate is undervalued and represents the most compelling investment opportunities. The securities research process incorporates several factors including: 

  • Property visits – the Portfolio Manager utilises its local presence to gauge the quality and location of the real estate, assessing properties and capital expenditure needs at the property level. 
  • Management meetings – the Portfolio Manager assesses the management team’s alignment with shareholders; determines the depth and experience of the team; and judges their ability to articulate and execute their strategy. 
  •  Modelling – the Portfolio Manager generates cash flow earnings projections; performs net asset value analysis; and analyses the capital structure. 

About the fund

The UBS Property Securities Fund (portfolio managed by CBRE while Distributed by UBS) is a portfolio of mainly Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts that the investment team believes are being undervalued by the market, based on the in-house assessment of the company’s future cashflows. The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling five-year periods 

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Pendal Horizon Fund: An actively managed portfolio of Australian shares

 The Fund is led by Crispin Murray, who has over 27 years’ industry experience and is currently the Head of Equity Strategies at Pendal. Mr. Murray is supported by a research team of nineteen, including Mr. Rajinder Singh who has over 17 years’ experience in Australian equities and manages a range of sustainability and ethical funds for Pendal.

The benchmark index is S&P/ ASX300 Accumulation Index.

Downside Risks: 

  • Market & security specific risk including Australian economic conditions deteriorate. 
  • The Portfolio Manager/analysts miss-calculate their bottom-up valuation. 
  • Stock selection fails to yield alpha against the benchmark – Companies which are screened out, such as in materials, energy, gambling, outperform. 
  • Key man risks with Crispin Murray, Andrew Waddington and Jim Taylor.

Investment Team:

Pendal’s nineteen-member Equity team is one of the largest in the industry. The Fund is managed by Crispin Murray, who is also the Head of Equity and is assisted by Rajinder Singh, who has a combined 44 year’s industry experience.

Fund Performance:

Fund Positioning:

Sector Allocation:

Investment Philosophy & Process:

Investment Philosophy: The Fund’s investment philosophy is based on the belief that good corporate governance and sustainability is a central factor to a company’s longterm success. 

Investment Process: The investment process is driven by bottom-up, fundamental research of stocks listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (both large and small cap). The key features of the process are best described in the diagram below. The Manager also utilises a proprietary system as part of its investment process, which includes Analyst Analyser which is a database that captures analyst financial models, valuations and recommendations

About the Fund:

The Pendal Ethical Share Fund is an actively managed portfolio of Australian shares which seeks to ensure that funds are invested in an ethical and socially responsible manner. The Fund invests in companies whose practices and impacts are aligned with an investor’s own social, environmental and ethical preferences and aims to provide a return (before fees, costs and taxes) that exceeds the S&P/ASX 300 Accumulation Index over a 5-year period.

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

CFS Index Australian Bond: Simple and reasonably priced choice for diversified Australian bond exposure

Approach

FSI matches the risk factors of the benchmark, including duration, sector exposures, and credit quality by employing a full replication method. The strategy can hold securities that have been or are expected to be included in the index, and it can exclude those likely to drop in or out. On average, the cash holding would be in the vicinity of 0.5% because of the impact of daily flows and liquidity needs. The larger asset base gives the firm the benefit of scale and helps to keep a lid on overall transaction costs. FSI uses the BlackRock Aladdin portfolio management tool to manage the index-tracking process end to end, including trading and risk assessment and monitoring.

Portfolio

CFS Index Australian Bond replicates the Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Year Index fully. As of 30 September 2021, the fund is composed mainly of Treasury (56.6%) and government-related (semigovernment and supranational) debt (36.4%). Corporate credit constitutes most of the remaining portion of the fund. A major portion of the credits in the index are issued by banks, followed by diversified financials and real estate trusts. . The concentrated credit exposure to banks and financials means Australian property fundamentals play a role in the portfolio’s performance in the long run.

People

FSI has a long history of managing passive strategies. FSI’s institutional passive funds under management is substantial. As of August 2021, FSI had around $5.1 billion in active funds and $12.2 billion in passive strategies. The Australian fixed-income team headed by Stephen Cooper within FSI is responsible for the CFS Index Australia Bond Fund. Cooper is an industry veteran. He is supported by four portfolio managers in the team, with Darja Milosevic and Alex Nikolovski dedicated to passive vehicles.

Performance 

As a core bond holding, CFS Index Australia Bond has served investors well over time by bringing broader portfolio volatility down and protecting capital when equity market slides. On the other hand, it has lagged when yields rose and when credit markets have been strong. This was evident in 2013 when the fund’s 1.7% gain trailed over half of its category peers or when yields rose toward the second half of 2020 through the end of the first quarter of 2021 (November 2020–March 2021). Encouragingly, the fund had done well when equity markets were weak. Its relatively long duration and high-quality exposure have been a boon during such occasions. 

CFS Performance.png

About the Fund

CFS Wholesale Indexed Australian Bond Fund is a unit trust incorporated in Australia. The objective of the Fund is to closely track the UBS Warburg Australian Composite Bond Index, All Maturities. The Fund invests in securities issued or guaranteed by governments, statutory authorities, banks, and corporations of a high credit standing, with some cash for liquidity.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

JP Morgan Investment Funds: A collection of top picks from diversified industries

He also tends to add and trim positions aggressively as they become more or less attractive according to analyst models, a tendency that benefits when stock prices mean revert. While Davis’ artful approach has some appeal, it doesn’t have a discernible edge relative to its competition.

Portfolio:

This portfolio finds a balance between differentiation and careful risk management. It held 51 stocks at the end of September 2021, significantly less than the 140-180 it used to have when it had three independently managed sleeves. However, manager Scott Davis’ desire to let stock selection drive results leads to only modest sector and industry tilts relative to its S&P 500 benchmark. Davis also considers factor exposure when building the portfolio. For instance, he increased the portfolio’s stake in financials companies toward the end of 2020 to bolster its exposure to cheaper, more cyclical stocks to help offset its lack of exposure to the energy sector.

The portfolio has historically leaned a bit more toward a growth style, and that still rings true. It displayed a slight growth bias relative to the benchmark as of October, sporting higher valuation metrics such as price/ sales and faster trailing revenue- and earnings-growth rates.

People:

This strategy continues to rely heavily on J.P. Morgan’s core research team, but it is now led exclusively by Scott Davis, who oversaw the strongest-performing sleeve of this formerly multi-managed offering. Davis became a named manager in August 2014, inheriting a 10% slice of the strategy, but quickly saw his share grow, most notably after manager Thomas Luddy stepped down at the end of 2017. Davis continues to leverage the ideas of J.P. Morgan’s core research team, which consists of 23 analysts with extensive industry experience.

Performance:

A good portion of the fund’s success came in 2020, which skews the trailing return figures a bit. Its 26.7% gain in 2020 outpaced the benchmark by over 8 percentage points, the best calendar year since Davis debuted. The fund’s case over other time periods is weaker: It outperformed the bogy about 51% of the time on a rolling one-year basis since Davis joined.

(Source: jpmorgan.com)

Price:

Analysts find it difficult to analyse expenses since it comes directly from the returns. Analysts expect that it would be able to generate positive alpha relative to its benchmark index.


(Source: Morningstar)                                                                      (Source: Morningstar)

About Funds:

The investment objective of this fund is to achieve a return in excess of the US equity market by investing primarily in US companies. It uses a research-driven investment process that is based on the fundamental analysis of companies and their future earnings and cash flows by a team of specialist sector analysts.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

JP Morgan Investment Funds- A collection of top picks from diversified industries

Process:

Davis maintains a relatively concentrated portfolio of 50-60 stocks but seeks to minimize the magnitude of sector or factor bets. He also tends to add and trim positions aggressively as they become more or less attractive according to analyst models, a tendency that benefits when stock prices mean revert. While Davis’ artful approach has some appeal, it doesn’t have a discernible edge relative to its competition.

Portfolio:

This portfolio finds a balance between differentiation and careful risk management. It held 51 stocks at the end of September 2021, significantly less than the 140-180 it used to have when it had three independently managed sleeves. However, manager Scott Davis’ desire to let stock selection drive results leads to only modest sector and industry tilts relative to its S&P 500 benchmark. Davis also considers factor exposure when building the portfolio. For instance, he increased the portfolio’s stake in financials companies toward the end of 2020 to bolster its exposure to cheaper, more cyclical stocks to help offset its lack of exposure to the energy sector.

The portfolio has historically leaned a bit more toward a growth style, and that still rings true. It displayed a slight growth bias relative to the benchmark as of October, sporting higher valuation metrics such as price/ sales and faster trailing revenue- and earnings-growth rates.

People:

This strategy continues to rely heavily on J.P. Morgan’s core research team, but it is now led exclusively by Scott Davis, who oversaw the strongest-performing sleeve of this formerly multi-managed offering. Davis became a named manager in August 2014, inheriting a 10% slice of the strategy, but quickly saw his share grow, most notably after manager Thomas Luddy stepped down at the end of 2017. Davis continues to leverage the ideas of J.P. Morgan’s core research team, which consists of 23 analysts with extensive industry experience.

Performance:

A good portion of the fund’s success came in 2020, which skews the trailing return figures a bit. Its 26.7% gain in 2020 outpaced the benchmark by over 8 percentage points, the best calendar year since Davis debuted. The fund’s case over other time periods is weaker: It outperformed the bogy about 51% of the time on a rolling one-year basis since Davis joined.

(Source: jpmorgan.com)

Price:

Analysts find it difficult to analyse expenses since it comes directly from the returns. Analysts expect that it would be able to generate positive alpha relative to its benchmark index.                                                              

                 
(Source: Morningstar)                                                                 

About Funds:

The investment objective of this fund is to achieve a return in excess of the US equity market by investing primarily in US companies. It uses a research-driven investment process that is based on the fundamental analysis of companies and their future earnings and cash flows by a team of specialist sector analysts.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

WCM Focused International Growth Fund Institutional Class: A promising option

Approach

The managers first generate ideas through a quality-growth screen, which includes companies with market caps of at least $3.5 billion, a good liquidity profile, and other metrics such as strong and improving margins. The team excludes non-growth industries such as utilities and looks for companies with solid returns on invested capital. Factors such as economies of scale, intellectual property, and legal or regulatory advantages are key. The team also places a heavy emphasis on culture, believing that culture drives certain companies forward and helps maintain their competitive edge. The team takes its best ideas and builds a relatively concentrated portfolio of roughly 30 to 40 international stocks. Because of their benchmark-agnostic approach, the portfolio may have extreme over- and underweighting to various sectors.

Portfolio

The managers use their best ideas to build a concentrated portfolio. . Coming out of the 2007-09 global financial crisis, the managers felt like their portfolio was too concentrated at about 20 holdings. They’ve gradually increased that count, and in July 2021 had 35 holdings. While still relatively concentrated (the typical foreign large-growth peer held 83 stocks in July), the expansion helps reduce individual stock risk. The managers take other prudent steps to minimize risk and remain relatively diverse. They avoid sectors that they believe offer little growth potential and as of July 2021, the fund had no exposure to energy, real estate, or utilities.

Portfolio Holdings .png

People

Co-CEO and manager Kurt Winrich’s upcoming retirement has been long in the works and the team will still have four capable managers to pick up the slack. Mike Trigg, who has been on the strategy since the fund’s 2011 inception, is the final decision-maker here. . Peter Hunkel, who has also managed since the fund’s inception, is responsible for portfolio construction. The team promoted Sanjay Ayer, also a former Morningstar equity analyst, to the management ranks in June 2019. Ayer joined WCM in 2007 and manages the WCM Global Growth Fund WCMGX and the WCM Emerging Markets Fund WCMEX, which have had success under him. Paul Black, co-CEO of WCM, is a named manager here but serves mainly as an advisor to the team. 

Performance 

Strong stock selection has fueled the fund’s outperformance. Picks in technology and industrials, in particular, have been among the biggest contributors to its performance. That helped the strategy weather 2020’s first-quarter coronavirus-driven slide. The fund held up slightly better than the index losing 29.4% from Jan. 18 to March 23, 2020, compared with the index’s 30.3% loss. The managers then opportunistically added MercadoLibre MELI and Ferrari RACE, which benefitted the strategy coming out of the bear market. In 2021, the fund has returned to its winning ways. Its 12.7% return handily beat the index’s 4.6% and the Morningstar Category’s 4.5%. That was good for the top decile in the category. Holdings such as ASML Holdings NV ADR ASML and Shopify SHOP were among the leading contributors in that period.

Performance .png

About the Fund

WCM Focused International Growth Fund seeks long term capital appreciation by investing in equity securities of non-U.S. domiciled companies or depository receipts of non-U.S. domiciled companies.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

Altius Sustainable Bond Fund- A fund that aims to provide a total return approach

The Altius Sustainable Bond Fund offers investors fixed interest investments, which are managed with the consideration of environment, social and corporate governance (ESG) principles. The Manager recently expanded its exclusion of companies engaged in thermal coal to all fossil fuels (or at least have revenue no greater than 10% sourced from these activities). The Fund is a credible offering. It is run by an investment team with strong credentials and lengthy investment experience in managed assets in the investment class (the team of six comprises three PMs all with at least 25 years’ experience and the remaining team members all with over 10 years’ experience).

Downside Risk: 

  • Interest rate risk (however the Fund’s total return focus should limit this). 
  • The Manager gets the thematic and top-down view wrong. 
  • Key man risk – Bill Bovingdon, Chris Dickman and Gavin Goodhand.

Investment Team:

The fund is managed by Australian Unity’s Cash and Fixed Interest team (Altius) consisting of experienced fixed interest investment professionals. The investment team is supported by a very experienced Investment Advisory Committee, which meet every quarter (formally). Below are the 

  • Bill Bovingdon – Executive Director, Chief Investment Officer 
  • Chris Dickman – Executive Director, Senior Portfolio Manager
  • Gavin Goodhand – Senior Portfolio Manager
  • Yen Wong – Head of Credit Research
  • Kirsten Lee – Credit Analyst.
  • Vincent Tang – Senior Portfolio Analyst

Performance:

(%)Fund  Benchmark**Out-performance
1-month-0.110.35-0.46
3-months0.390.77-0.38
1-year (p.a.)-0.550.32-0.23
3-years (p.a.1.422.49-1.07
5-year (p.a.)1.532.13-0.6
Since inception (p.a.)*2.262.65-0.39

Fees Structure:

The Fund has lowered its management fees 0.56% p.a. to 0.37%p.a. The Fund charges no performance fee.

Fund Positioning:

Sector Allocation:

Top 10 Holdings:

About the fund:

The Altius Sustainable Bond Fund is an Australian fixed interest fund that invests in companies which conduct their business and apply capital responsibly, considering a range of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. The Fund aims to provide a total return approach, offering duration exposure at appropriate points in the cycle, as well as positioning the portfolio defensively in a rising rate environment and invests only in domestic assets, thus avoiding importation of global risks (e.g. currency) and offering a different risk profile.

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.