Category: Funds

A fund refers to capital belonging to numerous investors used to collectively purchase securities while each investor retains ownership and control of his own shares. An investment fund provides a broader selection of investment opportunities, greater management expertise, and lower investment fees than investors might be able to obtain on their own. Types of investment funds include mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, money market funds, and hedge funds.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

AMP Capital Corporate Bond Fund Outdoing the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and The Average Credit Fund

Process:

AMP Capital Corporate Bond provides exposure to a wide range of credit securities within Australian, global, investment-grade, corporate bond, and high yield. The benchmark changed from the Bloomberg AusBond Credit 0+Yr Index to the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index in February 2016, reflecting the fund’s capital preservation and income emphasis since 2012. Monthly distributions are announced and reviewed biannually, which helps income-focused investors manage their expectations. Credit analysis is done on two accounts; first, a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the broader industry sector, and second, issuerand security-specific analysis. 

The analysis is conducted in line with a “score card” methodology that incorporates fundamentals, technicals, and valuations. The primary weighting is to the valuation and fundamental factors as the team believes this is the primary determinant of a positive outcome for investors over the longer term. The duration view is led by the macro team and is established through a similar score card system, which again considers fundamental, sentiment, and technical factors, with the analyst view of valuation playing a key part. The credit strategy panel, comprising senior investment staff, set the overall credit strategy, risk budget, and sector allocations. However, the ultimate duration and credit exposures are determined by comanagers Sonia Baillie and Nathan Boon.

Portfolio:

The vehicle chiefly comprises Australian credit, though it does hold around 5% each in US and UK names. The strategy can hold up to 10% in high yield and 15% in unrated bonds but is usually well below these limits. The portfolio is largely BBB and A rated corporate bonds, with the BBB names providing a slightly larger proportion of the fund’s asset value at nearly 44% to October 2021. Following the coronavirus-driven dislocation, the team took opportunistic exposures in long duration REITs and industrials, some of which have seen partial profit taking with significant spread tightening throughout 2021. 2019 saw the fund rotate back into corporate bonds following the late-2018 sell-off. 

The team believes credit fundamentals are improving and technicals supportive, but valuations indicate little expectation of further spread compression. It wants to maintain income by holding credit, albeit at a reducing amount to late-2021, also using credit derivatives to insulate from wider spreads. The fund’s duration limits were adjusted from plus or minus 1.5 years versus the old credit benchmark, to absolute terms of zero to 4.5 years in October 2014. The fund has been positioned within a duration range of 0.2-0.8 years since the start of 2017 (0.6 years in October 2021), meaning the sensitivity to rising interest rates is low. FUM has steadily declined over the past few years and currently sits at AUD 855 million as of October 2021.

People:

Sonia Baillie (head of credit) has led this portfolio since October 2017, joined by Nathan Boon (head of credit portfolio management) in March 2018. This group, however, is currently transitioning into the Macquarie fixed-income team as part of AMP Capital’s sale to that organisation; completion is expected by mid-2022, creating some uncertainty. The duo gets significant input from head of macro Ilan Dekell, and a team of analysts spread between Sydney and Chicago. Head of credit research Steven Hur was previously a key member until he left the group in December 2021. The fixed-income team is headed by Grant Hassell, who has more than 30 years of experience, though he is the sole member of this quartet not joining the Macquarie investment team in the same capacity. 

Hassell contributes to overall discussions through team meetings and investment committees, acting as the sounding board for the various heads to bring ideas together into a portfolio. While there has been staff turnover among the credit analyst and credit portfolio managers–former managers Jeff Brunton and David Carruthers left in 2014 and 2016, respectively–most key staffers have long tenure. For example, while Baillie was appointed portfolio manager only in 2017, she has been with the team since 2010, has held other senior roles, and worked in the firm’s Asian fixed-income business. Furthermore, AMP Capital has taken steps to improve staff incentives and address staff turnover.

Performance:

Over the long run, this fund has outdone the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and the average credit fund. That’s not necessarily compelling, given the fund has been running substantially more credit and/or duration risk than those yardsticks. Since AMP Capital slashed the fund’s duration, rival credit funds are a more reasonable benchmark looking ahead; the fund’s historically high duration means we also compare the fund’s history against the Bloomberg AusBond Credit Index, where this strategy has underperformed. The fund’s track record has benefited from higher-than-average credit risk, as well as significant interest-rate risk, that has paid off as rates declined to historically low levels. returns, yet three- and five-year returns fail to beat the average category peer. Given declining global interest rates, the fund reduced its distribution in mid-2017 to 0.275% per month, and then 0.25% per month at the beginning of 2018. This continued through 2021 when distributions dropped to 0.175% by year-end, the shop expects it to remain at these compressed levels, barring unforeseen circumstances. The rate peaked at 0.55% per month in 2012, highlighting that while these distribution indications can be helpful in the short run, they should not be relied on for long-term income expectations.

About Funds:

Though a new home will bring positives to AMP Capital Corporate Bond, it also introduces uncertainties for this diversified credit strategy. AMP Capital’s Global Equities and Fixed Interest business is in the midst of a sale to Macquarie Asset Management, which is expected to complete by mid-2022. Head of global fixed income Grant Hassell is leading the integration. The strategy has benchmarked to the Bloomberg Ausbond Bank Bill Index since early-2016, reflecting the income goals with capital stability. This move followed a history of changes, which under Macquarie’s guidance going forward could see further revisions in approach.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

BlackRock Advantage International Fund K: Fund which aims to outperform the MSCI EAFE Index

BlackRock Advantage International Fund K seeks long-term capital appreciation, with a focus on risk management.Powered by innovation and technology driven investment process having exposures to international portfolio at a low cost.

Approach

The strategy aims to outperform the MSCI EAFE Index by combining bottom-up and top-down factors into a stock-selection model that uses roughly 40-60 signals that fall into three broad buckets: fundamentals, sentiment, and macro themes. Fundamental signals include factors such as management quality, valuation, and profitability; sentiment signals include analyst-, investor-, and broker-sentiment indicators; and macro signals include factors specific to industries, countries, and investment styles. The model weights the signals roughly evenly between the three buckets.

The team keeps a tight lid on the 375- to 715-stock portfolio’s tracking error (the volatility of its relative performance) by keeping its sector and industry weights within 4 percentage points of the index’s, generally. It mitigates stock-specific risk by typically keeping individual positions within 1-1.5 percentage points of the benchmark’s.

The systematic approach has a short time horizon of six to 12 months, which can lead to portfolio churn and higher trading costs. The strategy’s annual portfolio turnover has ranged from 106% to 247% during the past four years, much higher than the average foreign large-blend category peer’s 43%-51%.

Portfolio

In contrast to other foreign large-blend funds, the managers here allocate the strategy’s assets across positions that stick, deviated most at around 0.9 percentage points larger than the index’s share, as of November 2021. While the portfolio mostly invests in benchmark constituents, 5%-15% of assets are in stocks unique to the portfolio. Indeed, close to the MSCI EAFE Index’s weights. Its 1.1% stake in the world’s third-largest tobacco company, Japan Tobacco 10.1% of assets were invested across roughly 150 offbenchmark stocks such as Rexel SA RXL, Rightmove PLC RMV, and Électricité de France EDF.

The strategy typically has a bit more exposure to mid-cap stocks than does the index. As of November, the portfolio’s allocation to mid-caps stood at 15% versus the index’s 10%. As a result, the portfolio’s $41 billion average market cap was slightly below the index’s $47 billion.

Performance

The fund has earned mixed results since BlackRock’s Systematic Active Equity team took over in mid-2017. From July 1, 2017, through Dec. 31, 2021, the Institutional shares posted a 7.3% annualized return, which beat the foreign large-blend category’s 7.1% but trailed the MSCI EAFE Index’s 7.5%. Its risk-adjusted results don’t look much better. 

The fund has fared worse than the index during severe market drawdowns but has outperformed the benchmark during prolonged rallies. The strategy’s calendar 2021 results were solid: The fund’s 13.0% gain beat the average peer’s 9.8% return as well as the index’s 11.3%. The portfolio benefited from good stock selections in the financial services and industrials sectors, namely Nordea Bank and Recruit Holdings, respectively.

Top 10 Holdings

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\top 10 holdings today.png

About the fund

BlackRock Advantage International’s experienced and well-resourced research team plies a suitable quantitative approach and earns the strategy’s share classes Morningstar Analyst Ratings of Bronze or Neutral, depending on fees.

The team’s quant-driven approach has a lot of moving parts. It analyzes 40-60 signals that fall into three broad buckets–fundamentals, sentiment, and macro themes–that collectively consider both bottom-up and top-down factors. The strategy aims to outperform the MSCI EAFE Index by combining bottom-up and top-down factors into a stock-selection model that uses roughly 40-60 signals that fall into three broad buckets: fundamentals, sentiment, and macro themes. Fundamental signals include factors such as management quality, valuation, and profitability; sentiment signals include analyst-, investor-, and broker-sentiment indicators; and macro signals include factors specific to industries, countries, and investment styles. The model weights the signals roughly evenly between the three buckets. The team keeps a tight lid on the 375- to 715-stock portfolio’s tracking error (the volatility of its relative performance) by keeping its sector and industry weights within 4 percentage points of the index’s, generally. It mitigates stock-specific risk by typically keeping individual positions within 1-1.5 percentage points of the benchmark’s.

 (Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Robeco QI Global Conservative Equities I: A strong option for investors looking for downside protection

Process:

The strategy’s robust foundation, high repeatability, discipline, and consistent execution remain attractive features. The team’s relentless efforts to implement new elements to the process, these also make the approach more complex and have led to a slight change of portfolio characteristics, which is appreciated. This rules-based, quantitative process is built on extensive academic research demonstrating that investing in low-risk stocks leads to better risk-adjusted returns. After an initial liquidity filter, Robeco’s quant model ranks the 4,500-stock universe on a multidimensional risk factor (volatility, beta, and distress metrics), combined with value, quality, sentiment and momentum factors. In recent years, the team has introduced several enhancements to refine the model, including short-term momentum-driven signals that can adjust a stock’s ranking up or down by maximum 10 percentage points. This should prioritize buy decisions for stocks that rank high in the model and score well on short term signals, and vice versa. Since 2020 the team also allows liquid mega-caps to have a higher weight in the portfolio. Top-quintile stocks are typically included in an optimisation algorithm that considers liquidity, market cap, and 10-percentage-point country and sector limits relative to the MSCI World Index. A 200-300 stock portfolio is constructed with better ESG and carbon footprints than the index, while rebalancing takes place monthly, generating modest annual turnover of about 25%. Stocks are sold when ranking in the bottom 40% of the model. 

Portfolio:

The defensive nature of the strategy currently translates into a higher allocation to low-beta and high yielding stocks in the consumer staples and communication services sectors, while industrials, energy and technology stocks are a large underweight. The valuation factors embedded in the model have steered the fund clear from MSCI ACWI index heavyweights Amazon.com AMZN, Tesla TSLA, and NVIDIA NVDA, while Microsoft MSFT and Apple AAPL were underweighted. Valuations make the fund lean towards European stocks while the U.S. stock market was an 8.8% underweight versus the index per November 2021. The model does like U.S. consumer defensives though, with larger positions for Proctor & Gamble PG, Walmart WMT, and Target TGT. The quant approach gives management wide latitude to invest across the market-cap spectrum, and the diversified 200- to 300-stock portfolio has long exhibited a small/mid-cap bias compared with the index.

People:

The team running this strategy is large, experienced, and stable. As such, it earns an Above Average People rating. This fund follows an entirely quant-based approach, an area where Robeco has extensive experience and expertise, and where it has invested heavily in human resources over the years. Robeco’s quant team runs various strategies: core quant equity, factor investing, and conservative equity, but there is significant interaction between them. The conservative equity team that runs this fund is led by Pim van Vliet, whose academic work has laid the foundation of the fund’s philosophy.

Performance:

This defensive strategy has generally offered good volatility reduction during turbulent markets. Robeco QI Global Conservative Equities’ C € share class absorbed 67% of the losses of the MSCI ACWI Index since inception. However, its results versus the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index have been less consistent. Disappointingly, it did not live up to its expectations in the corona-dominated markets of 2020, though the strategy’s failure can be explained by market dynamics in relation to the fund’s strategy. The portfolio lagged during the subsequent recovery that again benefited tech and ecommerce stocks, and while the value rally in the final quarter did help, cyclical value stocks that are not favoured here rallied the most.

(Source: Morningstar)

Price:

Analysts find it difficult to analyse expenses since it comes directly from the returns. Analysts expect that it would be able to deliver positive alpha relative to its category benchmark index.


(Source: Morningstar)                                                                       (Source: Morningstar)

About Funds:

Robeco’s quant-based conservative equities range is managed by a stable and experienced six-member team led by Pim van Vliet. They are supported by a group of 10 quantitative researchers led by David Blitz and a similarly sized group of data scientists. This credentialed team is vital to the fund’s success as it constantly refines the models used in the funds. It is also reassuring that Robeco’s broader quantitative team has successfully groomed quantitative researchers in its talent pool, allowing them to add people with complementary skills to the teams. The strategy’s academic foundation, repeatability, discipline, and consistent execution give us confidence. The rules-based, quantitative process is built on empirical research demonstrating that investing in low-risk stocks leads to better risk-adjusted returns. It goes beyond traditional low-volatility investing, combining a multidimensional risk factor with value, quality, sentiment, and momentum factors. Top-quintile-ranked stocks are included in the portfolio after running an optimisation algorithm.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund: A solid strategy led by an impressive, long-tenured team

Process:

The Walter Scott investment team executes a patient investment process, undertaking rigorous fundamental research to identify quality names that can deliver superior long-term returns. It earns an Above Average Process rating. The process starts with an initial screen of businesses that can deliver at least 20% cash flow return on investment over a full market cycle. The managers have an active watchlist of approximately 250 companies they closely monitor, and the team undertakes fundamental bottom-up analysis, assessing factors such as competitive position, industry dynamics, profitability, balance-sheet strength, financial model, and quality of management. 

Portfolio:

The team constructs a relatively concentrated portfolio that usually has 40-60 names. Adequate diversification is maintained by limiting position sizes to a maximum of 5 percentage points, but typically they don’t exceed 4% of the portfolio. The group’s long-term quality focus results in the strategy exhibiting a bias toward mega-cap stocks, though it does hold some mid-cap names. Historically, the strategy has exhibited significant country-level bets. It is typically underweighted in the United States relative to the MSCI World Index. At the sector level, the strategy favours tech, healthcare, and consumer cyclical stocks, while having a large underweighting in financial services.

People:

An experienced, stable team that works together well leads to a High People rating. Investment decision-making at subadvisor Walter Scott is team-based. All investments, new and existing, are discussed and debated until there is unanimous agreement by the research team. Stability and experience characterize Walter Scott’s investment team, with members boasting impressive experience and tenures with the firm. More than half of the investment team members have spent their entire investment careers at the company. In 2021, one of the joint portfolio managers, Yuanli Chen, left, a rare departure. Long-term cohead of research Alan Edington moved to a new position, Responsible Investment.

Performance:

The strategy has sported strong results from its late-December 2006 launch through 2021. The I shares’ 9.4% annualized gain exceeded its MSCI World Index prospectus benchmark’s 7.4% and edged the typical world large-stock growth peer. However, it’s lost a bit of an edge against a more growth-oriented benchmark, with the MSCI World Growth Index up 10% annualized during the period.

(Source: Morningstar)

Price:

Analysts find it difficult to analyse expenses since it comes directly from the returns. Analysts expect that it would be able to deliver positive alpha relative to its category benchmark index.


(Source: Morningstar)                                                                     (Source: Morningstar)

About Funds:

With a focus on investing for the long term, the portfolio consistently favors technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary names while being significantly underweight in financial services and energy. The strategy won’t always lead the way in buoyant markets. It landed behind the MSCI World Index benchmark in 2021. The investment seeks long-term total return. To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in stocks. The fund’s investments will be focused on companies located in the developed markets. Examples of “developed markets” are the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, Hong Kong and Western Europe. It may invest in the securities of companies of any market capitalization. The fund’s sub-investment adviser, Walter Scott & Partners Limited (Walter Scott), seeks investment opportunities in companies with fundamental strengths that indicate the potential for sustainable growth.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

MFS Institutional International Equity Fund

Approach

The managers rely on broad and thorough bottom-up research and a disciplined focus on moderately growing established companies with shares trading at decent prices. That is not unique, but the process is bred in MFS’ bones and has delivered strong results elsewhere, including Gold-rated MFS Global Equity MWEIX. The managers look for firms growing faster than global GDP. That’s a lower hurdle than more-aggressive growth funds since global GDP historic growth is in the single digits.

Portfolio

This is a diversified yet distinctive portfolio. It spreads its bets over its nearly 80 stocks. Most holdings were less than 2% of assets, and the fund had less than 30% of its money in its top 10 stocks. The strategy’s preference for competitively advantaged, moderately growing, developed-markets companies helps it stand out, though. More than two thirds of its holdings have wide or narrow economic moat ratings, much more than its foreign large-cap peers and relevant indexes, like the MSCI ACWI ex USA. It also had a large slug of assets in developed Europe, including the 2021 purchase of tire maker Cie Generale des establisment Michelin. 

Portfolio .png

People

The firm’s sprawling, yet experienced analyst team supports the managers. MFS has dozens of U.S. and nonU.S. equity analysts who divide responsibilities across eight global sectors. In addition, the firm’s large credit analyst team provides insights across the capital structure, and a quantitative research squad offers riskmanagement support. The equity analysts average more than 15 years of industry experience and nearly eight years’ firm tenure, and team turnover has been low. The managers also collaborate with the firm’s other non-U.S. portfolio managers, including Roger Morley and Ryan McAllister of Gold-rated MFS Global Equity.

Performance 

The fund has done well in a variety of environments. Its performance in the early 2020 pandemic-induced market collapse was mixed, though. Its 31% loss hurt but was less than the nearly 34% plunge of broader non-U.S. stock indexes. The typical foreign large-growth fund and growth benchmarks, however, shed about 30%. Pandemic-ravaged businesses like food service company Compass hurt, so did not owning more tech stocks.

Performance .png

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Pfizer strong pipeline development increasingly sets ups near term growth

Business Strategy and Outlook

Pfizer’s size establishes one of the largest economies of scale in the pharmaceutical industry. In a business where drug development needs a lot of shots on goal to be successful, Pfizer has the financial resources and the established research power to support the development of more new drugs. Also, after many years of struggling to bring out important new drugs, Pfizer is now launching several potential blockbusters in cancer, heart disease, and immunology. Pfizer’s vast financial resources support a leading salesforce. 

Pfizer’s commitment to postapproval studies provides its salespeople with an armamentarium of data for their marketing campaigns. Further, Pfizer’s leading salesforces in emerging countries position the company to benefit from the dramatically increasing wealth in nations such as Brazil, Russia, India, China, and Turkey. Pfizer’s recent decision to divest its off-patent division Upjohn to create a new company (Viatris) in combination with Mylan should drive accelerating growth at the remaining innovative business at Pfizer. With limited patent losses and fewer older drugs, Pfizer is poised for steady growth.

Financial Strength

Pfizer holds a very strong financial position with a large degree of flexibility. As of the end of 2020, debt/capital stood at 39% and debt/EBITDA was 2.9, which suggests that Pfizer remains on solid financial footing. With the majority of its cash flow derived from a diverse portfolio of products, it’s not expects a high degree of volatility with future earnings. After a deep dive on several of Pfizer’s pipeline drugs combined with continued strong data for COVID-19 treatment Paxlovid, it has increased our projections for several key drugs leading to a fair value estimate increase to $48 from $45.50. The strong pipeline increasingly supports our wide moat rating for the firm. For the core business of Pfizer, it is expected to close to 6% annual sales growth between 2020 and 2025 as new drugs offset generic competition. 

Bulls Say’s 

  • Bega is shifting investment to the spreads and grocery business, which we view as less commoditised and higher margin than dairy, with strong niche positions in Vegemite and peanut butter 
  • External factors outside of Bega’s control, such as the weather, can adversely impact supply and demand dynamics. This can impact commodity prices, inputs costs and the firm’s supply chain and lead to volatile earnings 
  • Changing consumer trends toward dairy-free and vegan diets could lead to declines in per-capita dairy and cheese consumption, weighing on the majority of Bega’s earnings

Company Profile 

Pfizer is one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical firms, with annual sales close to $50 billion (excluding COVID-19 vaccine sales). While it historically sold many types of healthcare products and chemicals, now, prescription drugs and vaccines account for the majority of sales. Top sellers include pneumococcal vaccine Prevnar 13, cancer drug Ibrance, cardiovascular treatment Eliquis, and immunology drug Xeljanz. Pfizer sells these products globally, with international sales representing close to 50% of its total sales. Within international sales, emerging markets are a major contributor.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Kotak Bond Direct Growth: Stable team supports the process and has the potential to outperform in the long term with its active duration positioning

Kotak Bond is actively managed and run by an experienced team with a robust investment strategy. The fund has delivered consistent returns, and we believe it is a strong choice for investors who seek a quality portfolio and are willing to occasionally take a higher investment risk for higher returns.

Approach 

The strategy is run using a team-based approach and has a strong fundamental process in place. The fund is more focused towards taking active duration bets and invests primarily in high-quality credits. Credit analysis is divided into banking, nonbanking financial companies, and manufacturing debt, further demarcated into three buckets based on the strength of the business, management, and corporate governance standards. The qualitative assessment is then followed by rigourous quantitative analysis wherein financial ratios such as leverage, coverage, and solvency ratios are considered.

Portfolio

In 2021, the manager maintained a high allocation to government securities mainly towards the medium and long end because of attractive yields. He is overweight at the medium end because he believes that, regardless of whether the yield went up or down, the middle of the segment would provide a good level of carry and roll-down advantage. At the same time, the steepness of the curve made the longer end of the curve look appealing. However, because of the uncertainty surrounding the rate hike, he kept a limited the fund avoids investing in anything below AAA segment and intermittently holds higher cash/money market instruments to take opportunistic trading calls when markets are bumpy.

People

Abhishek Bisen is an experienced manager who has been with the fund house since October 2006. He took over this fund in April 2008 along with Deepak Agrawal. From July 2015, Bisen has been sole manager after Agrawal moved out to manage credit and shorter-maturity funds. Bisen is well-engrained in Kotak’s philosophy, and his skills complement the investment process. The fixed-income strategies are run using a team-based approach that follows an inclusive culture. It fosters the collective input of the investment specialists closest to the source of investment information.

Performance

Abhishek Bisen has delivered robust returns during his tenure from April 2008 to November 2021. It ranked in the first quartile by outperforming 82% of its peers, delivering returns of 8.19% versus the category average of 7.39%. In 2021, he maintained a higher exposure to medium-duration bonds and government securities. This resulted in superior risk-adjusted returns for the fund. We believe the fund has the potential to outperform with its active investment strategy across interest-rate cycle. 

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

HDFC Corporate Bond Growth: A fund focused to generate optimise return by investing in high credit rated instruments

Approach 

The investment philosophy is to optimise returns without taking excessive duration or credit risk. with most performance is driven by selecting securities offering attractive yields within the AAA rated segment. Expectedly, the investment approach relies on fundamental research. It entails combining qualitative aspects with quantitative analysis. This in turn helps the managers to determine issuer exposure they can take, thereby acting as a risk-management tool for the individual portfolio and the fund company. The investment team lays more emphasis on risk control, thereby focusing on balancing safety, liquidity, and return.

Portfolio 

The fund’s investment mandate is to invest at least 80% of assets in corporate bonds having a rating of AA+ and above. Anupam Joshi’s emphasis on liquidity and risk control is borne out by the fund’s portfolio, where almost 100% of assets are invested in AAA or equivalent rated securities. Papers issued by public-sector undertakings such as NABARD, PFC, and REC continue to find a place in the portfolio. From the private sector, established names such as HDFC and Tata Sons, in which the manager has confidence, feature in the portfolio. On the duration front, the team believes interest rates will move up from where they are currently, but it will be a more gradual increase. In line with the same, the modified duration of the fund has been reduced in the past year to 2.72 years in November 2021 from 3.35 years in October 2020. Finally, Joshi will build cash when there aren’t attractive investment opportunities and to ride out periods of volatility and uncertainty.

People

Anupam Joshi joined HDFC Mutual Fund in October 2015 and has been managing this fund since then. Earlier, he was associated with IDFC Mutual fund as portfolio manager from 2008 till his exit from the fund house.

Performance

Under Anupam Joshi (October 2015-November 2021) the fund’s direct share class has clocked an annualised return of 8.45%, outperforming the category average (6.51%) and featuring in the top performance quartile. Under the difficult environment of 2020, the fund clocked a return of 12.09%, outperforming the category average of 9.10%. In 2021, too, the fund’s direct share class has delivered a top-quartile performance. The fund is also a top-quartile performer over the trailing one-, three- and five-year periods.

About the fund  

The scheme seeks to generate income/capital appreciation through investments predominantly in AA+ and above rated corporate bonds. Its benchmark against NIFTY Corporate Bond Index. The investment strategy is well-defined for this fund, which also paves way for its effective and predictable execution. It’s a low-risk, short- to medium-duration strategy that works on the philosophy of optimising returns for investors without exposing them to excessive duration or credit risk. Therefore, investments are made only in AAA rated securities and the duration is maintained within a range of 1.0 to 4.0 years.

Joshi brings in his own style of investing while managing this fund. For instance, earlier the fund was managed with an approach of holding majority of investments till maturity, thus allowing a linear roll-down in its average maturity. Joshi prefers managing the fund more actively. The strategy has its limitations: In times when credit markets are buoyant, the fund may find it hard to match peers that, within the defined mandate of the category, can go down the credit curve. The fund may also struggle against peers that follow a more dynamic approach to duration management, compared with Joshi’s measured approach, during fast changing interest-rate scenarios.

 (Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

UBS Property Securities Fund: The fund which aims to outperform the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index

Investment strategy 

The Fund uses a multi-step investment process for constructing the Fund’s investment portfolio that combines top-down sector allocation with bottom-up individual stock selection. Top-down sector allocation is determined through a systematic evaluation of listed and direct property market trends and conditions. Bottom-up stock selection is driven by proprietary analytical techniques to conduct fundamental company analysis, which provides a framework for security selection through an analysis of individual securities independently and relative to each other. Investment return objective The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling three year periods.

Investment return objective 

The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling three year periods.

 Downside Risks

  • Deterioration in the Australian economy especially the property market (fundamentals deteriorate). Rising bond yields negatively impacting pricing. 
  • The Portfolio Manager/analysts miss-calculate their bottom-up valuation 
  • Key person risks in Mr. Pica (however, the CBRE investment team is relatively large and capable of succession planning). 

Fund Performance (as at 31 May 2021)

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\Screenshot 2021-12-23 163325.png

(Source: UBS)

Fund Positioning: Top 5 Holdings – Overweights & Underweights (as at 31 May 2021)

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\Screenshot 2021-12-23 164000.png

(Source: UBS)

Investment Process

The Fund uses an investment process that combines in-depth top-down and bottom- up fundamental market research with a disciplined and systematic approach to portfolio construction and risk management. The Portfolio Manager’s bottom-up approach integrates both quantitative and qualitative research to identify individual securities where the real estate is undervalued and represents the most compelling investment opportunities. The securities research process incorporates several factors including: 

  • Property visits – the Portfolio Manager utilises its local presence to gauge the quality and location of the real estate, assessing properties and capital expenditure needs at the property level. 
  • Management meetings – the Portfolio Manager assesses the management team’s alignment with shareholders; determines the depth and experience of the team; and judges their ability to articulate and execute their strategy. 
  •  Modelling – the Portfolio Manager generates cash flow earnings projections; performs net asset value analysis; and analyses the capital structure. 

About the fund

The UBS Property Securities Fund (portfolio managed by CBRE while Distributed by UBS) is a portfolio of mainly Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts that the investment team believes are being undervalued by the market, based on the in-house assessment of the company’s future cashflows. The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling five-year periods 

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

UBS Property Securities Fund: The fund which aims to outperform the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index

Investment strategy 

The Fund uses a multi-step investment process for constructing the Fund’s investment portfolio that combines top-down sector allocation with bottom-up individual stock selection. Top-down sector allocation is determined through a systematic evaluation of listed and direct property market trends and conditions. Bottom-up stock selection is driven by proprietary analytical techniques to conduct fundamental company analysis, which provides a framework for security selection through an analysis of individual securities independently and relative to each other. Investment return objective The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling three year periods.

Investment return objective 

The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling three year periods.

 Downside Risks

  • Deterioration in the Australian economy especially the property market (fundamentals deteriorate). Rising bond yields negatively impacting pricing. 
  • The Portfolio Manager/analysts miss-calculate their bottom-up valuation 
  • Key person risks in Mr. Pica (however, the CBRE investment team is relatively large and capable of succession planning). 

Fund Performance (as at 31 May 2021)

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\Screenshot 2021-12-23 163325.png

(Source: UBS)

Fund Positioning: Top 5 Holdings – Overweights & Underweights (as at 31 May 2021)

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\Screenshot 2021-12-23 164000.png

(Source: UBS)

Investment Process

The Fund uses an investment process that combines in-depth top-down and bottom- up fundamental market research with a disciplined and systematic approach to portfolio construction and risk management. The Portfolio Manager’s bottom-up approach integrates both quantitative and qualitative research to identify individual securities where the real estate is undervalued and represents the most compelling investment opportunities. The securities research process incorporates several factors including: 

  • Property visits – the Portfolio Manager utilises its local presence to gauge the quality and location of the real estate, assessing properties and capital expenditure needs at the property level. 
  • Management meetings – the Portfolio Manager assesses the management team’s alignment with shareholders; determines the depth and experience of the team; and judges their ability to articulate and execute their strategy. 
  •  Modelling – the Portfolio Manager generates cash flow earnings projections; performs net asset value analysis; and analyses the capital structure. 

About the fund

The UBS Property Securities Fund (portfolio managed by CBRE while Distributed by UBS) is a portfolio of mainly Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts that the investment team believes are being undervalued by the market, based on the in-house assessment of the company’s future cashflows. The Fund aims to outperform (after management costs) the S&P/ASX 300 Property Accumulation Index over rolling five-year periods 

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.