Category: Funds

A fund refers to capital belonging to numerous investors used to collectively purchase securities while each investor retains ownership and control of his own shares. An investment fund provides a broader selection of investment opportunities, greater management expertise, and lower investment fees than investors might be able to obtain on their own. Types of investment funds include mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, money market funds, and hedge funds.

Categories
Funds Funds

SBI Corporate Bond Fund Direct Growth: The fund which invest in high quality corporate bond and short duration mandate

Fund Objective

The investment objective of the scheme is to provide the investors an opportunity to predominantly invest in corporate bonds rated AA+ and above to generate additional spread on part of their debt investments from high quality corporate debt securities while maintaining moderate liquidity in the portfolio through investment in money market securities.

Approach

The fund’s strategy is to generate attractive returns through high-quality corporate bonds and short duration mandates. It employs a bottom-up approach combined with a top-down overlay to generate superior risk adjusted returns. The managers use various qualitative and quantitative parameters and put a lot of emphasis on a company’s management, business, and financial health. They also use the analysis of sell-side research and credit rating agencies to form a view on the creditworthiness of companies but to a limited extent. The credit committee then reviews the rated securities, and the approved securities are assigned credit and tenor limits. While constructing the portfolio, the managers have the flexibility to implement the trades with reasonable leeway to express their views. The risk-management team periodically reviews the portfolio to ensure the managers adhere to the guidelines. We believe the flow of ideas/information is effective and fits nicely with the process in place, supporting an Above Average Process rating.

Portfolio

The fund has a higher credit-quality portfolio, making it more liquid and less prone to credit risk. The fund maintains 100% of its assets in AAA rated bonds, despite having the flexibility to take some allocation in lower-rated instruments. The duration of the portfolio is well managed between one and three years. The fund also invests in government securities based on portfolio manager’s view on interest rates, but this does not account for more than 20% of its net assets. But high allocation is made to state development loans, given attractive spreads with regard to central government securities.

The portfolio of the fund is well diversified. The manager also intermittently holds higher cash/money market instruments to take opportunistic trading calls when markets are bumpy.The strategy, however, is not without risk. The fund may underperform its peers if the market favours high-yielding bonds. Also when interest rates are falling, the fund may struggle to outperform its category peers that invest in a portfolio with a little longer duration.

Performance

Under a short tenure of the fund’s existence (February 2019 to December 2021), the fund’s direct share class has posted an excellent annualised return of 8.36% as against the category average (7.14%). The portfolio manager’s research-intensive approach has helped the fund generate superior returns, placing the fund in the first quartile.

In terms of year-on-year returns, the fund’s performance has been inconsistent. The fund outperformed most category peers by a wide margin in 2019 and 2020. However, the 2021 performance got impacted because of the fund’s conservative approach with regard to its peers. On expectation of normalisation of interest rates by the RBI, the manager kept the duration below two years. This resulted in the fund ranking in the fourth quartile as against its category peers. However, the fund has the potential and could bounce back going ahead.

About the fund

The investment objective of the scheme is to provide the investors an opportunity to predominantly invest in corporate bonds rated AA+ and above to generate additional spread on part of their debt investments from high quality corporate debt securities while maintaining moderate liquidity in the portfolio through investment in money market securities.

The fund follows a disciplined and risk-conscious investment process that draws extensively from the in depth expertise of the investment team. The process is bottom-up with a focus on high-quality business models with a top-down overlay. The team’s understanding of the markets and frequent interaction with its equity team and parent company give it an edge in forming views on the business and creditworthiness of the companies. Furthermore, it has built some additional aspects into the approach. They now do an even more detailed analysis of the group and the promoter-linked entities in which they invest.

The execution of the process has been above average with limited credit risk and a short duration strategy. Despite having the flexibility to invest up to 80% of its portfolio in AAA and AA+ rated corporate bonds, the manager constructs the portfolio with a primary focus on liquidity, avoiding exposure to the below AAA rated segment, and keeping the duration between 1 and 3 years

 (Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Nikko AM Global Share Fund: Solid Strategy, Experienced Team and Remarkable Process

Approach

The investment process is based around searching for stocks that have “future quality.” To achieve the investment objective, the analyst’s undertakes bottom-up fundamental research seeking quality of franchise (competitive advantages), quality of balance sheet (low debt), quality of management (strong stewardship), and quality of future valuation (sustainable but growing cash flow). The first step is developing stock ideas; the analyst’s makes use of third-party research, personal insights, company meetings, site visits, conferences, and input from other Nikko AM investment teams. Ultimately, the investment universe is restricted to companies with market caps above USD 1 billion and daily traded liquidity of more than USD 10 million. The next step is thorough fundamental bottom-up research on the firm’s business model, management and balance sheet. Detailed financial models, based on long-term cash flow forecasting, are built to establish a future quality valuation. The individual portfolio managers summarise the company research in a standard template and present stock ideas formally at a weekly meeting, where open critique is undertaken by the analysts. The investment philosophy is high-conviction, with the analysts adopting a largely index-agnostic strategy, which slightly favours growth and results in an active share of 90%-95%. Ultimately, stock selection plays a key role in the process.

Portfolio

The portfolio construction methodology is disciplined and repeatable, using a proprietary ranking tool to grade stocks in terms of expected alpha and risk. The resulting portfolio contains the analyst’s highest conviction 40-50 stock ideas. The investment process typically leads the team to construct a portfolio with a higher weighting in defensive sectors, including healthcare and consumer staples, and typically a lower weighting in cyclicals, namely, consumer discretionary and financials. However, these allocations depend on stock opportunities and economic conditions. At 31 Oct 2021, the portfolio had an active underweighting in defensive sectors, with healthcare heavily favoured and an active overweighting in cyclical sectors, with industrials and consumer discretionary stocks favoured. Regional allocation typically tends to be similar to the index. However, at 31 Oct 2021, the portfolio was only overweight in two regions: the United States and Hong Kong/Singapore. A comprehensive risk-management process is implemented to ensure no unintended sector, geographic, or commodity risk is included in the portfolio. The portfolio is also monitored from an environmental, social, and governance risk perspective. Risk-management guidelines include that no more than 10% of net assets may be invested in any one stock.

People

The investment team includes five highly experienced portfolio managers (William Low, James Kinghorn, Iain Fulton, Greig Bryson, and Johnny Russell) who operate as global generalists but with sector-specific responsibilities. In addition, two portfolio analysts, who mainly undertake thematic or project research joined the team in 2019. Low leads the team; he joined Nikko AM in mid-2014 as a portfolio manager with overall responsibility for the global-equity team (the team moved across from Scottish Widows Investment Partnership where they previous managed global equity strategies together). He has more than 30 years’ experience in the investment/finance industry, previously working for BlackRock and Dunedin Fund Managers as a portfolio manager and investment manager. Kinghorn and the other team members joined Nikko AM in mid-2014; Kinghorn had been at SWIP since 2011. Fulton joined after previously working at SWIP as head of research since 2005. Bryson joined after working at SWIP since 2007. Russell joined Nikko AM after working at SWIP since 2002. The team has access to the extensive global resources of Nikko AM, which boasts more than 100 portfolio managers and 50 analysts.

Performance 

In mid-2015, the existing Nikko AM global-equity fund was restructured from a multimanager approach to its current structure of direct investment in stocks in the MSCI ACWI, under the guidance of the incumbent five portfolio managers. This team arrived at Nikko AM in 2014, having previously worked at Scottish Widows Investment Partnership. Since the strategy and personnel changes, this fund has outperformed its Morningstar Category index (MSCI World Ex Australia NR Index) and most peers in the five years to 30 Nov 2021, on a trailing returns basis. Individual calendar-year results have been strong from 2015 through 2020, with standout 2018 and 2020 years, and 2016 the lone blot against the team. In 2017, outperformance was relatively slender, 

and positive contributors included Sony and Tencent. The strategy had a stronger 2018 with positive attribution from LivaNova. Returns were again solid against the index and peers during 2019, with Chinese sporting goods company Li Ning Company and US software giant Microsoft among the top contributors. Both the index and peers were thumped in 2020 by the team, which managed a softer drawdown during the first-quarter correction and adding alpha each of the remaining quarters. In the 11 months to 30 Nov 2021, the strategy have struggled, as style headwinds had an impact on performance, despite solid attribution from SVB Financial Group and Bio-Techne Corporation.

About Fund:

Nikko AM Global Share is a strategy with sturdy foundations, thanks to its highly experienced team of portfolio managers and well-structured investment process. The Edinburgh-based investment team functions in a very cooperative, transparent, and mutually respectful manner, adopting a flat operating structure, with individual portfolio managers having specific sector responsibility on a global basis. The resulting portfolio of typically around 40-50 stocks is slightly growth-orientated and high conviction, with around 35% of FUM in the top 10 stocks. The strategy benchmarks to the MSCI All Country World Index, giving it rein to venture into emerging markets, but this allocation is rarely more than 10% of assets.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

AMP Capital Corporate Bond Fund Outdoing the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and The Average Credit Fund

Process:

AMP Capital Corporate Bond provides exposure to a wide range of credit securities within Australian, global, investment-grade, corporate bond, and high yield. The benchmark changed from the Bloomberg AusBond Credit 0+Yr Index to the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index in February 2016, reflecting the fund’s capital preservation and income emphasis since 2012. Monthly distributions are announced and reviewed biannually, which helps income-focused investors manage their expectations. Credit analysis is done on two accounts; first, a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the broader industry sector, and second, issuerand security-specific analysis. 

The analysis is conducted in line with a “score card” methodology that incorporates fundamentals, technicals, and valuations. The primary weighting is to the valuation and fundamental factors as the team believes this is the primary determinant of a positive outcome for investors over the longer term. The duration view is led by the macro team and is established through a similar score card system, which again considers fundamental, sentiment, and technical factors, with the analyst view of valuation playing a key part. The credit strategy panel, comprising senior investment staff, set the overall credit strategy, risk budget, and sector allocations. However, the ultimate duration and credit exposures are determined by comanagers Sonia Baillie and Nathan Boon.

Portfolio:

The vehicle chiefly comprises Australian credit, though it does hold around 5% each in US and UK names. The strategy can hold up to 10% in high yield and 15% in unrated bonds but is usually well below these limits. The portfolio is largely BBB and A rated corporate bonds, with the BBB names providing a slightly larger proportion of the fund’s asset value at nearly 44% to October 2021. Following the coronavirus-driven dislocation, the team took opportunistic exposures in long duration REITs and industrials, some of which have seen partial profit taking with significant spread tightening throughout 2021. 2019 saw the fund rotate back into corporate bonds following the late-2018 sell-off. 

The team believes credit fundamentals are improving and technicals supportive, but valuations indicate little expectation of further spread compression. It wants to maintain income by holding credit, albeit at a reducing amount to late-2021, also using credit derivatives to insulate from wider spreads. The fund’s duration limits were adjusted from plus or minus 1.5 years versus the old credit benchmark, to absolute terms of zero to 4.5 years in October 2014. The fund has been positioned within a duration range of 0.2-0.8 years since the start of 2017 (0.6 years in October 2021), meaning the sensitivity to rising interest rates is low. FUM has steadily declined over the past few years and currently sits at AUD 855 million as of October 2021.

People:

Sonia Baillie (head of credit) has led this portfolio since October 2017, joined by Nathan Boon (head of credit portfolio management) in March 2018. This group, however, is currently transitioning into the Macquarie fixed-income team as part of AMP Capital’s sale to that organisation; completion is expected by mid-2022, creating some uncertainty. The duo gets significant input from head of macro Ilan Dekell, and a team of analysts spread between Sydney and Chicago. Head of credit research Steven Hur was previously a key member until he left the group in December 2021. The fixed-income team is headed by Grant Hassell, who has more than 30 years of experience, though he is the sole member of this quartet not joining the Macquarie investment team in the same capacity. 

Hassell contributes to overall discussions through team meetings and investment committees, acting as the sounding board for the various heads to bring ideas together into a portfolio. While there has been staff turnover among the credit analyst and credit portfolio managers–former managers Jeff Brunton and David Carruthers left in 2014 and 2016, respectively–most key staffers have long tenure. For example, while Baillie was appointed portfolio manager only in 2017, she has been with the team since 2010, has held other senior roles, and worked in the firm’s Asian fixed-income business. Furthermore, AMP Capital has taken steps to improve staff incentives and address staff turnover.

Performance:

Over the long run, this fund has outdone the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and the average credit fund. That’s not necessarily compelling, given the fund has been running substantially more credit and/or duration risk than those yardsticks. Since AMP Capital slashed the fund’s duration, rival credit funds are a more reasonable benchmark looking ahead; the fund’s historically high duration means we also compare the fund’s history against the Bloomberg AusBond Credit Index, where this strategy has underperformed. The fund’s track record has benefited from higher-than-average credit risk, as well as significant interest-rate risk, that has paid off as rates declined to historically low levels. returns, yet three- and five-year returns fail to beat the average category peer. Given declining global interest rates, the fund reduced its distribution in mid-2017 to 0.275% per month, and then 0.25% per month at the beginning of 2018. This continued through 2021 when distributions dropped to 0.175% by year-end, the shop expects it to remain at these compressed levels, barring unforeseen circumstances. The rate peaked at 0.55% per month in 2012, highlighting that while these distribution indications can be helpful in the short run, they should not be relied on for long-term income expectations.

About Funds:

Though a new home will bring positives to AMP Capital Corporate Bond, it also introduces uncertainties for this diversified credit strategy. AMP Capital’s Global Equities and Fixed Interest business is in the midst of a sale to Macquarie Asset Management, which is expected to complete by mid-2022. Head of global fixed income Grant Hassell is leading the integration. The strategy has benchmarked to the Bloomberg Ausbond Bank Bill Index since early-2016, reflecting the income goals with capital stability. This move followed a history of changes, which under Macquarie’s guidance going forward could see further revisions in approach.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

Nikko AM Global Share Fund: Solid Strategy, Experienced Team and Remarkable Process

Approach

The investment process is based around searching for stocks that have “future quality.” To achieve the investment objective, the analyst’s undertakes bottom-up fundamental research seeking quality of franchise (competitive advantages), quality of balance sheet (low debt), quality of management (strong stewardship), and quality of future valuation (sustainable but growing cash flow). The first step is developing stock ideas; the analyst’s makes use of third-party research, personal insights, company meetings, site visits, conferences, and input from other Nikko AM investment teams. Ultimately, the investment universe is restricted to companies with market caps above USD 1 billion and daily traded liquidity of more than USD 10 million. The next step is thorough fundamental bottom-up research on the firm’s business model, management and balance sheet. Detailed financial models, based on long-term cash flow forecasting, are built to establish a future quality valuation. The individual portfolio managers summarise the company research in a standard template and present stock ideas formally at a weekly meeting, where open critique is undertaken by the analysts. The investment philosophy is high-conviction, with the analysts adopting a largely index-agnostic strategy, which slightly favours growth and results in an active share of 90%-95%. Ultimately, stock selection plays a key role in the process.

Portfolio

The portfolio construction methodology is disciplined and repeatable, using a proprietary ranking tool to grade stocks in terms of expected alpha and risk. The resulting portfolio contains the analyst’s highest conviction 40-50 stock ideas. The investment process typically leads the team to construct a portfolio with a higher weighting in defensive sectors, including healthcare and consumer staples, and typically a lower weighting in cyclicals, namely, consumer discretionary and financials. However, these allocations depend on stock opportunities and economic conditions. At 31 Oct 2021, the portfolio had an active underweighting in defensive sectors, with healthcare heavily favoured and an active overweighting in cyclical sectors, with industrials and consumer discretionary stocks favoured. Regional allocation typically tends to be similar to the index. However, at 31 Oct 2021, the portfolio was only overweight in two regions: the United States and Hong Kong/Singapore. A comprehensive risk-management process is implemented to ensure no unintended sector, geographic, or commodity risk is included in the portfolio. The portfolio is also monitored from an environmental, social, and governance risk perspective. Risk-management guidelines include that no more than 10% of net assets may be invested in any one stock.

People

The investment team includes five highly experienced portfolio managers (William Low, James Kinghorn, Iain Fulton, Greig Bryson, and Johnny Russell) who operate as global generalists but with sector-specific responsibilities. In addition, two portfolio analysts, who mainly undertake thematic or project research joined the team in 2019. Low leads the team; he joined Nikko AM in mid-2014 as a portfolio manager with overall responsibility for the global-equity team (the team moved across from Scottish Widows Investment Partnership where they previous managed global equity strategies together). He has more than 30 years’ experience in the investment/finance industry, previously working for BlackRock and Dunedin Fund Managers as a portfolio manager and investment manager. Kinghorn and the other team members joined Nikko AM in mid-2014; Kinghorn had been at SWIP since 2011. Fulton joined after previously working at SWIP as head of research since 2005. Bryson joined after working at SWIP since 2007. Russell joined Nikko AM after working at SWIP since 2002. The team has access to the extensive global resources of Nikko AM, which boasts more than 100 portfolio managers and 50 analysts.

Performance 

In mid-2015, the existing Nikko AM global-equity fund was restructured from a multimanager approach to its current structure of direct investment in stocks in the MSCI ACWI, under the guidance of the incumbent five portfolio managers. This team arrived at Nikko AM in 2014, having previously worked at Scottish Widows Investment Partnership. Since the strategy and personnel changes, this fund has outperformed its Morningstar Category index (MSCI World Ex Australia NR Index) and most peers in the five years to 30 Nov 2021, on a trailing returns basis. Individual calendar-year results have been strong from 2015 through 2020, with standout 2018 and 2020 years, and 2016 the lone blot against the team. In 2017, outperformance was relatively slender, 

and positive contributors included Sony and Tencent. The strategy had a stronger 2018 with positive attribution from LivaNova. Returns were again solid against the index and peers during 2019, with Chinese sporting goods company Li Ning Company and US software giant Microsoft among the top contributors. Both the index and peers were thumped in 2020 by the team, which managed a softer drawdown during the first-quarter correction and adding alpha each of the remaining quarters. In the 11 months to 30 Nov 2021, the strategy have struggled, as style headwinds had an impact on performance, despite solid attribution from SVB Financial Group and Bio-Techne Corporation.

About Fund:

Nikko AM Global Share is a strategy with sturdy foundations, thanks to its highly experienced team of portfolio managers and well-structured investment process. The Edinburgh-based investment team functions in a very cooperative, transparent, and mutually respectful manner, adopting a flat operating structure, with individual portfolio managers having specific sector responsibility on a global basis. The resulting portfolio of typically around 40-50 stocks is slightly growth-orientated and high conviction, with around 35% of FUM in the top 10 stocks. The strategy benchmarks to the MSCI All Country World Index, giving it rein to venture into emerging markets, but this allocation is rarely more than 10% of assets.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

AMP Capital Corporate Bond Fund Outdoing the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and The Average Credit Fund

Process:

AMP Capital Corporate Bond provides exposure to a wide range of credit securities within Australian, global, investment-grade, corporate bond, and high yield. The benchmark changed from the Bloomberg AusBond Credit 0+Yr Index to the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index in February 2016, reflecting the fund’s capital preservation and income emphasis since 2012. Monthly distributions are announced and reviewed biannually, which helps income-focused investors manage their expectations. Credit analysis is done on two accounts; first, a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the broader industry sector, and second, issuerand security-specific analysis. 

The analysis is conducted in line with a “score card” methodology that incorporates fundamentals, technicals, and valuations. The primary weighting is to the valuation and fundamental factors as the team believes this is the primary determinant of a positive outcome for investors over the longer term. The duration view is led by the macro team and is established through a similar score card system, which again considers fundamental, sentiment, and technical factors, with the analyst view of valuation playing a key part. The credit strategy panel, comprising senior investment staff, set the overall credit strategy, risk budget, and sector allocations. However, the ultimate duration and credit exposures are determined by comanagers Sonia Baillie and Nathan Boon.

Portfolio:

The vehicle chiefly comprises Australian credit, though it does hold around 5% each in US and UK names. The strategy can hold up to 10% in high yield and 15% in unrated bonds but is usually well below these limits. The portfolio is largely BBB and A rated corporate bonds, with the BBB names providing a slightly larger proportion of the fund’s asset value at nearly 44% to October 2021. Following the coronavirus-driven dislocation, the team took opportunistic exposures in long duration REITs and industrials, some of which have seen partial profit taking with significant spread tightening throughout 2021. 2019 saw the fund rotate back into corporate bonds following the late-2018 sell-off. 

The team believes credit fundamentals are improving and technicals supportive, but valuations indicate little expectation of further spread compression. It wants to maintain income by holding credit, albeit at a reducing amount to late-2021, also using credit derivatives to insulate from wider spreads. The fund’s duration limits were adjusted from plus or minus 1.5 years versus the old credit benchmark, to absolute terms of zero to 4.5 years in October 2014. The fund has been positioned within a duration range of 0.2-0.8 years since the start of 2017 (0.6 years in October 2021), meaning the sensitivity to rising interest rates is low. FUM has steadily declined over the past few years and currently sits at AUD 855 million as of October 2021.

People:

Sonia Baillie (head of credit) has led this portfolio since October 2017, joined by Nathan Boon (head of credit portfolio management) in March 2018. This group, however, is currently transitioning into the Macquarie fixed-income team as part of AMP Capital’s sale to that organisation; completion is expected by mid-2022, creating some uncertainty. The duo gets significant input from head of macro Ilan Dekell, and a team of analysts spread between Sydney and Chicago. Head of credit research Steven Hur was previously a key member until he left the group in December 2021. The fixed-income team is headed by Grant Hassell, who has more than 30 years of experience, though he is the sole member of this quartet not joining the Macquarie investment team in the same capacity. 

Hassell contributes to overall discussions through team meetings and investment committees, acting as the sounding board for the various heads to bring ideas together into a portfolio. While there has been staff turnover among the credit analyst and credit portfolio managers–former managers Jeff Brunton and David Carruthers left in 2014 and 2016, respectively–most key staffers have long tenure. For example, while Baillie was appointed portfolio manager only in 2017, she has been with the team since 2010, has held other senior roles, and worked in the firm’s Asian fixed-income business. Furthermore, AMP Capital has taken steps to improve staff incentives and address staff turnover.

Performance:

Over the long run, this fund has outdone the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and the average credit fund. That’s not necessarily compelling, given the fund has been running substantially more credit and/or duration risk than those yardsticks. Since AMP Capital slashed the fund’s duration, rival credit funds are a more reasonable benchmark looking ahead; the fund’s historically high duration means we also compare the fund’s history against the Bloomberg AusBond Credit Index, where this strategy has underperformed. The fund’s track record has benefited from higher-than-average credit risk, as well as significant interest-rate risk, that has paid off as rates declined to historically low levels. returns, yet three- and five-year returns fail to beat the average category peer. Given declining global interest rates, the fund reduced its distribution in mid-2017 to 0.275% per month, and then 0.25% per month at the beginning of 2018. This continued through 2021 when distributions dropped to 0.175% by year-end, the shop expects it to remain at these compressed levels, barring unforeseen circumstances. The rate peaked at 0.55% per month in 2012, highlighting that while these distribution indications can be helpful in the short run, they should not be relied on for long-term income expectations.

About Funds:

Though a new home will bring positives to AMP Capital Corporate Bond, it also introduces uncertainties for this diversified credit strategy. AMP Capital’s Global Equities and Fixed Interest business is in the midst of a sale to Macquarie Asset Management, which is expected to complete by mid-2022. Head of global fixed income Grant Hassell is leading the integration. The strategy has benchmarked to the Bloomberg Ausbond Bank Bill Index since early-2016, reflecting the income goals with capital stability. This move followed a history of changes, which under Macquarie’s guidance going forward could see further revisions in approach.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

BlackRock Advantage International Fund K: Fund which aims to outperform the MSCI EAFE Index

BlackRock Advantage International Fund K seeks long-term capital appreciation, with a focus on risk management.Powered by innovation and technology driven investment process having exposures to international portfolio at a low cost.

Approach

The strategy aims to outperform the MSCI EAFE Index by combining bottom-up and top-down factors into a stock-selection model that uses roughly 40-60 signals that fall into three broad buckets: fundamentals, sentiment, and macro themes. Fundamental signals include factors such as management quality, valuation, and profitability; sentiment signals include analyst-, investor-, and broker-sentiment indicators; and macro signals include factors specific to industries, countries, and investment styles. The model weights the signals roughly evenly between the three buckets.

The team keeps a tight lid on the 375- to 715-stock portfolio’s tracking error (the volatility of its relative performance) by keeping its sector and industry weights within 4 percentage points of the index’s, generally. It mitigates stock-specific risk by typically keeping individual positions within 1-1.5 percentage points of the benchmark’s.

The systematic approach has a short time horizon of six to 12 months, which can lead to portfolio churn and higher trading costs. The strategy’s annual portfolio turnover has ranged from 106% to 247% during the past four years, much higher than the average foreign large-blend category peer’s 43%-51%.

Portfolio

In contrast to other foreign large-blend funds, the managers here allocate the strategy’s assets across positions that stick, deviated most at around 0.9 percentage points larger than the index’s share, as of November 2021. While the portfolio mostly invests in benchmark constituents, 5%-15% of assets are in stocks unique to the portfolio. Indeed, close to the MSCI EAFE Index’s weights. Its 1.1% stake in the world’s third-largest tobacco company, Japan Tobacco 10.1% of assets were invested across roughly 150 offbenchmark stocks such as Rexel SA RXL, Rightmove PLC RMV, and Électricité de France EDF.

The strategy typically has a bit more exposure to mid-cap stocks than does the index. As of November, the portfolio’s allocation to mid-caps stood at 15% versus the index’s 10%. As a result, the portfolio’s $41 billion average market cap was slightly below the index’s $47 billion.

Performance

The fund has earned mixed results since BlackRock’s Systematic Active Equity team took over in mid-2017. From July 1, 2017, through Dec. 31, 2021, the Institutional shares posted a 7.3% annualized return, which beat the foreign large-blend category’s 7.1% but trailed the MSCI EAFE Index’s 7.5%. Its risk-adjusted results don’t look much better. 

The fund has fared worse than the index during severe market drawdowns but has outperformed the benchmark during prolonged rallies. The strategy’s calendar 2021 results were solid: The fund’s 13.0% gain beat the average peer’s 9.8% return as well as the index’s 11.3%. The portfolio benefited from good stock selections in the financial services and industrials sectors, namely Nordea Bank and Recruit Holdings, respectively.

Top 10 Holdings

C:\Users\Akhila\Downloads\top 10 holdings today.png

About the fund

BlackRock Advantage International’s experienced and well-resourced research team plies a suitable quantitative approach and earns the strategy’s share classes Morningstar Analyst Ratings of Bronze or Neutral, depending on fees.

The team’s quant-driven approach has a lot of moving parts. It analyzes 40-60 signals that fall into three broad buckets–fundamentals, sentiment, and macro themes–that collectively consider both bottom-up and top-down factors. The strategy aims to outperform the MSCI EAFE Index by combining bottom-up and top-down factors into a stock-selection model that uses roughly 40-60 signals that fall into three broad buckets: fundamentals, sentiment, and macro themes. Fundamental signals include factors such as management quality, valuation, and profitability; sentiment signals include analyst-, investor-, and broker-sentiment indicators; and macro signals include factors specific to industries, countries, and investment styles. The model weights the signals roughly evenly between the three buckets. The team keeps a tight lid on the 375- to 715-stock portfolio’s tracking error (the volatility of its relative performance) by keeping its sector and industry weights within 4 percentage points of the index’s, generally. It mitigates stock-specific risk by typically keeping individual positions within 1-1.5 percentage points of the benchmark’s.

 (Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Robeco QI Global Conservative Equities I: A strong option for investors looking for downside protection

Process:

The strategy’s robust foundation, high repeatability, discipline, and consistent execution remain attractive features. The team’s relentless efforts to implement new elements to the process, these also make the approach more complex and have led to a slight change of portfolio characteristics, which is appreciated. This rules-based, quantitative process is built on extensive academic research demonstrating that investing in low-risk stocks leads to better risk-adjusted returns. After an initial liquidity filter, Robeco’s quant model ranks the 4,500-stock universe on a multidimensional risk factor (volatility, beta, and distress metrics), combined with value, quality, sentiment and momentum factors. In recent years, the team has introduced several enhancements to refine the model, including short-term momentum-driven signals that can adjust a stock’s ranking up or down by maximum 10 percentage points. This should prioritize buy decisions for stocks that rank high in the model and score well on short term signals, and vice versa. Since 2020 the team also allows liquid mega-caps to have a higher weight in the portfolio. Top-quintile stocks are typically included in an optimisation algorithm that considers liquidity, market cap, and 10-percentage-point country and sector limits relative to the MSCI World Index. A 200-300 stock portfolio is constructed with better ESG and carbon footprints than the index, while rebalancing takes place monthly, generating modest annual turnover of about 25%. Stocks are sold when ranking in the bottom 40% of the model. 

Portfolio:

The defensive nature of the strategy currently translates into a higher allocation to low-beta and high yielding stocks in the consumer staples and communication services sectors, while industrials, energy and technology stocks are a large underweight. The valuation factors embedded in the model have steered the fund clear from MSCI ACWI index heavyweights Amazon.com AMZN, Tesla TSLA, and NVIDIA NVDA, while Microsoft MSFT and Apple AAPL were underweighted. Valuations make the fund lean towards European stocks while the U.S. stock market was an 8.8% underweight versus the index per November 2021. The model does like U.S. consumer defensives though, with larger positions for Proctor & Gamble PG, Walmart WMT, and Target TGT. The quant approach gives management wide latitude to invest across the market-cap spectrum, and the diversified 200- to 300-stock portfolio has long exhibited a small/mid-cap bias compared with the index.

People:

The team running this strategy is large, experienced, and stable. As such, it earns an Above Average People rating. This fund follows an entirely quant-based approach, an area where Robeco has extensive experience and expertise, and where it has invested heavily in human resources over the years. Robeco’s quant team runs various strategies: core quant equity, factor investing, and conservative equity, but there is significant interaction between them. The conservative equity team that runs this fund is led by Pim van Vliet, whose academic work has laid the foundation of the fund’s philosophy.

Performance:

This defensive strategy has generally offered good volatility reduction during turbulent markets. Robeco QI Global Conservative Equities’ C € share class absorbed 67% of the losses of the MSCI ACWI Index since inception. However, its results versus the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index have been less consistent. Disappointingly, it did not live up to its expectations in the corona-dominated markets of 2020, though the strategy’s failure can be explained by market dynamics in relation to the fund’s strategy. The portfolio lagged during the subsequent recovery that again benefited tech and ecommerce stocks, and while the value rally in the final quarter did help, cyclical value stocks that are not favoured here rallied the most.

(Source: Morningstar)

Price:

Analysts find it difficult to analyse expenses since it comes directly from the returns. Analysts expect that it would be able to deliver positive alpha relative to its category benchmark index.


(Source: Morningstar)                                                                       (Source: Morningstar)

About Funds:

Robeco’s quant-based conservative equities range is managed by a stable and experienced six-member team led by Pim van Vliet. They are supported by a group of 10 quantitative researchers led by David Blitz and a similarly sized group of data scientists. This credentialed team is vital to the fund’s success as it constantly refines the models used in the funds. It is also reassuring that Robeco’s broader quantitative team has successfully groomed quantitative researchers in its talent pool, allowing them to add people with complementary skills to the teams. The strategy’s academic foundation, repeatability, discipline, and consistent execution give us confidence. The rules-based, quantitative process is built on empirical research demonstrating that investing in low-risk stocks leads to better risk-adjusted returns. It goes beyond traditional low-volatility investing, combining a multidimensional risk factor with value, quality, sentiment, and momentum factors. Top-quintile-ranked stocks are included in the portfolio after running an optimisation algorithm.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund: A solid strategy led by an impressive, long-tenured team

Process:

The Walter Scott investment team executes a patient investment process, undertaking rigorous fundamental research to identify quality names that can deliver superior long-term returns. It earns an Above Average Process rating. The process starts with an initial screen of businesses that can deliver at least 20% cash flow return on investment over a full market cycle. The managers have an active watchlist of approximately 250 companies they closely monitor, and the team undertakes fundamental bottom-up analysis, assessing factors such as competitive position, industry dynamics, profitability, balance-sheet strength, financial model, and quality of management. 

Portfolio:

The team constructs a relatively concentrated portfolio that usually has 40-60 names. Adequate diversification is maintained by limiting position sizes to a maximum of 5 percentage points, but typically they don’t exceed 4% of the portfolio. The group’s long-term quality focus results in the strategy exhibiting a bias toward mega-cap stocks, though it does hold some mid-cap names. Historically, the strategy has exhibited significant country-level bets. It is typically underweighted in the United States relative to the MSCI World Index. At the sector level, the strategy favours tech, healthcare, and consumer cyclical stocks, while having a large underweighting in financial services.

People:

An experienced, stable team that works together well leads to a High People rating. Investment decision-making at subadvisor Walter Scott is team-based. All investments, new and existing, are discussed and debated until there is unanimous agreement by the research team. Stability and experience characterize Walter Scott’s investment team, with members boasting impressive experience and tenures with the firm. More than half of the investment team members have spent their entire investment careers at the company. In 2021, one of the joint portfolio managers, Yuanli Chen, left, a rare departure. Long-term cohead of research Alan Edington moved to a new position, Responsible Investment.

Performance:

The strategy has sported strong results from its late-December 2006 launch through 2021. The I shares’ 9.4% annualized gain exceeded its MSCI World Index prospectus benchmark’s 7.4% and edged the typical world large-stock growth peer. However, it’s lost a bit of an edge against a more growth-oriented benchmark, with the MSCI World Growth Index up 10% annualized during the period.

(Source: Morningstar)

Price:

Analysts find it difficult to analyse expenses since it comes directly from the returns. Analysts expect that it would be able to deliver positive alpha relative to its category benchmark index.


(Source: Morningstar)                                                                     (Source: Morningstar)

About Funds:

With a focus on investing for the long term, the portfolio consistently favors technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary names while being significantly underweight in financial services and energy. The strategy won’t always lead the way in buoyant markets. It landed behind the MSCI World Index benchmark in 2021. The investment seeks long-term total return. To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in stocks. The fund’s investments will be focused on companies located in the developed markets. Examples of “developed markets” are the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, Hong Kong and Western Europe. It may invest in the securities of companies of any market capitalization. The fund’s sub-investment adviser, Walter Scott & Partners Limited (Walter Scott), seeks investment opportunities in companies with fundamental strengths that indicate the potential for sustainable growth.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

MFS Institutional International Equity Fund

Approach

The managers rely on broad and thorough bottom-up research and a disciplined focus on moderately growing established companies with shares trading at decent prices. That is not unique, but the process is bred in MFS’ bones and has delivered strong results elsewhere, including Gold-rated MFS Global Equity MWEIX. The managers look for firms growing faster than global GDP. That’s a lower hurdle than more-aggressive growth funds since global GDP historic growth is in the single digits.

Portfolio

This is a diversified yet distinctive portfolio. It spreads its bets over its nearly 80 stocks. Most holdings were less than 2% of assets, and the fund had less than 30% of its money in its top 10 stocks. The strategy’s preference for competitively advantaged, moderately growing, developed-markets companies helps it stand out, though. More than two thirds of its holdings have wide or narrow economic moat ratings, much more than its foreign large-cap peers and relevant indexes, like the MSCI ACWI ex USA. It also had a large slug of assets in developed Europe, including the 2021 purchase of tire maker Cie Generale des establisment Michelin. 

Portfolio .png

People

The firm’s sprawling, yet experienced analyst team supports the managers. MFS has dozens of U.S. and nonU.S. equity analysts who divide responsibilities across eight global sectors. In addition, the firm’s large credit analyst team provides insights across the capital structure, and a quantitative research squad offers riskmanagement support. The equity analysts average more than 15 years of industry experience and nearly eight years’ firm tenure, and team turnover has been low. The managers also collaborate with the firm’s other non-U.S. portfolio managers, including Roger Morley and Ryan McAllister of Gold-rated MFS Global Equity.

Performance 

The fund has done well in a variety of environments. Its performance in the early 2020 pandemic-induced market collapse was mixed, though. Its 31% loss hurt but was less than the nearly 34% plunge of broader non-U.S. stock indexes. The typical foreign large-growth fund and growth benchmarks, however, shed about 30%. Pandemic-ravaged businesses like food service company Compass hurt, so did not owning more tech stocks.

Performance .png

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Pfizer strong pipeline development increasingly sets ups near term growth

Business Strategy and Outlook

Pfizer’s size establishes one of the largest economies of scale in the pharmaceutical industry. In a business where drug development needs a lot of shots on goal to be successful, Pfizer has the financial resources and the established research power to support the development of more new drugs. Also, after many years of struggling to bring out important new drugs, Pfizer is now launching several potential blockbusters in cancer, heart disease, and immunology. Pfizer’s vast financial resources support a leading salesforce. 

Pfizer’s commitment to postapproval studies provides its salespeople with an armamentarium of data for their marketing campaigns. Further, Pfizer’s leading salesforces in emerging countries position the company to benefit from the dramatically increasing wealth in nations such as Brazil, Russia, India, China, and Turkey. Pfizer’s recent decision to divest its off-patent division Upjohn to create a new company (Viatris) in combination with Mylan should drive accelerating growth at the remaining innovative business at Pfizer. With limited patent losses and fewer older drugs, Pfizer is poised for steady growth.

Financial Strength

Pfizer holds a very strong financial position with a large degree of flexibility. As of the end of 2020, debt/capital stood at 39% and debt/EBITDA was 2.9, which suggests that Pfizer remains on solid financial footing. With the majority of its cash flow derived from a diverse portfolio of products, it’s not expects a high degree of volatility with future earnings. After a deep dive on several of Pfizer’s pipeline drugs combined with continued strong data for COVID-19 treatment Paxlovid, it has increased our projections for several key drugs leading to a fair value estimate increase to $48 from $45.50. The strong pipeline increasingly supports our wide moat rating for the firm. For the core business of Pfizer, it is expected to close to 6% annual sales growth between 2020 and 2025 as new drugs offset generic competition. 

Bulls Say’s 

  • Bega is shifting investment to the spreads and grocery business, which we view as less commoditised and higher margin than dairy, with strong niche positions in Vegemite and peanut butter 
  • External factors outside of Bega’s control, such as the weather, can adversely impact supply and demand dynamics. This can impact commodity prices, inputs costs and the firm’s supply chain and lead to volatile earnings 
  • Changing consumer trends toward dairy-free and vegan diets could lead to declines in per-capita dairy and cheese consumption, weighing on the majority of Bega’s earnings

Company Profile 

Pfizer is one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical firms, with annual sales close to $50 billion (excluding COVID-19 vaccine sales). While it historically sold many types of healthcare products and chemicals, now, prescription drugs and vaccines account for the majority of sales. Top sellers include pneumococcal vaccine Prevnar 13, cancer drug Ibrance, cardiovascular treatment Eliquis, and immunology drug Xeljanz. Pfizer sells these products globally, with international sales representing close to 50% of its total sales. Within international sales, emerging markets are a major contributor.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.