Author: lvc-admin

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Challenger Ltd fully franked interim dividend of 11.5cps up by 21%

Investment Thesis

  • CGF is trading on fair valuation, with a 2-yr forward PE-multiple of 14.3x and price-to-book value of 1.0x. 
  • Exposure to an attractive retirement income market, with strong long-term growth tailwinds.
  • Near-term challenges are likely to be priced in at current valuations, in our view, with investor expectations reset lower. 
  • Solid capital position.
  • Further cost initiatives leading to reduction in the already low cost-to-income ratio.
  • Two complementary businesses both with leading market positions.

Key Risks 

  • Weaker than expected annuity sales growth within its Life (annuity) segment.
  • Structural and reputational detriments from the Royal Commission lasting longer than anticipated. 
  • Any increase in competition from major Australian banks in annuities.
  • Weaker than expected net inflows for the Funds Management segment (possibly from lower interest levels from financial planners/advisers/investors).
  • Weaker than expected performance of boutique funds within its Funds Management segment.
  • Lower investment yields.
  • Uncertainty over capital requirements of deferred lifetime annuities.

Fund Management

  • EBIT increased +28% to $45m driven by +26.4% increase in FUM-based fee income with average FUM up +26% and a steady FUM-based margin of 16.7bps, partially offset by -50% decline in performance fees and +15% increase in expenses. Funds Management ROE increased +600bps to 33.8%.
  • FUM increased by +20% to $109bn, with net flows reaching $900m, reflecting a strong contribution from retail clients, with momentum continuing into the start of 2H22 with the business securing a GBP1bn UK fixed income mandate.
  • Investment performance remained strong with 92%, 96% and 94% of FUM outperforming the benchmark over 3 years, 5 years and since inception, respectively.

Company Profile 

Challenger Ltd (CGF) is an Australian-based investment management firm managing $78.4 billion in assets as of December 2018. CGF operates two core segments: (1) a fiduciary Funds Management division; and (2) APRA-regulated Life division. Challenger Life Company Ltd (Challenger Life) is Australia’s largest provider of annuities.

(Source: BanyanTree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

Megaport Ltd – Company achieved 2,455 customers across 768 Enabled Data Centres

Investment Thesis:

  • MP1 is a global Software Defined Network provider, focusing on cloud connectivity. As such, the Company is leveraged to the rapid growth of global cloud and data centres and is in a strong position to benefit from the rollout to new cloud and data centre regions. Key macro tailwinds behind MP1’s sector: (1) adoption of cloud by new enterprises; (2) increased level of investment and expenditure by existing customers; and (3) more and more enterprises looking to use multiple cloud products/providers, which works well with MP1’s business model.  
  • MP1 has a scale advantage over competitors. MP1 has over 600 locations around the globe. MP1 has significant scale advantage over competitors and whilst replicating this scale is not necessarily the difficult task, it will take several years to do so during which time MP1 will continue to add locations and customers using the scale advantage.
  • Strong R&D program ensuring MP1 remains ahead of competitors.
  • Strong cash balance of $104.6m. 
  • Strong relationship with data centres (DC). MP1 has equipment installed in 400 data centres, so MP1 is a customer of data centres. MP1 also drives DCs interconnection revenue. Whilst several data centres like NEXTDC, Equinix provide SDN (Software Defined Network) services, it is unlikely data centres will look to change their relationship with (or restrict) MP1 given they are designed to be neutral providers to network operators. Further, given MP1’s existing customer base and connections with cloud service providers, it would be very difficult for data centres (without significant disruption to customers/cloud service providers) to change the rules for MP1.

Key Risks:

  • High level of execution risk (especially with respect to development). 
  • Revenue, cost and product synergies fail to eventuate from the InnovoEdge acquisition. 
  • Heavy reliance on third party partners (especially data centre providers and cloud service providers). 
  • Data centres like NEXTDC, Equinix provide SDN services and decide to restrict MP1 in providing their services. 
  • Disappointing growth (in terms of expanding data centre footprint, customers, ports, Megaport Cloud Router).

Key highlights:

(1) Revenue increased +42% over pcp to $51.2m, driven by increased usage of services across all regions, with North America delivering strongest growth across all regions, increasing +55% over pcp, followed by Europe (+35% over pcp) and Asia Pacific (+28% over pcp). Monthly recurring revenue (MRR) increased +46% over pcp to $9.2m, driven by strong customer growth compounded with a 5% increase over pcp in services per customer. 

(2) Profit after direct costs improved +69.4% over pcp to $30.9m, driven by revenue growth and a controlled network cost. 

(3) Opex increased +42% over pcp with employee costs increasing +40% over pcp amid investment in headcount to support business growth (employee costs as a percentage of revenue declined -100bps over pcp to 55%), marketing (+126% over pcp) and travel (+1481% over pcp) costs increasing amid a gradual return of travel and conference activities following global easing of Covid-19 restrictions, and IT costs increasing +106% over pcp due to expensing of Software as a Service (SaaS) costs, previously capitalised, following a change in accounting policy. 

(4) The Company achieved 2,455 customers (up +7.4% over 2H21) across 768 Enabled Data Centres (420 located in North America, 208 in EMEA and 140 in Asia Pacific). 

(5) The Company ended the half with cash and equivalents position of $104.6m, down -23.2% over 2H21.

Company Description: 

Megaport Ltd (MP1) is a software-based elastic connectivity provider – that is, it is a global Network as a Service (NaaS) provider. MP1 develops an elastic connectivity platform providing customers interconnectivity and flexibility between other networks and cloud providers connected to the platform. 

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks Expert Insights

Omicron Boost to Healius’ Earnings Appears Short-Lived but Core Pathology Proves Resilient

Business Strategy and Outlook:

As demand for PCR testing surged during the omicron wave, higher positivity rates limited the ability of pathology providers to pool tests, causing significant delays and accelerating adoption of rapid antigen tests. While Healius is improving its turnaround times, management admitted that the sector wouldn’t be able to keep up again if a similar surge were to occur. Despite bolt-on acquisitions, revenue of AUD 200 million was flat on the prior corresponding period. This was largely driven by pandemic impacts including elective surgery restrictions and fewer medical centre referrals. Healius continues to increase its exposure to higher-margin modalities, and the company remains on track with its costout initiatives such as digitisation and network optimisation.

Despite Virtus deciding not to proceed with the acquisition of Adora, Healius is still classifying the business as a discontinued operation and suggested a sale to a different party is imminent.

Financial Strength:

Healius’ interim 2022 underlying EBIT rose 177% to AUD 376 million driven by operating leverage from elevated PCR testing. Healius declared a fully franked interim dividend of AUD 0.10 per share. Net debt/EBITDA was 0.4 at half-end, but it is expected that gearing to slightly increase following its Agilex acquisition. Segment EBIT margin also contracted roughly 200 basis points sequentially to a depressed 6% on higher locum staff costs due to radiologist shortages.

The smaller imaging segment, which contributed just 3% of group underlying EBIT, was weaker than expected. Despite bolt-on acquisitions, revenue of AUD 200 million was flat on the prior corresponding period. This was largely driven by pandemic impacts including elective surgery restrictions and fewer medical centre referrals. Segment EBIT margin also contracted roughly 200 basis points sequentially to a depressed 6% on higher locum staff costs due to radiologist shortages. This was despite support labour, excluding radiologists, reducing 4% on average per site.

Company Profile:

Healius is Australia’s second-largest pathology provider and third-largest diagnostic imaging provider. Pathology and imaging revenue is almost entirely earned via the public health Medicare system. Healius typically earns approximately 70% of revenue from pathology, 25% from diagnostic imaging and a small remainder from day hospitals.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Orora Ltd strong momentum with ongoing share buyback and balance sheet flexibility

Investment Thesis

  • Trading on fair value relative to our valuation.
  • Exposure to both developed and emerging markets’ growth.
  • Near-term headwinds should be in the price.
  • Revised strategy following recent strategic review.
  • Bolt-on acquisitions (and associated synergies) provide opportunities to
  • supplement organic growth.
  • Leveraged to a falling AUD/USD.
  • Potential corporate activity.
  • Capital management (current on-market share buyback plus potential for
  • additional initiatives).

Key Risks

  • Competitive pressures leading to margin erosion.
  • Input cost pressures which the company is unable to pass on to customers.
  • Deterioration in economic conditions in US, EM and Australia.
  • Emerging markets risk.
  • Adverse movements in AUD/USD.
  • Declining OCC prices.

1H22 Results Highlights

  • Sales revenue increased +9.6% (+10.6% in CC).
  • Underlying EBIT increased +10.4% (+11.1% in CC) driven by significantly improved performance in the North America segment.
  • Operating cash flow increased +0.6% to $145.5m with cash conversion declining -400bps to 75%, with higher earnings offset by an increase in working capital.
  • Net debt increased +13% over 2H21 to ~$512m, primarily reflecting the impact of increased debt arising from the on-market share buyback and increased capex partially offset by stronger earnings. ORA’s current leverage of 1.6x is below management’s targeted level of 2-2.5x EBITDA.

Company Profile 

Orora Limited (ORA) provides packaging products and services. The Company offers fiber, glass and beverage can packaging materials in Australia and Asia and packaging distribution services in North America and Australia.

(Source: BanyanTree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Qube Working Towards Cost Effective Supply Chain

Finance and Economy Chart for Dollar Gold Euro Currencies Trading View

Business Strategy and Outlook

Qube’s strategy is to consolidate the fragmented logistics chain surrounding the export and import of containers, bulk products, automobiles, and general cargo, to create a more efficient and cost-effective supply chain. The business has enjoyed some successes to date, though significant scope for industry consolidation remains. 

It is alleged Qube to generate robust earnings growth over the long term on acquisitions, developments and organic growth. The domestic port logistics industry has traditionally been very fragmented, highly competitive, and inefficient. Currently, there are more than 250 operators providing port logistics services in one segment of the market. These are typically small operators with limited geographic scope offering limited point-to-point services. Qube’s strategy is to provide a broad range of services nationwide, touching multiple segments of the import/export supply chain. Analysts are supportive of this strategy and believe there is significant scope for further industry rationalisation. 

Consolidating the fragmented logistics chain should significantly improve Qube’s competitive position. Qube has already established a dominant market share in some specific port logistics offerings, particularly with regards to rail haulage services to and from Port Botany. Successfully developing its strategic land holdings into inland intermodal terminals should add materially to Qube’s future earnings and support cost advantages to less efficient peers. Qube aims to develop inland rail terminals as an alternative to moving container volumes from port via road. When fully developed, Moorebank will be Australia’s largest inland intermodal terminal. The bulk and general segments are highly fragmented and competitive but Qube is one of the largest players, with operations at 28 city and regional ports. The automotive stevedoring business operates in a duopoly market structure, holding long-term off-ship transportation, processing and storage contracts with major foreign vehicle manufacturers.

Financial Strength

Following the sale of Moorebank warehouses, Qube is in strong financial health. Gearing (net debt/net debt plus equity) was 10% in December 2021, well below Qube’s 30%-40% long-term target range. It has less than AUD 400 million in debt after receiving the upfront component of Moorebank sale proceeds, providing ample headroom to fund developments and bolt-on acquisitions. A special dividend or share buyback is likely in 2022. It is projected net debt/EBITDA to fall from 3.8 at June 2021 to below 2 times in 2022 and for the medium term. Qube’s businesses have delivered steadily increasing operating cash flow in recent years, though operations remain cyclical. Recent growth initiatives should generate strong future cash flow, though a large-scale acquisition or development project may require new equity funding. Qube has significant capital expenditure requirements including Moorebank development. Qube is committed to paying 50%-60% of earnings per share before amortisation as dividends.

Bulls Say’s

  • There is significant potential to increase efficiency through vertical integration of port logistics services. Qube will attempt to deliver on this strategy through consolidation and integration. 
  • The Moorebank Intermodal Terminal should become a key piece of Sydney’s transport infrastructure, driving strong returns for Qube. 
  • Senior management has a proven track record in the port logistics segment and has demonstrated an ability to generate strong returns for shareholders

Company Profile 

Qube has three main divisions: operating; property; and Patrick. Operating undertakes road/rail transportation of containers to and from port, operation of container parks, customs/quarantine services, warehousing, intermodal terminals, international freight forwarding, domestic stevedoring, and bulk transport. Patrick is the container terminals business acquired from Asciano, and the property division includes tactical land holdings in Sydney. 

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Temple & Webster Group strong focus on reinvesting earnings back into business

Shot of elegant smart businesswoman explaining a project to his colleagues with statistics on the computer on coworking place.

Investment Thesis

  • Operates in a large addressable market – B2C furniture and homewares category is approx. $16bn. 
  • Structural tailwinds – ongoing migration to online in Australia in the homewares and furniture segment. At the moment less than 10% of TPW’s core market is sold online versus the U.S. market where the penetration rate is around 25%.  
  • Strong revenue growth suggests TPW can continue to win market share and become the leader in its core markets. 
  • Active customer growth remains strong, with revenue per customer also increasing at a solid rate. 
  • Successful execution in new growth pillars – Trade & Commercial (B2B) and Home Improvement. 
  • Management is very focused on reinvesting in the business to grow top line growth and capture as much market share as possible. Whilst this comes at the expense of margins in the short term, the scale benefits mean rapid margin expansion could be easily achieved. 
  • Strong balance sheet to take advantage of any in-organic (M&A) growth opportunities, however management is likely to be very disciplined. 
  • Ongoing focus on using technology to improve the customer experience – TPW has invested in merging the online with the offline experience through augmented reality (AR). 

Key Risks

  • Rising competitive pressures.
  • Any issues with the supply chain, especially because of the impact of Covid-19 on logistics, which affects earnings / expenses. 
  • Rising cost pressures eroding margins (e.g., more brand or marketing investment required due to competitive pressures).
  • Disappointing earnings updates or failing to achieve growth rates expected by the market could see the stock price significantly re-rate lower. 
  • Trading on high PE-multiples / valuations means the Company is more prone to share price volatility. 

1H22 Result Highlights

  • TPW delivered strong top line growth of +46% YoY for 1H22, despite experiencing some supply chain and product availability issues (which also impacted customer satisfaction metrics). Hence the growth rate would have likely been stronger in our view. The Company also saw some inflationary pressures on product and freight, which saw 1H22 delivered margin decline to 30.5% (from 33.0% in pcp) and was in line with management’s previous guidance.
  • Advertising & Marketing costs were up +55% YoY and increased as a percentage of revenue to 13.6% (from 12.8% in pcp), driven by a step up in both performance and brand marketing. TPW’s brand awareness continues to increase, now above 60%. Management also spoke about pushing the brand awareness strategy nationally.
  • TPW’s ongoing investment in the business (people and technology, new growth horizons in B2B and home improvement) saw fixed cost increase YoY and hence saw EBITDA decline -19% YoY to $12.0m.
  • TPW posted the sixth straight quarter of revenue per active customer growth, which was up +10% YoY. This was driven by higher average order value and the repeat rate. 

Company Profile 

Temple & Webster Group (TPW) is a leading online retailer in Australia, which offers consumers access to furniture, homewares, home décor, arts, gifts, and lifestyle products. 

(Source: BanayanTree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Woodside Petroleum delivered strong FY21 results

Investment Thesis

  • Since our Buy recommendation in our last report, WPL’s share price has appreciated 43.1% – We acknowledge our positive view on oil and gas prices across 2022, and the quality of WPL and BHP’s assets but recommend investors take profits and downgrade our recommendation as we yield on the side of caution, before we see how the WPL/BHP’s combined entity trades and its first year of audited financials.   
  • Quality assets (NWS, Pluto, Australia Oil, Browse, Wheatstone) with superior free cash flow breakeven price relative to peers. 
  • On-going focus on cost reduction and positioning of the business for a lower oil price environment.
  • Improving oil and gas prices, which should see earnings improve. 
  • Increasing LNG demand, with WPL well positioned to fulfill this. 
  • Solid balance sheet position.
  • Strong free cash flow generation.
  • Potential exploration success in Myanmar, Senegal, Gabon. However, we have not factored any success into our forecasts + valuation.
  • Whilst the change in CEO could result in some uncertainty around future strategy, it could also be an opportunity to refresh the strategy with a “fresh” set of eyes. The Board has reiterated that current growth plans will be retained. 

Key Risks 

  • Supply and demand imbalance in global oil/gas markets.
  • Lower oil / LNG prices.
  • Not meeting cost-out targets (e.g. reducing breakeven oil cash price).
  • Production disruptions.

FY21 Result Highlights

  • Operating revenue of $6,962m, up +93%, driven by annual sales volume 111.6MMboe at realised price of $60.30 per boe, up +86%.
  • NPAT of $1,983m, up +149%. Underlying NPAT of $1,620m, up +262%. Unit production cost of $5.30 per boe.
  • Operating cash flow of $3,792m, up +105%.
  • Free cash flow of $851m.
  • At FY21-end, WPL had cash on hand of $3,025m and liquidity of $6,125m. Net debt at year-end was $3,772m and gearing of 21.9% (at the lower end of targeted 15-35% gearing).

Company Profile 

Woodside Petroleum Ltd (WPL) explores for and produces natural gas, liquefied natural gas, crude oil, condensate, naptha and liquid petroleum gas. WPL owns producing assets in the North-West Shelf (NWS) project, Pluto LNG and Australian Oil. WPL is currently developing Browse, Sunrise, Wheatstone, Grassy Point and Kitimat LNG. WPL is currently undertaking exploration activities in Myanmar, Senegal, Morocco, Gabon, Ireland, NZ and Peru.

(Source: BanyanTree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Global stocks Shares

Marriott’s Strong Brand Intangible Asset Positioned Well for a Travel Rebound

Online stock exchange team

Business Strategy and Outlook:

While COVID-19 is still materially impacting near-term travel demand in many regions of the world, we expect Marriott to expand room and revenue share in the hotel industry over the next decade, driven by a favorable next-generation traveler position supported by renovated and newer brands, as well as its industry-leading loyalty program. Additionally, we believe the acquisition of Starwood (closed in September 2016) has strengthened Marriott’s long-term brand advantage, as Starwood’s global luxury portfolio complemented Marriott’s dominant upper-scale position in North America.

Marriott’s intangible brand asset and switching cost advantages are set to strengthen. Marriott has added several new brands since 2007, renovated a meaningful percentage of core Marriott and Courtyard hotels in the past few years, and expanded technology integration and loyalty-member presence; these actions have led to share gains and a strong positioning with millennial travelers. Starwood’s loyalty member presence and iconic brands should further strengthen Marriott’s advantages. With 97% of the combined rooms managed or franchised, Marriott has an attractive recurring-fee business model with high returns on invested capital and significant switching costs for property owners. Managed and franchised hotels have low fixed costs and capital requirements, along with contracts lasting 20 years that have meaningful cancelation costs for owners.

Financial Strength:

Marriott’s financial health remains in good shape, despite COVID-19 challenges. Marriott entered 2020 with debt/adjusted EBITDA of 3.1 times, as its asset-light business model allows the company to operate with low fixed costs and stable unit growth, but reduced demand due to COVID-19 caused the ratio to end the year at 9.1 times. During 2020, Marriott did not sit still; rather, it took action to increase its liquidity profile, including suspending dividends and share repurchases, deferring discretionary capital expenditures, raising debt, and receiving credit card fees from partners up front. As travel demand recovered in 2021, so too did Marriott’s debt leverage, with debt/adjusted EBITDA ending the year at 4.5 times. If demand once again plummeted, we think Marriott has enough liquidity to operate at zero revenue into 2023.

Bulls Say:

  • Marriott is positioned to benefit from the increasing presence of the next-generation traveler through emerging lifestyle brands Autograph, Tribute, Moxy, Aloft, and Element. 
  • Marriott stands to benefit from worker flexibility driving higher long-term travel demand. Our constructive stance is formed by higher income occupations being the most likely industries to continue to work from remote locations. 
  • Marriott has a high exposure to recurring managed and franchised fees (97% of total 2019 units), which have high switching costs and generate strong ROICs.

Company Profile:

Marriott operates nearly 1.5 million rooms across roughly 30 brands. Luxury represents 10% of total rooms, while full service, limited service, and time-shares are 43%, 46%, and 2% of all units, respectively. Marriott, Courtyard, and Sheraton are the largest brands, while Autograph, Tribute, Moxy, Aloft, and Element are newer lifestyle brands. Managed and franchised represent 97% of total rooms. North America makes up two thirds of total rooms. Managed, franchise, and incentive fees represent the vast majority of revenue and profitability for the company.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Global stocks Shares

Meat Shortages Are Lifting Selling Prices and Margins for Tyson, but Should Prove Temporary

Stock market information

Business Strategy and Outlook:

Several secular trends are affecting Tyson’s long-term growth prospects. While U.S. consumers (81% of fiscal 2021 sales) are limiting their consumption of red and processed meat (71% of Tyson’s sales), they are consuming more chicken (29%). International demand for meat has been strong, and although Tyson’s overseas sales mix is just 12%, it is likely to increase over time, as this is an area of acquisition focus. Also, in order to feed the world sustainably, alternative proteins should play a key role. Tyson is actively investing in lab-grown and plant-based meats and should participate in this growth (albeit to a small degree). The beef segment has been a bright spot in Tyson’s portfolio in recent years, as strong international demand, coupled with a drought-induced beef shortage in Australia, has increased the segment’s operating margins to 10% over the past five years from 2% prior to 2017. Conversely, the chicken segment has suffered from executional missteps that have resulted in structurally higher costs relative to competitors.

About 80% of Tyson’s products are undifferentiated (commoditized), so it is difficult for them to command price premiums and higher returns. Although Tyson is the largest U.S. producer of beef and chicken, we do not believe this affords it a scale-based cost advantage, as its segment margins tend to be in line with or even below those of its smaller peers. The absence of a competitive edge, in the form of either a brand intangible asset or a cost advantage, leads us to our no-moat rating.

Financial Strength:

Tyson’s financial health is viewed as solid and there aren’t any issues to suggest that it will be unable to meet its financial obligations. While Tyson generates healthy cash flow and is committed to retaining its investment-grade credit rating, the business is inherently cyclical, with many factors outside of its control. But management has made changes to improve the predictability of earnings. Chicken pricing contracts, which now link costs and prices, and a greater mix of prepared foods (from 10% in 2014 to the current 19%) both serve as stabilizers. In terms of leverage, net debt/adjusted EBITDA stood at a rather low 1.2 times at the end of fiscal 2021, below Tyson’s typical range of 2-3 times. At the end of December, Tyson held $3.0 billion cash and had full availability of its $2.25 billion revolving credit agreement. Together, this should be sufficient to meet the firm’s needs over the next year, namely about $2 billion in capital expenditures, nearly $700 million in dividends, and $1.1 billion in debt maturities.

Bulls Say:

  • China’s significant protein shortage resulting from African swine fever should boost near-term protein demand, while the country’s continued moderate increase in per capita consumption of proteins should drive long-term growth. 
  • While investor angst over chicken price-fixing litigation has weighed on shares, Tyson’s recently announced settlements materially reduce this overhang. 
  • In the current inflationary environment, Tyson’s cost pass-through model limits potential profit margin pressure.

Company Profile:

Tyson Foods is the largest U.S. producer of processed chicken and beef. It’s also a large producer of processed pork and protein-based products under the brands Jimmy Dean, Hillshire Farm, Ball Park, Sara Lee, Aidells, State Fair, and Raised & Rooted, to name a few. Tyson sells 81% of its products through various U.S. channels, including retailers (47% in fiscal 2021), food service (32%), and other packaged food and industrial companies (10%). In addition, 11% of the company’s revenue comes from exports to Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Europe, China, and Japan.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Santos reported strong FY21 results with underlying profit up by 230%

Investment Thesis:

  • Leveraged to the oil price.
  • High quality assets which offer a number of core assets within its portfolio (no single asset risk).  
  • On-going focus on cost reduction and positioning of the business for a lower oil price environment.
  • Strong balance sheet position. 
  • High quality management team who are able to operate assets and extract synergistic value from the recent merger with Oil Search.

Key Risks:

  • Supply and demand imbalance in global oil/gas markets.
  • Lower oil / LNG prices.
  • Not meeting cost-out targets (e.g. reducing breakeven oil cash price).
  • Production disruptions (not meeting GLNG ramp up targets).
  • Strategic investors sell down their stake or block any potential M&A activity.

Key highlights:

  • Management highlighted lower unit costs, our focus on safe, low-cost and efficient operations delivered a free cash flow breakeven of $21 per barrel in 2021. 
  • EBITDAX was up 48% to $2.8bn driven by higher oil prices and lower unit costs. Underlying profit was up 230% to a record $946m.
  • Production was up +3% to of 92.1mmboe. Sales volume of 107.1mmboe, down -3%
  • Product sales revenue of US$4.71bn, up +39%
  • Record free cash flow of US$1.5bn and underlying profit of US$946m, driven by higher oil and LNG prices vs pcp due to a recovery in global energy demand and supply constraints across the industry due to lower capital investment through the pandemic
  • Reported NPAT of US$658m includes losses on commodity hedging and costs associated with acquisitions and one-off tax adjustments and is significantly higher relative to the pcp due to impairments included in FY20
  • Reported NPAT of US$658m includes losses on commodity hedging and costs associated with acquisitions and one-off tax adjustments and is significantly higher relative to the pcp due to impairments included in FY20

Company Description: 

Santos Limited (STO) explores for and produces natural gas, liquefied natural gas, crude oil, condensate, naptha and liquid petroleum gas. STO conducts major onshore and offshore petroleum exploration and production activities in Australia, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, Vietnam. The company also transports crude oil by pipeline.  

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.