Author: lvc-admin

Categories
Funds Funds

Realindex Australian Share-Class A: A well versed, Economical Option with Good Background

Approach
Realindex uses a systematic index method employing four equally weighted measures of a company’s economic size to rank and weight stocks in the portfolio. These criteria are adjusted sales, cash flow, and dividends and latest available adjusted book value. Additional earnings quality, near-term value, and debtcoverage filters act to reduce exposure to stocks with greater uncertainty. A signal was also introduced in November 2015 that downweights stocks with negative momentum and overweights stocks with positive momentum. As a part of its endeavor to improve current metrics, Realindex has more recently refined the book value metric to factor in intangibles as well by adjusting it with capitalize R&D and marketing expenses. The filters have contributed to a value bias and tilt to established companies that typically trade at a discount. This alternative approach to traditional index investing aims to eliminate the relationship between portfolio weighting and over/undervaluation associated with weighting a portfolio by market cap. The portfolio is rebalanced quarterly, resulting in average annual turnover of about 15%. The team handles all aspects of research, portfolio management, implementation, and execution with a focus on minimizing trading costs and market impact.


Portfolio
Realindex constructs a diversified, value-leaning portfolio. The strategy’s factors and price filters can lead to some differences relative to the more commonly used S&P/ASX 200 Accumulation Index. For example, the portfolio typically has lower price/book ratios and higher dividend yields. Realindex’s absolute weighting to most sectors remains relatively stable because the fundamental size characteristics tend not to fluctuate wildly unlike the sector weights fluctuation in market-cap benchmarks. Other deviations have been a historic tilt away from healthcare and real estate. Relative to the category index, S&P/ASX 200 Index, the strategy is value-focused and yield-oriented. Large-cap bias is apparent in the portfolio, but it is relative to the category average. As of November 2021, the portfolio was overweight in financial services and underweight in resources and healthcare. Realindex’s portfolio, traditionally, has remained quite similar to market-cap benchmarks overall. Historically, active share has hovered around 20%.

People
Realindex has been through a significant phase of transition in the past couple of years bought about by the end of the partnership with RAFI and the exit of a few senior portfolio managers. This has provided an opportunity for Realindex to revamp its overall team structure and bring on experienced investment professionals. The experienced David Walsh has joined as the head of investment, leading portfolio management and research, which Scott Hamilton leads. With the hires of Joana Nash and Ron Guido as experienced senior quant portfolio managers, Realindex has also beefed up its quant research capabilities.
The team is nimbler now for prioritization and effective collaboration on research initiatives and efficient implementation of the research outcomes, although it is preferred to have clearer lines between the research and portfolio management teams. The visible progress made in the trailing 18 months in research projects (for example, ESG factor impact on price and incorporating intangibles into the book value) augmenting the investment process through the implementation of novel signals is testimony of the team’s collective ability. The recent departure of experienced senior portfolio manager Raelene De Souza is unfortunate. Historically, Realindex has been successful in attracting top investment talent. But the length of their association with the firm has been shorter than it is prefered.


Performance
Realindex Australian Shares has delivered impressive peer-relative performance from inception through February 2022. Its five-year return of 8.5% per year as of February 2022 has easily outpaced the category average but only matched the broader market’s index return, indicating the tough environment it has been for value managers. This performance is principally attributed to the overweighting in materials, underweighting in healthcare, and energy. Better stock inclusion from the resources and consumer cyclical sectors has been additive too. Specifically, overweightings in BHP Group and Wesfarmers has added to performance and offset marginally by the overweighting in Westpac Banking. Amid the pandemic-induced uncertainties across the market, the strategy was admirably more resilient than the average category manager. The impressive outperformance was largely fueled by the strategy’s overweighting in materials, consumer cyclical, and consumer staples (a recurring theme across short- and long-term performance), although slightly offset by its overweighting in financial services. Over the trailing year through February 2022, the strategy has outperformed the S&P/ASX 200 Index but marginally stayed below the category average as value stocks have staged a reversal.

About Fund:
Realindex forms a universe of Australian companies based on accounting measures.Factors such as quality, near – term value and momentum are applied to form a final portfolio of companies. The resulting portfolio has a value tilt relative to the benchmark and provides the benefits of being lower in cost, lower turnover and highly diversified compared to traditional active investment strategies. Realindex overhauled its investment team with an aim to create a nimbler team structure and has hired investment professionals with a high skillset and experience level. The new team has made real progress in the trailing 18 months defining the research agenda and prioritizing projects in terms of their potential to value add. These developments paint a positive picture for the strategy; however, investors should note that the team’s tenure is short and Realindex’s track record in team turnover has not been impressive. As such, it is alleged for the investment team to exhibit longevity before experts’ conviction level is strengthened.

(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Fixed Income Fixed Income

Cheap passive exposure to Australian fixed income

Approach

This strategy aims to track the Bloomberg Ausbond Composite 0+ Index with a tracking error of 0.05% per year or less (before fees). IShares is typically able to achieve full replication of the government-bond component in the portfolio because of ample liquidity and breadth. To alleviate liquidity challenges, the firm uses stratified sampling to acquire corporate and supranational exposures–an industry-standard approach, but one in which iShares excels thanks to its sophisticated global trading systems and experienced team. When the team can’t buy all the bonds in the index at a reasonable price, it will instead buy a basket of bonds that has similar credit and duration risks within allowable tolerance ranges. The team also employs strategies like securities lending to generate additional returns, helping to offset the performance drag from factors like fees and trading costs. IShares’ scale further minimises trading costs; a large active book and the firm’s ETF business allow for cross-trades and wide broker access. IShares thus executes trades cheaply, which is crucial in index fund management. It’s worth noting that Bloomberg’s index assumes distributions earn no interest, whereas iShares may accrue interest on its distribution cash balances. This may cause some tracking error, but ultimately it is a positive tailwind.

Portfolio

This strategy aims to fully replicate the Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Index. Factoring cost, liquidity, and existing diversification if it doesn’t make sense to own all the bonds on issue, it will use stratified sampling to buy a basket of bonds with similar credit and duration risks. As of 28 Feb 2022, the index was composed of government and semigovernment bonds (85%), supranationals (5%), and corporate bonds (9%). The fund invests in high-quality bonds, with AAA rated debt constituting 71% of the benchmark’s quality exposure. Banks and other financials issue most of the credit in the index. The fund’s duration continues to increase with the benchmark as yields mostly hovered around historic lows barring the recent spike, up from 4.95 years at October 2016 to 5.8 years at 28 Feb 2022. The lengthening duration is a result of Commonwealth Government Bonds being issued at longer tenures, such as 30 years. But it means the fund faces the risk of rising yields globally, when we would expect active managers in this space to outperform their long-duration passive peers. Overall credit quality and appropriate diversification make this strategy an appropriate core exposure.

Performance: In terms of Annualised and Cumulative basis

Top 10 Holdings of the fund

About the fund

The fund aims to provide investors with the performance of the Bloomberg Aus Bond Composite 0+ Yr Index SM, before fees and expenses. The index is designed to measure the performance of the Australian bond market and includes investment grade fixed income securities issued by the Australian Treasury, Australian semi-government entities, supranational and sovereign entities and corporate entities.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Pioneer Has No Plans to Deviate Away From Winning Variable Dividend Strategy

Business Strategy and Outlook

Pioneer Natural Resources is one of the largest Permian Basin oil and gas producers overall, and is the largest pure play. It has about 800,000 net acres in the play, all of which is located on the Midland Basin side where it believes it can get the best returns.That gives Pioneer an extensive runway of low-cost drilling opportunities primarily targeting the Wolfcamp A, Wolfcamp B, and Spraberry reservoirs. Like other Permian operators, Pioneer’s production is weighted toward liquids—over 80% of its output is crude oil and natural gas liquids, boosting unit revenue. By focusing on the most productive parts of the Permian, it is able to keep its unit costs well below the peer average. Getting into the basin early also means the firm also enjoys relatively low royalty rates, giving it a further advantage over many of its competitors. Pioneer has expanded fairly rapidly, with annual production growth averaging 10%-15% over the last decade or so. But the company is now prioritizing generous shareholder distributions ahead of further volume expansion. The current plan calls for no more than 5% annual growth while reinvesting much less than 100% of operating cash flows. The remaining surplus will be used to preserve Pioneer’s very impressive balance sheet, and to return cash to shareholders via a part-variable dividend.

Financial Strength

Pioneer’s leverage ratios were uncharacteristically high for much of 2021, owing to two substantial acquisitions (Parsley and DoublePoint). But the firm has been generating substantial free cash since then, and the subsequent divestiture of the Delaware Basin assets that were bundled with these acquisitions improved the firm’s balance sheet even further (with proceeds exceeding $3 billion). As a result, the firm now has one of the strongest balance sheets in the segment, with very low leverage ratios and at strip prices, the firm will reach zero net debt by the end of 2022.After the last reporting period, net debt/EBITDA was around 0.4 times and debt/capital is 23%. Management has mentioned a leverage ratio cap of 0.75 times, but really wants absolute debt to be as low as possible, or zero, so it can capitalize in cyclical downturns by aggressively buying back stock without worrying about the impact on the balance sheet.The firm has around $3 billion in maturities due between now and 2025, all of which can be comfortably funded from cash on hand or from operating cash flows (without compromising the firm’s ability to pay the fixed and variable components of its dividend). It has ample liquidity in reserve, too, with another $1.5 billion available on its undrawn credit facility.

Bulls Say  

  • Pioneer’s low-cost Permian Basin activities are likely to generate substantial free cash flows in the years to come, assuming mid cycle prices ($55/bbl for WTI). 
  • The firm intends to target a 10% total return for shareholders via its base dividend, a variable dividend with a payout of up to 75% of free cash flows, and 5% annual production growth. 
  • Pioneer has a rock-solid balance sheet and is able to generate free cash flows even during periods of very weak commodity prices.

Company Profile

Headquartered in Irving, Texas, Pioneer Natural Resources is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focusing on the Permian Basin in Texas. At year-end 2021, Pioneer’s proven reserves were 2.2 billion barrels of oil equivalent with net production for the year of 612 mboe per day. Oil and natural gas liquids represented 68% of production

(Source: Morningstar)

  • Relative to the pcp: (1) 

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Inghams Group – The Board declared a fully franked Dividend of 6.5 cps, in line with the pcp, and Equates to Payout Ratio of 60.9%

Investment Thesis:

  • Trading on undemanding multiples and below our valuation. 
  • Potential for an improvement in the pricing environment. 
  • Quality management team who has managed disruptions for the Covid-19 pandemic well. 
  • Quality assets and operates as Australia and New Zealand’s largest integrated poultry producer.
  • Project Accelerate has proven successful in driving automation and labour productivity, which supports earnings uplift despite decrease in revenue.  
  • Procurement initiatives implemented with benefits in line with expectation.
  • Investing to increase capacity and capability across the business in Australia and New Zealand plants.
  • Capital management initiatives are possible with a strong balance sheet.

Key Risks:

  • Re-negotiation of key contracts with large customers on unfavourable terms. 
  • Increase in feed and electricity costs, which may be pushed to customers through market price increases, reducing competitiveness. 
  • No news on the appointment of a new CEO creates uncertainty. 
  • Customer concentration risk in QSR (Quick Service Restaurants) and Supermarkets. 
  • Susceptible to exotic disease breakouts, impacting ING’s ability to supply poultry products. 
  • Significant reduction in volume and quality from parent stock supplier.
  • Material interruptions to ING’s complex and interlinked supply chain.

Key Highlights:

  • Group core poultry sales volumes grew +5.6%, driven by strong volume growth of +6.5% in Australia.
  • Statutory EBITDA of $220.4m, and Underlying EBITDA of $222.4m, was up +2.2% and +1.7%, respectively.
  • Statutory NPAT of $38.4m, up +8.8% and Underlying NPAT of $39.7m, up +5.9%
  • Cash flow from operations of $186.6m, was up +4.7%. Cash conversion ratio of 83.5% reflects seasonal working capital cycle and in-line with the pcp.
  • ING retained a solid balance sheet with net debt of $264.6m and leverage of 1.3x, a significant reduction from 1.7x in the pcp.
  • Total capital expenditure of $24.0m was lower than the pcp, reflecting completion of hatchery projects, ongoing project disruptions caused by Covid-19 lockdowns and delays in equipment being shipped.
  • The Board declared a fully franked dividend of 6.5 cps, in line with the pcp, and equates to payout ratio of 60.9% of Underlying NPAT post AASB 16 adjustments, which is at the lower end of ING’s 60 – 80% target range.
  • In Australia segment, Core poultry volumes grew +6.5% to 203.4kt, despite Covid-19 lockdowns and challenging market conditions. Revenue grew +1.9% driven by core poultry revenue growth of +2.2%, which grew despite weak pricing across the Wholesale channel due to excess supply, partially offset by feed revenue, declining -2.0% as customers transition supply away in preparation for closure of the ING’s WA Feedmill. Underlying EBITDA declined -0.3% to $185.1m, reflecting a lower Intercompany royalty charge, reduced by $3.2m.
  • In New Zealand segment, Core poultry volumes were flat at 33.7kt, as Covid-19 lockdowns were reintroduced. Core poultry revenue increased +3.6%, due to price increases applied across all channels to help offset higher feed costs and inflationary pressures related to supply chain disruption. Underlying EBITDA of $19.1m increased $3.3m versus the pcp, with the change to intercompany royalty charge accounting for $3.2m.

Company Description:

Inghams Group Ltd (ING) is Australia and New Zealand’s largest integrated poultry producer. The Company produces and sells chicken, turkey and stock feed that is used by the poultry, pig, dairy and equine industries. 

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Amadeus and GDS relationships to be the exception rather than the rule

Business Strategy and Outlook

While Amadeus still stands to see material near-term corporate and European demand headwinds from the coronavirus and geopolitical conflict, it is aniticipated its leadership position in global distribution systems, or GDS, to endure during the next several years, driven by its leading network of airline content and travel agency customers as well as its healthy position in software solutions for these carriers and agents. Amadeus is the largest of the three GDS operators (narrow-moat Sabre is number two, followed by privately held Travelport) that control nearly 100% of market volume. 

Amadeus’ GDS enjoys a network effect (source of its narrow moat). As more supplier content (mostly airline content) is added, more travel agents use the platform; as more travel agents use the platform, suppliers offer more content. This network advantage is solidified by technology that integrates GDS content with back-office operations of agents and IT solutions of suppliers, leading to more accurate information that is also easier to book and service the end customer with. The 2016 acquisition of airline IT company Navitaire and 2018 acquisition of hotel IT company TravelClick expanded Amadeus’ GDS network advantage through new customer integration, as Navitaire focuses on low-cost carriers while the company’s existing Altea division focuses on full-service carriers, and TravelClick has a midscale lodging presence versus Amadeus’ legacy hotel offering, which focuses on enterprises. 

Replicating a GDS platform entails aggregating and connecting content from hundreds of airlines to a platform that is also connected to travel agents, requiring significant costs and time. Still, although it is viewed GDS advantages as substantial, technology architechtures like that of eTraveli (set to be acquired by narrow-moat Booking Holdings in early 2022), enable end users to access not only GDS content but supply from competing platforms, which could take some volume from GDS operators. Also, GDS faces some risk of larger carriers and agencies direct connecting, although it is likely these relationships to be the exception rather than the rule.

Financial Strength

While near-term industry travel demand remains below prepandemic marks, Amadeus’ balance sheet is clearer. Amadeus entered 2020 with just 1.4 times net debt/EBITDA, and it is projected it has enough liquidity for four years even at near zero demand levels. Amadeus has taken aggressive actions to shore up its liquidity profile. In March 2020, Amadeus began to cut costs and secured an additional EUR 1 billion one-year bridge loan, in addition to the undrawn EUR 1 billion revolver it already had. In April 2020, the company raised EUR 1.5 billion with a EUR 750 million equity offering (at a 5% discount to closing stock prices) and a EUR 750 million convertible note (at a strike price 40% above closing stock prices). In May 2020, Amadeus raised EUR 1 billion in debt at interest rates of 2.5%-2.9%. It is alleged banking partners to provide any additional needed funding, given Amadeus’ sizable network, switching costs, and efficient scale advantages that underpin its narrow moat.Net debt/EBITDA increased to 5.5 times in 2021, due to lower demand resulting from COVID-19, but it is foreseen a return to within management’s 1-1.5 times target range by 2023. Although about EUR 2.7 billion of the company’s EUR 4.3 billion in long-term debt matures over the next four years, its low leverage and stable transaction-based model in normal demand environments should not present any financial health concerns. It is projected Amadeus will generate EUR 7 billion in free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditures) during 2022-26.

Bulls Say’s

  • The company’s GDS network hosts content from most airlines and is used by many travel agents, resulting in significant industry share. Replicating this network would involve meaningful time and costs. 
  • The network advantage is supported by new products and technology that further integrate airlines and agents into its GDS platform. The company’s Navitaire, AirIT, and TravelClick acquisitions aid this expanding technology and integration reach. 
  • The business model is driven by transaction volume and not pricing, leading to lower cyclical volatility.

Company Profile 

Among the top three operators, Amadeus’ 40%-plus market share in air global distribution system bookings is the largest in the industry. The GDS segment represents 56% of total prepandemic revenue (2019). The company has a growing IT solutions division (44% of 2019 revenue) that addresses the airline, airport, rail, hotel, and business intelligence markets. Transaction fees, which are tied to volume and not price, account for the bulk of revenue and profits. 

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Sun Life have to carefully weigh the capital required along with potential for disruption to its existing operations

Business Strategy and Outlook

Following the 2008-09 financial crisis, Sun Life made several positive changes to its business operations, most notably selling its lagging U.S. life insurance and annuities business. Sun Life’s medium-term objectives include underlying EPS growth of 8%-10%, underlying return on equity of 12%-14%, and a dividend payout rate of 40%-50%. Canada and the United States continue to have several demographic trends working in favor of insurers, especially with wealth- and asset-management businesses, as an aging population increasingly looks to manage its savings. However, areas of growth remain fiercely competitive, and life insurance will remain structurally difficult, making it hard for Sun Life to maintain any excess returns. Sun Life is also focused on expanding its operations in Asia, though it is skeptical of this initiative ultimately providing significant value, given the subpar returns on equity so far. 

It is also held for Sun Life to continue to invest in digital tools and apps. In 2018, Sun Life acquired Maxwell Health, a startup that offers a digital employee-benefits platform. On the distribution side, Sun Life is working to sell insurance through mobile banking apps in Asia. Sun Life has a “four-pillar” acquisition strategy in which any deal needs to meet at least one of the following: It must add scale, add capabilities, deliver lifetime return on equity with the firm’s medium-terms objective, or be accretive to earnings over a reasonable time frame. In asset management, it is alleged for more consolidation in the industry and expect Sun Life to participate. In 2019, it acquired real estate investment firm BentallGreenOak and in 2020 announced a majority stake in Crescent Capital and Infrared Capital Partners, both of which are alternative asset managers. While a large acquisition in the asset-management industry is possible, Sun Life would have to carefully weigh the capital required and the potential for disruption to its existing operations. In the insurance space, Sun Life swung big with its $2.5 billion acquisition of DentaQuest, which is expected to close midyear 2022.

Financial Strength

The life insurance business model typically entails significant leverage and potentially exposes the industry to outlier capital-market events and unanticipated actuarial changes. Sun Life was not immune to these risks and was hurt, like many of its peers, during the financial crisis. Since then, Sun Life has done a reasonably good job of reducing its debt by growing back its equity base while reducing absolute debt levels.As of Dec. 31, 2021, Sun Life has a total financial leverage ratio (the ratio of debt and preferred shares to total capital) of 25.5%, consistent with management’s long-term target of 25%. As of Dec. 31, 2020, Sun Life’s LICAT ratio was 145%. The Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test is the sum of the available capital, surplus allowance, and eligible deposits divided by the firm’s base solvency buffer. Life Insurers in Canada must have a minimum of 90%, suggesting that Sun Life has an adequate buffer from a regulatory perspective.

Bulls Say’s

  • Over the next 20 years, the retirement-age population will grow to about one in five, significantly increasing the demand for financial-protection products. 
  • When interest rates rise, earnings for insurers like Sun Life should increase. 
  • Given its strong operating margins, Sun Life’s MFS asset-management franchise should drive earnings growth during an equity market recovery.

Company Profile 

Sun Life Financial is one of Canada’s Big Three life insurance companies along with Great-West Lifeco and Manulife. Sun Life provides insurance, retirement, and wealth-management services to individual and corporate customers in Canada, the United States, and Asia. It also owns MFS Investment Management, a Boston-based asset-management firm. Sun Life generates about a third of its profit from asset-management operations. 

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Global stocks Shares

We Expect Avery Dennison Will Enjoy Another Year of Strong Growth in 2022

Business Strategy and Outlook

 Avery Dennison is the largest supplier of pressure-sensitive adhesive materials and passive radio frequency identifiers in the world. Rising consumer packaged goods penetration in emerging markets should add to label growth, while growth in omnichannel retailing will aid RFID sales at Avery Dennison.

Avery sells pressure-sensitive materials to a highly fragmented customer base that converts specialty film rolls into labels for companies such as Kraft Heinz or Amazon. The concentrated market positions of Avery and competitor UPM Reflactac give each bargaining power over their customers. The labels and graphics materials, or LGM, and industrial and healthcare materials, or IHM, segments account for roughly 74% of company revenue. They convert paper, vinyl, and adhesives into composite films that become shipping labels, automotive graphics, and special-use tapes and films. While demand for these products is stagnant in developed markets, and expect Avery’s large emerging market footprint (around 40% of revenue for these segments) to drive mid-single-digit revenue growth.

 Avery’s Retail Branding and Information Systems segment, or RBIS, makes up 26% of sales and produces a mixture of apparel graphics, product tags, and passive radio frequency identifiers or RFID. While RFID accounts for around 25% of the segment’s revenue, it has grown rapidly in recent years and has increasingly become the focus of Avery’s RBIS segment. RFID products are typically integrated into product tags in industries which have both a diverse inventory and where UPC scanning is cumbersome or labour-intensive, such as apparel. Avery’s recent strategy shift to focus on reducing both costs and prices of the technology in order to gain share demonstrates the commoditized nature of these products. Even so, and think Avery will at least be able to grow with the market, or between 15% and 20% per year. The remainder of segment revenue comes from the application and production of apparel graphics and tags. It is expected expect revenue growth of these end uses to remain mixed, dependent largely on shifting fashion preferences.

Financial Strength

Avery Dennison is in very good financial health. The company ended 2021 with net debt/EBITDA of roughly 2.2, which gives the firm room to manoeuvre with regard to additional acquisitions, opportunistic share buybacks, or to boost its dividend. This remains just below management’s target range of 2.3-2.6, aimed at preserving its BBB credit rating. Avery’s target range of debt remains manageable, and shouldn’t become a material burden even if economic conditions worsen. Thanks to the amount of business Avery derives from consumer staples, cash flows usually remain relatively stable throughout the economic cycle.

Bulls Say’s

  • Emerging-market adoption of consumer-packaged goods will provide a long runway for sales growth. 
  • As RFID technology becomes widely adopted, Avery’s growth should receive a hefty tailwind. 
  • Avery’s dominance in retail branding information systems should lead to widening segment margins

Company Profile 

Avery Dennison manufactures pressure-sensitive materials, merchandise tags, and labels. The company also runs a specialty converting business that produces radio-frequency identification inlays and labels. Avery Dennison draws a significant amount of revenue from outside the United States, with international operations accounting for the majority of total sales.

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Positive Flows Should Help Franklin Resources Navigate More Recent Market Volatility

Business Strategy and Outlook

A confluence of several issues-poor relative active investment performance, the growth of low-cost index-based products, and the expanding power of the retail-advised channel–has made it increasingly difficult for active asset managers to generate organic growth, leaving them more dependent on market gains to increase their assets under management, or AUM. While we believe there will always be room for active management, we feel the advantage for getting and maintaining placement on platforms will go to those managers that have greater scale, established brands, solid long-term performance, and reasonable fees. 

However, have to admit that a combination of narrow-moat Franklin Resources with no-moat Legg Mason was not even on the radar-believing both firms were more likely acquirers of smaller asset managers as opposed to either one being an acquisition target.The new Franklin provides investment management services to retail (53% of managed assets), institutional (45%) and high-net-worth (2%) clients and is one of the more global firms of the U.S.-based asset managers , with more than 35% of its AUM invested in global/international strategies and just over 25% of managed assets sourced from clients domiciled outside the U.S. 

Morningstar analysts expect the Legg Mason deal to keep margins from deteriorating in the face of industrywide fee compression and rising costs (necessary to improve investment performance and enhance product distribution), near-term organic growth will struggle to stay positive (albeit better than the negative growth profile for a stand-alone Franklin).

Financial Strength 

Franklin entered fiscal 2022 with $3.2 billion in principal debt (including debt issued/acquired as part of the Legg Mason deal)–$300 million of 2.8% notes due September 2022, $250 million of 3.95% notes due July 2024, $400 million of 2.85% notes due March 2025, $450 million of 4.75% notes due March 2026, $850 million of 1.6% notes due October 2030, $550 million of 5.625% notes due January 2044, and $350 million of 2.95% notes due August 2051. At the end of December 2021, the firm had $5.9 billion in cash and investments on its books. More than half of these types of assets have traditionally been held overseas, with as much as one third of that half used to meet regulatory capital requirements, seed capital for new funds, or supply funding for acquisitions. Assuming Franklin closes out the year in line with our expectations, the firm will enter fiscal 2023 with a debt/total capital ratio of around 22%, interest coverage of more than 20 times, and a debt/EBITDA ratio (by our calculations) of 1.4 times.Franklin has generally returned excess capital to shareholders as share repurchases and dividends. During the past 10 fiscal years, the firm repurchased $7.4 billion of common stock and paid out $7.1 billion as dividends (including special dividends). While Franklin’s current payout ratio of 30%-35% is lower than the 40% average payout (when excluding special dividends) during the past five years, we expect only low-single digit annual increases in the dividend until the integration of the Legg Mason deal is well behind them. As for share repurchases, Franklin spent $208 million, $219 million, and $755 million buying back 7.3 million, 9.0 million, and 24.6 million shares, respectively, during fiscal 2021, 2020, and 2019. Given the likelihood that Franklin may decide to pay off some of its debt as it comes due the next several years, we don’t expect see see a large level of share repurchases in the near term.

Bulls Say

  • Franklin Resources is one of the 20 largest U.S.-based asset managers, with more than two thirds of its AUM sourced from domestic clients. It is also the fifth largest global manager of cross-border funds. 
  • The purchase of Legg Mason has lifted Franklin’s AUM to more than $1.5 trillion, hoisting it into the second largest tier of U.S.-based asset managers, which includes firms like Pimco, Capital Group and J.P. Morgan Asset Management. 
  • Franklin maintains thousands of active financial advisor relationships worldwide and has close to 1,000 institutional client relationships.

Company Profile

Franklin Resources provides investment services for individual and institutional investors. At the end of December 2021, Franklin had $1.578 trillion in managed assets, composed primarily of equity (36%), fixed-income (40%), multi-asset/balanced (10%) funds, alternatives (10%) and money market funds. Distribution tends to be weighted more toward retail investors (53% of AUM) investors, as opposed to institutional (45%) and high-net-worth (2%) clients. Franklin is also one of the more global firms of the U.S.-based asset managers we cover, with more than 35% of its AUM invested in global/international strategies and just over 25% of managed assets sourced from clients domiciled outside the United States.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Fortescue Metals (FMG) delivered robust 1H22 results along with Capital Management Initiatives

Investment Thesis 

  • Improving sales mix towards higher grade products should continue to narrow the price discount FMG achieves to the market benchmark Platts 62% CFR Index. 
  • Global stimulus measures – fiscal and monetary policies – are positive for global growth and FMG’s products. 
  • Capital management initiatives – increasing dividends, potential share buybacks given the strength of the balance sheet.
  • Strong cash flow generation.
  • Quality management team.
  • Continues to be on the lower end of the cost curve relative to peers; with ongoing focus on C1 cost reductions should be supportive of earnings.

Key Risks

  • Decline in iron ore prices.
  • Cost blowouts/ production disruptions.
  • Cost out strategy fails to yield results. 
  • Company fails to deliver on adequate capital management initiatives.
  • Potential for regulatory changes.
  • Vale SA supply comes back on market sooner than expected. 
  • Growth projects delayed. 

1H22 Results Highlights   Relative to the pcp: 

  • FMG delivered record half year iron ore shipments of 93.1m tonnes (mt), up +3%. Revenue of US$8.1bn declined -13% per cent on 1H21. Average revenue of US$96/dry metric tonne (dmt) represented a 70% realisation of the average Platts 62% CFR Index (1H22: US$114/dmt, 90% realisation). C1 cost of US$15.28/wet metric tonne (wmt) was up +20% due to price escalation of key input costs, including diesel, other consumables and labour rates, the integration of Eliwana as well as mine plan driven cost escalation. 
  • Underlying EBITDA of US$4.8bn, with an Underlying EBITDA margin of 59% (-28% lower versus 1H21: US$6.6bn, 71% margin). 
  • NPAT of US$2.8bn was -32% lower than pcp. EPS of US$0.90 (A$1.24) was -32% weaker. 
  • Net cashflow from operating activities of US$2.1bn after payment of the FY21 final tax instalment of US$915m. 
  • Capex of US$1.5bn, inclusive of US$589m investment in the Iron Bridge growth project and the Pilbara Energy Connect decarbonisation project. 
  • The Board declared a fully franked interim dividend of A$0.86 per share, down -41% relative to the pcp. It equates to 70% 1H22 NPAT, and is consistent with FMG’s capital allocation framework and stated intent to target the top end of the dividend policy to payout 50 to 80% of full year NPAT. 
  • FMG retained a strong balance sheet with net debt of US$1.7bn at 31 December 2021, inclusive of cash on hand of US$2.9bn. FMG’s credit metrics remain strong with gross debt to last 12 months EBITDA of 0.3x and gross gearing of 23% as at 31 December 2021.

Company Profile

Fortescue Metals Group Ltd (FMG) engages in the exploration, development, production, processing, and sale of iron ore in Australia, China, and internationally. It owns and operates the Chichester Hub that consists of the Cloudbreak and Christmas Creek mines located in the Chichester Ranges in the Pilbara, Western Australia; and the Solomon Hub comprising the Firetail and Kings Valley mines located in the Hamersley Ranges in the Pilbara, Western Australia. The Company was founded in 2003 and is based in East Perth, Australia.

 (Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Property

Continued Demand for Logistics Should Drive Growth for Prologis for Several Years

Business Strategy and Outlook:

Prologis leases distribution space to some of the nation’s top retailers, and its tenant list is the strongest in the business. The continued growth in e-commerce should provide a long growth runway for distribution and logistics facilities, especially given the large amount of space necessary to support online sales compared with brick-and-mortar retail. It is difficult for industrial REITs to earn moats since supply can quickly and easily enter key cities to negate supply and demand imbalances. The aggressive construction after the financial crisis brought significant new facilities on line, and it is expected that supply will continue to grow. Although demand outpaced newly added supply for several years, supply additions have increased sharply, and company is cautious that a slowdown in consumer spending could expose the asset class, increasing vacancies, as seen in the recent downturn.

With vacancy rates hovering around historic lows in the United States and Europe and average market rent rebounding significantly since 2012, the Prologis is in the best position to benefit from incremental demand. The company’s vast portfolio surpasses all other logistics REITs in size, predominantly along coastal markets, where it more than doubles its competition. There is an undeniable shift toward tech-savvy millennial consumers, who are more likely to skip the brick-and-mortar locations and spend more time on retail websites and utilize mobile purchasing. They are also more likely to return items, which adds to the space needed to fuel the growing e-commerce distribution industry. As retailers seek additional distribution facilities closer to population centers to accommodate this trend, Prologis will tap into its deep land bank to complete lucrative developments and drive value for shareholders.

Financial Strength:

Prologis’ balance sheet has improved over the past several years, and the firm’s financial position is considered to be more in line with industry-leading REITs. It is forecasted that 2022 debt/EBITDA to be 6.0 times. This level is reasonably maintainable, with the company having completed the Industrial Property Trust acquisition with cash. Additionally, improving operating performance should help Prologis maintain this metric going forward. 

As a REIT, Prologis is required to pay out at least 90% of its income as dividends to shareholders. The current dividend of $3.16 per share is more than comfortable for Prologis. In fact, it’s likely that the company will continue to tap into the debt markets as its main source of financing, given its healthy appetite for expensive developments and cheap access to capital. Management continually evaluates the portfolio and sells facilities as well as land, which allows the company to subsidize developments and not become overburdened with debt financing. It is estimated that dispositions will begin to

slow in the short term as supply continues to increase.

Bulls Says:

  • Prologis has the largest portfolio of quality facilities in place and is in the best position to capitalize on e- commerce demand.
  • Industrial property is the real estate subsector best positioned to weather the coronavirus outbreak- related storm.
  • Prologis has an enviable tenant list, which gives investors hope for expansion and a sense security in a downturn.

Company Profile:

Prologis was formed by the June 2011 merger of AMB Property and ProLogis Trust. The company develops, acquires, and operates over 900 million square feet of high-quality industrial and logistics facilities across the globe. The company is organized into four global divisions (Americas, Europe, Asia, and other Americas) and operates as a real estate investment trust.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.