Author: lvc-admin

Categories
Dividend Stocks Shares

Capable Hands Remain at the Helm of Magellan; Valuation Upside High as Shares Lose Steam

Business Strategy and Outlook

Magellan is an active manager of listed equities and infrastructure. The firm has a fundamental, high-conviction investment approach. Its flagship Global strategy has historically tilted toward IT, e-commerce platforms, and consumer franchises; preferring large, developed market multinationals. FUM have been attracted by consistently achieving excess returns with lower volatility and drawdowns relative to peers.

Magellan’s products are well-distributed. Its funds are featured across platforms.There is a focus on targeting retail investors, with product expansion an increasingly common driver of growth. After pioneering the first active ETF in Australia in 2015, Magellan has worked on attracting new FUM via its partnership initiatives, launching its own low-cost active ETFs, and introducing a new equity fund that caters to retirees seeking predictable income.

Morningstar analysts think Magellan has built the foundations for ongoing earnings growth, supported by its economic moat, product variety, and historically strong track record. Regardless, the potential earnings upside from these positive traits will take time to manifest. In light of Magellan’s recent underperformance, Mornigstars analysts believe a sustained improved track record will be the precursor to stronger fund inflows.

Morningstar analysts anticipate fee margin compression from investors trading down from Magellan’s core funds in preference for its low-cost ETFs, mix shift to other asset classes, and industry wide fee pressure. Continued strong performance is key to sustaining margins, as future FUM growth is likely to hinge more on market movements rather than net inflows given Magellan’s maturity and scale.

Capable Hands Remain at the Helm of Magellan; Valuation Upside High as Shares Lose Steam

Magellan has historically delivered above market returns with relatively low drawdowns. This has allowed it to rapidly scale in FUM to over AUD 93 billion and provides the foundation for continued earnings growth. While Morningstar analysts don’t believe it will be immune from the structural trend of investors moving to passive investments, ongoing competition among fund managers and major institutions in-housing their asset management, and is better placed than most active managers to address these headwinds. Magellan is moving beyond just managing money, to implementing new initiatives such as product expansion to attract new money. Morningstar analysts  believe shares are undervalued, but concur there are limited near-term earnings and share price catalysts due to recent underperformance. 

Chairman and CIO Hamish Douglass’ indefinite leave from Magellan . But morningstar analysts  don’t believe this is overly value-destructive for shareholders. In the interim, Chris Mackay and Nikki Thomas will work with Magellan’s investment team to manage its flagship Global Equity strategies. The strategies are in good hands. Mackay is Magellan’s co-founder, and was its chairman and CIO until 2012. Despite analysts’ conviction in Magellan, Morningstar’s analyst concern is not all investors may be willing to ride out this storm. Thus Morningstar analysts have lowered its fair value estimate to AUD 34.50 per share from AUD 38, after factoring in 3% more net outflows than before and further trimming our retail fee forecasts.

Financial Strength 

Magellan is in sound financial health. The firm has a conservative balance sheet with no debt, with its financial position also boosted by solid operating cash flows. As of June 30, 2021, Magellan had cash and equivalents of about AUD 212 million and financial investments with a net fair value of around AUD 453 million mainly invested in its own unlisted funds and listed shares. This should provide it with enough liquidity to cope with most market conditions. Its high dividend payout ratio of: (1) 90%-95% of the net profit after tax of its core funds management business before performance fees; and (2) annual performance fee dividend in the range of 90%-95% of net crystallised performance fees after tax reflects the capital-light nature of asset management.

Bulls Say

  • Magellan retains an intangible brand, supported by historically strong performance, which it has leveraged to hold on to client funds, attract new money and charge premium fees. 
  • Due to structural market trends and product expansion initiatives, the prospects for organic FUM growth is strong, notably from investors seeking to diversify exposure to international equities or gain a steady retirement income stream. 
  • Aside from domestic tailwinds from superannuation, Magellan’s distribution relationships in the much larger offshore markets of the U.K. and the U.S. should support growth.

Company Profile

Magellan Financial Group is an Australia-based niche funds manager. Established in 2006, the firm specialises in the management of equity and infrastructure funds for domestic retail and institutional investors. Magellan has been particularly successful in winning mandates from global institutional investors. Current FUM is split across global equities, infrastructure and Australian equities.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

One of the cheapest funds tracking the broadly diversified S&P 500.

Investment Objective

Vanguard 500 Index Fund seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of large-capitalization stocks.

Approach

This broadly diversified portfolio is representative of the opportunity set in the large-blend category. It relies on the market’s collective wisdom to size its positions and enjoys low turnover as a result. It earns a High Process Pillar rating. The index pulls in stocks of the largest 500 U.S. companies that pass its market-cap, liquidity, and profitability screens.An index committee selects constituents from this eligible universe, allowing for more flexibility around index changes compared with more-rigid rules based indexes. The index committee aims to avoid unnecessary turnover, and it reconstitutes the index on an as-needed basis. The committee may temporarily deviate from these rules. It may not delete existing constituents that violate eligibility criteria until an addition to the index is warranted.The portfolio managers reinvest dividends as they are paid and use derivatives to equitize cash and keep pace with the benchmark. They have also historically used securities lending to generate additional income for the fund, which has helped tighten the fund’s tracking difference and make up for some of its annual expense ratio.

Portfolio 

Market-cap weighting allows the fund to harness the market’s collective view of each stock’s relative value, and it keeps turnover low. As of January 2022, stocks representing around 90% of the portfolio enjoy either a narrow or wide Morningstar Economic Moat Rating. This weighting scheme pushes the work of sizing positions onto the market. Over the long term, this has been a winning proposition. But the market has manic episodes from time to time. Over shorter time frames, investors’ enthusiasm for a particular stock or sector can make the portfolio top-heavy as it tilts toward recent winners. This has been the case with technology stocks in recent years. The portfolio’s top 10 holdings represented approximately 29% of its assets as of January 2022, higher than its historical average but much lower than the category average. Nonetheless, the fund is still representative of the opportunity set available to its actively managed peers in the large-blend category, and its sector and style characteristics are similar to the category average. As of December 2021, the fund was slightly overweight in tech stocks and made up the difference with a smaller allocation to industrials.

Performance 

From its inception in 2010 through January 2022, the exchange-traded share class outperformed the category average by 2.35 percentage points annualized. Its annual returns consistently ranked in the category’s better-performing half. The fund’s risk-adjusted returns also held up well against category peers, while its Sharpe ratio maintained a top-quartile ranking in the category over the trailing one-, three-, five-, and 10-year periods. Most of this outperformance can be attributed to its low cash drag and competitive expense ratio.

The portfolio tends to perform as well as its category peers during downturns while outperforming during market rallies. It captured 96% of the category average’s downside and 106% of its upside during the trailing 10 years ending in 2022. During the initial coronavirus-driven shock from Feb. 19 to March 23, 2020, the fund outperformed the category average by 9 basis points. It then bounced back faster than peers during the recovery phase from late March through December 2020, gaining 3.29 percentage points more than the category average. 

Tracking performance has been solid. Over the trailing one-, three-, five-, and 10-year periods ended January 2022, the fund trailed the S&P 500 by an amount approximating its annual expense ratio.

Top 10 Holdings

About the fund

The fund employs a “passive management”—or indexing—investment approach designed to track the performance of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, a widely recognized benchmark of U.S. stock market performance that is dominated by the stocks of large U.S. companies. The fund attempts to replicate the target index by investing all, or substantially all, of its assets in the stocks that make up the index, holding each stock in approximately the same proportion as its weighting in the index. The 500 Index Fund is a low-cost way to gain diversified exposure to the U.S. equity market. The key risk for the fund is the volatility that comes with its full exposure to the stock market. Because the 500 Index Fund is broadly diversified within the large-capitalization market, it may be considered a core equity holding in a portfolio.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Small Cap

GrainCorp’s Bumper 2022 Is Set to Be Even More Lucrative Than Record 2021

Business Strategy and Outlook

GrainCorp enjoys significant market shares in grain storage, handling, and port elevation services along the eastern seaboard of Australia. Earnings are heavily affected by seasonal conditions, but the diversification into oilseed crushing and refining reduces earnings volatility and provides growth opportunities. GrainCorp’s core Australian grain storage and logistics business is heavily reliant on favourable weather patterns. Beyond storage and logistics, the grain marketing segment competes domestically and internationally against other major commodities trading houses such as Cargill and Glencore.

The firm will likely remain at the mercy of Australian grain competitiveness relative to global pricing. Similarly, GrainCorp’s oil crushing and refining business remains competitive. While we expect profitability in this segment to improve due to cost-savings measures and ongoing growth, we don’t believe the segment enjoys durable competitive advantages. 

Financial Strength

GrainCorp’s capital structure is reasonable. It comprises debt and equity, with noncore debt associated with the funding of grain marketing inventory. As a result of swings in crop prices, GrainCorp’s cash flow and working capital requirements can be volatile, so the company will need to drawdown on debt on demand. As at Sept. 30, 2020, core debt (net debt less commodity inventory) was AUD 37 million and total net debt was AUD 239 million. There’s a risk that earnings pressure in drought-affected years could test debt covenants with its bank lenders. 

The primary metrics are its net debt/capital gearing ratio and EBITDA/interest ratio. Gearing ratios can be volatile, given the swings in inventory levels. The net debt gearing ratio (net debt/net debt plus equity) sat at a reasonable 33% as at Sept. 30, 2021. Similarly, core debt gearing (core debt/core debt plus equity) was below 5%. Management doesn’t disclose the minimum EBITDA/interest ratio. In fiscal 2020, this ratio was about 4 times on an adjusted basis, but improved to 13 times in fiscal 2021.

Bulls Say’s 

  • With strategic processing, storage, and transportation assets, GrainCorp’s size gives the company scale advantages over regional competitors. 
  • Global thematics, such as increased food demand, particularly in Asia, should benefit agribusinesses such as GrainCorp. 
  • Despite divesting the malt business, GrainCorp has entered into a new grains derivative contract which assists with smoothing out earnings through the cycle.

Company Profile 

GrainCorp is an agribusiness with an integrated business model operating across three divisions. The company operates the largest grain storage and logistics network in eastern Australia. GrainCorp provides grain marketing services to all major grain-producing regions in Australia, as well as to Canadian and U.K. growers. The company has also diversified into edible oil refining and supply, and bulk liquid storage.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Property

James Hardie’s FVE Raised 4% to AUD 35.40; Outlook for Fiscal 2023 Is Strong

Business Strategy and Outlook

James Hardie Industries is the clear leader in fibre cement siding and internal lining products in North America and Asia-Pacific. After patenting cellulose-reinforced fibre cement in the late 1980s, the Australian company entered the North American market in 1990, establishing its business with the benefit of patent protection. In doing so, the company’s product line has become synonymous with the product category. The firm now enjoys 90% share in fibre cement siding in North America, its largest and most important market, with similar positions in Australia and New Zealand. More recently, James Hardie has entered the Philippines and European residential siding markets.

Fibre cement siding possesses durability advantages and superior aesthetics over vinyl cladding, leading to vinyl’s market share eroding to about 26% today from around 39% in 2003. At this same time, fibre cement’s share has increased to 19%, almost entirely due to increased penetration for Hardie’s product. With Hardie the clear leader in fibre cement systems, it is expected that the firm will continue to take share from vinyl while maintaining its own position within its category.

Financial Strength

James Hardie announced an ordinary first-half fiscal 2022 dividend of USD 0.40 per share after regular dividends were suspended in early fiscal 2021 in response to the pandemic. It is forecasted that an annual full-year payout ratio of 65% of underlying earnings, near the top-end of Hardie’s 50%-70% targeted payout range. Hardie runs a conservative balance sheet with leverage typically within a targeted range of 1-2 net debt/EBITDA. Net debt/EBITDA stood at 0.8 at the end of fiscal third-quarter 2022.Hardie’s asbestos-related liability–the AICF trust–has a gross carrying value at fiscal third-quarter 2022 of USD 1 billion and remains an overhang. However, payments to fund the liability are capped at 35% of trailing free cash flow. While this reduces cash flows available to shareholders over the medium term, the liability shouldn’t constrain the business’ ability to reinvest and thus expand and protect its competitive positioning. 

Bulls Say’s 

  • James Hardie’s clear leadership in the fibre cement category should drive growth in market share in the North American siding market. We forecast the company retaining its 90% share of the category, while fibre cement climbs to 28% of the total housing market. 
  • Hardie’s strong brand equity translates into pricing power, allowing for inflation in manufacturing costs to be easily passed on, thus protecting profitability in the face of imminent input cost inflation. 
  • The Fermacell acquisition could finally unlock Europe as an avenue of significant growth following market saturation in North America

Company Profile 

James Hardie is the world leader in fibre cement products, accounting for roughly 90% of all fibre cement building materials sold in the U.S. It has nine manufacturing plants in eight U.S. states and five across Asia-Pacific. Fibre cement competes with vinyl, wood, and engineered wood products with superior durability and moisture-, fire-, and termite-resistant qualities. The firm is a highly focused single-product company based on primary demand growth, cost-efficient production, and continual innovation of its differentiated range. With saturation of the North American market in sight, the acquisition of Fermacell in early 2018, Europe’s leading fibre gypsum manufacturer, will provide Hardie with a subsequent avenue of growth.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Capri Has Suggested The Two Brands (Jimmy Choo and Versace), When Mature, Could Combine For Operating Profit Of $450 Million

Business Strategy and Outlook

It is probable Michael Kors lacks the brand strength (and ultimately pricing power) to provide an economic moat for Capri. Powered by store openings and retail expansion in the 2010-15 period, Michael Kors became one of the largest American handbag producers in sales and units. However, its sales have declined from peak levels due to markdowns at third-party retail, store closures, and weakness in some categories. While Capri has reduced distribution to limit discounting of its bags, competition in the American handbag market is fierce, and store closures in the region continue. Michael Kors, though, has good potential in Asia, which Bain & Company expects will compose 50% (up from 37% at present) of the worldwide luxury market by 2025. It is foreseen the brand stands to win favor with Chinese consumers, but it is not foreseen for the brand to reach Capri’s $1 billion Asia sales target (up from $448 million in fiscal 2021) in the next 10 years given its limited tenure in the region relative to Coach and others. 

Capri spent a steep $3.4 billion to purchase Jimmy Choo and Versace to boost its status as a luxury house and reduce its dependence on Michael Kors. However, it is not likely these deals have changed Capri’s no-moat status as the acquired brands have more fashion risk, less profitability, and narrower appeal than Michael Kors. Capri is investing in store remodels, store openings, and expanding the set of accessories for both Jimmy Choo and Versace, but it is not seen these efforts will yield the intended gains, particularly given the severe interruption it is probable from COVID-19. While Capri has suggested the two brands, when mature, could combine for operating profit of $450 million and account for 30% of its total, it is not probable for this to happen until the end of this decade.

Financial Strength

Capri has debt, but it is seen as it is very manageable. The firm took on significant debt to fund its Jimmy Choo and Versace acquisitions, which came with a combined price tag of $3.4 billion. At the end of December 2021, it had total short- and long-term debt of $1 billion, but it also had more than $261 million in cash and $1 billion in available borrowing capacity. Moreover, during the COVID-19 crisis, it amended its revolving and term loan credit agreement so that most of its term loan that was due in December 2020 was extended to December 2023. Thus, Capri has no significant debt maturities prior to 2023. The firm’s debt/adjusted EBITDA was a very manageable 2.3 at the end of fiscal 2021, and it is foreseen this will fall to 0.8 at the end of fiscal 2022 on greater EBITDA and debt reduction. Capri has resumed share repurchases, which were suspended during the pandemic. The firm averaged more than $500 million in annual buybacks in fiscal 2015-20. It is now foreseen its share repurchases at an annual average of about $740 million over the next decade. However, Capri does not pay dividends.Capri plans to open new stores and remodel existing stores for all three of its brands, although these efforts stalled in fiscal 2020 due to COVID-19. Analysts forecast its fiscal 2022 capital expenditures will rise to $205 million (3.7% of sales) from just $111 million (2.7% of sales) last year. Long term, Analysts forecast Capri’s annual capital expenditures as a percentage of sales at 4.1% as management works to improve the performance at Jimmy Choo and Versace.

Bulls Say’s

  • Michael Kors is one of the largest brands in terms of units and sales in the high-margin handbag market, and it is likely, this positioning should aid its prospects as it looks to grow in complementary categories like footwear. 
  • Michael Kors has reduced its dependence on wholesale customers, which is viewed favorably as increased direct-to-consumer sales allow for better pricing and control over marketing. 
  • The acquisitions of Jimmy Choo and Versace afford diversification opportunities by bringing two luxury brands that maintain products with high price points into the fold.

Company Profile 

Michael Kors, Versace, and Jimmy Choo are the brands of Capri Holdings, a marketer, distributor, and retailer of upscale accessories and apparel. Kors, Capri’s largest brand, offers handbags, footwear, and apparel through more than 800 company-owned stores, wholesale, and e-commerce. Versace (acquired in 2018) is known for its ready-to-wear luxury fashion, while Jimmy Choo (acquired in 2017) is best known for women’s luxury footwear. John Idol has served as CEO since 2003 but will be replaced in the position by Joshua Schulman in late 2022. (Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities

First Solar’s Sales Efforts Have Become Increasingly Focused On Select End Markets

Business Strategy and Outlook

First Solar’s strategy has pivoted back to its origins as a supplier of thin film solar modules following the exit of its North American development business, and its operations and maintenance business in 2021. The company’s development business supported profits during 2012-17 when First Solar’s module business faced challenges. However, margins in the business became compressed in recent years, and it is likely the company made a prudent decision to exit the business given increasing need for scale. The company retains modest development activities in Japan, but it is not seen, these as core to its long-term strategy. 

Upon taking the helm in 2016, CEO Mark Widmar has led the successful execution of the transition to its Series 6 module. This was a major transition for the company and came at a hefty price tag–$2 billion in capital expenditures–but has resulted in a better competitive position compared with its prior module generation (Series 4). Further, the company’s sales efforts have become increasingly focused on select end markets. The U.S. and India represent approximately 90% of booking opportunities, where trade policies leave the company in a more favorable competitive position. In particular, the company performs well in the U.S. utility-scale market, where it is projected, its market share to be approximately 30%. 

Financially, the company is focused on leveraging scale benefits to drive margin improvement. Given continued expectations for declining selling prices and a largely fixed operating expense profile (circa 80% fixed), the key lever to grow operating margins is through capacity additions. It is largely definite with many of the company’s strategic moves in recent years. However, it is questioned whether a pure module supplier can achieve consistent excess profits. It would be interesting to see the company seek adjacent revenue opportunities- for example, balance of system components- to complement its module business.

Financial Strength

First Solar’s financial strength stands alone relative to solar module peers. It is considered that this a competitive advantage because it allows First Solar more flexibility to take advantage of investment opportunities. The company carries essentially no debt besides project debt associated with its Systems business and holds more than $1 billion in cash and investments as of late 2021. First Solar’s financial strength is in part due to its conservative approach to expanding capacity, which is in stark contrast to the track record of the broader industry. Cash flow generation has been weighed down by working capital in recent years, but it is probable, this should normalize over the medium term. Capital expenditures will be elevated for the next few years, due to large-scale manufacturing expansions in the U.S. and India. It is likely, the potential for local debt (India) and potential incentives (U.S.) to help fund part of the associated capital expenditures. Given its robust level of cash and investments, combined with continued steady cash flow generation, It isn’t seen the elevated capital expenditures posing a threat to the company’s financial position.

Bulls Say’s

  • First Solar’s balance sheet strength has enabled it to persist through solar cycles when competitors have failed. 
  • First Solar’s thin film cadmium telluride technology is unique within the industry and benefits from its simple manufacturing process and supply chain. 
  • First Solar is well positioned to benefit from potential U.S. manufacturing incentives.

Company Profile 

First Solar designs and manufactures solar photovoltaic panels, modules, and systems for use in utility-scale development projects. The company’s solar modules use cadmium telluride to convert sunlight into electricity. This is commonly called thin-film technology. First Solar is the world’s largest thin-film solar module manufacturer. It has production lines in Vietnam, Malaysia, and Ohio. It plans to add a large factory in India. 

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Onsemi’s Sales Growth Above That Of The Broader Semiconductor Industry

Business Strategy and Outlook

It is seen Onsemi is a power chipmaker aligning itself to the differentiated parts of its portfolio in order to accelerate growth and margin expansion. It is probable Onsemi to outpace the growth of its underlying markets over the next five years as it tailors its portfolio of transistors, analog chips, and sensors to pursue secular trends toward electrification and connectivity that allow it to sell into new sockets. Specifically, Onsemi is the top supplier of image sensors to automotive applications like advanced driver-assist systems, or ADAS, and its semiconductors enable power management and conversion in electric vehicles, or EVs, and renewable energy–all of which is likely to keep Onsemi’s sales growth above that of the broader semiconductor industry. 

It is viewed onsemi will be vulnerable to modest cyclicality in the short term, but think its portfolio realignment will lend itself to more durable returns through a cycle. The firm’s increased focus on sticky verticals, as well as its differentiated sensor and silicon carbide technologies, contribute to Analysts narrow economic moat rating. Onsemi’s bread and butter historically was in more commodity like discrete power chips, but it is probable for it to focus on higher-value applications in the automotive and industrial end markets going forward and in turn earn more consistent returns on invested capital. 

It is seen Onsemi will focus on expanding margins over the medium term. Management invested heavily in pruning and improving its manufacturing efficiency in 2018 and 2019, and it is alleged it see the fruits of these efforts after 2022 when Onsemi fully acquires its first 12-inch fab. It is also alleged the firm will focus its investments on the automotive and industrial markets–higher growth and higher margin than its legacy consumer and smartphone markets. It is seen management faces execution risk in hitting its lofty goal of 48%-50% adjusted gross margin, but expect both a focus on higher-margin verticals and an improved manufacturing footprint to get it to the high-40% range in the next five years–from a previous midcycle margin below 38%.

Financial Strength

It is probable Onsemi’s primary financial focus in the medium term will be generating free cash flow and paying down debt after hefty investments over the last five years. Onsemi took on more than $2 billion debt for its 2016 Fairchild acquisition, and also committed over $1 billion in capital expenditures between 2018 and 2019 to improve its manufacturing footprint (shuttering inefficient fabs and purchasing equipment for its new 12-inch fab). Management has a stated goal of holding off on new share repurchases until the firm meets its 2:1 net leverage goal (net debt/adjusted EBITDA). As of the end of fiscal 2021, Onsemi held $1.4 billion in cash compared with $3.1 billion in total debt, putting its year-end net leverage at 0.88 times. It is projected Onsemi to generate an average of $2 billion in free cash flow through 2026-even while committing roughly 10% of sales to capital expenditures-and seen the firm can use its extra cash to resume repurchases. If Onsemi were to come into a liquidity crunch, it has $1.3 billion available (as of end-fiscal 2021) under its $2 billion revolving credit facility.

Bulls Say’s

  • Onsemi’s image sensors are best of breed in the automotive market, with a leading market share in high-growth, mission-critical applications like ADAS. 
  • It is viewed Onsemi will continue to outgrow its underlying markets and the broader semiconductor industry by selling greater dollar content into applications like cars and servers, which also helps stave off its vulnerability to market cycles. 
  • Onsemi is focusing its portfolio on the automotive, industrial, and cloud markets, which is seen, will expand margins and create stickier customer relationships.

Company Profile 

Onsemi is a leading supplier of power and analog semiconductors, as well as sensors. Onsemi is the second-largest global supplier of discrete transistors like insulated gate bipolar transistors, or IGBTs, and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors, or MOSFETs, and also has a significant integrated power chip business. Onsemi is also the largest supplier of image sensors to the automotive market, targeting autonomous driving applications. The firm is concentrated in and focused on the automotive, industrial, and communications markets, and is reducing its exposure to the consumer and computing markets.

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Global stocks Shares

Grainger Shows Strong End Market Growth to Close out 2021; but We See Shares as Still Overvalued

Business Strategy and Outlook

W.W. Grainger operates in the highly fragmented maintenance, repair, and operating product distribution market, where its over $13 billion of sales represents only 6% global market share (the company has 7% share in the United States and 4% in Canada). The growing prevalence of e-commerce has intensified the competitive environment because of more price transparency and increased access to a wider array of vendors, including Amazon Business, which has entered the mix. As consumer preference began to shift to online and electronic purchasing platforms, Grainger invested heavily in improving its e-commerce capabilities and restructuring its distribution network. It is the now the 11th-largest e-retailer in North America; it shrank its U.S. branch network from 423 in 2010 to 287 in 2020 and added distribution centres in the U.S. to support the growing amount of direct-to-customer shipments. Still, the company had work to do on its pricing. Grainger historically relied on a pricing model that applied contractual discounts to high list prices. Leading up to 2017, though, this model made it difficult to win new business. To address this problem, Grainger rolled out a more competitive pricing model. Lower prices hurt gross profit margins, but volume gains, especially among higher-margin spot buys and midsize accounts, have offset price reductions and helped the company meet its 12%-13% operating margin goal by 2019 (12.1% adjusted operating margin in 2019.

Grainger continues to expand its endless assortment strategy, albeit skeptical of the margin expansion opportunity for this business, given strong competition in the space from the likes of Amazon Business and others. Still, Grainger has distinct competitive advantages in its traditional business, such as its long-standing relationships with large customers and its inventory management solutions, which should help it earn excess returns over the next 10 years.

Financial Strength

As of the fourth quarter of 2021, Grainger had $2.4 billion of debt outstanding, which net of $241 million of cash, represents a leverage ratio of about 1.2 times our 2022 EBITDA estimate. Grainger’s leverage ratio is relatively conservative for the industry, in our view. We believe the company certainly has room to increase leverage if needed, but management looks to be committed to keeping its net leverage ratio between 1-1.5 times. Grainger’s outstanding debt consists of $500 million of 1.85% senior notes due in 2025, $1 billion of 4.6% senior notes due in 2045, $400 million of 3.75% senior notes due in 2046, and $400 million of 4.2% senior notes due in 2047.Grainger has a proven ability to generate free cash flow throughout the cycle. Indeed, it has generated positive free cash flow every year since 2000, and its free cash flow generation tends to spike during downturns because of reduced working capital requirements. By our midcycle year, we forecast the company to generate over $1 billion in free cash flow, supporting its ability to return free cash flow to shareholders. Given the firm’s reasonable use of leverage and consistent free cash flow generation, we believe Grainger exhibits strong financial health.

Bulls Say’s

  •  With a more sensible, transparent pricing model, Grainger should continue to gain share with existing customers and win higher-margin midsize accounts. 
  • As a large distributor with national scale and inventory management services, Grainger is well positioned to take share from smaller regional and local distributors as customers consolidate their MRO spending. 
  • Grainger operates a shareholder-friendly capital allocation strategy; it has increased its dividend for 49 consecutive years and has reduced its diluted average share count by nearly 45% over the last 20 years.

Company Profile 

W.W. Grainger distributes 1.5 million maintenance, repair, and operating products that are sourced from over 4,500 suppliers. The company serves about 5 million customers through its online and electronic purchasing platforms, vending machines, catalog distribution, and network of over 400 global branches. In recent years, Grainger has invested in its e-commerce capabilities and is the 11th-largest e-retailer in North America.

 (Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

2021 a Year of Strong Growth for C.H. Robinson; Outlook Positive, but Expect Normalization in 2022

Business Strategy and Outlook

C.H. Robinson dominates the $80-plus billion asset-light highway brokerage market, and its immense network of shippers and asset-based truckers supports a wide economic moat, in our view. Although the company isn’t immune to freight downturns, its variable-cost model helps shield profitability during periods of lack lustre demand, as evidenced by a long history of above-average profitability. The firm does not own transportation equipment, and a large portion of operating expenses are tied to performance-based variable compensation, which tends to move in line with net revenue growth. The firm is thought to be well positioned to capitalize on truck brokerage industry consolidation (including market share gains) despite intensifying competition.

Over and above underlying shipment demand trends, share gains will probably remain the key growth driver for Robinson long term. For perspective, it is estimated that Robinson’s stake of the domestic freight brokerage industry at roughly 18% in recent years, up from 13% in 2004, based on market data from Armstrong & Associates. The truck brokerage business is still vastly fragmented, and small, less sophisticated providers are finding it increasingly difficult to keep up with rising demand for efficient capacity access and the need to automate processes. Robinson’s industry-leading network of asset-based truckload carriers (most small) should remain highly valuable to shippers over the long run. This is particularly because truckload-market capacity will probably continue to see growth constraints due in part to the stubbornly limited driver pool.

Robinson has also positioned its air and ocean forwarding unit to contribute to growth. In this segment, it competes with other top-shelf providers like Expeditors International. In 2012, it purchased Phoenix International, which doubled Robinson’s forwarding scale, and organic growth has continued (on average), along with additional tuck-in deals that have boosted the firm’s global footprint. Buying scale and lane density are important in order to secure adequate capacity for shippers, particularly during the peak season.

Financial Strength

C.H. Robinson has taken a more active stance with its balance sheet over the past decade, increasing leverage in part to fund occasional opportunistic acquisitions. Before 2012, the firm was largely debt free. That said, its capital structure remains quite healthy. At the end of 2021, the firm had a manageable total debt load near $1.9 billion and $257 million in cash. Debt/EBITDA was near 1.6 times (versus 1.4 times in 2019 and 2020), and in line with management’s targeted range of 1.0-1.5 times. Interest coverage (EBITDA/interest expense) in 2021 was a comfortable 20 times. Importantly, as a well-managed asset-light 3PL, Robinson has a long history of consistent free cash flow generation, averaging more than 3.0% of gross revenue over the past five years (20% of net revenue). Note that truck brokers’ free cash flow tends to be lowest in strong years of growth by nature of the intermediary business model and related spike in accounts receivable. It is expected that free cash flow to approximate 3%-4% of gross revenue over our forecast horizon. Robinson is expected to have no issues servicing its long-term obligations, given its top-tier profitability, and the firm’s liquidity should be more than ample to weather cyclical demand pullbacks

Bulls Say’s

  •  C.H. Robinson enjoys a long history of impressive execution throughout the freight cycle, and it has thwarted a host of competitive threats over the years. 
  • It is estimated that C.H. Robinson has gradually increased its share of the truck brokerage industry to roughly 17% from 13% in 2004. 
  • Robinson’s non-asset-based operating model has generated average returns on capital near 27% during the past decade and 21% since 2017 (around 23% in 2021)–well above returns generated by most traditional asset-intensive carriers.

Company Profile 

C.H. Robinson is a top-tier non-asset-based third-party logistics provider with a significant focus on domestic freight brokerage (57% of 2021 net revenue), which reflects mostly truck brokerage but also rail intermodal. Additionally, the firm also operates a large air and ocean forwarding division (34%), which has grown organically and via tuck-in acquisitions. The remainder of revenue consists of the European truck-brokerage division, transportation management services, and a legacy produce-sourcing operation.

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Murphy Oil Sees Major Gulf Projects Nearing Fruition, Plans Long-Term Harvest

Business Strategy and Outlook

Murphy Oil repositioned itself as a pure-play exploration and production company in 2013, spinning off its retail gas and refinery businesses.The firm is a top-five producer in the Gulf of Mexico, and the region accounts for almost half of its production. Murphy has a number of expansion projects lined up there that should offset legacy declines and enable it to hold production flat in the next few years. There is regulatory risk, though: after entering office, U.S. President Joe Biden has pledged to halt offshore oil and gas permitting activity (to demonstrate his climate credentials). Murphy already holds valid leases for its upcoming projects and is ahead of schedule on permitting but will eventually require further approvals if it wants to continue its development plans. Thus far, the Biden administration has taken little action, leaving Murphy unencumbered. But we would not rule out a more comprehensive ban.

The firm has made considerable progress cutting costs and boosting productivity since the post-2014 downturn. However, while the firm still has over 1,400 drillable locations in inventory.When this portion is exhausted, well performance, and thus returns, could deteriorate. And in Canada, the firm is currently prioritizing the Tupper Montney gas play while natural gas prices in the region are more stable after a period of steep discounts caused by takeaway constraints that have now cleared.

Morningstar analysts have increased its fair value estimate for Murphy to $33 from $26, after taking a second look at Murphy’s fourth quarter operating and financial results. 

Financial Strength 

The COVID-19-related collapse in crude prices during 2020 impacted the balance sheets of most upstream oil firms, and Murphy saw its leverage ratios tick higher as well. But management has engineered a rapid recovery, aided by strengthening commodity prices. At the end of the last reporting period, debt/capital was 37% and net debt/EBITDA was 1.5 times. That’s about average for the peer group. However, the firm is generating substantial free cash, and management intends to prioritize further debt repayments.The firm currently holds about $2.5 billion of debt, and has roughly $2 billion in liquidity ($500 million cash and about $1.5 billion undrawn bank credit). The term structure of the firm’s debt is reasonably well spread out, and nothing is due before 2024. The firm should have no issues covering its obligations with cash from operations, unless oil prices fall significantly below our midcycle forecast ($60 Brent) for a significant period.

Bulls Say

  • The joint venture with Petrobras is accretive to Murphy’s production and generates cash flows that can be redeployed in the Eagle Ford and offshore. 
  • The Karnes County portion of Murphy’s Eagle Ford acreage offers economics that are as good as or better than any other U.S. shale. 
  • Murphy’s diversified portfolio gives it access to oil and natural gas markets in several regions, insulating it to a degree from commodity price fluctuations or regulatory risks.

Company Profile

Murphy Oil is an independent exploration and production company developing unconventional resources in the United States and Canada. At the end of 2021, the company reported net proved reserves of 699 million barrels of oil equivalent. Consolidated production averaged 167.4 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2021, at a ratio of 63% oil and natural gas liquids and 37% natural gas.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.