Tag: Top Stocks

Categories
Technology Stocks

TE Connectivity Ltd. to grow its midcycle operating margins and enhance its cash flow

fintech icon on abstract financial technology background represent Blockchain and Fintech Investment Financial Internet Technology Concept.

Business Strategy and Outlook

TE Connectivity is a leading designer and manufacturer of connectors and sensors, supplying custom and semicustom solutions to a bevy of end markets in the transportation, industrial, and communications verticals. TE has maintained a leading share of the global connector market for the last decade, specifically dominating the automotive connector market, from which it derives more than 40% of revenue. While the firm’s entire business benefits from trends toward efficiency and connectivity, these are especially notable in cars, where shifts toward electric and autonomous vehicles provide lucrative opportunities for TE to sell into new vehicle sockets, like an onboard charger or advanced driver-assist system. 

TE’s products offer high performance and reliability for mission-critical applications in harsh environments. As such, its customer relationships tend to be very sticky, with customers facing high financial and opportunity costs from switching to another component supplier, as well as the risk of component failure in new products. TE’s customers also rely on the firm supplying cutting-edge products to power new capabilities in end applications. As older products become commoditized, the firm can maintain high prices with new innovations. As a result of these switching costs and pricing power, TE Connectivity possesses a narrow economic moat.

In the future, TE Connectivity will focus on increasing its dollar content in end applications across its end markets. TE’s products pave the way for greater electrification and connectivity in vehicles, planes, and factories, which allows the firm to occupy a greater portion of these end products’ electrical architectures. TE will remain a serial acquirer, bolting on smaller components players to expand its geographic and technological reach. Finally, TE is expected to continue expanding its margins via footprint consolidation, as it streamlines the fixed-asset portfolio it has gained over a decade of acquisitions

Financial Strength

TE Connectivity is expected to remain leveraged, using strong free cash flow to invest organically and inorganically, and to send capital back to shareholders. As of Sept. 24, 2021, the firm carried $4.1 billion in total debt and $1.2 billion in cash on hand. While the firm is leveraged, its cash flow generation will be more than able to fulfil its obligations. TE has less than $700 million a year in payments due through fiscal 2026, and it is projected to generate more than $2 billion in free cash flow annually over the next five years. Even in a severely soft macro environment in 2020, the firm generated $1.4 billion in free cash flow. After fulfilling its obligations, TE is expected to use the remainder of its cash to maintain its dividend and conduct share repurchases. The firm will remain leveraged, using extra capital for opportunistic acquisitions while using its heady cash flow to pay off its principal and interest.

Bulls Say’s

  • TE Connectivity is a leader in the automotive connector and sensor market, enabling OEMs to build more advanced and efficient electric and autonomous vehicles. 
  • TE’s products are specialized for mission-critical applications in harsh environments, where reliable performance creates sticky customer relationships. 
  • TE’s ongoing footprint consolidation should allow it to expand its midcycle operating margins and improve its cash flow.

Company Profile 

TE Connectivity is the largest electrical connector supplier in the world, supplying interconnect and sensor solutions to the transportation, industrial, and communications markets. With operations in 150 countries and over 500,000 stock-keeping units, TE Connectivity has a broad portfolio that forms the electrical architecture of its end customers’ cutting-edge innovations.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Technology Stocks

Revised Tax Expectations Nudge Cooper’s FVE Upward

Young woman trading stock market by touching.

Business Strategy and Outlook

As a cash-pay business with sticky customers and few competitors, the contact lens industry is an attractive market, in our opinion. Four players (Johnson & Johnson, Alcon, Cooper, and Bausch Health) dominate the global market, and industry regulation creates strong barriers to entry, keeping new entrants away. Cooper’s surgical segment has contributed approximately one fourth of total revenue since 2018, following the acquisition of Paragard, a nonhormonal copper intrauterine device.

Though Paragard sales dropped during the COVID-19 pandemic, its believe that the product is well positioned to benefit from secular trends toward increased adoption of IUDs in the U.S. IUD usage rate to mirror the rate in other developed countries, leading to market saturation and a slowdown in segment revenue growth. 

Financial Strength

Cooper is in solid financial strength. While the company took on $1.4 billion in debt in fiscal 2018 to acquire Teva’s Paragard IUD, its vision and surgical segments should generate enough cash to allow the company to pay down debt and continue investing in its businesses. Historically, Cooper had no trouble paying down debt, with debt/EBITDA down from 3.1 in fiscal 2014 to 1.9 times by the end of fiscal 2017. Even with the large acquisition and significant upticks in COVID-19-related costs, the firm ended 2020 with debt about 3 times EBITDA. 

The contact lens market is already very consolidated, especially after the Sauflon acquisition, so future large acquisitions seem unlikely for CooperVision, but the firm may seek additional capital to pursue bolt-on deals in its surgical division. CooperSurgical has acquired about 40 companies since 1990, and we project this trend to continue. Cooper has spent $1.1 billion and $1.9 billion on acquisitions over the past five and 10 years, respectively.

Bulls Say’s 

  • CooperVision will benefit as customers trade up from weekly or monthly contact lenses to more expensive daily lenses. 
  • Paragard is the only nonhormonal IUD approved in the U.S. and does not have any serious competition. 
  • MiSight has first-mover advantage in a fast-growing market with a multibillion-dollar market potential.

Company Profile 

Cooper Companies operates two units: CooperVision and CooperSurgical. Accounting for approximately 75% of total sales, CooperVision is the the second-largest player in the oligopolistic contact lens market. Over 50% of CooperVision’s sales are in international territories. The second unit, CooperSurgical, develops and manufactures diagnostic and surgical products for gynecologists and obstetricians, including the Paragard IUD, which Cooper acquired from Teva in 2017. 

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
ETFs ETFs Research Sectors

BetaShares Australian Sustainability Leaders ETF: Australian equities exposure with a tangible approach to ESG

Approach

FAIR tracks the Nasdaq Future Australian Sustainable Leaders Index, a benchmark Nasdaq co-developed with BetaShares in 2017. As per the guidelines laid out by the Responsible Investment Committee, Sustainability Leaders are defined as companies generating more than 20% revenue from select sustainable business or having a certain grade (B or better) from sanctioned ethical consumer reports or being a certified B corporation. There is a maximum 10 stocks per sector and a limit of 4% exposure at an individual stock level.  

Portfolio

As at 30 November 2021, FAIR has a large-cap-dominated portfolio comprising 86 stocks. Stocks must have a market cap of more than USD 100 million and three-month trading volume of over USD 750,000. The index differs largely from the category index S&P/ASX 200, as there is a significant overweight in healthcare, real estate, technology, and communication services. On the other hand, the portfolio is underweight in financial services and materials with nil exposure to energy stocks.

People

The three-person responsible investment committee may remove index inclusions at any time based solely on qualitative considerations of whether a company still meets ESG considerations. The committee comprises Betashares co-founder David Nathanson and Adam Verwey, a managing director of large investor Future Super.

Performance

In early 2020, the fund dropped significantly owing to the frantic sell-off triggered by the global coronavirus pandemic. Despite this, the fund managed to close on a positive return of 2.23% for the year 2020. The uptrend continued into 2021, and it ended the calendar year with 17.99% returns, closely matching the category.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

TC Energy Continues to Pursue Promising Low-Carbon Efforts

Business Strategy and Outlook

TC Energy faces many of the same challenges as Canadian pipeline peer Enbridge but also offers important contrasts. The most critical differences between Enbridge and TC Energy arise from their approaches to energy transition.

Canadian carbon emissions taxes are expected to increase to CAD 170 a ton by 2030 from CAD 40 today, meaning it is critical that TC Energy, with its natural gas exposure, follow Enbridge’s approach to rapidly reduce its carbon emission profile and continue to pursue projects like the Alberta Carbon Grid, which will be able to transport more than 20 million tons of carbon dioxide. These taxes potentially increase costs for Canadian pipes compared with U.S. pipes but also make hydrogen a viable alternative to gas-powered electricity generation by 2030 in Canada, presenting an emerging threat. TC Energy recently introduced targets to reduce its Scope 1 and 2 intensity by 30% by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050, which is a start.

In addition, Enbridge’s backlog is more diversified across its businesses already, and it already has a more material renewable business, including hydrogen, renewable natural gas, and wind efforts. Morningstar analysts think the renewable business lacks an economic moat today, and considers it is an important area of investment for TC Energy that it needs to pursue. The renewable investments can compete for capital across the rest of the portfolio, generating reasonable returns on capital, allowing the overall enterprise to adapt to the markets as they evolve. This shift is especially the case as a CAD 170 per ton carbon tax in Canada opens the door for potentially sizable investments to reduce carbon emissions.

Financial Strength 

TC Energy carries significantly higher leverage than the typical U.S. midstream firm, with current debt/EBITDA well over 5 times.The high degree of leverage is supported by the highly protected nature of its earnings stream. As capital spending declines over the next few years TC Energy to currently will reach the 4s in the latter half of the decade.TC Energy is also unusual in that it will continue to rely on the capital markets to meet about 20% of its expected capital expenditures over the next few years.TC Energy has outlined plans to spend about CAD 5 billion annually on a continued basis. About CAD 1.5 billion-2 billion is maintenance spending on its pipelines, and 85% of this is recoverable due to being invested in the rate base. Bruce Power and the U.S. and Canadian natural gas pipelines will consume about CAD 1 billion each annually. ESG-related opportunities such as using renewable power to power its own operations or seeking carbon capture efforts would be on top of this spending. TC’s dividend growth remains prized by its investors, and 3%-5% growth going forward is easily supportable under the firm’s 60/40 framework.

Bulls Say

  • TC Energy has strong growth opportunities in Mexican natural gas as well as liquefied natural gas. 
  • The company offers virtually identical growth prospects and a protected earnings profile to Enbridge but allows investors to bet more heavily on natural gas. 
  • The Canadian regulatory structure allows for greater recovery of costs due to project cancelations or producers failing compared with the U.S.

Company Profile

TC Energy operates natural gas, oil, and power generation assets in Canada and the United States. The firm operates more than 60,000 miles of oil and gas pipelines, more than 650 billion cubic feet of natural gas storage, and about 4,200 megawatts of electric power.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

Adobe Remains Dominant in Creative While Building Its Second Empire in Digital Experience

Business Strategy and Outlook

Adobe has come to dominate in content creation software with its iconic Photoshop and Illustrator solutions, both now part of the broader Creative Cloud, which is now offered via a subscription model. The company has added new products and features to the suite through organic development and bolt-on acquisitions to drive the most comprehensive portfolio of tools used in print, digital, and video content creation The benefits from software as a service are well known in that it offers significantly improved revenue visibility and the elimination of piracy for the company, and a much lower cost hurdle to overcome ($1,000 or more up-front, versus plans as low as $10 per month) and a solution that is regularly updated with new features for users.

Adobe benefits from the natural cross-selling opportunity from Creative Cloud to the business and operational aspects of marketing and advertising. On the heels of the Magento and Marketo acquisitions in the second half of fiscal 2018 and Workfront in 2021, Morningstar analysts believe Adobe to continue to focus its M&A efforts on the digital experience segment and other emerging areas.

Adobe believes it is attacking an addressable market greater than $205 billion. The company is introducing and leveraging features across its various cloud offerings (like Sensei artificial intelligence) to drive a more cohesive experience, win new clients, upsell users to higher price point solutions, and cross sell digital media offerings.

Financial Strength 

Morningstar analysts believe Adobe enjoys a position of excellent financial strength arising from its strong balance sheet, growing revenues, and high and expanding margins. As of November 2021, Adobe has $5.8 billion in cash and equivalents, offset by $4.1 billion in debt, resulting in a net cash position of $1.6 billion. Adobe has historically generated strong operating margins. Free cash flow generation was $6.9 billion in fiscal 2021, representing a free cash flow margin of 43.7%. Morningstar analysts believe that margins should continue to grind higher over time as the digital experience segment scales. In terms of capital deployment, Adobe reinvests for growth, repurchases shares, and makes acquisitions. The company does not pay a dividend. Over the last three years Adobe has spent $2.8 billion on acquisitions, $9.6 billion on buy-backs, while share count has decreased by 15 million shares. It is believed that the company will continue to repurchase shares as its primary means of returning cash to shareholders over the medium term. Morningstar analysts also believe the company will continue to make opportunistic and strategic tuck-in acquisitions.

Bulls Say

  • Adobe is the de facto standard in content creation software and PDF file editing, categories the company created and still dominates. 
  • Shift to subscriptions eliminates piracy and makes revenue recurring, while removing the high up-front price for customers. Growth has accelerated and margins are expanding from the initial conversion inflection. 
  • Adobe is extending its empire in the creative world from content creation to marketing services more broadly through the expansion of its digital experience segment. This segment should drive growth in the coming years.

Company Profile

Adobe provides content creation, document management, and digital marketing and advertising software and services to creative professionals and marketers for creating, managing, delivering, measuring, optimizing and engaging with compelling content across multiple operating systems, devices and media. The company operates with three segments: digital media content creation, digital experience for marketing solutions, and publishing for legacy products (less than 5% of revenue).

 (Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Nikko AM Global Share Fund: Solid Strategy, Experienced Team and Remarkable Process

Approach

The investment process is based around searching for stocks that have “future quality.” To achieve the investment objective, the analyst’s undertakes bottom-up fundamental research seeking quality of franchise (competitive advantages), quality of balance sheet (low debt), quality of management (strong stewardship), and quality of future valuation (sustainable but growing cash flow). The first step is developing stock ideas; the analyst’s makes use of third-party research, personal insights, company meetings, site visits, conferences, and input from other Nikko AM investment teams. Ultimately, the investment universe is restricted to companies with market caps above USD 1 billion and daily traded liquidity of more than USD 10 million. The next step is thorough fundamental bottom-up research on the firm’s business model, management and balance sheet. Detailed financial models, based on long-term cash flow forecasting, are built to establish a future quality valuation. The individual portfolio managers summarise the company research in a standard template and present stock ideas formally at a weekly meeting, where open critique is undertaken by the analysts. The investment philosophy is high-conviction, with the analysts adopting a largely index-agnostic strategy, which slightly favours growth and results in an active share of 90%-95%. Ultimately, stock selection plays a key role in the process.

Portfolio

The portfolio construction methodology is disciplined and repeatable, using a proprietary ranking tool to grade stocks in terms of expected alpha and risk. The resulting portfolio contains the analyst’s highest conviction 40-50 stock ideas. The investment process typically leads the team to construct a portfolio with a higher weighting in defensive sectors, including healthcare and consumer staples, and typically a lower weighting in cyclicals, namely, consumer discretionary and financials. However, these allocations depend on stock opportunities and economic conditions. At 31 Oct 2021, the portfolio had an active underweighting in defensive sectors, with healthcare heavily favoured and an active overweighting in cyclical sectors, with industrials and consumer discretionary stocks favoured. Regional allocation typically tends to be similar to the index. However, at 31 Oct 2021, the portfolio was only overweight in two regions: the United States and Hong Kong/Singapore. A comprehensive risk-management process is implemented to ensure no unintended sector, geographic, or commodity risk is included in the portfolio. The portfolio is also monitored from an environmental, social, and governance risk perspective. Risk-management guidelines include that no more than 10% of net assets may be invested in any one stock.

People

The investment team includes five highly experienced portfolio managers (William Low, James Kinghorn, Iain Fulton, Greig Bryson, and Johnny Russell) who operate as global generalists but with sector-specific responsibilities. In addition, two portfolio analysts, who mainly undertake thematic or project research joined the team in 2019. Low leads the team; he joined Nikko AM in mid-2014 as a portfolio manager with overall responsibility for the global-equity team (the team moved across from Scottish Widows Investment Partnership where they previous managed global equity strategies together). He has more than 30 years’ experience in the investment/finance industry, previously working for BlackRock and Dunedin Fund Managers as a portfolio manager and investment manager. Kinghorn and the other team members joined Nikko AM in mid-2014; Kinghorn had been at SWIP since 2011. Fulton joined after previously working at SWIP as head of research since 2005. Bryson joined after working at SWIP since 2007. Russell joined Nikko AM after working at SWIP since 2002. The team has access to the extensive global resources of Nikko AM, which boasts more than 100 portfolio managers and 50 analysts.

Performance 

In mid-2015, the existing Nikko AM global-equity fund was restructured from a multimanager approach to its current structure of direct investment in stocks in the MSCI ACWI, under the guidance of the incumbent five portfolio managers. This team arrived at Nikko AM in 2014, having previously worked at Scottish Widows Investment Partnership. Since the strategy and personnel changes, this fund has outperformed its Morningstar Category index (MSCI World Ex Australia NR Index) and most peers in the five years to 30 Nov 2021, on a trailing returns basis. Individual calendar-year results have been strong from 2015 through 2020, with standout 2018 and 2020 years, and 2016 the lone blot against the team. In 2017, outperformance was relatively slender, 

and positive contributors included Sony and Tencent. The strategy had a stronger 2018 with positive attribution from LivaNova. Returns were again solid against the index and peers during 2019, with Chinese sporting goods company Li Ning Company and US software giant Microsoft among the top contributors. Both the index and peers were thumped in 2020 by the team, which managed a softer drawdown during the first-quarter correction and adding alpha each of the remaining quarters. In the 11 months to 30 Nov 2021, the strategy have struggled, as style headwinds had an impact on performance, despite solid attribution from SVB Financial Group and Bio-Techne Corporation.

About Fund:

Nikko AM Global Share is a strategy with sturdy foundations, thanks to its highly experienced team of portfolio managers and well-structured investment process. The Edinburgh-based investment team functions in a very cooperative, transparent, and mutually respectful manner, adopting a flat operating structure, with individual portfolio managers having specific sector responsibility on a global basis. The resulting portfolio of typically around 40-50 stocks is slightly growth-orientated and high conviction, with around 35% of FUM in the top 10 stocks. The strategy benchmarks to the MSCI All Country World Index, giving it rein to venture into emerging markets, but this allocation is rarely more than 10% of assets.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds Research Sectors

AMP Capital Corporate Bond Fund Outdoing the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and The Average Credit Fund

Process:

AMP Capital Corporate Bond provides exposure to a wide range of credit securities within Australian, global, investment-grade, corporate bond, and high yield. The benchmark changed from the Bloomberg AusBond Credit 0+Yr Index to the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index in February 2016, reflecting the fund’s capital preservation and income emphasis since 2012. Monthly distributions are announced and reviewed biannually, which helps income-focused investors manage their expectations. Credit analysis is done on two accounts; first, a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the broader industry sector, and second, issuerand security-specific analysis. 

The analysis is conducted in line with a “score card” methodology that incorporates fundamentals, technicals, and valuations. The primary weighting is to the valuation and fundamental factors as the team believes this is the primary determinant of a positive outcome for investors over the longer term. The duration view is led by the macro team and is established through a similar score card system, which again considers fundamental, sentiment, and technical factors, with the analyst view of valuation playing a key part. The credit strategy panel, comprising senior investment staff, set the overall credit strategy, risk budget, and sector allocations. However, the ultimate duration and credit exposures are determined by comanagers Sonia Baillie and Nathan Boon.

Portfolio:

The vehicle chiefly comprises Australian credit, though it does hold around 5% each in US and UK names. The strategy can hold up to 10% in high yield and 15% in unrated bonds but is usually well below these limits. The portfolio is largely BBB and A rated corporate bonds, with the BBB names providing a slightly larger proportion of the fund’s asset value at nearly 44% to October 2021. Following the coronavirus-driven dislocation, the team took opportunistic exposures in long duration REITs and industrials, some of which have seen partial profit taking with significant spread tightening throughout 2021. 2019 saw the fund rotate back into corporate bonds following the late-2018 sell-off. 

The team believes credit fundamentals are improving and technicals supportive, but valuations indicate little expectation of further spread compression. It wants to maintain income by holding credit, albeit at a reducing amount to late-2021, also using credit derivatives to insulate from wider spreads. The fund’s duration limits were adjusted from plus or minus 1.5 years versus the old credit benchmark, to absolute terms of zero to 4.5 years in October 2014. The fund has been positioned within a duration range of 0.2-0.8 years since the start of 2017 (0.6 years in October 2021), meaning the sensitivity to rising interest rates is low. FUM has steadily declined over the past few years and currently sits at AUD 855 million as of October 2021.

People:

Sonia Baillie (head of credit) has led this portfolio since October 2017, joined by Nathan Boon (head of credit portfolio management) in March 2018. This group, however, is currently transitioning into the Macquarie fixed-income team as part of AMP Capital’s sale to that organisation; completion is expected by mid-2022, creating some uncertainty. The duo gets significant input from head of macro Ilan Dekell, and a team of analysts spread between Sydney and Chicago. Head of credit research Steven Hur was previously a key member until he left the group in December 2021. The fixed-income team is headed by Grant Hassell, who has more than 30 years of experience, though he is the sole member of this quartet not joining the Macquarie investment team in the same capacity. 

Hassell contributes to overall discussions through team meetings and investment committees, acting as the sounding board for the various heads to bring ideas together into a portfolio. While there has been staff turnover among the credit analyst and credit portfolio managers–former managers Jeff Brunton and David Carruthers left in 2014 and 2016, respectively–most key staffers have long tenure. For example, while Baillie was appointed portfolio manager only in 2017, she has been with the team since 2010, has held other senior roles, and worked in the firm’s Asian fixed-income business. Furthermore, AMP Capital has taken steps to improve staff incentives and address staff turnover.

Performance:

Over the long run, this fund has outdone the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and the average credit fund. That’s not necessarily compelling, given the fund has been running substantially more credit and/or duration risk than those yardsticks. Since AMP Capital slashed the fund’s duration, rival credit funds are a more reasonable benchmark looking ahead; the fund’s historically high duration means we also compare the fund’s history against the Bloomberg AusBond Credit Index, where this strategy has underperformed. The fund’s track record has benefited from higher-than-average credit risk, as well as significant interest-rate risk, that has paid off as rates declined to historically low levels. returns, yet three- and five-year returns fail to beat the average category peer. Given declining global interest rates, the fund reduced its distribution in mid-2017 to 0.275% per month, and then 0.25% per month at the beginning of 2018. This continued through 2021 when distributions dropped to 0.175% by year-end, the shop expects it to remain at these compressed levels, barring unforeseen circumstances. The rate peaked at 0.55% per month in 2012, highlighting that while these distribution indications can be helpful in the short run, they should not be relied on for long-term income expectations.

About Funds:

Though a new home will bring positives to AMP Capital Corporate Bond, it also introduces uncertainties for this diversified credit strategy. AMP Capital’s Global Equities and Fixed Interest business is in the midst of a sale to Macquarie Asset Management, which is expected to complete by mid-2022. Head of global fixed income Grant Hassell is leading the integration. The strategy has benchmarked to the Bloomberg Ausbond Bank Bill Index since early-2016, reflecting the income goals with capital stability. This move followed a history of changes, which under Macquarie’s guidance going forward could see further revisions in approach.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Robeco QI Global Conservative Equities I: A strong option for investors looking for downside protection

Process:

The strategy’s robust foundation, high repeatability, discipline, and consistent execution remain attractive features. The team’s relentless efforts to implement new elements to the process, these also make the approach more complex and have led to a slight change of portfolio characteristics, which is appreciated. This rules-based, quantitative process is built on extensive academic research demonstrating that investing in low-risk stocks leads to better risk-adjusted returns. After an initial liquidity filter, Robeco’s quant model ranks the 4,500-stock universe on a multidimensional risk factor (volatility, beta, and distress metrics), combined with value, quality, sentiment and momentum factors. In recent years, the team has introduced several enhancements to refine the model, including short-term momentum-driven signals that can adjust a stock’s ranking up or down by maximum 10 percentage points. This should prioritize buy decisions for stocks that rank high in the model and score well on short term signals, and vice versa. Since 2020 the team also allows liquid mega-caps to have a higher weight in the portfolio. Top-quintile stocks are typically included in an optimisation algorithm that considers liquidity, market cap, and 10-percentage-point country and sector limits relative to the MSCI World Index. A 200-300 stock portfolio is constructed with better ESG and carbon footprints than the index, while rebalancing takes place monthly, generating modest annual turnover of about 25%. Stocks are sold when ranking in the bottom 40% of the model. 

Portfolio:

The defensive nature of the strategy currently translates into a higher allocation to low-beta and high yielding stocks in the consumer staples and communication services sectors, while industrials, energy and technology stocks are a large underweight. The valuation factors embedded in the model have steered the fund clear from MSCI ACWI index heavyweights Amazon.com AMZN, Tesla TSLA, and NVIDIA NVDA, while Microsoft MSFT and Apple AAPL were underweighted. Valuations make the fund lean towards European stocks while the U.S. stock market was an 8.8% underweight versus the index per November 2021. The model does like U.S. consumer defensives though, with larger positions for Proctor & Gamble PG, Walmart WMT, and Target TGT. The quant approach gives management wide latitude to invest across the market-cap spectrum, and the diversified 200- to 300-stock portfolio has long exhibited a small/mid-cap bias compared with the index.

People:

The team running this strategy is large, experienced, and stable. As such, it earns an Above Average People rating. This fund follows an entirely quant-based approach, an area where Robeco has extensive experience and expertise, and where it has invested heavily in human resources over the years. Robeco’s quant team runs various strategies: core quant equity, factor investing, and conservative equity, but there is significant interaction between them. The conservative equity team that runs this fund is led by Pim van Vliet, whose academic work has laid the foundation of the fund’s philosophy.

Performance:

This defensive strategy has generally offered good volatility reduction during turbulent markets. Robeco QI Global Conservative Equities’ C € share class absorbed 67% of the losses of the MSCI ACWI Index since inception. However, its results versus the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index have been less consistent. Disappointingly, it did not live up to its expectations in the corona-dominated markets of 2020, though the strategy’s failure can be explained by market dynamics in relation to the fund’s strategy. The portfolio lagged during the subsequent recovery that again benefited tech and ecommerce stocks, and while the value rally in the final quarter did help, cyclical value stocks that are not favoured here rallied the most.

(Source: Morningstar)

Price:

Analysts find it difficult to analyse expenses since it comes directly from the returns. Analysts expect that it would be able to deliver positive alpha relative to its category benchmark index.


(Source: Morningstar)                                                                       (Source: Morningstar)

About Funds:

Robeco’s quant-based conservative equities range is managed by a stable and experienced six-member team led by Pim van Vliet. They are supported by a group of 10 quantitative researchers led by David Blitz and a similarly sized group of data scientists. This credentialed team is vital to the fund’s success as it constantly refines the models used in the funds. It is also reassuring that Robeco’s broader quantitative team has successfully groomed quantitative researchers in its talent pool, allowing them to add people with complementary skills to the teams. The strategy’s academic foundation, repeatability, discipline, and consistent execution give us confidence. The rules-based, quantitative process is built on empirical research demonstrating that investing in low-risk stocks leads to better risk-adjusted returns. It goes beyond traditional low-volatility investing, combining a multidimensional risk factor with value, quality, sentiment, and momentum factors. Top-quintile-ranked stocks are included in the portfolio after running an optimisation algorithm.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

JD.com Going Towards Asset-Heavy Model Bulls For Now

Business Strategy and Outlook

JD.com has emerged as a leading disruptive force in China’s retail industry by offering authentic products online at competitive prices with speedy and high-quality delivery service. JD’s mobile shopping market share has increased from 21% in 2016 to 27% in 2020 on approx. JD adopted an asset-heavy model with self-owned inventory and self-built logistics, while Alibaba has more of an asset-light model. 

JD is a long-term margin expansion story driven by increasing scale from JD direct sales and marketplace, partially offset by the push into JD logistics in the medium term. JD is the largest retailer in China by revenue. Among listed Chinese peers, JD’s net product revenue in 2020 was two to three times higher than for Suning, the second-largest listed retailer. JD’s increasing scale in each category will allow it to garner bargaining power toward the suppliers and volume-based rebates. Since 2016, JD no longer fully reinvests its gains from improving scale and is committed to delivering annual margin expansion in the long run. Gross margin improved yearly from 5.5% in 2011 to 15.2% in 2016, and following the consolidation of JD Finance in second-quarter 2017, gross margin improved year over year from 13.7% in 2016 to 14.6% in 2020. 

In the medium term, it is foreseen the investment into community group purchase, JD logistics and the supermarket category will hold back some of the margin gains. JD is unlikely to have non-GAAP net margin increase in 2021. Starting in April 2017, the logistics business became an independent business unit that will open its services to third parties. Management is squarely focused on gaining market share instead of profitability at this point, and to do so, it has invested heavily in supply chain management, integrated warehouse, and delivery services to penetrate into less developed areas. As the logistics business gains scale and reaches higher capacity utilization, it is foreseen for, gross profit margin improvement. Management believes it is not time to turn profitable in the supermarket category in order to be a category leader in China.

Financial Strength

JD.com had a net cash position of CNY 135 billion at the end of 2020. Its free cash flow to the firm has continued to generate positive FCFF at CNY 8.1 billion in 2020. JD has not paid dividends. JD.com has invested heavily in fulfilment infrastructure and technology in recent years, leading to concerns about its free cash flow profile and margin improvement story. It is contemplated management will put more emphasis on growing revenue per user, expansion into lower-tier cities and the businesses’ profitability. Therefore, JD will not invest in new areas as aggressively as before, so it is alleged think JD will be able to maintain positive non-GAAP net margin versus being unprofitable before. its financial strength will improve in future. Most of the initial investments in the third-party logistics business have been carried out, and utilization of the warehouses has picked up. Its technology team is already in place without the need to add substantial headcounts. JD will also be cautious in its investment in the group-buying business and new retail, given a profitable business model has not been established in the market. JD has tried to improve its asset-heavy model by transferring a portfolio of warehouses to establish a CNY 10.9 billion logistics property core fund in partnership with the sovereign wealth fund of Singapore, GIC. JD will own 20% of the fund, lease back the logistics facilities and receive management fees for managing the facilities. The deal will be completed in phases with the majority of them completed in 2019.

 Bulls Say’s

  • JD.com’s nationwide distribution network and fulfilment capacity will be extremely difficult for competitors to replicate. 
  • The partnership with Tencent could allow JD.com to gain significant user traffic from Tencent’s dominant social-networking products in China. 
  • JD is now the largest supermarket in China, the high frequency FMCG categories have attracted new customers from less developed areas and can drive purchase of other categories.

Company Profile 

Trip.com is the largest online travel agent in China and is positioned to benefit from the country’s rising demand for higher-margin outbound travel as passport penetration is only 12% in China. The company generated about 78% of sales from accommodation reservations and transportation ticketing in 2020. The rest of revenue comes from package tours and corporate travel. Prior to the pandemic in 2019, the company generated 25% of revenue from international business, which is important to its margin expansion. Most of sales come from websites and mobile platforms, while the rest come from call centers. The competes in a crowded OTA industry in China, including Meituan, Alibaba-backed Fliggy, Toncheng, and Qunar. The company was founded in 1999 and listed on the Nasdaq in December 2003. 

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

APTIV ENJOYING STICKY MARKET SHARE THANKS TO CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS AND LONG TERM CONTRACTS

Business Strategy and Outlook

It is foreseen Aptiv’s average yearly revenue growth to exceed average annual growth in global light-vehicle demand by high-single-digit percentage points. The company provides automakers with components and systems that are in high demand from consumers and that government regulation requires to be installed. Aptiv’s high-growth technologies include advanced driver-assist systems, autonomous driving, connectivity, data services, and high-voltage electrical distribution systems for hybrids and battery electric vehicles. 

It is seen, Aptiv’s ability to regularly innovate and commercialize new technologies bolsters sales growth, margin, and return on investment. A global manufacturing presence enables Aptiv to serve customers around the globe, capitalizing on the economies of scale inherent in automakers’ plans to use more global vehicle platforms. Lean manufacturing discipline and a low-cost country footprint enable more favourable operating leverage as volume increases. 

Aptiv enjoys relatively sticky market share, supported by integral customer relationships and long-term contracts. The design phase of a vehicle program can last between 18 months and three years depending on the complexity and extent of the model redesign. The production phase averages between five and 10 years. Engineering and design for the types of products that Aptiv provides necessitate highly integrated, long-term customer relationships that are not easily broken by competitors’ attempts at market penetration. 

New Car Assessment Programs are used by governments around the world to provide an independent vehicle safety rating. Legislators, especially in the United States and in Europe, have set NCAP guidelines that will progressively require the addition of ADAS features as standard equipment through the end of this decade. If automakers intend certain models to achieve a 4- or 5-star safety rating, some ADAS features must be part of that vehicle’s standard equipment to even qualify for certain rating levels.

Financial Strength

It is seen, Aptiv’s financial health is in good shape. Since 2015, pro forma for the spin-off of Delphi Technologies in 2017, total debt/total capital has averaged 16.9% while total debt/EBITDA has averaged 2.9 times. Furthermost of Aptiv’s capital needs are met by cash flow from operations. However, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the drawdown of the company’s $2.0 billion revolver on March 23, 2020. The revolver was repaid after the company raised capital through share issuance and a mandatory convertible preferred in June 2020. Aptiv’s liquidity remains healthy at $5.2 billion, with around $2.8 billion in cash and equivalents at the end of December 2020. The company was also granted covenant relief, with a debt/EBITDA ratio of 4.5 times through the second quarter of 2021, up from 3.5 times. With the exemption of the credit line that includes the revolver and a term loan, which expires in August 2021, the company has no other major maturities until 2024.The company has approximately $4.1 billion in senior unsecured note principal outstanding with maturities that range from 2024 to 2049, at a weighted average stated interest rate of 3.2%. Aptiv issued $300 million in 4.35% senior notes due in 2029 and $300 million 4.4% notes due in 2046 in March 2019 to redeem senior notes due in 2020 with an interest rate of 3.15%. The bonds and bank debt are all senior unsecured, pari passu, and have similar subsidiary guarantees.

Bulls Say’s

  • Owing to product segments with better-than-industry average growth prospects like safety, electrical architecture, electronics, and autonomous driving, it is projected Aptiv’s revenue to grow mid- to high-single digit percentage points in excess of the percentage change in global demand for new vehicles.
  • The ability to continuously innovate and commercialize new technologies should enable Aptiv to generate excess returns over its cost of capital.
  • A global manufacturing footprint enables participation in global vehicle platforms and provides penetration in developing markets.

Company Profile 

Bed Bath & Beyond is a home furnishings retailer, operating just under 1,000 stores in all 50 states, Puerto Rico, Canada, and Mexico. Stores carry an assortment of branded bed and bath accessories, kitchen textiles, and cooking supplies. In addition to 809 Bed Bath & Beyond stores, the company operates 133 Buy Buy Baby stores and 53 Harmon Face Values stores (health/beauty care). In an effort to refocus on its core businesses, the firm has divested the online retailer Personalizationmall.com, One Kings Lane, Christmas Tree Shops and That (gifts/housewares), Linen Holdings, and Cost-Plus World Market.

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.