Tag: Australian Market
Reported EBITDA rose 6% to AUD 662 million. Adjusted EBITDA rose 7% to AUD 627 million, tracking slightly ahead of our full-year forecast mainly because of higher-than expected electricity demand. More people working from home benefited volumes and saw the firm earn AUD 21 million above its regulatory cap. This will be returned to customers via lower tariffs mainly in fiscal 2022. As AusNet is regulated, there is no lasting impact on our longer-term earnings forecasts or valuation from demand fluctuations.
Electricity distribution performed well, with revenue up 4% to AUD 502 million and adjusted EBITDA up 11% to AUD 288 million. The strong result benefited from tariff increases and stronger residential demand, but the outlook isn’t as rosy. This asset undergoes a regulatory reset in early 2021, which will likely reduce allowed returns on equity to under 5% for the next five years, from over 7% currently. We forecast average annual revenue growth of just 1% over the next five years, despite ongoing reinvestment and growth in regulated asset base. Gas distribution also benefited from tariff increases and stronger residential demand, helping revenue increase 4% to AUD 149 million and adjusted EBITDA increase 8% to AUD 117 million. The next regulatory reset for the gas network is in early 2023. Overall, we expect revenue to grow at about 3% for the next two fiscal years, before resetting about 5% lower from 2023.
EBITDA in the electricity transmission network rose 1% to AUD 181 million. We forecast revenue grows 1% per year for a couple of years, before falling a few per cent in fiscal 2023 following the next regulatory reset in 2022. The main growth opportunity for AusNet is transmission connections to new wind and solar farms and between states. Some will be unregulated, some regulated. All will be capitalintensive, but we think the firm can fund without an equity raising.
(Source: Morningstar)
Disclaimer
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
There is an approximate one-month delay between shipping the iron ore and prices being finalised. Higher profit versus last year was driven primarily by price, which rose 21% to USD 79 per tonne. Volumes were mildly positive, with iron ore shipments up 6% to 177 million tonnes. The strong result saw Fortescue increase total dividends by 54% to AUD 1.72 per share, slightly ahead of our AUD 1.60 forecast.
We make no change to our AUD 7.70 per share fair value estimate. While the fiscal 2020 result was strong, we struggle to see how the buoyant iron ore price can be sustained. It’s hard to imagine external conditions getting materially better, and we see longer-term downside. On the demand side, we see a coming headwind as infrastructure spending to offset the COVID-19 downturn in China abates and as urbanisation and infrastructure requirements
generally reduce. The peak of urbanisation has passed, and China’s stock of housing and infrastructure is now relatively mature. We expect China’s steel consumption to slow accordingly and for a growing proportion of steel to come from recycling at the expense of iron ore demand.
We see modest supply additions from Fortescue’s Iron Bridge, Vale’s planned 20 million tonne S11D expansion, and the 7 million-8 million tonne Samarco restart. Longer term, the restart of production from Vale’s mines interrupted by the 2019 Feijao tailings dam failure is material. Production in 2020 is likely to be almost 100 million tonnes lower than we expected before the failure, or about 6% of global supply.
Admittedly, the outlook for near-term earnings is very strong. We expect only a 9% decline in earnings in fiscal 2021 from fiscal 2020’s record level. However, the iron ore price is way above its marginal cost, reflecting the dual shocks to supply–primarily from Vale since 2019 –and demand from China’s stimulus.
Year-to-date steel production in China is up a remarkable 2.8% with a sharp recovery from the February COVID-19- related downturn. In July 2020, steel output in China was up 9.1% on the same month in 2019. The uptick in iron ore imports has been even stronger with China imports up 12% to 659 million tonnes in the year ended July 2020. And for the month of July, imports were a record 102 million tonnes and up 24% on July 2019. With China the dominant source of demand for iron ore, accounting for more than 70% of seaborne consumption, strength there has more than offset any weakness everywhere else.
(Source: Morningstar)
Disclaimer
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
While we expect cost control, plans to launch smaller package sizes at higher prices per litre, and an increasing line up of non-carbonated drinks, we forecast volume declines in soft drinks and a negative mix shift from reduced on-the-go sales to drive a double-digit decline in EPS in 2020. Nonetheless, we’re encouraged by the firm’s continued market share gains, and expect earnings growth to rebound in 2021 and beyond. On top of this organic outlook, Amatil has received a non-binding offer to take over the company from fellow bottler CCEP at an attractive price. Uncertainty remains, but we think there is a strong change the deal progresses.
Key Investment Considerations
- Coca-Cola Amatil is facing declining carbonated beverage consumption and heightened bottled water competition in its core Australian market, which will likely limit the firm’s near-term pricing power. Despite challenges in mainstream soft drinks, Amatil’s distribution deals with third parties, growth opportunities in emerging markets, and launches of smaller package sizes should drive positive annual revenue gains.
- Amatil aims to pay out more than 80% of its annual earnings in dividends, and we forecast a low-single-digit growth pace. We expect dividends will remain unfranked until 2021, after which we see franking at 50%.
- Coca-Cola Amatil’s long-standing relationship with The Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) and a solid distribution network and retailer relationships in Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, Indonesia, and Papua New Guinea, afford the beverage bottler sustainable brand intangible assets and a cost advantage versus its competitors and potential upstarts. However, health-led headwinds in developed markets will likely drive further pressure on Amatil’s carbonated beverage portfolio.
- The Coca-Cola Company’s nearly 31% ownership in Coca-Cola Amatil solidifies the relationship between the parent company and bottler, and an upcoming shift to incidence-based pricing should further align the firms’ goals.
- Indonesia is a major long-run growth opportunity for Amatil, given the country’s continued economic development and relatively low rate of packaged beverage consumption.
- Amatil has opportunities to increase its asset utilisation through additional distribution partnerships, such as recent deals struck with Monster Energy, Molson Coors, and Restaurant Brands.
- Developments such as container return schemes in NSW and other Australian states, and potential sugary beverage taxes, serve as a price increase for consumers, and likely accelerate the decline of CSD volumes in Australia.
- Pricing has been dented by both competitors and customers; Amatil has driven costs out of its production system, but a continued inability to pass through raw material inflation to consumers presents a long-term challenge.
- The Coca-Cola Company owns the rights to Amatil’s major brands, and could negatively alter the pricing consideration for beverage concentrate purchasing.
(Source: Morningstar)
Disclaimer
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
The stock suits investors seeking exposure to the food and beverage sector. Australia can still increase its store base by around 40% over the next decade. European growth is much more substantial, with potential to substantially increase the existing store base to around 2,850 outlets during the next decade. In its capacity as a master franchisee, Domino’s capital requirements are limited, which means that royalty payments should continue to be paid as dividends.
Key Considerations
- Domino’s was an early adopter of digital. By migrating orders online, the company has been able to save costs, establish a customer database, and up-sell to customers.
- Japan and Europe are underpenetrated markets. Replicating its success in Australia abroad presents a significant growth opportunity.
- Short-term drivers can materially affect year-to-year earnings, including currency movements, raw material input costs, and changes to foreign government policies related to sales taxes and wages.
- Domino’s is a highly visible brand based on a successful U.S. business model. Across Domino’s three regions, sales have increase at a CAGR of 14% over the past four years. We expect annual growth rates to continue in the low teens over the next five years.
- The pizza market in Europe is highly fragmented, presenting significant opportunity for Domino’s to take market share with an attractive value proposition, increased convenience to the customer, and a differentiated product offering.
- The company’s large network size has positive implications for discounted supplier arrangements.
- There is a high level of competition, stemming from independent pizza stores and other quick-service restaurants.
- The company might evaluate its target markets in new countries incorrectly, given the geographical distance and cultural variances.
- The low-price business model may still be affected by slowing retail and discretionary spending.
(Source: Morningstar)
Disclaimer
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
We forecast the company to gain share in the USD 5 billion sleep apnea treatment market as reimbursement becomes increasingly linked to evidence of patient compliance. We expect to see both commercial and national health insurance payers get on the connected device bandwagon, which benefits the duopoly of ResMed and Philips greatly.ResMed’s recent acquisitions of software services platforms for home healthcare practitioners is a new strategic direction and the company has already pieced together approximately 20% share in this USD 1.5 billion market.
Key Investment Considerations
- ResMed has a strong position in the structurally growing sleep apnea market, where volume growth has been more than sufficient to offset the price deflation headwind.
- Cash flow is robust with 100% of earnings represented by free cash flow over the preceding five years, a trend we forecast to continue.
- Risks remain around tax issues as ResMed has been subject to large tax charges in both the U.S. and Australia in the last two years. We are concerned about the reflection on corporate culture and the potential USD 300 million-plus in taxes and penalties payable.
- ResMed is taking a “smart devices” and “big data” approach to further entrench itself as one of the two leading players in the global sleep apnea market. The strategy is two-fold – accelerating diagnosis of the underpenetrated market and monitoring patient compliance which keeps diagnosed patients in the treatment net and payers happier to reimburse the cost of respiratory devices.
- The global sleep apnea market is only 20%-30% penetrated and respiratory device companies are making headway growing volumes around 10% per year, offset by average price deflation of 2%-3%. It is dominated by ResMed and Philips, which together make up an estimated 80% of the USD 5 billion value. ResMed plays a key role in driving diagnosis with its at-home sleep testing devices and ongoing education drive to create awareness of the disease.
- ResMed has demonstrated a robust top line despite experiencing pricing pressure, and this together with the low financial leverage, leads us to use a below-average cost of equity of 7.5%. This results in a company weighted average cost of capital estimate of 7.4%.
- The ResMed initiatives to improve sleep apnea diagnosis could result in an acceleration of revenue growth over the next five years. With the sleep apnea market an estimated 50% diagnosed in the U.S. and less in other major markets, the runway for growth is long.
- Pricing risk for durable medical supplies has played out and pressure could ease going forward resulting in faster top-line growth and expanding margins.
- The strategic focus on data to support product purchases positions ResMed well to demonstrate the value of its products to the healthcare system.
- The tax issues that came to light in 2018 could suggest a corporate culture that allows questionable practices in other areas like selling, which is regulated in the U.S.
- Future cash flows need to fund the total potential historical tax liabilities of USD 300 million over the upcoming years.
- ResMed is unproven as a software provider, an area it is currently directing a lot of capital to.
(Source: Morningstar)
Disclaimer
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
Since the firm turned profitable in 1992, earnings growth has been impressive, as is the track record of client retention. All this testifies to the quality of the company’s products, the benefits of its consistent research and development spending, and the strength of its staff and management. Critically, the nature of enterprise software and its intricate embedding into clients’ technology infrastructure are such that switching costs are very high, something that Technology One has further enhanced through its end-to-end solutions offering and track record of quality delivery.
Key Investment Considerations
- Technology One offers enterprise software solutions that are deeply embedded in clients’ information technology, or IT, infrastructure, resulting in high switching costs for users.
- The company generates revenue from software development and implementation, along with subsequent upgrades and ongoing support, providing revenue resilience and an impressive client retention rate. OAlthough the company operates in a highly competitive industry, its earnings growth track record since turning profitable in 1992 has been exemplary and testifies to the quality of the company’s products and staff.
- Technology One is a provider of Enterprise Resource Planning, or ERP, software in Australia and the United Kingdom. The company has an excellent track record of consistent revenue, NPAT, EPS, and franked dividend growth over the past 30 years, and the asset light nature of the company has supported strong cash generation and a consistently strong balance sheet.
- Technology One’s business model captures value in the entire software development and implementation chain. It develops and markets the software, implements the solution for clients, and offers ongoing subsequent support.
- The company’s software products are embedded in customers’ business operations, locking in existing clients and underpinning recurring revenue streams in post-sales support and licence fees.
- Cross-selling opportunities remain, as products taken up per customer are low at three, compared with 12 available in Technology One’s enterprise product suite.
- Skills shortages in the information technology sector mean the loss of key personnel can be costly, and bidding for talent may drive up labour expense.
- Development delays with new products and failure to keep pace with technological changes could significantly affect Technology One’s ability to compete in the fast-moving enterprise software industry.
- Failure of the international expansion strategy in the United Kingdom could dent the company’s longer-term growth profile.
(Source: Morningstar)
Disclaimer
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
The strategic intent is taking shape: segregate the AUD 200 million EBITDA-generating InfraCo Towers for potential monetisation (akin to Optus’ current moves to do the same), maintain the optionality of keeping the AUD 1.5 billion EBITDA-generating InfraCo Fixed stand-alone (as NBN mulls its future ownership), and continue refocusing the AUD 5.7 billion EBITDA-generating ServeCo on its transformation to become a more simple, efficient, and digital-centric competitor.
Rather than having investors obsess over the ebbs and flows of Telstra’s near-term earnings still suffering from the margin-crunching impact of NBN and competition, the restructure is likely to shift investor focus to the group’s underlying asset values. We expect a flurry of favourable sum-of-parts asset valuations to hit the market over the coming months, underpinned by the current low-interest rate environment and possibly “inspired” by the lucrative investment banking and advisory fees on offer.
The cloud surrounding Telstra’s near-term earnings is also clearing. Management not only reiterated fiscal 2021 earnings guidance (second-half-weighted and driven by cost-cuts, COVID-19 recovery, mobile earnings growth), but also provided encouraging signs for beyond. Return to underlying EBITDA growth in fiscal 2022 (excluding one-off NBN receipts) and an upgrade to fiscal 2023 return on invested capital, or ROIC, to 8% (from 7%) are all broadly in line with our unchanged estimates. But they are still comforting, especially after the shock of the August update when management (too conservatively) trimmed fiscal 2023 ROIC target to 7%-plus (from 10% previously).
As an illustration of the type of sum-of-parts valuation that investors may see in the coming months, traditional infrastructure entities typically trade at low-to-mid-teen EBITDA multiples. We see no reason why Telstra’s InfraCo Towers and InfraCo Fixed won’t attract similar multiples, given their recurring, predictable and indexed earnings growth (at margins of well over 60%) and likely long-term contracts with Telstra and NBN as anchor tenants. Applying, say, a 12 times multiple to both InfraCo Towers’ fiscal 2020 pro forma AUD 200 million EBITDA and InfraCo Fixed’s AUD 1.5 billion EBITDA, and 8 times to the still-rationalising ServeCo’s AUD 5.7 billion EBITDA produces total enterprise value of AUD 66.0 billion. Subtract AUD 16.8 billion in net debt and one can come up with an asset-based valuation of around AUD 4.10 per share for Telstra. And we are likely to witness much more creative ways to boost this value from the investment community in the future. Our unchanged AUD 3.80 fair value estimate for Telstra will remain based on a discounted cash flow methodology.
(Source: Morningstar)
Disclaimer
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
