the types of services it historically didn’t provide but has entered via acquisitions in the last several years. We believe the ability to connect enterprises (smaller deployments) to hyper scalers like cloud a provider is what make data centers differentiated and that the ability to do it on a global scale is attractive for customers. Digital’s portfolio seems to be in the sweet spot to provide these abilities, and we think it can close the gap with Equinox as the premier global data center provider for connectivity.
Total revenue grew 10% year over year. Like its peers, Digital’s revenue was boosted by higher reimbursements for power costs. If utility reimbursement had grown at the same pace as rental revenue (10%), total sales growth would’ve been just under 9%. The higher pass-through revenue likely weighed on margins a bit. The adjusted] EBITDA margin was 55%, down more than one percentage point from last year’s second quarter but generally consistent with where the margin has been since the March 2020 Interxion acquisition.
Bookings in the quarter totaled $113 million in annualized revenue, including $13 million in interconnection revenue, a figure that has remained fairly constant each quarter since the Interxion acquisition. Leasing in the Americas accounted for more than half of the total bookings, with Europe and Asia Pacific each making up about a quarter. Two very encouraging results in the quarter were the improvement in pricing, as shown by renewal spreads, and the proportion of bookings made up of smaller deployments.
Company Future Outlook
We are raising our fair value estimate to $130 from $127. We believe the stock is moderately overvalued but more reasonably priced than peers and the first data center firm we’d look to on a pullback. We believe that Digital’s transformation should provide it with pricing power, so we expect to continue seeing better renewal spreads over time. However, we expect these spreads to remain choppy even as they trend up, so we are under no illusions that we’ve seen the last leases having to renew at lower rates.
Company Profile
Digital Realty owns and operates nearly 300 data centers worldwide. It has more than 35 million rentable square feet across five continents. Digital’s offerings range from retail co-location, where an enterprise may rent single cabinet and rely on Digital to provide all the accommodations, to “cold shells,” where hyper scale cloud service providers can simply rent much, or all, of a barren, power-connected building. In recent years, Digital Realty has de-emphasized cold shells and now primarily provides higher-level service to tenants, which outsource their related IT needs to Digital. Digital Realty has also moved more into the co-location business, increasingly serving enterprises and facilitating network connections. Digital Realty operates as a real estate investment trust.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
Knights long-standing laser focus on network efficiency has served it well given the asset-intensive nature of trucking. Its legacy operating ratio (expenses/revenue, excluding fuel surcharges) averaged in the mid-80% range before the merger, versus an industry average that traditionally exceeds 90%. Within its legacy dry van truckload unit, Knight has long emphasized short- to medium-haul shipments (length of haul near 500 miles) and high-density lanes near its existing service centers. Regional freight is an attractive niche because shipments face less competition from intermodal and are seeing growth as shippers locate distribution centers closer to end customers.
In 2017, Knight Transportation and Swift Transportation merged. Following the transaction, Knight-Swift became the largest asset-based full-truckload carrier in the industry. Overall, we believe the merger structure was positive for previous shareholders because of meaningful cost and revenue synergy opportunities, which have proved to be within reach over the past few years.
Knight’s management has executed well in terms of applying its best-in-class operating acumen to Swift’s network. In fact, Swift’s adjusted truckload OR was roughly at parity with the Knight trucking division’s OR in first-quarter 2021. Pandemic lockdowns weighed on freight demand in early 2020, but retail shipments turned robust in the second half on strong inventory restocking, and industrial end markets are recovering off pandemic lows. Furthermore, truckload-market capacity has tightened materially and double-digit contract rate gains are likely this year.
Financial Strength
At the end of 2020, Knight-Swift held roughly $700 million of total debt on the balance sheet (including capital lease obligations, an accounts receivable securitization program, and a term loan), some of which stems from the former Swift operations. Recall truckload-industry giants Knight Transportation and Swift Transportation merged in September 2017. The firm held $157 million in cash on the balance sheet at year-end 2020, similar to 2019, with total available liquidity near $740 million. Management expects net capital expenditures of $450 million to $500 million in 2021, which we estimate will be around 10.4% of total revenue, compared with 9% in 2019.
Bull Says
- The 2017 Knight-Swift merger created meaningful opportunities for cost and revenue synergies that have thus far proved value accretive. The firm is also enjoying a demand surge from heavy retailer restocking that should last into the first half of 2021.
- The legacy Knight operations rank among the most efficient and profitable carriers in trucking, with an average operating ratio in the mid-80s prior to the merger.
- Knight has expanded its asset-light truck brokerage division at a healthy clip over the years, and these operations add incremental opportunities for long term growth.
Company Profile
Knight-Swift Transportation is by far the largest asset-based full-truckload carrier in the United States. About 80% of revenue derives from asset-based truckload shipping operations (including for-hire dry van, refrigerated, and dedicated contract). The remainder stems from truck brokerage and other asset-light logistics services (8%), as well as intermodal (8%), which uses the Class-I railroads for the underlying movement of the firm’s shipping containers and also offer drayage services.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
with two thirds of its assets under management derived from retirement-based accounts. At the end of 2020, 83%, 79%, and 77% of the company’s fund AUM were beating peers on a 3-, 5-, and 10-year basis, respectively, with 77% of AUM in the funds closing out the year with an overall rating of 4 or 5 stars, better than just about every other U.S.-based asset manager. T. Rowe Price also has a much stronger Morningstar Success Ratio—which evaluates whether a firm’s open-end funds deliver sustainable, peer-beating returns over longer periods–giving it an additional leg up.
T. Rowe Price is uniquely positioned among the firms we cover (as well as the broader universe of active asset managers) to pick up business in the retail-advised channel, given the solid long-term performance of its funds and reasonableness of its fees, exemplified by deals the past few years with Fidelity Investments’ Funds Network and Schwab’s Mutual Fund OneSource platform. With the company likely to generate mid- to high-single-digit AUM growth on average going forward (aided by 0%-3% annual organic growth), we see top-line growth expanding at a positive 7.7% CAGR during 2021-25, with operating margins of 47%-49% on average.
Financial Strength
T. Rowe Price has traditionally maintained a very conservative balance sheet, with no debt on its books since 2002. The company has relied overwhelmingly on its internally generated capital to fund acquisitions and other investments, while still returning a sizable amount of capital to shareholders via stock repurchases and dividends. During 2011-20, T. Rowe Price, by our calculations, generated $14.9 billion in free cash flow (cash flow from operations less capital expenditures) and returned $5.3 billion to shareholders as share repurchases (net of issuances) and $6.2 billion as dividends. Our current forecast has the firm generating $3.5 billion in free cash flow annually on average during 2021-25, the bulk of which will be dedicated to seed capital investments, acquisitions, dividends, and share repurchases.
The company’s quarterly dividend was raised 20% in February 2021 to $1.08 per share, and the company has announced a $3.00 per share special dividend, which was paid out in July 2021. The company remains comfortable with the 35%-40% payout ratio we’ve seen for the regular quarterly dividend over the past five years. During 2019, T. Rowe Price bought back 7.0 million shares (equivalent to 2.9% of its outstanding shares) for just over $700 million, offset by $83 million worth of stock issued under stock-based compensation plans. The firm followed this up with the repurchase of 10.9 million shares for $1.2 billion (equivalent to 4.6% of outstanding shares) during 2020, offset by some $200 million worth of stock-based compensation plan issuances. During the first half of 2021, T. Rowe Price bought back 1.9 million shares for around $309 million.
Bulls Say’s
- With $1.623 trillion in AUM at the end of June 2021, T. Rowe Price is one of the larger U.S.-based asset managers. Retirement accounts and variable-annuity investment portfolios account for two thirds of assets.
- At the end of the second quarter of 2021, 91%, 84%, and 86% of T. Rowe Price’s multi-asset AUM was beating passive peers on a 3-, 5-, and 10-year basis, respectively.
- Target-date retirement portfolios have been a significant source of organic growth, generating just under $100 billion in net inflows (equivalent to an 8% rate of annual growth) for the firm the past 10 years.
Company Profile
T. Rowe Price provides asset-management services for individual and institutional investors. It offers a broad range of no-load U.S. and international stock, hybrid, bond, and money market funds. At the end of June 2021, the firm had $1.623 trillion in managed assets, composed of equity (61%), balanced (28%), and fixed-income (11%) offerings. Approximately two thirds of the company’s managed assets are held in retirement-based accounts, which provides T. Rowe Price with a somewhat stickier client base than most of its peers. The firm also manages private accounts, provides retirement planning advice, and offers discount brokerage and trust services. The company is primarily a U.S.-based asset manager, deriving just 9% of its AUM from overseas.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
We are pleased with Facebook’s continuing enhancement of its platforms as it improves e-commerce functionality, increases video content, and introduces more audio content, which support the firm’s network effect moat source on the user and advertiser sides, increasing overall ad inventory. Facebook is also investing in innovation for the long-run, including Metaverse, which we view as the next stage of growth and development in virtual reality. While Metaverse is likely to require more interoperability between many platforms and may slowly erode Facebook’s walled garden, the firm’s current network effect moat source should maintain more users on the Facebook side of the Metaverse.
Management guided for significant deceleration in revenue growth during the second half of this year, which we had already modeled in. Total revenue of $29.1 billion was up 55.6% year over year due to higher ad prices and an increase in users. Facebook benefited from ongoing strong demand for direct response and the resurgence of brand advertising. Monthly active users increased 7% and 2% year over year and from last quarter, respectively, to nearly 2.9 billion. Engagement remained at around 66% as daily active users increased to 1.9 billion (also up 7% from last year and 2% sequentially).
Strong Revenue Growth
Strong revenue growth during the quarter created operating leverage for Facebook resulting in 42.5% operating margin, compared with 31.9% last year. Management expects yearover- year revenue growth during the second half to “decelerate significantly.” The firm provided a bit more color by stating that the slowdown will be modest when comparing the second quarter 2021 with the same period in 2019 (revenue up 72.2%). The firm still expects full-year operating expense between $70 billion and $73 billion and capital expenditures of $19 billion-$21 billion.
Metaverse to take hold and attract billions of users, the virtual world needs to be more interoperable, like the physical world where users can easily experience many different environments and interact with different individuals and groups. Allowing interoperability may represent a risk to the network effect of platforms like Facebook. However, in our view, given Facebook’s 2.9 billion users and strong network effect moat source, the firm’s Horizon will be a step ahead of competitors in attracting users and quickly building the virtual environments, which should attract more users, content creators, businesses, and advertisers.
Company Profile
Facebook is the world’s largest online social network, with 2.5 billion monthly active users. Users engage with each other in different ways, exchanging messages and sharing news events, photos, and videos. On the video side, the firm is in the process of building a library of premium content and monetizing it via ads or subscription revenue. Facebook refers to this as Facebook Watch. The firm’s ecosystem consists mainly of the Facebook app, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp, and many features surrounding these products. Users can access Facebook on mobile devices and desktops. Advertising revenue represents more than 90% of the firm’s total revenue, with 50% coming from the U.S. and Canada and 25% from Europe. With gross margins above 80%, Facebook operates at a 30%-plus margin.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
While Macquarie claims to have found no evidence of misconduct, Nuix’s IPO is still under investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Some of the market’s concerns appear to have subsided. Today’s closing price for Nuix was $2.53, up 1.2 percent.
According to the Australian Financial Review, Macquarie’s chairman, Peter Warne, talked to the media today ahead of the company’s annual general meeting. He reportedly stated that Macquarie’s IPO team studied Nuix’s prospectus and float and found nothing suspicious.
Nuix had Macquarie as a supporter when it went public on the ASX. Macquarie was also Nuix’s largest shareholder, owning over 70% of the IT firm prior to its IPO. Macquarie currently owns about 30% of Nuix’s stock.
ASIC suspects Doyle may have informed his brother about Nuix’s February downgrading, according to court documents. Doyle’s brother is then accused of selling 1.8 million Nuix shares to avoid a $5.7 million loss.
Despite today’s advances, Nuix’s stock remains in negative territory. Its stock is currently trading for 68 percent less than it was when Nuix went public in December. With around 317 million shares outstanding, the company has a market capitalization of around $793 million.
Company Profile
Nuix specializes in transforming massive amounts of messy data – from emails, social media, communications and other human-generated content – into actionable intelligence. With Nuix’s investigative analytics and intelligence software, you can understand the context and connections across billions of items in your data – search it, filter it, visualize it, analyze it and find the truth it holds.
(Source: FactSet)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
On July 2, Xcel filed a $343 million rate increase request that we think will be one of its most important and hotly debated rate requests ever in Colorado, its largest jurisdiction. The proceedings during the next six months will test whether regulators are willing to raise customer rates to pay for Xcel’s clean energy and safety investments along with supporting Colorado law that requires Xcel to supply 100% carbon-free electricity by 2050.
Rate settlements in Xcel’s
The Colorado outcome could affect Xcel’s five-year, $24 billion investment plan and management’s 5%-7% annual earnings growth target in the near term. That difference accounts for about 15% of Xcel’s rate increase request. Rate settlements in Xcel’s three smallest jurisdictions are in line with our estimates. In New Mexico, Xcel settled for a $62 million rate increase ($88 million request) and 9.35% allowed ROE (10.35% request). In Wisconsin, Xcel settled for a $45 million combined electric and gas rate increase in 2022 and a $21 million combined rate increase in 2023 based on a 9.8% allowed ROE in 2022 and 10% allowed ROE in 2023. In North Dakota, Xcel settled for a $7 million rate increase ($13 million revised request) and 9.5% allowed ROE (10.2% request).
Company Profile
Xcel Energy manages utilities serving 3.7 million electric customers and 2.1 million natural gas customers in eight states. Its utilities are Northern States Power, which serves customers in Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Michigan; Public Service Company of Colorado; and Southwestern Public Service Company, which serves customers in Texas and New Mexico. It is one of the largest renewable energy providers in the U.S. with one third of its electricity sales coming from renewable energy.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
We are raising our fair value estimate to $60 from $58. The change is from the time value of money, higher revenue growth based on how 2021 is unfolding, and a 20 basis point increase in our midscale operating margin including floor plan interest to 3%. We made the latter change to reflect our expectation of better overhead cost leveraging long-term due to the chance that inventories will be lower than pre-pandemic levels after the] semiconductor shortage ends, which should enable better pricing power long-term. Sonic is also due to introduce a digital commerce platform in the fourth quarter that will start at the Echo Park used vehicle stores but likely be rolled out companywide over time. This platform could enable further overhead cost efficiencies long-term.
Second-quarter results were in our view strong and we are encouraged to see same-store revenue up 24.9% compared with the second quarter of 2019. The lucrative service business also did well with same-store service gross profit up 6.9% versus second-quarter 2019. We see more upside this year from this nearly 50% gross margin business because the warranty side of it has not rebounded yet from the pandemic while customer pay has; and management said its California stores, which made up 26.4% of 2020 total revenue, have not rebounded as much from the pandemic as the rest of Sonics stores.
Company’s Future Outlook
Echo Park lost $14.4 million in pretax income for the quarter as high auction prices made sourcing inventory more expensive. Management now sees Echo Park annually selling two million vehicles once it is mature sometime in the 2030s. The more noteworthy news though is Sonic’s board is “considering a full range” of alternatives for Echo Park and has hired Lazard and Kirkland & Ellis as advisors, though no deal may occur. We’d prefer to see Echo Park get larger over time before a divestiture so Sonic shareholders could benefit but it is possible that a sale or spin-off, should it occur, could unlock value for Echo Park not currently recognized by the market. The downside, in our view, of divesting Echo Park is once it’s gone from Sonic; Sonic will not have an exciting growth story to talk about beyond its franchise business. We have about $36 billion of Echo Park revenue modeled for 2021-25.
Company Profile
Sonic Automotive is by our estimate the sixth-largest public auto dealership group in the United States by new-vehicle unit sales. The company has 84 franchised stores in 12 states, primarily in metropolitan areas in California, Texas, and the Southeast, plus 25 Echo Park used-vehicle stores. In addition to new- and used-vehicle sales, the company derives revenue from parts and collision repair, finance, insurance, and wholesale auctions. Luxury and import dealerships make up about 88% of new-vehicle revenue, while Honda, BMW, Mercedes, and Toyota constitute about 60% of new-vehicle revenue. BMW is the largest brand at over 24%. 2020’s revenue was $9.8 billion, with Echo Park’s portion totaling $1.4 billion.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
Vulcan’s non-core, battery metal projects will be taken over by it. Kuniko will become a zero-carbon copper, nickel, and cobalt producer with properties in Scandinavia as a result of this deal.
The first offering allowed interested individuals to purchase one of 12.5 million Kuniko shares for 20 cents each. A 1:4 pro rata priority offer allowed Vulcan owners to purchase about 26.93 million Kuniko shares for 20 cents each.
The spin-off was first announced in April by the corporation. The stock price of Vulcan then dropped as a result of the announcement.
Kuniko has raised $7.88 million through its prospectus offerings to fund its operations. Kuniko plans to go public on the ASX on August 23rd.
Vulcan’s stock is now trading currently on 30th July 2021 at $9.08. The Vulcan’s recent ASX performance has been outstanding. Vulcan shares are now worth 222 percent more than they were at the beginning of 2021. They’ve also increased by 1,682 percent over the same period last year.
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd’s current normalized EBIDTA is recorded at (889695), P/E ratio is ($0.08) and EPS is marked at (0.09). And its 1 year change is reported at +2007.53%. Vulcan has a market capitalisation of roughly $969 million at its current share price.
Company Profile
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd (ASX: VUL) was founded by Dr. Frencis Wedin on 2nd May 2018 and it’s listed on the ASX under the ticker KNI. Vulcan Energy Resources Limited is an energy metals exploration firm established in Australia. In Germany’s Upper Rhine Valley, the company is working on a combined geothermal and lithium extraction project. The Company’s zero-carbon lithium extraction method is powered by sustainable geothermal energy and generates renewable energy as a by-product. From its combined geothermal and lithium resource in Germany’s Upper Rhine Valley, Vulcan Energy Resources Limited hopes to develop a battery-quality lithium hydroxide chemical product with a net zero carbon footprint. It is established with the intention of exploring and developing battery metals.
(Source: FactSet)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.