A fund refers to capital belonging to numerous investors used to collectively purchase securities while each investor retains ownership and control of his own shares. An investment fund provides a broader selection of investment opportunities, greater management expertise, and lower investment fees than investors might be able to obtain on their own. Types of investment funds include mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, money market funds, and hedge funds.
In late 2020, Vanguard changed this strategy’s prospectus benchmark from the MSCI ACWI Energy Index to the MSCI ACWI Energy + Utilities Index (a custom benchmark that splices the MSCI ACWI Energy and MSCI ACWI Utilities indexes). The firm made the change so this strategy could capitalize on the evolution away from fossil fuels and toward renewable energy sources by investing significantly more in electric and other utilities.
Portfolio
The MSCI ACWI Energy + Utilities Index is a dynamic benchmark, and its sector weights vary based on the performance of energy stocks versus utilities stocks. Meanwhile, the MSCI ACWI Energy Index gained 36% in 2021, whereas the MSCI ACWI Utilities Index returned 10% last year. The MSCI ACWI Energy + Utilities Index’s energy stake increased to 56% as of Dec 31, 2021, as result, while its utilities position decreased to 44% (per Vanguard data).
People
Tom Levering has good credentials for picking utilities stocks as well as energy equities. For starters, he spent several years as a utilities consultant before joining Wellington in 2000, and he served as an energy and utilities analyst for roughly two decades–and led Wellington’s combined energy/utilities team for a few years–before he took charge of this fund in early 2020.
Performance
The Investor share class of this strategy recorded a 27.7% gain in 2021. That’s significantly less than the 36.0% and 44.8% returns posted by the MSCI ACWI Energy Index and the average fund in the energy equity Morningstar Category, respectively. But this strategy is an energy/utilities hybrid that began 2021 with roughly 48% of its assets in utilities stocks and ended the year with roughly 44% of assets in such names, and the MSCI ACWI Utilities Index produced a gain of just 10.1% last year. The Investor share class’ 27.7% gain is significantly better than the 23.6% return of a 50/50 MSCI ACWI Energy/Utilities custom index and better than the 23.0% return of the strategy’s custom prospectus benchmark.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
Vanguard Ethically Conscious Australian Shares Fund seeks to track the return of the FTSE Australia 300 Choice Index before taking into account fees, expenses and tax.
Approach
This fund seeks to provide broad ESG-focused Australian share market exposure in a passively managed, taxefficient vehicle. To achieve that goal, it uses an index-replication approach to track the FTSE Australia 300 Choice Index, a derivative of the FTSE Australia 300 Index. The index is arrived at by excluding companies that deal significantly in business activities involving fossil fuels, nuclear power, alcohol, tobacco, gambling, weapons, and adult entertainment. Additionally, a screen is also applied to filter out names embroiled in severe controversies. Vanguard holds all the securities that make up the index with industry-level exposure limit set at 5 percentage points relative to the parent index. Security weights are approximately the same proportion as the index’s weights. However, the portfolio will deviate from the index when the managers believe such deviations are necessary to minimize transaction costs. The fund may also be exposed to securities that have been removed from or are expected to be included in the index.
Portfolio
The portfolio is top-heavy, with about half of the index in the top 10 companies. The concentration in banks skews the fund’s sector weights, with financial services forming around 34.5% of the portfolio (versus 26.8% for the Morningstar Category average). The basic material is the second-largest sector exposure, but it is meaningfully lower than the category index because of the ESG screening. The industry capping of 5 percentage points further adds to the portfolio diversification. VETH’s market cap does not deviate materially from the category average or index. As such, the average market of the strategy is AUD 25.3 billion versus AUD 29.2 billion for the S&P/ ASX 200 Index category benchmark. Broadly, the portfolio is diversified and offers exposure to almost the entire opportunity set of the domestic equity market. As a result, it has significant overlap with Vanguard’s other broad-based domestic equity products like VAS, both in terms of style and exposure, making it suitable as a core holding.
Performance
Launched in October 2020, the strategy has a very short track record. The trailing nine-month period has been eventful for the domestic equity market with yields moving up and value factor rotation. As such, the fund’s performance has been eventful as well in tandem with broader market movements. From its inception through July 2021, the strategy has closely mirrored the underlying index but trailed the S&P/ASX 200 category benchmark by 87 basis points. As the materials, energy, and commodity sectors rallied during this period, the fund’s relative underweighting in these sectors has hurt performance. As the value factor rebounded toward the end of last year through the first half of 2021, the modest growth tilt of the strategy relative to the category index detracted. Growth names like A2 Milk have been the major contributor to underperformance during this period. Investors should be cautious and not extrapolate this performance, however. Based on the past attributes, investors may expect similar cyclicality in performance tied to the broader domestic economic activities and value/growth factor rotation.
Top 10 Holdings of the fund
About the fund
The Fund provides low cost exposure to stocks listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and excludes companies with significant business activities involving fossil fuels, nuclear power, alcohol, tobacco, gambling, weapons, adult entertainment and a conduct related screen based on severe controversies. Diversification requirements are applied to restrict the proportion of the index invested in any one industry to +/-5% of the industry weights of the FTSE Australia 300 Index, subject to any limitation issues resulting from the exclusionary screening.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
The strategy rests on a solid philosophy and a clearly designed and consistently applied bottom-up process. The ability to leverage the analysts’ insights through both long and short positions makes it distinctive, though small active bets make us somewhat cautious regarding its alpha potential. The strategy aims to capture temporarily mispriced opportunities through consistent use of the analysts’ long-term valuation forecasts. Those derive from an in-house dividend-discount model that is fed by the team’s earnings, cash flow, and growth-rate estimates. The analysts rank stocks in each industry based on their estimated fair value. The managers incorporate these rankings into their stock-picking, expressing modest sector preferences based on their macroeconomic view.
Portfolio:
This benchmark-aware and highly diversified fund held 289 stock positions per end of November 2021, of which 124 are shorts. The long leg of the fund is conservatively managed, with modest bets versus the Russell 1000 Index and an active share of 55%-60%. NXP Semiconductors, Alphabet, and Amazon.com were the largest active positions in the portfolio, with an overweight of around 200 basis points. Rivian was bought in 2021 for risk-management considerations to offset the underweight of Tesla, which the managers never held. Most stocks that are sold short in the 30/30 extension carry a weight of less than 25 basis points.
People:
Growing confidence in the two experienced portfolio managers and the large and seasoned analyst team supporting them leads to an upgrade of the People Pillar rating to Above Average from Average. Susan Bao is an experienced and long-tenured manager on this strategy and is well-versed in the firm’s hallmark investment process. Bao and Luddy have also managed this 130/30 strategy together since the start of the U.S.-domiciled vehicle in 2005 and since 2007 on its offshore counterpart. Steven Lee succeeded Luddy in 2018. Lee brings close to three decades of experience, but most of it was gained as an analyst. Since 2014, he has managed JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity, the firm’s analyst-driven long-short strategy, which serves as the blueprint for this strategy’s 30/30 extension. Although portfolio management is collegial, Bao concentrates on consumer, financials, and healthcare, while Lee is the lead for industrial/commodities, technology, and utilities/telecom. While their collaboration is still relatively short, it has already proved fruitful, and the managers have demonstrated their ability to generate alpha from both long and short ideas provided by the analyst team.
Performance:
It has outperformed the Russell 1000 Index on a total return and alpha basis since inception and over shorter time horizons. Since Susan Bao and Steven Lee have comanaged the strategy, a more relevant period to consider, the strategy also outperformed its average peer and the index. However, results were a bit mixed during that period, with a disappointing performance in 2018 offset by successful stock-picking predominantly in 2020 and 2021. The strategy had a good year in 2021, as stock selection in the long-leg and in the market-neutral component contributed positively. Positions in semiconductors, banks, and energy helped.
(Source: Morningstar)
Price:
It’s critical to evaluate expenses, as they come directly out of returns. The share class on this report levies a fee that ranks in its Morningstar category’s costliest quintile. Such high fees stack the odds heavily against investors. Based on our assessment of the fund’s People, Process and Parent pillars in the context of these fees, we don’t think this share class will be able to deliver positive alpha relative to the category benchmark index, explaining its Morningstar Analyst Rating of Neutral.
(Source: Morningstar) (Source: Morningstar)
About Funds:
A growing conviction in the duo that manages JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus and its Luxembourg resided sibling JPM U.S. Select Equity Plus, and the considerable resources they have effectively utilised, lead to an upgrade of the strategy’s People Pillar rating to Above Average from Average. The strategy looks sensible and is designed to fully exploit the analyst recommendations by taking long positions in top-ranked companies while shorting stocks disliked by the analysts. Classic fundamental bottom-up research should give the fund an informational advantage. The portfolio is quite diversified, holding 250-350 stocks in total with modest deviations from the category index in the long leg. The 30/30 extension is broadly sector-, style-, and beta-neutral. Here the managers are cognizant of the risks of shorting stocks, where they select stocks on company-specific grounds or as part of a secular theme. For example, the team prefers semiconductors, digital advertising, and e-commerce offset by shorts in legacy hardware, media, and network providers. Short exposure generally stands at 20%-30%, with the portfolio’s net exposure to the market kept at 100%. The strategy’s performance since inception, which still has some relevance given Bao’s involvement, has been outstanding.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
The strategy rests on a solid philosophy and a clearly designed and consistently applied bottom-up process. The ability to leverage the analysts’ insights through both long and short positions makes it distinctive, though small active bets make us somewhat cautious regarding its alpha potential. The strategy aims to capture temporarily mispriced opportunities through consistent use of the analysts’ long-term valuation forecasts. Those derive from an in-house dividend-discount model that is fed by the team’s earnings, cash flow, and growth-rate estimates. The analysts rank stocks in each industry based on their estimated fair value. The managers incorporate these rankings into their stock-picking, expressing modest sector preferences based on their macroeconomic view.
Portfolio:
This benchmark-aware and highly diversified fund held 289 stock positions per end of November 2021, of which 124 are shorts. The long leg of the fund is conservatively managed, with modest bets versus the Russell 1000 Index and an active share of 55%-60%. NXP Semiconductors, Alphabet, and Amazon.com were the largest active positions in the portfolio, with an overweight of around 200 basis points. Rivian was bought in 2021 for risk-management considerations to offset the underweight of Tesla, which the managers never held. Most stocks that are sold short in the 30/30 extension carry a weight of less than 25 basis points.
People:
Growing confidence in the two experienced portfolio managers and the large and seasoned analyst team supporting them leads to an upgrade of the People Pillar rating to Above Average from Average. Susan Bao is an experienced and long-tenured manager on this strategy and is well-versed in the firm’s hallmark investment process. Bao and Luddy have also managed this 130/30 strategy together since the start of the U.S.-domiciled vehicle in 2005 and since 2007 on its offshore counterpart. Steven Lee succeeded Luddy in 2018. Lee brings close to three decades of experience, but most of it was gained as an analyst. Since 2014, he has managed JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity, the firm’s analyst-driven long-short strategy, which serves as the blueprint for this strategy’s 30/30 extension. Although portfolio management is collegial, Bao concentrates on consumer, financials, and healthcare, while Lee is the lead for industrial/commodities, technology, and utilities/telecom. While their collaboration is still relatively short, it has already proved fruitful, and the managers have demonstrated their ability to generate alpha from both long and short ideas provided by the analyst team.
Performance:
It has outperformed the Russell 1000 Index on a total return and alpha basis since inception and over shorter time horizons. Since Susan Bao and Steven Lee have comanaged the strategy, a more relevant period to consider, the strategy also outperformed its average peer and the index. However, results were a bit mixed during that period, with a disappointing performance in 2018 offset by successful stock-picking predominantly in 2020 and 2021. The strategy had a good year in 2021, as stock selection in the long-leg and in the market-neutral component contributed positively. Positions in semiconductors, banks, and energy helped.
(Source: Morningstar)
Price:
It’s critical to evaluate expenses, as they come directly out of returns. The share class on this report levies a fee that ranks in its Morningstar category’s costliest quintile. Such high fees stack the odds heavily against investors. Based on our assessment of the fund’s People, Process and Parent pillars in the context of these fees, we don’t think this share class will be able to deliver positive alpha relative to the category benchmark index, explaining its Morningstar Analyst Rating of Neutral.
(Source: Morningstar) (Source: Morningstar)
About Funds:
A growing conviction in the duo that manages JPMorgan U.S. Large Cap Core Plus and its Luxembourg resided sibling JPM U.S. Select Equity Plus, and the considerable resources they have effectively utilised, lead to an upgrade of the strategy’s People Pillar rating to Above Average from Average. The strategy looks sensible and is designed to fully exploit the analyst recommendations by taking long positions in top-ranked companies while shorting stocks disliked by the analysts. Classic fundamental bottom-up research should give the fund an informational advantage. The portfolio is quite diversified, holding 250-350 stocks in total with modest deviations from the category index in the long leg. The 30/30 extension is broadly sector-, style-, and beta-neutral. Here the managers are cognizant of the risks of shorting stocks, where they select stocks on company-specific grounds or as part of a secular theme. For example, the team prefers semiconductors, digital advertising, and e-commerce offset by shorts in legacy hardware, media, and network providers. Short exposure generally stands at 20%-30%, with the portfolio’s net exposure to the market kept at 100%. The strategy’s performance since inception, which still has some relevance given Bao’s involvement, has been outstanding.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
Lingering uncertainty about this factor-oriented fund’s potential for sleeve manager and style changes keeps its Process rating at Below Average.
Between March 2013 and the end of 2017, Wellington Management’s investment strategy and risk group altered this fund from a wide-ranging, single-manager offering to its current form. Six managers now run separate sleeves of the portfolio. The sleeves vary in size, but each is concentrated in 50 or fewer stocks and has distinct emphases, whether value or growth, market cap, or domicile. Gregg Thomas, who took over the investment strategy and risk group in late 2018, controls the aggregate portfolio’s characteristics by adjusting the size of Thomas Simon’s sleeve, which uses a multifactor approach to complement the five other sleeves, and by shifting assets among or even swapping managers to match the Russell 3000 Index’s risk profile. The idea is to let the stock-pickers rather than size, sector, or factor bets drive performance.
Although regular line-up changes have made it difficult to assess the strategy, there could be more stability in the future. Thomas now envisions making a manager change every three to five years, on average, down from every two years when he took over in 2018. The current roster has been stable only since late 2019, however, when Thomas changed two managers, including replacing a veteran global manager with a relatively inexperienced mid-cap value manager.
Portfolio:
A rotating cast of six sleeve managers has had collective charge of the portfolio since the late 2017 retirement of long-time sole manager Saul Pannell. His departure concluded a transition that started in March 2013 when Wellington Management’s investment strategy and risk group began apportioning 10% of the fund’s assets to different managers–a total that hit 50% by mid-2014 and stayed there until early 2017, after which the group gradually redirected Pannell’s remaining assets.
The transition to a multimanager offering beginning in 2013 ballooned the portfolio’s number stocks to 350- plus before falling to around 200 since April 2017. The fund’s sector positioning versus the Russell 3000 Index began to moderate in 2013 and has since typically stayed within about 5 percentage points of the benchmarks. Its tech underweighting dipped to nearly 10 percentage points in November 2020 but was back to around 5 percentage points by late 2021.
Industry over- and underweighting’s tend to stay within 4 percentage points. In late 2021, however, the portfolio was 5.6 percentage points light in tech hardware companies, entirely because it did not own Apple AAPL. The fund’s non-U.S. stock exposure neared 30% of assets in 2014 but has been in the single digits since late 2019, when a domestic-oriented mid-cap value sleeve manager replaced a sleeve manager with a global focus.
People:
The fund earns an Above Average People rating because its subadvisor’s multimanager roster includes veterans who have built competitive records elsewhere at sibling strategies where they also invest alongside shareholders. Those managers, however, serve this fund at the behest of Wellington Management’s Gregg Thomas. He took over capital allocation and manager selection duties at year-end 2018, when he became director of the investment strategy and risk group. Between March 2013 and year-end 2017, this group changed the fund from a wide-ranging single-manager offering to a multimanager strategy. Six managers now oversee separate sleeves of the portfolio. Growth investor Stephen Mortimer, dividend-growth stickler Donald Kilbride, and contrarian Gregory Pool each run 15%-25% of assets; mid-cap specialists Philip Ruedi and Gregory Garabedian 10%-20% each; and Thomas Simon uses a multifactor approach on 5%-20% assets to round out the whole portfolio’s characteristics. Thomas monitors those characteristics and redirects assets or even swaps managers to match the Russell 3000 Index’s risk profile, leaving it up to the stock-pickers to drive outperformance. That’s led to considerable manager change here. Of the original seven sleeve managers the investment strategy and risk group installed in March 2013, only Donald Kilbride remains; and the current six-person roster has been in place only since Sept. 30, 2019.
Performance:
This multimanager offering has struggled since Wellington Management’s Gregg Thomas took over capital allocation and manager selection duties at year-end 2018. Through year-end 2021, the A shares’ 22% annualized gain lagged the Russell 3000 Index and large-blend category norm by 3.8 and 0.8 percentage points, respectively, with greater volatility than each. The fund also has not distinguished itself since its current six-person sleeve manager stabilized on Sept. 30, 2019.
The fund was competitive in 2019’s rally and in 2020’s market surge following the brief but severe coronavirus-driven bear market. Of those two calendar years, the fund fared best against peers in 2020, with a top-quartile showing. But in neither year did it beat the index.
Results in 2021 were then relatively poor. The A shares’ 15.2% gain trailed the index by 10.5 percentage points and placed near the peer group’s bottom. It was an off year for the sleeve managers’ stock picking. Especially painful were modest positions in biotechnology stocks Chemocentryx CCXI and Allakos ALLK, whose shares both tumbled after disappointing clinical trial data.
The fund was lacklustre during its four-plus years of transition from a single-manager offering under Saul Pannell to its current format. From March 2013 to Pannell’s 2017 retirement, its 13.1% annualized gain lagged the index by 1.5 percentage points and placed in the peer group’s bottom half.
About Funds:
The firm maintains a long-standing relationship with well-respected subadvisor Wellington Management Company. Wellington has long run the firm’s equity funds–over half of its $116 billion in fund assets–and took the reins of Hartford Fund’s fixed-income platform beginning in 2012. In 2016, Hartford Funds began offering strategic-beta exchange-traded funds with its acquisition of Lattice Strategies and partnered with U.K.-based Schroders to expand its investment platform further. The Schroders alliance added another strong subadvisor to Hartford’s lineup, with expertise in non-U.S. strategies. Hartford Funds mostly leaves day-to-day investment decisions to its well-equipped subadvisors and instead steers product development, risk oversight, and distribution for its strategies. In 2013, the firm reorganized and grew its product-management and distribution effort. Since then, leadership has added resources to its distribution and oversight teams, merged and liquidated subpar offerings, introduced new strategies, evolved its strategic partnerships with MIT AgeLab and AARP, and lowered some fees. That said, fees are still not always best in class but have improved.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
The fund aims to achieve capital growth equal to, or greater than the Benchmark with lower volatility over the long term by investing globally in listed securities of companies having their registered office or exercising a preponderant part of their economic activities in emerging countries through the underlying fund.
Approach
The strategy’s robust foundation and consistent execution remain attractive features. The rules based, quantitative process is built on academic research demonstrating low-risk stocks leads to better risk adjusted returns. After an initial liquidity filter, Robeco’s quant model ranks the 2,000-stock universe on a multidimensional risk factor (volatility, beta, and distress metrics), combined with value, quality, sentiment, and momentum factors. In recent years, enhancements to refine the model have been added, including short-term momentum-driven signals that can adjust a stock’s ranking up or down by a maximum 10 percentage points. This should prioritise buy decisions for stocks that rank high in the model and score well on short term signals, and vice versa. From 2020 the team also allows liquid mega-caps to have more weight in the portfolio. Top-quintile stocks are typically included in an optimisation algorithm that considers liquidity, market cap, and 10-percentage-point country and sector limits relative to the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. A 200- to 300-stock portfolio is constructed with better ESG and carbon footprints than the index; rebalancing takes place monthly, generating annual turnover of about 25%. Stocks are sold when ranking in the bottom 40% of the model.
Portfolio
The defensive nature of the strategy translates into a higher allocation to low-beta and high-yielding stocks in the utilities, consumer staples and communication services sectors, while consumer discretionary stocks are a large underweight. The valuation factors embedded in the model have steered the fund clear from index heavyweight Meituan, while positions in Alibaba and Tencent were sold in August and September 2021, respectively. The quant approach gives management wide latitude to invest across the market-cap spectrum, and the diversified 200- to 300-stock portfolio has long exhibited a small/mid-cap bias compared with the index. However, the team’s decision to increase the maximum absolute weight in mega-caps to 4% from 3% for liquidity purposes has increased top-10 concentration to around 20%, double the level at inception. Still, 29% of assets remain invested outside of large- and mega- caps, about three times the MSCI Emerging Markets index’ allocation.
Performance
This defensive strategy has generally offered good volatility reduction during turbulent markets, capturing 67.77% of the losses of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index since inception, and 76.89% of the upside return. It did not live up to expectations in the coronavirus-dominated markets of 2020, falling more than the index, explained by market dynamics that did not work in its favour. Exposure to dividend stocks and traditional low-risk stocks did poorly compared to high-growth and momentum stocks; the tilt to mid and small caps also detracted. The portfolio lagged during the subsequent recovery that benefited underweight technology and e-commerce stocks. While the value rally in the final quarter did help, cyclical value stocks that are not favoured rallied the most. Consequently, the fund underperformed the Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index by 11 percentage points. Things changed in 2021, benefiting from low risk exposure and value tilt during the correction of Chinese e-commerce stocks following a regulatory crackdown. Taiwanese financials and Indian IT stocks aided returns, helping to recoup lost grounds. The fund’s alpha since inception versus the MSCI EM index remains positive, yet slightly behind the minimum volatility index. Although three- and five-year absolute returns have been below index, Sharpe ratios are broadly similar to index with a lower drawdown since inception.
About the fund
The fund aims to achieve capital growth equal to, or greater than the Benchmark with lower volatility over the long term by investing globally in listed securities of companies having their registered office or exercising a preponderant part of their economic activities in emerging countries through the underlying fund.
The investment strategy of the underlying fund seeks to capture the low risk anomaly. Analysis by Robeco has shown that low-risk stocks (in terms of volatility and beta) are able to generate returns equal to, or greater than, the market with lower associated risks. The beta of a stock or portfolio is a number describing the correlated volatility of an asset in relation to the volatility of the benchmark that the asset is being compared to.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
The investment objective of the scheme is to provide the investors an opportunity to predominantly invest in corporate bonds rated AA+ and above to generate additional spread on part of their debt investments from high quality corporate debt securities while maintaining moderate liquidity in the portfolio through investment in money market securities.
Approach
The fund’s strategy is to generate attractive returns through high-quality corporate bonds and short duration mandates. It employs a bottom-up approach combined with a top-down overlay to generate superior risk adjusted returns. The managers use various qualitative and quantitative parameters and put a lot of emphasis on a company’s management, business, and financial health. They also use the analysis of sell-side research and credit rating agencies to form a view on the creditworthiness of companies but to a limited extent. The credit committee then reviews the rated securities, and the approved securities are assigned credit and tenor limits. While constructing the portfolio, the managers have the flexibility to implement the trades with reasonable leeway to express their views. The risk-management team periodically reviews the portfolio to ensure the managers adhere to the guidelines. We believe the flow of ideas/information is effective and fits nicely with the process in place, supporting an Above Average Process rating.
Portfolio
The fund has a higher credit-quality portfolio, making it more liquid and less prone to credit risk. The fund maintains 100% of its assets in AAA rated bonds, despite having the flexibility to take some allocation in lower-rated instruments. The duration of the portfolio is well managed between one and three years. The fund also invests in government securities based on portfolio manager’s view on interest rates, but this does not account for more than 20% of its net assets. But high allocation is made to state development loans, given attractive spreads with regard to central government securities.
The portfolio of the fund is well diversified. The manager also intermittently holds higher cash/money market instruments to take opportunistic trading calls when markets are bumpy.The strategy, however, is not without risk. The fund may underperform its peers if the market favours high-yielding bonds. Also when interest rates are falling, the fund may struggle to outperform its category peers that invest in a portfolio with a little longer duration.
Performance
Under a short tenure of the fund’s existence (February 2019 to December 2021), the fund’s direct share class has posted an excellent annualised return of 8.36% as against the category average (7.14%). The portfolio manager’s research-intensive approach has helped the fund generate superior returns, placing the fund in the first quartile.
In terms of year-on-year returns, the fund’s performance has been inconsistent. The fund outperformed most category peers by a wide margin in 2019 and 2020. However, the 2021 performance got impacted because of the fund’s conservative approach with regard to its peers. On expectation of normalisation of interest rates by the RBI, the manager kept the duration below two years. This resulted in the fund ranking in the fourth quartile as against its category peers. However, the fund has the potential and could bounce back going ahead.
About the fund
The investment objective of the scheme is to provide the investors an opportunity to predominantly invest in corporate bonds rated AA+ and above to generate additional spread on part of their debt investments from high quality corporate debt securities while maintaining moderate liquidity in the portfolio through investment in money market securities.
The fund follows a disciplined and risk-conscious investment process that draws extensively from the in depth expertise of the investment team. The process is bottom-up with a focus on high-quality business models with a top-down overlay. The team’s understanding of the markets and frequent interaction with its equity team and parent company give it an edge in forming views on the business and creditworthiness of the companies. Furthermore, it has built some additional aspects into the approach. They now do an even more detailed analysis of the group and the promoter-linked entities in which they invest.
The execution of the process has been above average with limited credit risk and a short duration strategy. Despite having the flexibility to invest up to 80% of its portfolio in AAA and AA+ rated corporate bonds, the manager constructs the portfolio with a primary focus on liquidity, avoiding exposure to the below AAA rated segment, and keeping the duration between 1 and 3 years
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
The investment process is based around searching for stocks that have “future quality.” To achieve the investment objective, the analyst’s undertakes bottom-up fundamental research seeking quality of franchise (competitive advantages), quality of balance sheet (low debt), quality of management (strong stewardship), and quality of future valuation (sustainable but growing cash flow). The first step is developing stock ideas; the analyst’s makes use of third-party research, personal insights, company meetings, site visits, conferences, and input from other Nikko AM investment teams. Ultimately, the investment universe is restricted to companies with market caps above USD 1 billion and daily traded liquidity of more than USD 10 million. The next step is thorough fundamental bottom-up research on the firm’s business model, management and balance sheet. Detailed financial models, based on long-term cash flow forecasting, are built to establish a future quality valuation. The individual portfolio managers summarise the company research in a standard template and present stock ideas formally at a weekly meeting, where open critique is undertaken by the analysts. The investment philosophy is high-conviction, with the analysts adopting a largely index-agnostic strategy, which slightly favours growth and results in an active share of 90%-95%. Ultimately, stock selection plays a key role in the process.
Portfolio
The portfolio construction methodology is disciplined and repeatable, using a proprietary ranking tool to grade stocks in terms of expected alpha and risk. The resulting portfolio contains the analyst’s highest conviction 40-50 stock ideas. The investment process typically leads the team to construct a portfolio with a higher weighting in defensive sectors, including healthcare and consumer staples, and typically a lower weighting in cyclicals, namely, consumer discretionary and financials. However, these allocations depend on stock opportunities and economic conditions. At 31 Oct 2021, the portfolio had an active underweighting in defensive sectors, with healthcare heavily favoured and an active overweighting in cyclical sectors, with industrials and consumer discretionary stocks favoured. Regional allocation typically tends to be similar to the index. However, at 31 Oct 2021, the portfolio was only overweight in two regions: the United States and Hong Kong/Singapore. A comprehensive risk-management process is implemented to ensure no unintended sector, geographic, or commodity risk is included in the portfolio. The portfolio is also monitored from an environmental, social, and governance risk perspective. Risk-management guidelines include that no more than 10% of net assets may be invested in any one stock.
People
The investment team includes five highly experienced portfolio managers (William Low, James Kinghorn, Iain Fulton, Greig Bryson, and Johnny Russell) who operate as global generalists but with sector-specific responsibilities. In addition, two portfolio analysts, who mainly undertake thematic or project research joined the team in 2019. Low leads the team; he joined Nikko AM in mid-2014 as a portfolio manager with overall responsibility for the global-equity team (the team moved across from Scottish Widows Investment Partnership where they previous managed global equity strategies together). He has more than 30 years’ experience in the investment/finance industry, previously working for BlackRock and Dunedin Fund Managers as a portfolio manager and investment manager. Kinghorn and the other team members joined Nikko AM in mid-2014; Kinghorn had been at SWIP since 2011. Fulton joined after previously working at SWIP as head of research since 2005. Bryson joined after working at SWIP since 2007. Russell joined Nikko AM after working at SWIP since 2002. The team has access to the extensive global resources of Nikko AM, which boasts more than 100 portfolio managers and 50 analysts.
Performance
In mid-2015, the existing Nikko AM global-equity fund was restructured from a multimanager approach to its current structure of direct investment in stocks in the MSCI ACWI, under the guidance of the incumbent five portfolio managers. This team arrived at Nikko AM in 2014, having previously worked at Scottish Widows Investment Partnership. Since the strategy and personnel changes, this fund has outperformed its Morningstar Category index (MSCI World Ex Australia NR Index) and most peers in the five years to 30 Nov 2021, on a trailing returns basis. Individual calendar-year results have been strong from 2015 through 2020, with standout 2018 and 2020 years, and 2016 the lone blot against the team. In 2017, outperformance was relatively slender,
and positive contributors included Sony and Tencent. The strategy had a stronger 2018 with positive attribution from LivaNova. Returns were again solid against the index and peers during 2019, with Chinese sporting goods company Li Ning Company and US software giant Microsoft among the top contributors. Both the index and peers were thumped in 2020 by the team, which managed a softer drawdown during the first-quarter correction and adding alpha each of the remaining quarters. In the 11 months to 30 Nov 2021, the strategy have struggled, as style headwinds had an impact on performance, despite solid attribution from SVB Financial Group and Bio-Techne Corporation.
About Fund:
Nikko AM Global Share is a strategy with sturdy foundations, thanks to its highly experienced team of portfolio managers and well-structured investment process. The Edinburgh-based investment team functions in a very cooperative, transparent, and mutually respectful manner, adopting a flat operating structure, with individual portfolio managers having specific sector responsibility on a global basis. The resulting portfolio of typically around 40-50 stocks is slightly growth-orientated and high conviction, with around 35% of FUM in the top 10 stocks. The strategy benchmarks to the MSCI All Country World Index, giving it rein to venture into emerging markets, but this allocation is rarely more than 10% of assets.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
AMP Capital Corporate Bond provides exposure to a wide range of credit securities within Australian, global, investment-grade, corporate bond, and high yield. The benchmark changed from the Bloomberg AusBond Credit 0+Yr Index to the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index in February 2016, reflecting the fund’s capital preservation and income emphasis since 2012. Monthly distributions are announced and reviewed biannually, which helps income-focused investors manage their expectations. Credit analysis is done on two accounts; first, a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the broader industry sector, and second, issuerand security-specific analysis.
The analysis is conducted in line with a “score card” methodology that incorporates fundamentals, technicals, and valuations. The primary weighting is to the valuation and fundamental factors as the team believes this is the primary determinant of a positive outcome for investors over the longer term. The duration view is led by the macro team and is established through a similar score card system, which again considers fundamental, sentiment, and technical factors, with the analyst view of valuation playing a key part. The credit strategy panel, comprising senior investment staff, set the overall credit strategy, risk budget, and sector allocations. However, the ultimate duration and credit exposures are determined by comanagers Sonia Baillie and Nathan Boon.
Portfolio:
The vehicle chiefly comprises Australian credit, though it does hold around 5% each in US and UK names. The strategy can hold up to 10% in high yield and 15% in unrated bonds but is usually well below these limits. The portfolio is largely BBB and A rated corporate bonds, with the BBB names providing a slightly larger proportion of the fund’s asset value at nearly 44% to October 2021. Following the coronavirus-driven dislocation, the team took opportunistic exposures in long duration REITs and industrials, some of which have seen partial profit taking with significant spread tightening throughout 2021. 2019 saw the fund rotate back into corporate bonds following the late-2018 sell-off.
The team believes credit fundamentals are improving and technicals supportive, but valuations indicate little expectation of further spread compression. It wants to maintain income by holding credit, albeit at a reducing amount to late-2021, also using credit derivatives to insulate from wider spreads. The fund’s duration limits were adjusted from plus or minus 1.5 years versus the old credit benchmark, to absolute terms of zero to 4.5 years in October 2014. The fund has been positioned within a duration range of 0.2-0.8 years since the start of 2017 (0.6 years in October 2021), meaning the sensitivity to rising interest rates is low. FUM has steadily declined over the past few years and currently sits at AUD 855 million as of October 2021.
People:
Sonia Baillie (head of credit) has led this portfolio since October 2017, joined by Nathan Boon (head of credit portfolio management) in March 2018. This group, however, is currently transitioning into the Macquarie fixed-income team as part of AMP Capital’s sale to that organisation; completion is expected by mid-2022, creating some uncertainty. The duo gets significant input from head of macro Ilan Dekell, and a team of analysts spread between Sydney and Chicago. Head of credit research Steven Hur was previously a key member until he left the group in December 2021. The fixed-income team is headed by Grant Hassell, who has more than 30 years of experience, though he is the sole member of this quartet not joining the Macquarie investment team in the same capacity.
Hassell contributes to overall discussions through team meetings and investment committees, acting as the sounding board for the various heads to bring ideas together into a portfolio. While there has been staff turnover among the credit analyst and credit portfolio managers–former managers Jeff Brunton and David Carruthers left in 2014 and 2016, respectively–most key staffers have long tenure. For example, while Baillie was appointed portfolio manager only in 2017, she has been with the team since 2010, has held other senior roles, and worked in the firm’s Asian fixed-income business. Furthermore, AMP Capital has taken steps to improve staff incentives and address staff turnover.
Performance:
Over the long run, this fund has outdone the Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index and the average credit fund. That’s not necessarily compelling, given the fund has been running substantially more credit and/or duration risk than those yardsticks. Since AMP Capital slashed the fund’s duration, rival credit funds are a more reasonable benchmark looking ahead; the fund’s historically high duration means we also compare the fund’s history against the Bloomberg AusBond Credit Index, where this strategy has underperformed. The fund’s track record has benefited from higher-than-average credit risk, as well as significant interest-rate risk, that has paid off as rates declined to historically low levels. returns, yet three- and five-year returns fail to beat the average category peer. Given declining global interest rates, the fund reduced its distribution in mid-2017 to 0.275% per month, and then 0.25% per month at the beginning of 2018. This continued through 2021 when distributions dropped to 0.175% by year-end, the shop expects it to remain at these compressed levels, barring unforeseen circumstances. The rate peaked at 0.55% per month in 2012, highlighting that while these distribution indications can be helpful in the short run, they should not be relied on for long-term income expectations.
About Funds:
Though a new home will bring positives to AMP Capital Corporate Bond, it also introduces uncertainties for this diversified credit strategy. AMP Capital’s Global Equities and Fixed Interest business is in the midst of a sale to Macquarie Asset Management, which is expected to complete by mid-2022. Head of global fixed income Grant Hassell is leading the integration. The strategy has benchmarked to the Bloomberg Ausbond Bank Bill Index since early-2016, reflecting the income goals with capital stability. This move followed a history of changes, which under Macquarie’s guidance going forward could see further revisions in approach.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
The investment process is based around searching for stocks that have “future quality.” To achieve the investment objective, the analyst’s undertakes bottom-up fundamental research seeking quality of franchise (competitive advantages), quality of balance sheet (low debt), quality of management (strong stewardship), and quality of future valuation (sustainable but growing cash flow). The first step is developing stock ideas; the analyst’s makes use of third-party research, personal insights, company meetings, site visits, conferences, and input from other Nikko AM investment teams. Ultimately, the investment universe is restricted to companies with market caps above USD 1 billion and daily traded liquidity of more than USD 10 million. The next step is thorough fundamental bottom-up research on the firm’s business model, management and balance sheet. Detailed financial models, based on long-term cash flow forecasting, are built to establish a future quality valuation. The individual portfolio managers summarise the company research in a standard template and present stock ideas formally at a weekly meeting, where open critique is undertaken by the analysts. The investment philosophy is high-conviction, with the analysts adopting a largely index-agnostic strategy, which slightly favours growth and results in an active share of 90%-95%. Ultimately, stock selection plays a key role in the process.
Portfolio
The portfolio construction methodology is disciplined and repeatable, using a proprietary ranking tool to grade stocks in terms of expected alpha and risk. The resulting portfolio contains the analyst’s highest conviction 40-50 stock ideas. The investment process typically leads the team to construct a portfolio with a higher weighting in defensive sectors, including healthcare and consumer staples, and typically a lower weighting in cyclicals, namely, consumer discretionary and financials. However, these allocations depend on stock opportunities and economic conditions. At 31 Oct 2021, the portfolio had an active underweighting in defensive sectors, with healthcare heavily favoured and an active overweighting in cyclical sectors, with industrials and consumer discretionary stocks favoured. Regional allocation typically tends to be similar to the index. However, at 31 Oct 2021, the portfolio was only overweight in two regions: the United States and Hong Kong/Singapore. A comprehensive risk-management process is implemented to ensure no unintended sector, geographic, or commodity risk is included in the portfolio. The portfolio is also monitored from an environmental, social, and governance risk perspective. Risk-management guidelines include that no more than 10% of net assets may be invested in any one stock.
People
The investment team includes five highly experienced portfolio managers (William Low, James Kinghorn, Iain Fulton, Greig Bryson, and Johnny Russell) who operate as global generalists but with sector-specific responsibilities. In addition, two portfolio analysts, who mainly undertake thematic or project research joined the team in 2019. Low leads the team; he joined Nikko AM in mid-2014 as a portfolio manager with overall responsibility for the global-equity team (the team moved across from Scottish Widows Investment Partnership where they previous managed global equity strategies together). He has more than 30 years’ experience in the investment/finance industry, previously working for BlackRock and Dunedin Fund Managers as a portfolio manager and investment manager. Kinghorn and the other team members joined Nikko AM in mid-2014; Kinghorn had been at SWIP since 2011. Fulton joined after previously working at SWIP as head of research since 2005. Bryson joined after working at SWIP since 2007. Russell joined Nikko AM after working at SWIP since 2002. The team has access to the extensive global resources of Nikko AM, which boasts more than 100 portfolio managers and 50 analysts.
Performance
In mid-2015, the existing Nikko AM global-equity fund was restructured from a multimanager approach to its current structure of direct investment in stocks in the MSCI ACWI, under the guidance of the incumbent five portfolio managers. This team arrived at Nikko AM in 2014, having previously worked at Scottish Widows Investment Partnership. Since the strategy and personnel changes, this fund has outperformed its Morningstar Category index (MSCI World Ex Australia NR Index) and most peers in the five years to 30 Nov 2021, on a trailing returns basis. Individual calendar-year results have been strong from 2015 through 2020, with standout 2018 and 2020 years, and 2016 the lone blot against the team. In 2017, outperformance was relatively slender,
and positive contributors included Sony and Tencent. The strategy had a stronger 2018 with positive attribution from LivaNova. Returns were again solid against the index and peers during 2019, with Chinese sporting goods company Li Ning Company and US software giant Microsoft among the top contributors. Both the index and peers were thumped in 2020 by the team, which managed a softer drawdown during the first-quarter correction and adding alpha each of the remaining quarters. In the 11 months to 30 Nov 2021, the strategy have struggled, as style headwinds had an impact on performance, despite solid attribution from SVB Financial Group and Bio-Techne Corporation.
About Fund:
Nikko AM Global Share is a strategy with sturdy foundations, thanks to its highly experienced team of portfolio managers and well-structured investment process. The Edinburgh-based investment team functions in a very cooperative, transparent, and mutually respectful manner, adopting a flat operating structure, with individual portfolio managers having specific sector responsibility on a global basis. The resulting portfolio of typically around 40-50 stocks is slightly growth-orientated and high conviction, with around 35% of FUM in the top 10 stocks. The strategy benchmarks to the MSCI All Country World Index, giving it rein to venture into emerging markets, but this allocation is rarely more than 10% of assets.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
Laverne Securities Pty Ltd, ACN 629 216 477, T/As Investor Desk, is a Corporate Authorised Representative of Laverne Capital Pty Ltd (AFSL 482937). This service is administered by OpenInvest Limited ACN 614 587 183 via the OpenInvest Portfolio Service ARSN 628 156 052. This website provides factual information about the service, and any general advice contained does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making any investment decision, please review the PDS and Target Market Determination available at https://www.investordesk.com.au/key-documents/. Should you require assistance in determining whether an investment in the service is right for you, you may wish to seek personal advice from an appropriately licensed financial adviser.
