Tag: US Market
Though it’s slightly declining in importance, advertising remains an important source of revenue for Nexstar. Just under 44% of total 2019 revenue came from nonpolitical advertising. Over 70% of non-political advertising revenue is generated at the local level by selling ad time to area businesses, including restaurants, auto dealerships, and retailers, which have suffered during the pandemic. Because of its size and geographic reach, Nexstar also sells advertising nationally to auto manufacturers, telecom firms, fast-food restaurants, and retailers via their ad agencies. The larger scale of the firm, along with increased political ad spending, has increased the importance of elections. Hence it is expected that Nexstar will continue to benefit from political ad spending growth offsetting slower local and national ad growth.
Over the past decade, retransmission revenue has grown rapidly as a source of revenue for local television stations. For Nexstar, retrans revenue was 45% of total 2019 revenue, up from 25% in 2014. While the growth in retrans revenue has been and will continue to be a growth driver for local station owners, and it is projected that national network owners will continue to raise both network affiliation fees and reverse compensation fees, decreasing the bottom-line benefit to Nexstar.
Financial Strength
Nexstar is more highly leveraged than it has been traditionally, it is in decent financial shape. Overall debt increased as a result of the Tribune Media acquisition. The firm had $7.5 billion in debt as of September 2021, up sharply from $3.9 billion at the end of 2018. Nexstar continues to use its free cash flow to lower its debt load. It spent over $425 million in the first nine month of 2021 to reduce its debt load, lowering its first-line net leverage to 2.14times at the end of the quarter from 3.52 times at the end of 2019. The new level is well below the covenant level of 4.25 times. Total net leverage is at 3.4 times, well below the management’s target of 4.0 times. The firm had no bond maturities due until 2024, though some of its $4.7 billion first-lien loans will come due over the next three years.
Bulls Say
- Nexstar can drive local ad revenue growth via its duopoly markets.
- The increased reach provided by the Tribune merger will help attract more national advertisers and grow political ad spending.
- Nexstar has the heft and reach to strike more advantageous retransmission agreements with pay television distributors.
Company Profile
Nexstar is the largest television station owner/operator in the United States, with 197 stations in 115 markets. Of its 197 full-power stations, 158 are affiliated with the four national broadcasters: CBS (50), Fox (43), NBC (35), and ABC (30). The 2019 merger with Tribune made Nexstar the top broadcast affiliate for both Fox and CBS as well as the number-two partner for NBC and number three for ABC. The firm now has networks in 15 of the top 20 television markets and reaches 69 million television households. Nexstar also owns WGN, a nationwide pay-television network, and a 31% stake in Food Network and Cooking Channel.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
Narrow moat Kroger is the leading American grocer, with 2,742 supermarkets (at the end of 2020) across multiple banners. While the entry into boxes is set to be “small-scale,” a more meaningful long-term opportunity exists if the initial efforts are well-executed. Not only does this partnership offer Bed Bath an incremental distribution network for its products, but it also provides visibility to customers who want a one stop omnichannel option tied into their grocery transactions.
Second, Bed Bath is launching a digital marketplace for the home and baby categories that will offer curated third-party brand products that fit into the firm’s digital platform. While the economics of these projects were not offered, a benefit should fall to both the top line and the bottom line (as scale helps absorb costs).
Financial Strength:
The dividend yield by the company during the year 2020 was a whopping 6.3% and PE ratio was 23.5.
Bed Bath now plans to complete its $1 billion share buyback in 2021, two years ahead of schedule. Depending on the acquisition prices, Bed Bath could purchase its equity at premiums to the analyst’s fair value estimate, which would not be viewed as prudent. However, this move is appreciated by the analysts as it signals management’s long-term belief surrounding the stability of the business, and that the turnaround is well underway.
Company Profile:
Bed Bath & Beyond is a home furnishings retailer, operating around 1,000 stores in all 50 states, Puerto Rico, Canada, and Mexico. Stores carry an assortment of branded bed and bath accessories, kitchen textiles, and cooking supplies. In addition to 813 Bed Bath & Beyond stores, the company operates 132 Buy Buy Baby stores and 54 Harmon Face Values stores (health/beauty care). In an effort to refocus on its core businesses, the firm has divested the online retailer Personalizationmall.com, the One Kings Lane business and Christmas Tree Shops and That (gifts/housewares), Linen Holdings, and Cost Plus World Market.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
Vans has grown from its roots as an action sports brand into an everyday brand. Around 60% of Vans apparel is now purchased by females, and it is one of the most popular shoe brands for teens of both sexes. It is viewed as less of a sports brand than a brand for creative people. Vans, like wide-moat Nike and others, offer customization options that are very popular among consumers aged 13-24. Vans has strong potential as it is still relatively small (approximately $3.5 billion in fiscal 2021 revenue) compared with global brands like Nike (about 10 times larger).
It is expected that the North Face will benefit from its new FutureLight waterproof fabric, brand extensions, and expansions of its direct-to-consumer business. VF plans 8%-9% annual growth for The North Face, which may be possible after the coronavirus crisis has passed.
Future Outlook
VF laid out fiscal 2024 goals of a gross margin above 55.5%, an operating margin above 15%, and an ROIC above 20% at its 2019 investor event. These targets are aggressive, but achievable. Indeed, the analyst of Morningstar forecast an operating margin of 15% in fiscal 2024, up from an estimated 13% in fiscal 2022. To achieve this, VF will need continuing strong growth from high-margin brands Vans and Supreme as the virus fades.
Narrow-Moat VF Dealing With Supply Chain Woes and Weakness in China, but Brands Remain Healthy
Vans’ sales increased just 8% in the quarter due to a 10% decline in wholesale sales related to the supply problems and soft demand in China. Attributing the same to the latter COVID-19-related closures and weakness in China’s economy and do not think the long-term prospects for Vans in the region have been affected. The activewear and casualization trends are positive for Vans. Other key brands The North Face and Timberland were affected by supply problems, leading to outdoor coalition growth of 31%, short of the 40% forecast. Dickies was a standout, as workwear sales jumped 18%.
Apart from these issues, apparel and footwear manufacturers are dealing with higher labor, energy, and raw material costs, especially for cotton. In VF’s case, cotton represents only about 10% of its product costs, lower than for some competing firms that are heavier in apparel. Thus far, VF and others in the industry have been able to overcome inflation with strong pricing as discounting in the clothing space remains relatively low. Moreover, as product shortages are likely to persist and underlying demand is healthy, as a result pricing will remain strong through the holiday period.
Bulls Say
- Vans, expected to generate over $4 billion in sales in fiscal 2022, is developing into a fashion brand. It still has growth potential, given its small share in the roughly $120 billion (Euromonitor) sports-inspired apparel and footwear markets.
- VF has disposed of its weaker jeans (in 2019) and work (in 2021) brands, helping to pull its gross margins up to the mid-50s from the high-40s.
- As an upscale brand with high price points, Supreme brings higher margins than any of VF’s individual brands except Vans. There is potential for VF to generate significant sales of Supreme gear in China.
Company Profile
VF designs, produces, and distributes branded apparel and accessories. Its largest apparel categories include action sports, outdoor, and workwear. Its portfolio of about 15 brands includes Vans, The North Face, Timberland, Supreme, and Dickies. VF markets its products in the Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific through wholesale sales to retailers, e-commerce, and branded stores owned by the company and partners. The company has grown through multiple acquisitions and traces its roots to 1899.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
Shaw has made significant efforts to improve its wireless network and is now bundling wireless with wireline service to customers in its cable footprint, enabling it offer even better value and enhancing service when offloaded onto its Wi-Fi network. Between the ends of fiscal years 2016 and 2020, Shaw more than doubled its postpaid wireless subscriber base, increased average billings per user (ABPU) by 20%, and expanded its wireless EBITDA margin by 900 basis points. The firm continues to invest heavily to improve its wireless network, and we think the firm is a legitimate competitor for new wireless customers and will continue seeing wireless results trend upwards.
The stronger competition has caused Shaw to lose customers and market share over the last several years. The losses are attributable to television and voice customers, which face secular challenges for all competitors, but even Internet customer growth has been anemic (up 2% since 2017, including customer losses in 2021).
Financial Strength
Shaw is currently in a good financial positionAt the end of fiscal 2020, Shaw had over CAD 700 million in cash and CAD 4.5 billion in long-term debt, which represented 1.6 times net debt to adjusted EBITDA. Shaw’s coverage ratio (adjusted EBITDA to interest expense) ended 2020 at 8.7, and the company has CAD 1.5 billion available on a revolving credit facility. Shaw has no long-term debt maturing until the end of 2023. Its debt covenants require its leverage ratio to stay below 5.0 and its coverage ratio to stay above 2.0, both comfortably distant from where the firm is currently. Shaw has maintained a dividend of CAD 1.19 per share since 2016, and will remain flat over the next few years, as the firm allocates capital to additional spectrum auctions in 2021 and 2022. Shaw suspended its share buyback in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it still expects its free cash flow will be able to cover the dividend.
Bulls Says
- Shaw is doing all the right things to build up its wireless business, acquiring and building out sufficient assets and luring customers by offering great deals.
- The Canadian government is keen on bringing wireless competition to the big three incumbents. Unlike previous national upstarts, Shaw’s strong financial position and family control afford it the time and money to stick with a long-term strategy to succeed.
- Shaw’s move to bundle wireless and wireline service with Shaw Mobile could expedite its wireless share gains and stem wireline losses it has seen recently
Company Profile
Shaw Communications is a Canadian cable company that is one of the biggest providers of Internet, television, and landline telephone services in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and northern Ontario. In fiscal 2021, more than 75% of Shaw’s total revenue resulted from this wireline business. Shaw is also now a national wireless service provider after acquiring Wind Mobile in 2016. Shaw has upgraded its wireless network, undertaken an aggressive pricing strategy, and significantly enhanced its spectrum holdings. As a smaller carrier, Shaw has favored bidding status in spectrum auctions, giving it a further boost in enhancing its wireless network. At the 2019 auction, Shaw added significant amounts of 600 MHz spectrum to the 700 MHz spectrum it is currently deploying.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
that it stands to capitalize on its research and development, solid quality, operational excellence, and acquisition strategy. However, Polaris’ brands do not benefit from switching costs, and with peers innovating more quickly than in the past, it could jeopardize the firm’s ability to take price and share consistently, particularly in periods of inflated recalls or aggressive industry discounting.
Polaris had sacrificed some financial flexibility after its transformational acquisitions of TAP (2016) and Boat Holdings (2018), but debt-service metrics have been rapidly worked down via EBITDA expansion and cost-saving scale benefits (with debt/adjusted EBITDA set to average around 1.1 times over our forecast). As evidenced by solid ROICs (at 17%, including goodwill, in 2020), Polaris still has top-notch brand goodwill in its segments, supporting consumer interest and indicating the firm’s brand intangible asset is intact.
Financial Strength:
For Polaris exiting the recession, rising profits led to increases in company equity, which helped reduce debt/capital from 49% in December 2009 to 31% in December 2015. With the addition of leverage from the acquisition of TAP (which the company paid $655 million net of $115 million in tax benefits for in 2016), and the financing of Boat Holdings in 2018, Polaris ended 2019 with debt/adjusted EBITDA just above 2 times and debt/capital of 60%. However, robust demand and successful execution through COVID-19 has restored the metric to 1.5 times at the end of 2020, a very manageable level which the company should be able to maintain. Additionally, Polaris is poised to produce strong cumulative free cash flow to equity over the next five years’ worth around $3.2 billion.
Bulls Say:
- Polaris has historically had a strong reputation for innovation, and new product lines and acquisitions have supported solid performance in both strong and difficult environments.
- Profit margins could tick up faster than we expect with faster than enterprise average volume growth from the sizable off-road and low-operating expense Boat Holdings business segments.
- Management remains focused on operating as a bestin-class manufacturer. With continutious improvement at existing facilities, the pursuit of excellence should support stable operating margin performance.
Company Profile:
Polaris designs and manufactures off-road vehicles, including all-terrain vehicles and side-by-side vehicles for recreational and utility purposes, snowmobiles, small vehicles, and on-road vehicles, including motorcycles, along with the related replacement parts, garments, and accessories. The firm entered the aftermarket parts segment in 2016, tying up with Transamerican Auto Parts and then tapped into boats through the acquisition on Boat Holdings in 2018, offering exposure to new segments of the outdoor lifestyle market. Polaris products retailed through 2,300 dealers in North America and through 1,400 international dealers as well as more than 30 subsidiaries and 90 distributors in more than 120 countries outside North America at the end of 2020.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
FedEx and UPS are the major U.S. incumbents.UPS has also boosted its exposure to the asset-light third-party freight brokerage market, especially with its 2016 acquisition of truckload broker Coyote Logistics.
Despite its unionized workforce and asset intensity, UPS produces operating margins well above competitors’, thanks in large part to its leading package density. In the United States, FedEx’s express and ground units together handled 14.4 million average parcels daily in its four fiscal quarters ended in November 2020, while UPS moved 21.1 million in calendar 2020. The disparity is greater in the U.S. ground market, where UPS moved on average 17.4 million parcels per day and FedEx ground averaged 11.4 million.
Favorable e-commerce trends should remain a longer-term top-line tailwind for UPS’ U.S. ground and express package business. That said, growth won’t be costless; UPS is amid an operational transformation initiative aimed at mitigating the challenges of a rising mix of lower-margin business-to-consumer deliveries.
Amazon has been insourcing more of its own last-mile delivery needs at a rapid pace to supplement capacity access amid robust growth. This removes some incremental growth opportunities for UPS while creating risk that Amazon decides to take in house the shipments it currently sends though UPS–the retailer now makes up approximately 13% of UPS’ total revenue.
Financial Strength
UPS’ balance sheet is reasonable and mostly healthy. It held $6.9 billion in cash and marketable securities compared with roughly $24.7 billion of total debt at year-end 2020. Debt/EBITDA leverage came in around 2.4 times in 2020, ignoring underfunded pensions, though the firm plans to pay off more than $2 billion in 2021, with help from cash generation and the $800 million UPS Freight sale. Leverage will likely finish 2021 at comfortably less than 2 times EBITDA. EBITDA/interest coverage for 2020 was a healthy 15 times.Share repurchases slowed modestly in 2018 and 2019 on account of heavy capital investment and were suspended in 2020 (into 2021) due to pandemic risk-mitigation efforts (including debt reduction).
Bulls Say
- UPS’ U.S. ground and express package delivery operations should enjoy healthy medium-term growth tailwinds rooted in highly favorable e-commerce trends.
- UPS’ massive package sortation footprint, immense air and delivery fleet, and global operations knit together a presence that’s extraordinarily difficult to replicate.
- On top of superior parcel density, UPS uses many of the same assets to handle both express and ground shipments, driving industry-leading operating margins.
Company Profile
As the world’s largest parcel delivery company, UPS manages a massive fleet of more than 500 planes and 100,000 vehicles, along with many hundreds of sorting facilities, to deliver an average of about 22 million packages per day to residences and businesses across the globe. UPS’ domestic U.S. package operations generate 61% of total revenue while international package makes up 20%. Less-than-truckload shipping, air and ocean freight forwarding, truckload brokerage, and contract logistics make up the remaining 19%.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.
a brand intangible asset and switching cost advantage. This view is supported by the company’s roughly 40% share of all U.S. economy and midscale branded hotels and the industry’s fourth-largest loyalty program by which encourages third-party hotel owners to join the platform.
With essentially all of its nearly 9,000-plus hotels managed or franchised, Wyndham has an attractive recurring-fee business model with healthy returns on invested capital, as these asset-light relationships have low fixed costs and capital requirements. This asset-light model creates switching costs, given 10- to 20-year contracts that have meaningful cancellation costs for owners.
The 2018 acquisition of La Quinta as a strategically strong fit that supports Wyndham’s intangible-asset-driven narrow moat while enhancing long-term growth Cyclicality, illnesses like COVID-19, and overbuilding are the main risks for shareholders.
Wyndham Continues to Lead the Global Travel Rebound; More Demand Recovery Expected in 2022
Wyndham’s leisure, continued to lead the global travel recovery in the third quarter, with total revenue per available room reaching 98% of 2019 levels. U.S. and international revPAR increased to 107% and 75% of 2019 levels, respectively, up from 95% and 56% in the three months prior. Wyndham expects demand to sustain in the fourth quarter and now sees its 2021 revPAR growth at 43% versus 40% prior and compared with our forecast of 41%.
Looking to 2022, we expect strong U.S. leisure demand to continue, aided by remote work flexibility, while international markets should experience a strong revPAR recovery because vaccination rates now allow for reduced travel restrictions. This view is supported by Wyndham’s Canadian revPAR improving to 90% of 2019 levels in the quarter, up from around 60%, as the country reduced its pandemic-related restrictions.
Financial Strength
Wyndham’s financial health remains in good shape, despite COVID-19 challenges. Wyndham exited 2020 with debt/adjusted EBITDA of 7.9 times, up from 3.5 times in 2019, as its asset-light business model allows the company to operate with low fixed costs and stable unit growth . But Wyndham did not sit still during the depths of the pandemic; rather, it took action to increase its liquidity profile, tapping its $750 million credit facility (which was repaid in full by Nov. 2020), cutting discretionary expenses, suspending buybacks, and reducing its quarterly dividend from $0.32 to $0.08 (which was increased back to $0.32 per share in Oct. 2021).Further, Wyndham saw positive cash flow generation in 2020, despite COVID-19 significantly reducing global travel demand in that year. While Wyndham’s adjusted EBIT/interest expense was negative 0.4 times in 2020.The company has only $64 million in debt maturing over the next three years.
Bull Says
- The La Quinta brand offers long-term growth opportunity to 2,000 units from 937 at the end of 2020, as it is not in 30% of the regions monitored by Smith Travel Research, despite strong third-party hotel operator renewal rates and strong revPAR share in existing market.
- Wyndham’s economy/midscale select service presence operates at low operating costs, allowing its U.S. hotels to break even at 30% occupancy levels.
- The vast majority of Wyndham Hotels’ EBITDA is generated by service-for-fee operations, which are less capital-intensive than owned assets, leading to healthy ROICs.
Company Profile
As of Sept. 30, 2021, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts operates 803,000 rooms across 22 brands in the economy (around 51% of total U.S. rooms) and midscale (45%) segments. Super 8 is the largest brand, representing around 30% of all hotels, with Days Inn (18%) and La Quinta (10%) the next two largest brands. During the past several years, the company has expanded its extended stay/lifestyle brands (2% of total properties), which appeal to travelers seeking to experience the local culture of a given location. The United States represents 61% of total rooms. The company closed its La Quinta acquisition in the second quarter of 2018, adding around 90,000 rooms at the time the deal closed.
(Source: Morningstar)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.