Categories
Dividend Stocks

Domain’s Relatively Low Exposure to Real Estate Price Risk Expected To Underpin Growth

Business Strategy and Outlook

Domain offers exposure to favourable trends in the Australian real estate market, but with relatively low exposure to real estate price risk in the long term. The company has generated strong revenue growth in recent years, boosted by an increase in agents using its website, listings, premium listings, and acquisitions. However, similar growth is not expected from these factors in future, as it is projected that Domain now has near saturation of available agents and listings and as such, further acquisitions are not anticipated. 

Domain is expected to generate revenue growth primarily from growth within its residential division, and listings are projected to increase by at least 1%-2% per year, in line with population and dwelling growth over the long term. In addition, it is viewed that Domain can generate above-inflation growth in revenue per listing, as a result of above-inflation listing price growth and an increase in the proportion of premium listings on its website, from around 10% national penetration toward REA Group’s 20%. A revenue CAGR for the group of 12% is forecasted over the next decade. 

Domain currently generates a lower EBIT margin than REA Group and other leading Australian online listings websites; however, the company is expected to achieve margin expansion as a result of strong revenue growth and operating leverage. Although margin improvement is anticipated, a lower margin is forecasted for Domain in comparison to peers, as Domain is the number-two provider, whereas peers are all leading providers in their respective segments.

Financial Strength

Domain is in good financial health, which is partly attributed to the capital-light business model and expected cash flow strength. As with many software companies, most of Domain’s costs relate to employee costs, and the company does not require large capital expenditures to grow. The lack of capital requirements means cash conversion is usually high and cash flows are available for dividend payments and growth investments, such as acquisitions or investments in early-stage businesses. It also means that equity issuance is usually negligible, which means little or no dilution of existing shareholders. Domain is not expected to undertake large acquisitions, in part due to the lack of obvious large acquisition candidates but also due to the present opportunity to invest in and expand its core business.

Bulls Say’s

  • Domain is projected to generate high revenue growth, primarily owing to an increase in revenue per listing as a result of an increase in premium listings. 
  • Domain should benefit from Australian population growth of around 1%-2%, which should equate to a similar increase in dwelling numbers and therefore listings. 
  • Domain’s diversification into real estate-related businesses, such as mortgage, insurance, and utility services, is likely to strengthen the firm’s competitive position by increasing switching costs, and could diversify earnings.

Company Profile 

Domain is an Australian real estate services business that owns real estate listings websites and print magazines, and provides real estate-related services. Domain was formed as a home and lifestyle section of newspapers owned by Fairfax Media Limited (ASX:FXJ) in 1996, and an associated residential real estate website, www.domain.com.au, was launched in 1999. Domain’s real estate listings website has grown to become its core business and the second-largest residential real estate website in Australia, after REA Group’s (ASX:REA) owned www.realestate.com.au. Newscorp (ASX:NWS) owns 60% of REA Group.

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

ABN Amro Has a Solid Position in the Attractive Dutch Market

Business Strategy & Outlook:

After emerging from outright government ownership ABN Amro is one of the simpler banks in Europe. It is essentially a retail and commercial bank with limited capital markets activities. Its strong retail deposit base supported above-average profitability until negative interest rates started to bite. Having a lending book dominated by fixed-rate mortgages does not help either. The long-duration lending book forces ABN Amro to use more expensive long-term funding in order to manage liquidity risk, which then compounds margin pressure in a declining interest-rate environment. ABN Amro offers investors exposure to the oligopolistic Dutch banking system where ABN Amro and its two main rivals hold more than 90% of all Dutch current accounts. This is in sharp contrast to the fragmented banking markets that are the norm in much of the eurozone. Historically this concentration supported higher levels of profitability for ABN Amro and its Dutch peers.

ABN Amro has a solid competitive position in Dutch retail banking with a 20% market share in Dutch personal current accounts and a 25% share of business current accounts. This provides ABN Amro with cheap, sticky funding and forms the base from which ABN Amro can cross-sell other products. In a negative interest-rate environment what should be a major competitive advantage has turned into a major headache. In a negative interest-rate environment banks earn negative interest on their surplus liquidity and with essentially a zero interest-rate floor on some of their deposits this leads to a margin squeeze. The injection of liquidity via monetary and fiscal interventions from central banks and governments following the coronavirus pandemic has just amplified this problem as banks are faced with even more deposits from clients flush with cash. ABN Amro cannot pass on negative interest rates to smaller depositors without damaging client goodwill. It is increasingly passing on higher costs to larger clients. Interest-rate hedges only provide protection against interest-rate volatility, not to a long-term decline in interest rates, especially not when rates go negative.

Financial Strengths:

Even after taking into consideration the more onerous capital guidelines under Basel IV ABN Amro is one of the best-capitalised banks in Europe. At the end of 2020 ABN Amro indicated that on a Basel IV basis it has a common equity Tier 1 ratio of over 15%, compared with its internal target of 13%. With an enviable retail deposit base ABN Amro is one of the banks in Europe with the soundest liquidity profile. Retail deposits tend to be sticky as retail depositors are less likely to move to other banks in the search of higher yields. Wholesale funding are much more likely to disappear during periods of stress in the funding markets. Wholesale funding makes up only around 26% of ABN Amro’s total funding.

Bulls Say:

  • ABN Amro is one of the three leading banks in the oligopolistic Dutch banking sector.
  • It has an attractive funding mix with low reliance on wholesale funding.
  • It has a simple, clear, and focused business model and strategy.

Company Description:

ABN Amro Bank is a Dutch bank, and the Netherlands accounts for around 90% of its operating profit. Operationally, retail and commercial banking contributes the bulk of its operating profit, while ABN Amro continues to reduce its exposure to corporate and investment banking. It views private banking as one of its key growth areas.

(Source: Morningstar)

DISCLAIMER for General Advice: (This document is for general advice only).

This document is provided by Laverne Securities Pty Ltd T/as Laverne Investing. Laverne Securities Pty Ltd, CAR 001269781 of Laverne Capital Pty Ltd AFSL No. 482937.

The material in this document may contain general advice or recommendations which, while believed to be accurate at the time of publication, are not appropriate for all persons or accounts. This document does not purport to contain all the information that a prospective investor may require.  The material contained in this document does not take into consideration an investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on the advice, investors should consider the appropriateness of the advice, having regard to the investor’s objectives, financial situation, and needs. The material contained in this document is for sales purposes. The material contained in this document is for information purposes only and is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to the subscription for, purchase or sale of securities or financial products and neither or anything in it shall form the basis of any contract or commitment. This document should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment and recipients should seek independent advice.

The material in this document has been obtained from sources believed to be true but neither Laverne and Banyan Tree nor its associates make any recommendation or warranty concerning the accuracy or reliability or completeness of the information or the performance of the companies referred to in this document. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Any opinions and or recommendations expressed in this material are subject to change without notice and, Laverne and Banyan Tree are not under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. References made to third parties are based on information believed to be reliable but are not guaranteed as being accurate.

Laverne and Banyan Tree and its respective officers may have an interest in the securities or derivatives of any entities referred to in this material. Laverne and Banyan Tree do and seek to do business with companies that are the subject of its research reports. The analyst(s) hereby certify that all the views expressed in this report accurately reflect their personal views about the subject investment theme and/or company securities.

Although every attempt has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in the document, liability for any errors or omissions (except any statutory liability which cannot be excluded) is specifically excluded by Laverne and Banyan Tree, its associates, officers, directors, employees, and agents.  Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Laverne and Banyan Tree, its directors, employees and agents accept no liability or responsibility for any loss or damage of any kind, direct or indirect, arising out of the use of all or any part of this material.  Recipients of this document agree in advance that Laverne and Banyan Tree are not liable to recipients in any matters whatsoever otherwise; recipients should disregard, destroy or delete this document. All information is correct at the time of publication. Laverne and Banyan Tree do not guarantee reliability and accuracy of the material contained in this document and are not liable for any unintentional errors in the document.

The securities of any company(ies) mentioned in this document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to all categories of investors. This document is provided to the recipient only and is not to be distributed to third parties without the prior consent of Laverne and Banyan Tree.

Categories
LICs LICs

Blackstone Remains the Go-To Firm in the Alternative Asset Management Segment

Business Strategy & Outlook:

Blackstone has built a solid position in the alternative asset-management industry, utilizing its reputation, broad product portfolio, investment performance track record and cadre of dedicated professionals to not only raise massive amounts of capital but maintain the reputation it has built for itself as a “go-to firm” for institutional and high-net-worth investors looking for exposure to alternative assets. Unlike the more traditional asset managers, who have had to rely on investor inaction (driven by either good fund performance or investor inertia/uncertainty) to keep annual redemption rates low, the products offered by alternative asset managers can have lockup periods attached to them, which prevent investors from redeeming part or all of their investment for a prolonged period of time. 

Blackstone is one of the world’s largest alternative asset managers with $880.9 billion in total assets under management, including $650.0 billion in fee-earning assets under management, at the end of 2021. The company’s portfolio is broadly diversified across four business segments–private equity (24% of fee-earning AUM and 32% of base management fees), real estate (34% and 39%), credit & insurance (30% and 16%), and hedge fund solutions (11% and 13%) –and it primarily serves clients in the institutional channel. With customer demand for alternatives increasing, and investors in alternative assets attempting to limit the number of providers they use, large-scale players like Blackstone are well positioned to gather and retain assets for their funds. That said, investors in Blackstone are betting that the company’s outstanding investment track record and fundraising capabilities will continue into the future. While the confidence in the firm’s ability to earn excess returns over the next 10 years, it will become increasingly difficult for the company to do so longer-term as increased competition from peers (including more traditional asset managers like BlackRock), continued pressure on fees, and a general maturation of the segment (from a solid period of above average growth due to shifting investor demand for alternatives) weigh on results.

Financial Strengths:

Blackstone’s business model depends heavily on having fully functioning credit and equity markets that will allow its investment funds to not only arrange financing for leveraged buyouts and/or additional debt issuances for the companies and properties it oversees but cash out of them once their investment has run its course. While the company saved itself a lot of headaches during the collapse of the credit and equity markets during the 2008-09 financial crisis by having relatively little debt on its own books, debt levels crept up to less-than-ideal levels during 2010-19. Given that asset managers like Blackstone have a high degree of revenue cyclicality and operating leverage, and are generally asset light, they should not maintain more than low to moderate levels of financial leverage. 

The company entered 2022 with $7.6 billion in longer-term debt (on a principal basis) on its books, with 60% of that total coming due during 2030-50. The company also has a $2.25 billion revolving credit facility (which expires in November 2025) but had no outstanding balances at the end of January 2022. Blackstone should enter 2023 with a debt/total capital ratio of 44%, debt/EBITDA (by our calculations) at 1.1 times, and interest coverage of more than 30 times. On the distribution front, share repurchases have been rare over the past decade, with the company repurchasing (net of issuances) just over $3 billion of stock (most of which was bought back in the past four calendar years). Dividend payments, meanwhile, exceeded $25 billion during 2012-21 and are expected to account for 85% of distributable earnings annually going forward.

Bulls Say:

  • Blackstone, with $650 billion in fee-earning AUM at the end of 2021, is a “go-to firm” for institutional and high-net-worth investors looking for exposure to alternative assets.
  • The company’s ever-increasing scale, diversified product offerings, long track record of investment performance and strong client relationships position the firm to perform well in a variety of market conditions.
  • Customer demand for alternatives has been increasing, with institutional investors in the category limiting the number of providers they use—both positives for Blackstone’s business model.

Company Description:

Blackstone is one of the world’s largest alternative asset managers with $880.9 billion in total asset under management, including $650.0 billion in fee-earning asset under management, at the end of 2021. The company has four core business segments: private equity (24% of fee-earning AUM, and 32% of base management fees, during 2021); real estate (34% and 39%); credit & insurance (30% and 16%); and hedge fund solutions (12% and 13%). While the firm primarily serves institutional investors (87% of AUM), it does serve clients in the high-net-worth channel (13%). Blackstone operates through 25 offices located in the Americas (8), Europe and the Middle East (9), and the Asia-Pacific region (8).

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

Launching Coverage of No Moat, Stable Moat Trend GoDaddy With an $80 FVE

Business Strategy & Outlook:

GoDaddy’s position as the world’s leading domain registrar creates a unique opportunity to capture demand from newly formed businesses and upsell complementary products beyond domain registration. The one-stop-shop model will appeal to micro- and small businesses looking to establish and manage a ubiquitous online identity with integrated commerce solutions. The initial domain registration process is typically a customer’s first interaction with GoDaddy, and acts as an onramp for additional products. For example, an entrepreneur seeking an online presence for their idea may approach GoDaddy for a domain registration initially, and as a natural extension purchase a subscription to a domain linked email account, website building tools and commerce solutions. 

GoDaddy has expanded its offering beyond domain registration to include a domain aftermarket platform, website design, security and hosting services, productivity tools such as email, and omni-commerce solutions. While domain registration remains the company’s core offering, GoDaddy made a strategic shift into the omni-commerce market via the 2021 acquisition of payment processing platform Poynt. This acquisition complements the company’s existing product suite and allows GoDaddy to compete more directly with providers such as narrow-moat Block (owner of Square) and narrow-moat Shopify. While the company’s shift into payment processing remains in its infancy, GoDaddy aspires to offer payment functionality across all surfaces including attaching it to every new domain registered. However, GoDaddy is pursuing growth in a crowded market with several established providers, and the company is expected to face challenges upselling products to existing clients due to customer switching costs and inertia. While the GoDaddy will have greater success upselling products to newly formed businesses or those upgrading from a subpar product, the company will need to maintain competitive pricing over the medium term to take share, limiting margin upside. In conjunction, GoDaddy’s core offering is commoditized, with new entrants such as Google Domains increasing pricing pressure.

Financial Strengths: 

GoDaddy’s balance sheet is stretched as the company has increased leverage to support growth and return capital to shareholders. As of year-end fiscal 2021, the company had a net debt position of about $2.6 billion and reported $3.9 billion of long-term debt from a credit facility and senior notes. This includes $800 million of senior notes issued in February 2021 intended to fund working and capital expenditure, as well provide headroom for strategic acquisitions. While this has increased the company’s leverage, the GoDaddy will be able to meet interest and maturity payments on outstanding debt over our forecast period. the company will remain compliant with the operating and financial covenant’s related to the various debt instruments including remaining below certain gearing ratios. 

GoDaddy does not pay dividends but instead returns capital to shareholders through a share repurchase program. The company intends to return $3 billion of capital to shareholders over the three years to fiscal 2024, which shall be funded through free cash flow and debt.

Bulls Say:

  • GoDaddy benefits from a highly recognizable brand, economies of scale, and customer switching costs.
  • Omni-commerce is a natural extension for GoDaddy with promising uptake to date.
  • The strategic shift into payment processing should provide opportunity for greater scale-based cost advantage.

Company Description:

GoDaddy is a provider of domain registration and aftermarket services, website hosting, security, design, and business productivity tools, commerce solutions, and domain registry services. The company primarily targets micro- to small businesses, website design professionals, registrar peers, and domain investors. Since acquiring payment processing platform Poynt in 2021, the company has expanded into omni-commerce solutions, including offering an online payment gateway and offline point-of-sale devices.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Pandemic-Driven Home Improvement Trend Pushes Demand Forward for Kingfisher; Shares are Undervalued

Business Strategy & Outlook:

Kingfisher is a leading home improvement retailer operating under the retail banners of B&Q and Screwfix in the U.K and Brico Depot and Castorama in France, while also expanding in other European markets. Kingfisher has attempted multiple strategies to optimize its product offering and leverage its leading position in the French and British home improvement market with little success delivering excess economic returns. While the coronavirus pandemic has provided unexpected tailwinds for Kingfisher, such as increases in do-it-yourself activity and online penetration rates, operating margins remain below U.S peers, who enjoy greater scale and are thus able to operate at a more efficient cost base. Prior to the pandemic, Kingfisher had not reported an increase in like-for-like sales since fiscal 2017. The COVID-19-driven home improvement trend is unlikely to be maintainable as customers shift expenditures toward services as governments no longer impose lockdown restrictions and rising interest rates lowers accessibility to homeownership, a major driver of home improvement activity.

With consumer demand currently elevated, greater emphasis is placed on Kingfisher’s ability to grow market share through investments into its digital capabilities and own-exclusive brands, especially from trade customers who visit stores more frequently and have a larger basket size. Kingfisher’s retail banners in France are dilutive to the group and will benefit from the reorganization of its logistics operation in the region, which will reduce transportation costs and improve customer service. Self-help measures such as optimizing Kingfisher’s store footprint, lease renegotiations at lower rates and reversing stock inefficiencies will free up cash that will be returned to shareholders via a dividend payout ratio of approximately 40%.

Financial Strengths: 

Kingfisher is in a sound financial position. The group ended fiscal 2022 with a net debt/EBITDA ratio (including lease liabilities) of 1.0 times, below its 2.0-2.5 target range, which provides a cushion for any potential slowdown in DIY activity in the future. The group is also one of the few around with a pension surplus. Kingfisher has very little funded debt, which is comfortably covered by the group’s cash balance.

Kingfisher’s main source of debt are lease liabilities, consisting of GBP 2.4 billion within its net debt position of GBP 1.6 billion as at fiscal 2021-22. Approximately 40% of Kingfisher’s store space is owned (mostly in France and Poland), which provides financial flexibility, as these assets can be monetized through sale and leaseback transactions, a tool Kingfisher has begun to use. Better inventory management, which lags peers, would also improve Kingfisher’s cash generation.

Bulls Say:

  • Demand for Kingfisher’s home improvement products stands to benefit from aging housing stock in the U.K. and France, as well as people spending more time indoors during the pandemic.
  • Self-help opportunities at Kingfisher should help increase operating margins by optimizing its store space footprint and improving logistical inefficiencies across its French operations.
  • As the second-largest home improvement retailer in Europe, Kingfisher has the opportunity to better leverage its size to drive costs down and use its customer knowledge to develop its own products.

Company Description:

Kingfisher is a home improvement company with over 1,470 stores in eight countries across Europe. The company operates several retail banners that are focused on trade customers and general do-it-yourself needs. Kingfisher’s main retail brands include B&Q, Screwfix, and TradePoint in the United Kingdom and Castorama and Brico Depot in France. The U.K. and France are Kingfisher’s largest markets, accounting for 81% of sales. The company is the second-largest DIY retailer in Europe, with a leading position in the U.K. and a number-two position in France.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

Initiating on Tencent Music Entertainment, USD 8.60 FVE; Cloud Music, HKD 130 FVE; TME Our Top Pick

Business Strategy & Outlook:

With over 600 million monthly active users, or MAU, Tencent Music Entertainment, or TME, is the largest music streaming platform in China. The firm monetizes through live streaming, a high margin business generating over 60% of revenue and over 100% of operating profit, while subscription-based music streaming remains loss-making. A low subscriber-to-user ratio in the mid-teen percentages offers a long runway for paying user growth in music streaming. With platforms putting more content, such as popular songs, behind the paywall, more users would subscribe, and fuel top-line growth. Potential revenue growth also comes from advertising, where the firm’s investments into long-form audio are likely to open up more ad inventory. Even though social entertainment (mainly video live streaming) contributes most of the firm’s revenue, it is believed that there will be minimal growth ahead given competition from Douyin and Kuaishou.

With China’s antitrust laws putting an end to TME’s exclusive music copyright agreements, it’s anticipated more competition for users. Its peer Cloud Music is aiming to bridge the content gap by signing with previously inaccessible labels. Despite competitive headwinds, the TME will remain the largest platform for music streaming, benefiting primarily from network effect and intangible assets that maintain user engagement and stickiness. The subscription prices are unlikely to go lower because: 1) competitors are making losses and have little incentive for price competition; and 

2) Chinese streaming platforms offer almost the lowest prices worldwide, so more discounts will be less effective in attracting users.

Unlike developed markets, the supply side of music in China is more fragmented, with just 30% of licensing from top five labels. As licensors sell their content on a mostly fixed cost basis, TME is well-positioned to see margin expansion as revenue grows.

Financial Strengths:

TME is financially sound. As of the end of 2021, the firm was sitting on a net cash position of CNY 22 billion, more than three times that of peer Cloud Music. Despite some near-term industry challenges, the firm to generate positive free cash flows over the next years. Taking advantage of the low interest environment, the company issued a total of USD 800 million (CNY 5 billion) senior unsecured notes at below 2% interest in 2020. 

The debt/equity ratio is running at a manageable 30%, and debt/EBITDA is maintained below 1.5 times as at the end of 2021. The firm is believed to maintain this capital structure. Given the positive free cash flow assumptions the firm can easily fulfill its debt obligations while simultaneously funding future investment initiatives. The business has been generating positive free cash flows since 2016. In 2021, it generated a free cash flow of CNY 3.5 billion. This is significantly better than peer Cloud Music, who will be burning through cash for the next couple of years.

Bulls Say:

  • Compared to Spotify, TME has plenty of room for subscriber growth that should come about as it moves more music content behind the paywall.
  • TME piggybacks off Tencent’s billion-plus user network. This relationship allows for better retention of users while attracting new ones.
  • By investing in independent artists and long-form audio, TME could better manage content cost over the long term.

Company Description:

TME is the largest online music service provider in China. It was founded in 2016 with the business combination of QQ Music (founded in 2005), Kuwo Music (founded in 2005) and Kugou Music (founded in 2004) streaming platforms. Tencent is the largest shareholder of TME with over 50% shares and over 90% voting rights held. TME also provides social entertainment services, including music live audio/video broadcasts and online concert services through the three platforms mentioned above, and online karaoke through an independent platform WeSing.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

SAP SE: Cloud Continues to Deliver Strong Growth

Investment Thesis:

  • Leading market share positions in on-premise enterprise resources planning (ERP) and on-premise customer relationship management (CRM) markets with customers in over 180 countries and strong brand awareness. 
  • The market is undervaluing SAP’s CRM business (relative to its peer group such as Salesforce.com).
  • Support revenues and Cloud subscriptions provide recurring revenue, which gives SAP a defensive profile. 
  • Competent management team.
  • Strong operating and free cash flow generation with attractive dividend policy (payout ratio of at least 40%).

Key Risks:

  • Slower take-up for HANA and S/4HANA. 
  • Deteriorating sentiment if the economy and IT spending weakens. 
  • Market share loss in software revenue driven by cloud migration.
  • Aggressive M&A with risk of overpaying.
  • Additional opex spending dampening margin expansion. 
  • Key-man risk due to management changes.
  • Competition from other established players like Microsoft, Salesforce.com and Oracle.
  • The CFO Luka Mucic departure in March 2023 is a negative.

Key Highlights:

  • For FY22 management expects accelerating cloud revenue growth, supported by strong traction of SAP S/4HANA Cloud, leading to (in CC) Cloud revenue of €11.55–11.85bn (up +23-26%), Cloud and Software revenue of €25–25.5bn (up +4-6%) with share of more predictable revenue (total of cloud revenue and software support revenue) increasing +300bps to 78%, non-IFRS operating profit of €7.8–8.25bn (flat to down 5%), FCF of >€4.5bn (vs €5.01bn in pcp), effective tax rate (IFRS) of 25-28.0% (vs 21.4% in pcp) and an effective tax rate (non-IFRS) of 22-25.0% (vs 19.9% in pcp).
  • By 2025 management continues to expect total revenue of >€36bn with Cloud revenue of >€22bn, non-IFRS operating profit of >€11.5bn with non-IFRS cloud gross margin of ~80%, more predictable revenue share of 85%, and FCF of €8bn.
  • The Company announced a new share repurchase program with a volume of up to €1bn to service future share-based compensation awards, which is planned to be executed in CY22. 
  • Revenue growth of +19% in CC to $9.59bn with S/4HANA growing +47% in CC to $1.1bn.
  • Cloud backlog growing +32% (+26% in CC) to $9.45bn with S/4HANA cloud backlog up +84% (+76% in CC) to $1.71bn.
  • IFRS cloud gross margin improving +40bps to 67%. 
  • ‘RISE with SAP’ continued to gain traction, closing more than 650 customer deals in 4Q21, bringing total customer count to 1,300 since launch in 1Q21, and accelerated adoption momentum in cloud with SAP adding ~1,300 SAP S/4HANA customers (>2x the last four quarter average of 600) in the quarter (~50% customers were net new with win rate against competitors >70%), taking total adoption to more than 18,800 customers (out of which ~5,000 are S/4HANA cloud customers), up +18% over pcp, of which more than 13,100 (~70%) are live.

Company Description:

SAP SE (SAP) is a global software and service provider headquartered in Walldorf, Germany, operating through two segments: Applications, Technology & Services segment, and the SAP Business Network segment. The Applications, Technology & Services segment is engaged in the sale of software licenses, subscriptions to its cloud applications, and related services and the SAP Business Network segment includes its cloud-based collaborative business networks and services relating to the SAP Business Network (including cloud applications, professional services and education services). SAP is the market leader in enterprise application software and also the leading analytics and business intelligence company, with the Company reporting that more than 77% of all transaction revenue globally touches an SAP system.

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Chorus posted solid 1H22 Results; Dividend guidelines increased and announced share buyback

Investment Thesis 

  • CNU trades on a dividend yield of ~4.7%.
  • Once UFB capex and capex on fiber network significantly fades, CNU is very cash generative and its capex will revert to maintenance spend.
  • Significant barriers to entry with high capex required for new competitors.
  • Benefits from population growth (i.e. potential for more connections) and increasing bandwidth requirements from trends such as end-users watching TV on the internet or increasing content on the internet. 
  • Fiber remains the best possible broadband product and has become the preferred broadband product of choice for customers. CNU announced in January 2017 that CNU reached an agreement with the government to take fiber to ~200,000 more customers (on top of the 1.1m already planned for first year UFB roll-out). CNU commenced UFB2 rollout in July 2017, which is expected to complete around December 2024. This would result in high penetration with ~85% of NZ population with access to fiber by 2024. The NZ government provided an additional up to ~NZ$291m in funding (whereas other fiber companies received ~NZ$16m in funding to extend fiber to ~33k more premises).

Key Risks

  • Potential changes to management and strategy with new incoming Kate McKenzie.
  • Increasing prevalence in usage of wireless networks over fiber networks, especially in regional NZ, where there is either poor or no broadband coverage.
  • Any capital expenditure blowout.
  • Network outages or reliability issues.
  • Regulatory risk. 

1H22 Results Highlights Relative to the pcp: 

  • Revenues increased +1% to $483m largely due to gains from ongoing network optimisation programme. 
  • Operating expenses declined -9.3% to $136m amid ongoing focus on reducing discretionary costs and decline in some expense lines due to Covid-19 restrictions. 
  • EBITDA increased +5.8% to $347m, which combined with +2.4% increase in D&A expense amid growth in network asset base and -7.8% decline in interest costs due to the refinancing of debt at lower rates in 1H21 (weighted average effective interest rate declined -30bps to 3.7%) delivered NPAT of $42m, up +55.6%. 
  • Capex declined -25.5% to $263m with fibre remaining the dominant category of spend at 85% and copper related expenditure continuing to trend downwards. 
  • Credit metrics improved with net debt to EBITDA declining to 4.03x from 4.24x at 1H21, and well within bank covenants (financial covenants require senior debt ratio to be no greater than 4.75x) and BBB/Baa2 rating by S&P/Moody.

Dividend guidance increased + share buyback announced

Given the finalisation of crucial inputs by Commerce Commission for the new regulatory framework together with the subsequent increase in credit thresholds for CNU by ratings agencies (Moody’s and S&P recognise that the new regulatory regime now provides CNU with some certainty over the revenues that can be earned from the fibre network), management upgraded their FY22 dividend guidance by +34.6% to 35cps and forecast FY23 dividend to be a minimum of 40cps and the FY24 dividend a minimum of 45cps. CNU also announced a share buyback of up to $150m (might be suspended if management identifies more accretive opportunities for shareholder value to be realised). 

Company Profile

Chorus Ltd (CNU) is a dual-listed (ASX and NSX) wholesale and retail telecommunications company based in New Zealand. CNU maintains and builds the Chorus local access network made up of local telephone exchanges, cabinets and copper and fiber cables throughout New Zealand.

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Inghams Group – The Board declared a fully franked Dividend of 6.5 cps, in line with the pcp, and Equates to Payout Ratio of 60.9%

Investment Thesis:

  • Trading on undemanding multiples and below our valuation. 
  • Potential for an improvement in the pricing environment. 
  • Quality management team who has managed disruptions for the Covid-19 pandemic well. 
  • Quality assets and operates as Australia and New Zealand’s largest integrated poultry producer.
  • Project Accelerate has proven successful in driving automation and labour productivity, which supports earnings uplift despite decrease in revenue.  
  • Procurement initiatives implemented with benefits in line with expectation.
  • Investing to increase capacity and capability across the business in Australia and New Zealand plants.
  • Capital management initiatives are possible with a strong balance sheet.

Key Risks:

  • Re-negotiation of key contracts with large customers on unfavourable terms. 
  • Increase in feed and electricity costs, which may be pushed to customers through market price increases, reducing competitiveness. 
  • No news on the appointment of a new CEO creates uncertainty. 
  • Customer concentration risk in QSR (Quick Service Restaurants) and Supermarkets. 
  • Susceptible to exotic disease breakouts, impacting ING’s ability to supply poultry products. 
  • Significant reduction in volume and quality from parent stock supplier.
  • Material interruptions to ING’s complex and interlinked supply chain.

Key Highlights:

  • Group core poultry sales volumes grew +5.6%, driven by strong volume growth of +6.5% in Australia.
  • Statutory EBITDA of $220.4m, and Underlying EBITDA of $222.4m, was up +2.2% and +1.7%, respectively.
  • Statutory NPAT of $38.4m, up +8.8% and Underlying NPAT of $39.7m, up +5.9%
  • Cash flow from operations of $186.6m, was up +4.7%. Cash conversion ratio of 83.5% reflects seasonal working capital cycle and in-line with the pcp.
  • ING retained a solid balance sheet with net debt of $264.6m and leverage of 1.3x, a significant reduction from 1.7x in the pcp.
  • Total capital expenditure of $24.0m was lower than the pcp, reflecting completion of hatchery projects, ongoing project disruptions caused by Covid-19 lockdowns and delays in equipment being shipped.
  • The Board declared a fully franked dividend of 6.5 cps, in line with the pcp, and equates to payout ratio of 60.9% of Underlying NPAT post AASB 16 adjustments, which is at the lower end of ING’s 60 – 80% target range.
  • In Australia segment, Core poultry volumes grew +6.5% to 203.4kt, despite Covid-19 lockdowns and challenging market conditions. Revenue grew +1.9% driven by core poultry revenue growth of +2.2%, which grew despite weak pricing across the Wholesale channel due to excess supply, partially offset by feed revenue, declining -2.0% as customers transition supply away in preparation for closure of the ING’s WA Feedmill. Underlying EBITDA declined -0.3% to $185.1m, reflecting a lower Intercompany royalty charge, reduced by $3.2m.
  • In New Zealand segment, Core poultry volumes were flat at 33.7kt, as Covid-19 lockdowns were reintroduced. Core poultry revenue increased +3.6%, due to price increases applied across all channels to help offset higher feed costs and inflationary pressures related to supply chain disruption. Underlying EBITDA of $19.1m increased $3.3m versus the pcp, with the change to intercompany royalty charge accounting for $3.2m.

Company Description:

Inghams Group Ltd (ING) is Australia and New Zealand’s largest integrated poultry producer. The Company produces and sells chicken, turkey and stock feed that is used by the poultry, pig, dairy and equine industries. 

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Amadeus and GDS relationships to be the exception rather than the rule

Business Strategy and Outlook

While Amadeus still stands to see material near-term corporate and European demand headwinds from the coronavirus and geopolitical conflict, it is aniticipated its leadership position in global distribution systems, or GDS, to endure during the next several years, driven by its leading network of airline content and travel agency customers as well as its healthy position in software solutions for these carriers and agents. Amadeus is the largest of the three GDS operators (narrow-moat Sabre is number two, followed by privately held Travelport) that control nearly 100% of market volume. 

Amadeus’ GDS enjoys a network effect (source of its narrow moat). As more supplier content (mostly airline content) is added, more travel agents use the platform; as more travel agents use the platform, suppliers offer more content. This network advantage is solidified by technology that integrates GDS content with back-office operations of agents and IT solutions of suppliers, leading to more accurate information that is also easier to book and service the end customer with. The 2016 acquisition of airline IT company Navitaire and 2018 acquisition of hotel IT company TravelClick expanded Amadeus’ GDS network advantage through new customer integration, as Navitaire focuses on low-cost carriers while the company’s existing Altea division focuses on full-service carriers, and TravelClick has a midscale lodging presence versus Amadeus’ legacy hotel offering, which focuses on enterprises. 

Replicating a GDS platform entails aggregating and connecting content from hundreds of airlines to a platform that is also connected to travel agents, requiring significant costs and time. Still, although it is viewed GDS advantages as substantial, technology architechtures like that of eTraveli (set to be acquired by narrow-moat Booking Holdings in early 2022), enable end users to access not only GDS content but supply from competing platforms, which could take some volume from GDS operators. Also, GDS faces some risk of larger carriers and agencies direct connecting, although it is likely these relationships to be the exception rather than the rule.

Financial Strength

While near-term industry travel demand remains below prepandemic marks, Amadeus’ balance sheet is clearer. Amadeus entered 2020 with just 1.4 times net debt/EBITDA, and it is projected it has enough liquidity for four years even at near zero demand levels. Amadeus has taken aggressive actions to shore up its liquidity profile. In March 2020, Amadeus began to cut costs and secured an additional EUR 1 billion one-year bridge loan, in addition to the undrawn EUR 1 billion revolver it already had. In April 2020, the company raised EUR 1.5 billion with a EUR 750 million equity offering (at a 5% discount to closing stock prices) and a EUR 750 million convertible note (at a strike price 40% above closing stock prices). In May 2020, Amadeus raised EUR 1 billion in debt at interest rates of 2.5%-2.9%. It is alleged banking partners to provide any additional needed funding, given Amadeus’ sizable network, switching costs, and efficient scale advantages that underpin its narrow moat.Net debt/EBITDA increased to 5.5 times in 2021, due to lower demand resulting from COVID-19, but it is foreseen a return to within management’s 1-1.5 times target range by 2023. Although about EUR 2.7 billion of the company’s EUR 4.3 billion in long-term debt matures over the next four years, its low leverage and stable transaction-based model in normal demand environments should not present any financial health concerns. It is projected Amadeus will generate EUR 7 billion in free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditures) during 2022-26.

Bulls Say’s

  • The company’s GDS network hosts content from most airlines and is used by many travel agents, resulting in significant industry share. Replicating this network would involve meaningful time and costs. 
  • The network advantage is supported by new products and technology that further integrate airlines and agents into its GDS platform. The company’s Navitaire, AirIT, and TravelClick acquisitions aid this expanding technology and integration reach. 
  • The business model is driven by transaction volume and not pricing, leading to lower cyclical volatility.

Company Profile 

Among the top three operators, Amadeus’ 40%-plus market share in air global distribution system bookings is the largest in the industry. The GDS segment represents 56% of total prepandemic revenue (2019). The company has a growing IT solutions division (44% of 2019 revenue) that addresses the airline, airport, rail, hotel, and business intelligence markets. Transaction fees, which are tied to volume and not price, account for the bulk of revenue and profits. 

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.