Tag: Street Talks

Investment Thesis:

• Solid momentum in the core Gucci brand, aside from the disruption caused by the Coronavirus. 
• Sales momentum will be assisted once international tourism returns. 
• Leveraged to increasing consumer consumption in Asia (China, India). 
• Leveraged to tourism flows (international travel) as consumers seek out experiences. 
• New upcoming brands.
• Strong cash flow generation and solid dividend yield.
• Strong balance sheet, which provides the Company flexibility.  
• Key cornerstone investor (Pinault Family) provides stability in the share register.  

Key Risks:

• Adverse currency movements, especially EUR strength against the U.S. dollar (USD) and Chinese Renminbi (RMB). 
• Increased competition from existing players and new emerging brands. 
• Key brands – Gucci (>70% of revenue), Saint Laurent (>10% of revenue), Bottega (>5% of revenue) – cease to resonate with consumers and growth halts. 
• Value destructive acquisition of brand(s). 
• Macro-economic conditions globally deterioration, impacting consumer spending and less tourism movements (i.e. travelers overseas).
• Geopolitical tensions among regions restricting funds & tourists flow or a breakout of health epidemic impacting tourists flow in Europe / Asia. 
• Significant change at the senior management level (divisional CEOs or Creative Director).  
• Significant changes with the key cornerstone investor (leading to influence on long-term company strategy or shareholder outcomes). 
   

Key Highlights:

• Revenue increased +34.7% over pcp (+35% on a comparable basis with North America up +76%, APAC up +33%, Japan up +21%, Western Europe up +10% and Rest of the World up +48%) and +13% over pre-Covid FY19 to €17,645.2m, driven by outstanding performances from all Houses, which generated revenue of €17,019m, up +34.3% over pcp (+34.9% on a comparable basis).
• Recurring operating income rose sharply, up +60% over pcp (up +5% over FY19) to reach a new record €5,017.2m, with margin improving +450bps over pcp (down -170bps over FY19) to 28.4%, with recurring operating income from the Houses up +53.7% over pcp to €5,175.3m with margin expanding +380bps to 30.4% despite all Houses continuing to invest significantly in their operations.
• Capital management – using strong cashflow to deleverage the balance sheet and increase shareholder returns. The Company delivered +87.6% YoY growth in FCF to €3.9bn which combined with proceeds from the disposal of an additional 5.9% in Puma (stake is now ~4%, covering the exchangeable bond due in 2022), saw management reduce net debt by -92.2% over pcp to €168m (debt/equity down -16.6% to 1.2%), resume share-buyback to repurchase 0.7% of shares for €540m (1.3% remaining with second tranche to cover 0.5% and expected to be completed by 26th April 2022), increase dividends by +50% over pcp to €12 and reinforce KER’s eyewear portfolio with the acquisition of LINDBERG.
• Online penetration is growing at a solid pace. The Company saw online sales continue to grow at an solid pace, up +55% over pcp, leading to a doubling of the online channel’s penetration rate in two years, and now accounting for 15% of total sales in the retail (23% North America, 26% Western Europe, 7% APAC and 5% Japan), as management continued to drive brand engagement with the upcoming generations of luxury shoppers and target new customers through the metaverse by Balenciaga’s appearance on Fortnite and Gucci leveraging a presence on Roblox gaming platform, apart from successful internalization of all brand.com sites, which allows the Company to use e-concession only if complements KER’s own sites and control all the key elements of presence.
• Outlook – management hints towards price increases and M&A activity. Though no specific guidance was provided for FY22, management flagged Gucci (which increased prices twice in 2020 and in 2021) along with KER’s other labels would again raise prices in a “targeted manner” in the year and pointed towards potential acquisitions to expand the Company’s footprint and bolster jewellery offering, which management believes has high potential.

Company Description:

Kering (KER), listed on the Euronext Paris (Paris stock market), is a global luxury group made up of iconic brands in Fashion, Leather Goods, Jewellery and Watches. The Company designs, manufactures and markets its goods globally. The group’s core brands are Gucci, Saint Laurent and Bottega Veneta. 

(Source: Banyantree)

DISCLAIMER for General Advice: (This document is for general advice only).

This document is provided by Laverne Securities Pty Ltd T/as Laverne Investing. Laverne Securities Pty Ltd, CAR 001269781 of Laverne Capital Pty Ltd AFSL No. 482937.

The material in this document may contain general advice or recommendations which, while believed to be accurate at the time of publication, are not appropriate for all persons or accounts. This document does not purport to contain all the information that a prospective investor may require.  The material contained in this document does not take into consideration an investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on the advice, investors should consider the appropriateness of the advice, having regard to the investor’s objectives, financial situation, and needs. The material contained in this document is for sales purposes. The material contained in this document is for information purposes only and is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to the subscription for, purchase or sale of securities or financial products and neither or anything in it shall form the basis of any contract or commitment. This document should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment and recipients should seek independent advice.

The material in this document has been obtained from sources believed to be true but neither Laverne and Banyan Tree nor its associates make any recommendation or warranty concerning the accuracy or reliability or completeness of the information or the performance of the companies referred to in this document. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Any opinions and or recommendations expressed in this material are subject to change without notice and, Laverne and Banyan Tree are not under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. References made to third parties are based on information believed to be reliable but are not guaranteed as being accurate.

Laverne and Banyan Tree and its respective officers may have an interest in the securities or derivatives of any entities referred to in this material. Laverne and Banyan Tree do and seek to do business with companies that are the subject of its research reports. The analyst(s) hereby certify that all the views expressed in this report accurately reflect their personal views about the subject investment theme and/or company securities.

Although every attempt has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in the document, liability for any errors or omissions (except any statutory liability which cannot be excluded) is specifically excluded by Laverne and Banyan Tree, its associates, officers, directors, employees, and agents.  Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Laverne and Banyan Tree, its directors, employees and agents accept no liability or responsibility for any loss or damage of any kind, direct or indirect, arising out of the use of all or any part of this material.  Recipients of this document agree in advance that Laverne and Banyan Tree are not liable to recipients in any matters whatsoever otherwise; recipients should disregard, destroy or delete this document. All information is correct at the time of publication. Laverne and Banyan Tree do not guarantee reliability and accuracy of the material contained in this document and are not liable for any unintentional errors in the document.

The securities of any company(ies) mentioned in this document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to all categories of investors. This document is provided to the recipient only and is not to be distributed to third parties without the prior consent of Laverne and Banyan Tree.

Business Strategy and Outlook

Veolia Environment is the world’s largest water company. Treatment and distribution of water accounts for 30% of the group’s revenue. In France, where Veolia is the historical leader, the business has been affected by a wave of contract renewals since 2010, which reduced profitability. Still, the indexation of those contracts to inflation should support earnings if high inflation persists. 

Veolia’s waste management accounts for 40% of turnover. This business is more cyclical and was hit by economic crises in Europe over 2009-13. Since 2015, the economic recovery in Europe has boosted waste volumes and enhanced margins. The group intends to increase the profitability and structural growth of this division by expanding exposure to hazardous waste treatment, which exhibits efficient scale. Veolia’s third main business is energy. This business makes up 20% of the turnover and encompasses energy services, heating and cooling networks, and electricity. This is more defensive than waste management. However, the weight of municipal clients limits pricing power.

In April 2021, Veolia and historical rival Suez reached a merger agreement after seven months of fierce battles for the former to acquire the 71.1% it did not hold in the latter at EUR 19.85 per share in January 2022. Veolia agreed to relinquish activities representing EUR 7 billion or 40% of Suez turnover and EUR 1.2 billion of EBITDA comprising French waste and water businesses and some international water activities like in Italy or Morocco. Importantly, Veolia managed to seize all the assets it’s deemed strategic: water activities in Spain and Chile (Agbar), the U.S. regulated water business and waste activities in the U.K. and Australia. Despite the high price paid, it is alleged the acquisition of Suez will be significantly value-accretive for Veolia thanks to the high amount of synergies. The European Commission cleared the deal on Dec. 14, 2021, conditional on remedies representing around EUR 0.3 billion of turnover. The last antitrust issue is the U.K. where the CMA is conducting an investigation that might lead to a disposal of some of the local waste assets acquired from Suez.

Financial Strength

Veolia’s standalone net debt decreased from EUR 13.2 billion in 2020 to EUR 9.5 billion at the end of 2021. This drop was notably driven by a EUR 2.5 billion rights issue in October 2021 and the issuance of EUR 0.5 billion of hybrid bonds accounted as equity to fund the acquisition of Suez which was completed in January 2022. On a proforma basis, net debt amounted to EUR 18.2 billion at year-end 2021. In 2022, projections are done on pro forma net debt to decrease to EUR 17.14 billion as the EUR 9 billion cash outflows dedicated to the tender offer for 71% of Suez shares not held by Veolia in January are more than offset by the EUR 10.4 billion disposals of Suez assets that Veolia agreed to relinquish to a consortium formed by GIP, Merdiam, Caisse des Depots and CNP Assurances. Experts’ 2022 net debt estimate implies a net debt/EBITDA ratio of 2.7, below the group’s guidance of around 3 times. Beyond 2022, it is foreseen the leverage ratio to decrease to 1.7 in 2026 on EBITDA growth notably fuelled by the achievement of the EUR 0.5 billion synergies. Analysts forecast dividend to grow by 14.9% per year on average between 2021 and 2026, in line with the current income growth, as targeted by the group. This points to a 2026 dividend of EUR 2, twice as higher as the EUR 1 paid on 2021 results.

Bulls Say’s

• The acquisition of Suez will be significantly value accretive for Veolia thanks to high synergies despite the high price paid. To get the comparable international assets through bolt-on acquisitions would have been much more costly. 
• Inflation is positive for Veolia thanks to the indexation of 70% of its contracts, the ability to pass through cost increases in other contracts and the long position in electricity and recycled materials. 
• Increasing exposure to hazardous waste will structurally increase the group’s margins and returns on invested capital.

Company Profile 

Veolia is the largest water company globally and a leading player in France. It is also involved in waste management with a significant exposure to France, the United Kingdom, Germany, the United States, and Australia. The third pillar of the group is energy services, giving the group significant exposure to Central Europe. Veolia started to refocus its activities in 2011, leading to the exit of almost half of its countries and of its transport activity, which should be completed within the next few years. 

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Business Strategy and Outlook

A confluence of several issues-poor relative active investment performance, the growth of low-cost index-based products, and the expanding power of the retail-advised channel–has made it increasingly difficult for active asset managers to generate organic growth, leaving them more dependent on market gains to increase their assets under management, or AUM. While we believe there will always be room for active management, we feel the advantage for getting and maintaining placement on platforms will go to those managers that have greater scale, established brands, solid long-term performance, and reasonable fees. 

However, have to admit that a combination of narrow-moat Franklin Resources with no-moat Legg Mason was not even on the radar-believing both firms were more likely acquirers of smaller asset managers as opposed to either one being an acquisition target.The new Franklin provides investment management services to retail (53% of managed assets), institutional (45%) and high-net-worth (2%) clients and is one of the more global firms of the U.S.-based asset managers , with more than 35% of its AUM invested in global/international strategies and just over 25% of managed assets sourced from clients domiciled outside the U.S. 

Morningstar analysts expect the Legg Mason deal to keep margins from deteriorating in the face of industrywide fee compression and rising costs (necessary to improve investment performance and enhance product distribution), near-term organic growth will struggle to stay positive (albeit better than the negative growth profile for a stand-alone Franklin).

Financial Strength 

Franklin entered fiscal 2022 with $3.2 billion in principal debt (including debt issued/acquired as part of the Legg Mason deal)–$300 million of 2.8% notes due September 2022, $250 million of 3.95% notes due July 2024, $400 million of 2.85% notes due March 2025, $450 million of 4.75% notes due March 2026, $850 million of 1.6% notes due October 2030, $550 million of 5.625% notes due January 2044, and $350 million of 2.95% notes due August 2051. At the end of December 2021, the firm had $5.9 billion in cash and investments on its books. More than half of these types of assets have traditionally been held overseas, with as much as one third of that half used to meet regulatory capital requirements, seed capital for new funds, or supply funding for acquisitions. Assuming Franklin closes out the year in line with our expectations, the firm will enter fiscal 2023 with a debt/total capital ratio of around 22%, interest coverage of more than 20 times, and a debt/EBITDA ratio (by our calculations) of 1.4 times.Franklin has generally returned excess capital to shareholders as share repurchases and dividends. During the past 10 fiscal years, the firm repurchased $7.4 billion of common stock and paid out $7.1 billion as dividends (including special dividends). While Franklin’s current payout ratio of 30%-35% is lower than the 40% average payout (when excluding special dividends) during the past five years, we expect only low-single digit annual increases in the dividend until the integration of the Legg Mason deal is well behind them. As for share repurchases, Franklin spent $208 million, $219 million, and $755 million buying back 7.3 million, 9.0 million, and 24.6 million shares, respectively, during fiscal 2021, 2020, and 2019. Given the likelihood that Franklin may decide to pay off some of its debt as it comes due the next several years, we don’t expect see see a large level of share repurchases in the near term.

Bulls Say

• Franklin Resources is one of the 20 largest U.S.-based asset managers, with more than two thirds of its AUM sourced from domestic clients. It is also the fifth largest global manager of cross-border funds. 
• The purchase of Legg Mason has lifted Franklin’s AUM to more than $1.5 trillion, hoisting it into the second largest tier of U.S.-based asset managers, which includes firms like Pimco, Capital Group and J.P. Morgan Asset Management. 
• Franklin maintains thousands of active financial advisor relationships worldwide and has close to 1,000 institutional client relationships.

Company Profile

Franklin Resources provides investment services for individual and institutional investors. At the end of December 2021, Franklin had $1.578 trillion in managed assets, composed primarily of equity (36%), fixed-income (40%), multi-asset/balanced (10%) funds, alternatives (10%) and money market funds. Distribution tends to be weighted more toward retail investors (53% of AUM) investors, as opposed to institutional (45%) and high-net-worth (2%) clients. Franklin is also one of the more global firms of the U.S.-based asset managers we cover, with more than 35% of its AUM invested in global/international strategies and just over 25% of managed assets sourced from clients domiciled outside the United States.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Investment Thesis:

• Number one player in the domestic market (approximately 50% market share), with only one major competitor (Huon Aquaculture Group). This could see rational pricing behavior, which should be positive for both companies. 
• High barriers to entry (assets, desired temperatures and regulatory licences are difficult to obtain).
• Initiatives like selective breeding programs and investments in infrastructure appear to be paying dividends, with more recent generations of TGR’s salmon showing more robust growth than their predecessors. 
• Given the complex nature of salmon farming, TGR is unlikely to have its dominant position as an Australian leading salmon farmer seriously threatened in the foreseeable future.
• Addition of prawns into TGR’s product portfolio brings diversification benefits to the Company’s risk profile.
• Growth in prawns represents material upside for group earnings.

Key Risks:

• Impact on production due to adverse weather conditions and diseases. 
• The De Costi subsidiary presents an opportunity for diversification; however, execution and competitive risks remain. 
• Potential review of chemical colouring in salmon may lead to further negative publicity and undermine demand for salmon. 
• Cost pressures or cost blowout could deteriorate margins significantly given the large cost base relative to earnings (EBITDA).
• Irrational competitive behaviour (domestic and international markets).
• Negative media reports on the sustainability of the Tasmanian salmon industry.
• Regulatory risks regarding Federal, State and Local laws and regulations regarding the leases, licenses, permits and quotas which may affect TGR’s operations.

Key Highlights:

• TGR’s operating EBITDA was up +14.1% to $89.5m, driven by strong revenue growth of +43.3% to $419.1m, but partially offset by lower EBITDA $/kg due to Grocery tenders in late FY21 and a material increase in supply chain costs.
• Operating cashflow of $86.99m, was up 110.2% and more aligned with operating EBITDA.
• Revenue of $419.14m, up +43.3%.
• Operating cash flow of $86.99m, up +110.2%
• Underlying EBIT of $50.01m, up +6.9%.
• Underlying NPAT of $31.18m, up +10.3%.
• The Board declared an interim dividend of 8cps, up +14.3%, in line with a target payout ratio of at least 50% of Operating NPAT.
• Leverage (Bank debt / Operating EBITDA) reduced from 2.55x to 2.37x as cash was used to lower debt and growth in EBITDA (in line with operating cashflow). Debt service cover was stable at 2.80. Gearing (Net debt/ Equity) reduced to 38.0% from 39.7%.
• TGR retained prudent credit metrics with significant headroom to banking covenants.
• TGR has substantial headroom available in debt facilities with $160.1m in undrawn debt facilities and cash of $43.1m. 
• Capex fell to $46.0m (versus 1H21: $67.7m) as TGR’s major investment program rolled off.

Company Description:

Tassal Group (TGR) is Australia’s largest vertically integrated seafood/aquaculture company. Based in Tasmania, TGR is engaged in hatching, farming, processing, sale and marketing of Atlantic salmon and ocean trout. Tassal is also undergoing investments to enter the prawn’s market. The company’s products are distributed in Australia, Japan and other international markets. 

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Business Strategy and Outlook

California will always present political, regulatory, and operating challenges for utilities like Edison International. But California’s aggressive clean energy goals also offer Edison more growth opportunities than most utilities. Policymakers know that meeting the state’s clean energy goals, notably a carbon emissions-free economy by 2045, will require financially healthy utilities. 

It is foreseen Edison will invest at least $6 billion annually, resulting in 6% annual earnings growth at least through 2025. Edison already has regulatory and policy support for most of these investments, which address grid safety, renewable energy, electric vehicles, distributed generation, and energy storage. Wildfire safety investments alone could reach $4 billion during the next four years. It is seen state policies will force regulators to support Edison’s investment plan and earnings growth. In August 2021, regulators approved nearly all of Edison’s 2021-23 investment plan. Regulatory proceedings in 2022 will address wildfire-specific investments and Edison’s $6 billion investment plan for 2024. 

Operating cost discipline will be critical to avoid large customer bill increases related to its investment plan. Edison faces regulatory scrutiny to prove its investments are producing customer benefits. It also must resolve the balance of what could end up being $7.5 billion of liabilities related to 2017-18 fires and mudslides. Large equity issuances in 2019 and 2020–in part to fund the company’s $2.4 billion contribution to the state wildfire insurance fund and a higher equity allowance for ratemaking–weighed on earnings the last two years. Edison now has most of its financing in place to execute its growth plan and continue its streak of 18 consecutive annual dividend increases. It is anticipated Edison to retain a small share of unregulated earnings, but those are more likely to come from low-risk customer-facing or energy management businesses wrapped into Edison Energy.

Financial Strength

Edison’s credit metrics are well within investment-grade range. California wildfire legislation and regulatory rulings in 2021 removed the overhang that threatened Edison’s investment-grade ratings in early 2019.Edison has kept its balance sheet strong with substantial equity issuances since 2019. It is not projected Edison will have any liquidity issues as it resolves 2017-18 fire and mudslide liabilities while funding its growth investments. Edison issued $2.4 billion of new equity in 2019 at prices in line with Amnalysts fair value estimate. This financing supported both its growth investments and half of its $2.4 billion contribution to the California wildfire insurance fund. The new equity also allowed Southern California Edison to adjust its allowed capital structure to 52% equity from 48% equity for rate-making purposes, leading to higher revenue and partially offsetting the earnings dilution.Edison’s $800 million equity raise in May 2020 at $56 per share was well below analysts fair value estimate but was necessary to support its growth plan in 2020 and early 2021. Edison also raised nearly $2 billion of preferred stock in 2021 and might issue more preferred stock to limit equity dilution as it finances its growth program. In particular, it is likely Edison will have to raise equity to finance its $1 billion energy storage project in 2022.It is held dividends to grow in line with SCE’s earnings. The board approved a $0.15 per share annualized increase, or 6%, for 2022, its 18th consecutive annual dividend increase. Management has long targeted a 45%-55% payout based on SCE’s earnings, but the board appears to be comfortable going above that range based on the 2021 and 2022 dividends that implied near-60% payout ratios. As long as Edison continues to receive regulatory support, it is held the board will keep the dividend at the high end of its target payout range.

Bulls Say’s

• With Edison’s nearly $6 billion of planned annual investment during the next four years, analysts project 6% average annual average earnings growth in 2022-25. 
• Edison has raised its dividend for 18 consecutive years to $2.80 in 2022, a 6% increase from 2021. Management appears comfortable maintaining a payout ratio above its 45%-55% target. 
• California’s focus on renewable energy, energy storage, and distributed generation should bolster Edison’s investment opportunities in transmission and distribution upgrades for many years.

Company Profile 

Edison International is the parent company of Southern California Edison, an electric utility that supplies power to 5 million customers in a 50,000-square-mile area of Southern California, excluding Los Angeles. Edison Energy owns interests in nonutility businesses that deal in energy-related products and services. In 2014, Edison International sold its wholesale generation subsidiary Edison Mission Energy out of bankruptcy to NRG Energy. 

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.