Categories
Dividend Stocks

Cochlear Ltd- outlook

As such, we expect growth in this market to fade over the next 10 years.To combat this pressure, Cochlear is actively trying to grow the adult developed market for cochlear implants, which we estimate to be approximately 40% of current annual units. However, the cost of growing awareness and reimbursement support results in minimal operating leverage and the company has specifically guided to flat margins post the initial recovery from the pandemic.

Key Investment Consideration

  • Increasing investment is required to achieve top-line growth resulting in no operating leverage. OThe annuity-like revenue from sound processor upgrades and accessories to growing implant recipient base is set to increase from 30% in fiscal 2020 to approximately 50% of revenue by 2030.
  • Despite forecasting an 11.2% revenue improvement in fiscal 2021 off a depressed base year, we do not anticipate Cochlear to resume paying dividends until fiscal 2022 when it is expected to become free cash flow positive again.
  • There are signs Cochlear is looking to expand beyond the hearing market with the investment in Nyxoah, a company focused on development of a hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea, a large under penetrated market.
  • The annuity-like revenue from sound processor upgrades is an increasingly important component of the revenue stream.
  • Cochlear earns ROICs well ahead of the cost of capital even in our bear case scenario, which is testament to the
  • high quality of the company.
  • Growth in the cochlear implant market is becoming more costly to achieve and the lack of operating leverage limits the potential upside to earnings going forward.
  • The arrival of lost-cost competitor, Nurotron, could disrupt markets other than China should it seek to expand and this could trigger price deflation for incumbents.
  • The COVID-19 crisis could cause a significant outright loss of adult potential cochlear implant recipients as they avoid hospitals and cancel rather than defer elective surgeries. The referral and assessment process takes between nine and 12 months and as such, the impacts will take some time to be visible in the financial results.

 (Source: Morningstar)

Disclaimer

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks Shares

ResMed Inc ltd – Long-Run Strategy

We forecast the company to gain share in the USD 5 billion sleep apnea treatment market as reimbursement becomes increasingly linked to evidence of patient compliance. We expect to see both commercial and national health insurance payers get on the connected device bandwagon, which benefits the duopoly of ResMed and Philips greatly.ResMed’s recent acquisitions of software services platforms for home healthcare practitioners is a new strategic direction and the company has already pieced together approximately 20% share in this USD 1.5 billion market.

Key Investment Considerations

  • ResMed has a strong position in the structurally growing sleep apnea market, where volume growth has been more than sufficient to offset the price deflation headwind.
  • Cash flow is robust with 100% of earnings represented by free cash flow over the preceding five years, a trend we forecast to continue.
  • Risks remain around tax issues as ResMed has been subject to large tax charges in both the U.S. and Australia in the last two years. We are concerned about the reflection on corporate culture and the potential USD 300 million-plus in taxes and penalties payable.
  • ResMed is taking a “smart devices” and “big data” approach to further entrench itself as one of the two leading players in the global sleep apnea market. The strategy is two-fold – accelerating diagnosis of the underpenetrated market and monitoring patient compliance which keeps diagnosed patients in the treatment net and payers happier to reimburse the cost of respiratory devices.
  • The global sleep apnea market is only 20%-30% penetrated and respiratory device companies are making headway growing volumes around 10% per year, offset by average price deflation of 2%-3%. It is dominated by ResMed and Philips, which together make up an estimated 80% of the USD 5 billion value. ResMed plays a key role in driving diagnosis with its at-home sleep testing devices and ongoing education drive to create awareness of the disease.
  • ResMed has demonstrated a robust top line despite experiencing pricing pressure, and this together with the low financial leverage, leads us to use a below-average cost of equity of 7.5%. This results in a company weighted average cost of capital estimate of 7.4%.
  • The ResMed initiatives to improve sleep apnea diagnosis could result in an acceleration of revenue growth over the next five years. With the sleep apnea market an estimated 50% diagnosed in the U.S. and less in other major markets, the runway for growth is long.
  • Pricing risk for durable medical supplies has played out and pressure could ease going forward resulting in faster top-line growth and expanding margins.
  • The strategic focus on data to support product purchases positions ResMed well to demonstrate the value of its products to the healthcare system.
  • The tax issues that came to light in 2018 could suggest a corporate culture that allows questionable practices in other areas like selling, which is regulated in the U.S.
  • Future cash flows need to fund the total potential historical tax liabilities of USD 300 million over the upcoming years.
  • ResMed is unproven as a software provider, an area it is currently directing a lot of capital to.

 (Source: Morningstar)

Disclaimer

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Technology Stocks

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co

HPE posted broad-based strength and a bounce back to annual growth, aided by the year ago quarter being the worst impacted by the pandemic. While we expect HPE to benefit with its shift toward offering its portfolio as-a-service and believe it is well positioned in certain higher growing IT segments, core solutions potentially facing strong headwinds makes us cautious about sustained, long-term growth.

Sales expanded by 11% year-over-year as IT infrastructure spending ramped up behind digital transformation efforts. Intelligent edge grew 20% annually, led by switching and wireless strength, and Aruba as-a-service offerings rapidly expanded and have become a meaningful part of HPE’s overall annualized recurring revenue, or ARR. High performance compute and mission critical series grew by 13% year over year and ended the quarter with a book of over $2 billion in awarded contracts. Compute expanded by 12% year over year, while storage grew by 5% annually behind strong demand for all flash arrays, software storage management, and hyperconverged infrastructure demand. HPE’s as-a-service shift continues to ramp up momentum, with 41% year-over-year growth in as-a-service orders, and HPE’s $678 million in ARR grew 30% annually.

HPE guided to an adjusted EPS range of $0.38-$0.44. For fiscal 2021, the increased adjusted EPS range is $1.82-$1.94 and for free cash flow to be between $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion. We believe that HPE is well positioned for the growth in edge workloads and the need for consistent management across on-premises, clouds, and edge sites. With a growing mix of software and recurring revenue flowing into the business, we view the targets as achievable.

Profile

Hewlett Packard Enterprise is a supplier of IT infrastructure products and services. The company operates as three major segments. Its hybrid IT division primarily sells computer servers, storage arrays, and Point next technical services. The intelligent edge group sells Aruba networking products and services. HPE’s financial services division offers financing and leasing plans for customers. The Palo Alto, California-based company sells on a global scale and has approximately 66,000 employees.

Source:Morningstar

Disclaimer

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Technology Stocks

Veeva Raises Annual Guidance after First-Quarter Revenue Beat

Commercial Cloud results also benefited from adoption of CRM add-ons, which we see as the fundamental driver of long-term growth for the suite. Vault had a very strong quarter as well, bolstered by its Development Cloud that is composed of an end-to-end stack of modules that integrates different components of the drug development process (clinical, quality, regulatory, safety). The company added a record number of new customers to its Vault Quality suite of offerings. Vault Regulatory and Vault Safety also performed well, adding new customers and expanding adoption of modules among existing customers.

Professional services revenue grew an impressive 38% year over year and despite only composing one fifth of total revenue, contributed to more than half of Veeva’s revenue beat, as demand for Vault R&D services and business consulting was higher than anticipated during the quarter. Management expects service revenue to normalize in the second quarter, as it attributes higher utilization of services to the timing of client project starts. Ultimately, services revenue is more volatile than subscription revenue due to its nature (ad hoc versus SaaS), and we are maintaining our long-term revenue growth estimates for the segment.

Veeva anticipates momentum to carry through the rest of the year and has raised total revenue guidance to a range of $1,815 million-$1,825 million (an increase of $60 million over last quarter’s estimates). Taking this raise into account along with a slight improvement in our short-term operating margin estimates, we are raising our fair value estimate to $305 from $300.

Company Profile

Veeva is a leading supplier of software solutions for the life sciences industry. The company’s best-of-breed offering addresses operating and regulatory requirements for customers ranging from small, emerging biotechnology companies to departments of global pharmaceutical manufacturers. The company leverages its domain expertise and cloud-based platform to improve the efficiency and compliance of the underserved life sciences industry, displacing large, highly customized and dated enterprise resource planning, or ERP, systems that have limited flexibility. As the vertical leader, Veeva innovates, increases wallet share at existing customers, and expands into other industries with similar regulations, protocols, and procedures, such as consumer goods, chemicals, and cosmetics.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks Shares

Wesfarmers Ltd – Exceptional Growth

Wesfarmers is one of Australia’s largest private-sector employers, with more than 100,000 employees. Wesfarmers has a wide moat, which is sourced from cost advantages derived from its significant retail scale. After the demerger of Coles in 2018, returns on equity are no longer affected by goodwill associated with the 2008 acquisition of Coles and returns on invested capital comfortably exceed the group’s weighted cost of capital.

Key Investment Consideration

  • Leading Australian hardware retailer Bunnings generates about half of the group’s operating income and we expect the chain to continue building its market share. Bunnings is exposed to the health of the Australian housing market and the cyclical weakness in home prices is likely to negatively affect sales and profitability.
  • Wesfarmers offers investors an opportunity to diversify across different categories in the discretionary retail sector, beyond hardware, with additional diversification provided by its smaller industrials division.
  • Wesfarmers is Australia’s best-known conglomerate. Activities span discount department stores, office supplies, home improvement, energy manufacture and distribution, industrial and safety supplies, chemicals, and fertilisers. Business interests can be divided into two broad groups: retail and industrial.
  • The company’s hardware store footprint across the Australian economy and its leading market positions within several segments, combined with strong underlying return on invested capital (before goodwill), lead to our wide moat rating.
  • Wesfarmers is one of Australia’s largest retailers, and despite the Coles demerger, still earns around 80% of sales from the retail channel across discount department stores, hardware/home improvement, and office supplies.
  • The Bunnings is the undisputed leader in Australian home improvement retailing. Based on its market position, Bunnings could start giving up some volume growth and improve profitability by increasing prices. OThe diversification of Wesfarmers’ revenue streams across multiple retail categories and industrial businesses lowers earnings volatility and better predictability of dividends for income investors.
  • Wesfarmers’ strong balance sheet lowers funding costs, but also provides the financial firepower to opportunistically pursue acquisitions.
  • Wesfarmers’ retailing businesses are pro-cyclical and the near-term outlook for the Australian economy and consumer spending is mixed at best.
  • Mergers and acquisitions are risky and can be value destructive to shareholders. Wesfarmers’ most recent acquisition, Homebase in the U.K. and Kidman Resources were ill-timed and cost investors dearly.
  • The department store segment is grappling with intense competition from online, international apparel retailers and most importantly Amazon Australia, but are also confronted with the secular decline of thedepartment store format.

 (Source: Morningstar)

Disclaimer

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6

His cool-headedness has been key to its success. As a long-term investor, he looks for resilient companies with staying power and doesn’t chase fads. He tries to avoid firms that lack an enduring competitive advantage, steers clear of those loaded up with too much debt, and scrutinizes their leadership’s integrity and prowess.

The strategy stands out for its sprawling portfolio of 800-plus stocks drawn from across the globe and market-cap spectrum. Once solidly small-cap-focused, it now orients toward mid-caps but distinguishes itself from that category by owning an above-average stake of large caps (34% of assets) and small caps (30%). Its generous helping of European and Japanese firms, which have tended to enhance the strategy’s risk-adjusted returns, also sticks out.

Altogether, foreign stocks regularly soak up more than 35% of the portfolio, typically the highest share in the category. Tillinghast’s partiality for high-quality fare reveals itself through the portfolio’s average returns on equity, which are far higher than the Russell Midcap Value Index’s, and its aggregate debt/capital ratio, which is consistently lower

Focused on the long term.

Manager Joel Tillinghast looks for sturdy, underpriced businesses. Stocks selling for less than $35 or with an earnings yield (12-month earnings per share/share price) at least as high as the Russell 2000 Index’s median are considered to be potential bargains. But his “low-priced” mandate isn’t steered by stinginess. As a long-term investor, Tillinghast wants to own resilient companies with strong profitability, little debt, a defendable market niche, and capable leadership.

He often finds what he thinks are excellent opportunities overseas but reserves serious consideration for foreign markets with democratic institutions and the rule of law.The strategy owned more than 800 stocks at last count, with a large tail of tiny positions. Its huge asset base (more than $41 billion as of April 2021) makes breadth a necessity, as Tillinghast can’t take big positions in the small- and mid-cap names he favors without exceeding ownership limits. In that regard, the fund’s size is a constraint.

Its average market cap is more than triple the Russell 2000 Index’s, but it has remained squarely in mid-cap territory. In recent years, the fund landed in the mid-blend Morningstar Category but most recently moved to mid-value. This doesn’t reflect a change in process but rather where the fund’s holdings have skewed recently

Sprawling but not bland

Despite a sprawling portfolio, the fund has avoided becoming bland or benchmarklike. It has long distinguished itself through a sizable stake in foreign stocks: Its 44% stake as of January 2021 was extraordinary in the mid-cap category, where the average peer invests 2%-4% overseas. Joel Tillinghast works closely with a few analysts who source non-U.S. ideas, including one stationed in Japan, a country that takes up over 9% of assets.

The fund has long favored consumer cyclicals–26% of assets versus the Russell Midcap Value Index’s 13% share–where Tillinghast is better able to find firms with compelling competitive advantages. Its roughly 12% financials stake tends to be below that of relevant benchmarks and peers, driven by Tillinghast’s avoidance of complex banks with leveraged balance sheets. The portfolio usually holds 6% to 10% of its assets in cash, which has acted as a drag on its total returns over the past decade. Comanagers run around 5% of assets, which usually include more than 100 unique names.

Half of that stake is overseen by three sector-based managers, with the remainder split between a quantitatively driven subportfolio and a sleeve featuring global stocks. The crew manages its respective slices with discretion but always under Tillinghast’s philosophical guidance.

(Source: Morning star)

Disclaimer

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Digital Giants Finally Click Like Button on Nine’s News Content

Management projects the deals to propel an AUD 30 to 40 million EBITDA uplift in fiscal 2022 for the publishing unit. Some of this increase will likely be driven by continuing cost cuts and efficiency improvements. However, we believe the bulk of it is from the new content supply deals—juicy high margin arrangements which finally shift the image of the much-maligned and structurally-challenged division to one that can now much better monetise its (albeit still dwindling) journalistic resources.

Our fiscal 2021 earnings forecasts for Nine are largely intact. But we have increased our EBITDA estimates from fiscal 2022 by 6% on average, giving effect to the uplift from the new content supply agreements (up to three years with Facebook, five years with Google), as well as lifting the expected benefits from management’s relentless focus on costs in the publishing business. More specifically, from our fiscal 2021 publishing EBITDA forecast base of AUD 124 million, we now expect fiscal 2022 EBITDA to be AUD 158 million, up from AUD 120 million. Investors and, more importantly, the journalist community will be keenly watching how these digital platform deals change management’s resource and capital allocation to the publishing division in the future. Judging by the 26% premium that no-moat-rated Nine shares are trading at relative to our intrinsic assessment, it appears investors are betting the publishing unit will become an even bigger cash cow that Nine will milk, in order to fund its growth ambitions for the digital-centric units such as 9Now and Stan. On the other hand, competition is intensifying in the digital space, and we prefer to remain on the conservative side.

Company Profile

Nine Entertainment operates Nine Network, a free-to-air television network spread across five capital cities, as well as in regional Northern New South Wales and Darwin. It also owns Australia’s third-largest portfolio of online digital properties, one that reaches more than 60% of the country’s active online audience. The merger with Fairfax combines Nine’s top-ranked TV

network and the second-largest newspaper group, topped with a collection of quality digital assets in Nine Digital, subscription video on demand operator Stan, and Fairfax’s 59%-owned Domain. It ensures the merged entity remains relevant in the eyes of audiences and advertisers.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Funds Funds

Diamond Hill High Yield Inv

Bill Zox joined Diamond Hill in 2001 as an equity analyst. He was named a portfolio manager on Diamond Hill Corporate Credit DHSTX in April 2006 before taking over lead management in 2008. John McClain joined the firm in June 2014 as a credit analyst and was also named comanager of Diamond Hill Corporate Credit in February 2015.

The strategy’s investment approach stands out relative to its high-yield bond Morningstar Category peers’. The team focuses on relatively small issues and tends to make sizable bets on its best ideas (up to 10% per issuer), thereby increasing idiosyncratic and liquidity risk. The portfolio has on average about 30% of assets concentrated in its top 10 positions. That said, the team offsets those risks somewhat by treading lightly in the market’s lowest-quality names and limiting how much it will own of an individual issue. This process combines an intrinsic value-driven and contrarian approach to build a high current income portfolio with the opportunity for capital appreciation targeting a high-yield Morningstar Category best-quartile return over rolling five-year periods. While the portfolio’s concentration and idiosyncratic risks are material, the managers’ analytical rigor and responsible balancing of its risks provides comfort.

A distinctive and disciplined investment process

This process combines an intrinsic value-driven and contrarian approach to build a high current income portfolio with the opportunity for capital appreciation targeting a category best-quartile return over rolling five-year periods and a 150 basis points gross excess return over the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Index benchmark.

Comanagers Bill Zox and John McClain execute a disciplined value approach: They buy issues when their market prices are lower than the team’s estimate of intrinsic business value and sell them when their initial thesis has played out or when there are better opportunities in the market. When valuations get rich and opportunities get scarce, the managers may run a larger-thanpeers allocation to investment-grade bonds to reduce the portfolio’s market risk

The team focuses on relatively small issues and tends to make sizable bets on its best ideas (up to 10% per issuer), thereby increasing idiosyncratic and liquidity risk. The portfolio has on average about 30% of assets concentrated in the top 10 positions. That said, the team offsets those risks somewhat by treading lightly in the market’s lowest-quality names and limiting how much it will own of an individual issue

An opportunistically managed portfolio driven by valuations

In response to the 2019 credit rally, the team raised its investment-grade bond exposure up to 20% at the end of that year, its highest level since the strategy’s January 2015 inception, leaving the strategy in a relatively good position to face the coronavirus-driven sell-off that started at the end of February 2020. As the market plunged, the team rotated capital and pushed the portfolio’s credit quality profile even higher as it found numerous investment-grade opportunities in names that included Nvidia, TJX, and Sysco. At the end of 2020’s first quarter, bonds rated BBB or higher represented close to 34% of assets.

After riding the Fed’s wave of purchases and betting on the economy reopening through the second half of 2020, the managers shifted gears. As valuations got rich, they rotated the portfolio out of some higher-rated longer-duration fare into shorter-maturity higher-yielding securities. At the end of March 2021, investmentgrade bonds represented less than 5% of the strategy’s assets, and its allocation to BB-rated bonds went down to 35% from almost 42% at the end of 2020 while bonds rated B moved the other way to 48% from 41% over the same period.

A category leader with a best-in-class long-term volatility-adjusted record

The team’s attention to valuations together with strong credit selection have helped the strategy hold up better than most rivals during high-yield sell-offs. For instance, despite the energy-led sell-off that started in June 2015, an investment in McDermott International MDR was the largest contributor that year, and the portfolio’s energy stake was the largest relative contributor to the strategy’s 0.3% return, which bested 90% of its category peers. Likewise, the strategy outperformed its typical peer by 184 basis points in the last quarter of 2018 and ended that year ahead of 97% of competitors.

(Source: Morning star)

Disclaimer

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Dividend Stocks

Qube Holdings Ltd– Weathering the Storm

However, Qube’s strategy to consolidate a fragmented industry should deliver above-market rates of growth and scale benefits. Qube is developing the Moorebank intermodal terminal and warehouses, located on the Southern Sydney Freight Line, to help alleviate congestion at Port Botany and drive efficiencies in the distribution supply chain. Moorebank, on full completion and ramp-up, should materially contribute to group earnings and deliver a strong competitive advantage for the group’s logistics operations.

Key Investment Consideration

  • Logistics and bulk operations are cyclical and highly dependent on container and bulk volumes. Operating conditions are challenging, with COVID-19 and tough competition pressuring margins and volumes.
  • Our forecasts assume mid single-digit revenue growth in the medium term for Qube, supported by organic growth, scale benefits, investment in new projects, and acquisitions.
  • The development of Moorebank as an intermodal precinct should significantly improve the economics and efficiency of managing container volumes to and from Port Botany over rail.
  • Qube’s strategy is to consolidate the fragmented logistics chain surrounding the export and import of containers, bulk products, automobiles, and general cargo, to create a more efficient and cost-effective supply chain. The business has enjoyed some successes to date, though significant scope for industry consolidation remains.
  • There is significant potential to increase efficiency through vertical integration of port logistics services. Qube will attempt to deliver on this strategy through consolidation and integration.
  • The Moorebank Intermodal Terminal should become a key piece of Sydney’s transport infrastructure, driving
  • strong returns for Qube.
  • Senior management has a proven track record in the port logistics segment and has demonstrated an ability to generate strong returns for shareholders.
  • A corporate structure of associate companies, acquired businesses, and newly purchased assets limits transparency. Meanwhile, a strategy focused on acquisitions adds integration risk. OWhile Qube’s long-term prospects are attractive, its businesses are cyclical and cash flow may be affected by a deterioration in economic conditions.
  • There are still risks surrounding the development of Moorebank and other projects. Currently trading on a high P/E ratio, any disappointments could hit the share price hard.
  • A key positive is the firm’s strengthening financial health, which will get a major boost if the Moorebank Logistics Park, or MLP, is sold. Net debt/EBITDA was a relatively aggressive 3.8 times in fiscal 2020, and could fall below 1 times if Moorebank sells, which we consider conservative.
  • The sale of MLP is progressing well. After receiving nonbinding indicative offers from a range of potential suitors, Qube has entered exclusive negotiation with LOGOS Property Group, an Asia Pacific property investor. There is no guarantee an attractive offer will be made but values for good-quality industrial property are holding up well, as seen in Goodman Group’s security price. The coronavirus hasn’t hurt–online shopping, which requires investment in logistics and industrial property, is booming and interest rates have reduced.

 (Source: Morningstar)

Disclaimer

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Shares Small Cap

Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth

He is responsible for the model and research and draws on seven managers/analysts. Frederick Konopka also became a manager in 2008 and handles portfolio construction and trading for the team. MDT looks to group companies into different baskets producing various streams of alpha potential using valuation, growth, momentum, and quality indicators.

By using classification and regression tree analysis, the team can test thousands of potential combinations of factors based on 30-plus years of U.S. stock data to find the best mixtures of alpha using a three-month investment horizon. Still, such a short investment horizon can be difficult to implement. It leads to annual portfolio turnover that can be lofty and varies greatly. Over the past five years, turnover ranged from 188% to 227%, well above the 59%-66% range for the typical small-growth. The portfolio’s holdings have varied from 150 to 250, suggesting some opportunities may be too illiquid and costly to pursue unless they’re spread out across more holdings.

Since Mahr became lead manager in August 2008, the Institutional shares’ 11.9% annualized return through April 2021 lagged the small growth category’s 12.2% gain and the Russell 2000 Growth Index’s 12.2% rise. The fund has performed better since the team’s 2013 process switch to multiple decision trees, but the fund’s high volatility has kept its risk-adjusted results in line with the index.

Quantitative approach with short focus

MDT groups companies into different baskets of alpha potential. The team forecasts three month returns using valuation factors based on structural earnings, tangible book value, and forward earnings estimates; growth factors like analyst conviction and long-term earnings growth; quality factors measuring free cash flow, leverage, and reliance on external capital; and momentum factors like relative stock price trend. The team uses classification and regression tree analysis to test thousands of potential combinations based on 30-plus years of U.S. stock data.

Prior to 2013, the team used one large decision tree to forecast alpha, but that approach was subject to overfitting issues. Switching to regression analysis using multiple decision trees resulted in combinations of subsets of the factors with the best alpha potential. This leads to the fund holding stocks with different avenues to produce alpha, potentially leading to more opportunities to outperform. The MDT team continues to refine its model, usually updating the model twice a year. These revisions are typically on the margin, though. In 2020, for example, they adjusted their structural earnings indicator by using an industry relative basis.

Diversified, but high turnover

The strategy’s short-term approach has led to higher turnover than most smallgrowth peers. Its annual portfolio turnover range of 118%-227% the past five years is much higher than the median range of 59%-66%. The fund might struggle to maintain its fast-trading ways if assets hit the team’s $8 billion-$10 billion estimate of its small-cap capacity, which includes this strategy, Federated MDT Small Cap Core QISCX, and Federated MDT Small Cap Value. So far, the team is not near that limit, with around $2 billion across its small-cap charges. However, the portfolio’s number of holdings has varied from 150 to 250, suggesting some opportunities may be too illiquid and costly to pursue unless their potential alpha is spread out across more holdings. This could become more pronounced as the asset base grows

Performance – Volatile

The fund’s absolute and risk-adjusted returns lag the Russell 2000 Growth Index during lead manager Dan Mahr’s tenure. Since Mahr took over in August 2008, the Institutional shares’ 11.9% annualized return through April 2021 trailed the small-growth category’s 12.2% gain and the Russell 2000 Growth Index’s 12.2% rise. It has done so with more volatility than the benchmark, resulting in subpar riskadjusted performance measures, like the Sharpe ratio. Most of the fund’s underperformance has come during market turbulence. Mahr’s Aug. 31, 2008,start date means he took over amid the credit crisis, and the fund barely edged the benchmark through that period’s March 9, 2009, bottom. The fund lagged the bogy’s ensuing trough-to-peak (April 23, 2010) performance by 26.6 percentage points, annualized.

(Source: Morning star)

Disclaimer

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.