Tag: Energy

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Longtime Cost Leader Diamondback Thriving in Higher Commodity Environment

Business Strategy & Outlook

Diamondback Energy was a modest-size oil and gas producer when it went public in 2012, but it has rapidly become one of the largest Permian-focused oil firms through a combination of organic growth and corporate acquisitions, most notably Energen in 2018 and QEP Resources in 2021. The firm consistently ranks among the lowest-cost independent producers in the entire industry, supporting a maintainable margin advantage.

Keeping costs low is baked into the culture at Diamondback, and the operations to remain lean and efficient, despite the recent expansions. From the outset, the company has enjoyed a competitive advantage that enables it to systematically undercut its upstream peers. This was initially based on the ideal location of its acreage in the core of the basin, and helped by the early adoption of innovations like high-intensity completions (resulting in more production for each dollar spent). More recently, the firm has started seeing significant economies of scale as well.

Management has fiercely protected the balance sheet over the years and has been willing to tap equity markets, when necessary, as it did several times during the 2015-16 downturn in global crude prices. But that’s ancient history now. Diamondback’s financial health is excellent, and the firm can maintain or grow its production while generating substantial free cash flows under a wide range of commodity scenarios. There is no chance that the firm will choose to allocate more capital for new drilling than appropriate, which means production will probably stay flat or grow at low-single-digit rates for the foreseeable future. Excess cash will be used for debt reduction or returned to shareholders. To preserve flexibility for management, the firm has not committed to a specific reinvestment rate or vehicle for capital returns, like certain peers have, but it does intend to distribute at least half of its free cash somehow. Finally, highlight the firm’s stake in its mineral rights subsidiary, Viper Energy Partners. This vehicle owns the mineral rights relating to some of Diamondback’s most attractive acreage, further juicing returns on drilling for the parent.

Financial Strengths

Diamondback has historically maintained excellent financial health, with one of the strongest balance sheets in upstream coverage. The Energen acquisition pushed up its leverage ratios for a brief spell in 2019, COVID-19 kept them elevated in 2020, and the Guidon and QEP deals extended these periods of above average leverage into 2021. But borrowing never reached an unmaintainable level, even in these periods, and the firm’s leverage has already recovered. At the end of the last reporting period, debt to capital was 30% and annualized debt/EBITDA was 0.7 times. And as the firm is capable of generating substantial free cash under a wide range of commodity price scenarios, these ratios to continue improving. Consolidated liquidity is over $1.5 billion, with no material debt maturities until 2024.

Bulls Say

  • Diamondback is one of the lowest-cost oil producers operating in the United States.
  • The firm generates substantial free cash under a wide range of commodity scenarios and has to pledged to return at least half of that to shareholders.
  • Diamondback has been an early adopter of returns-enhancing technology in the field, and is expected to remain at the leading edge.

Company Description

Diamondback Energy is an independent oil and gas producer in the United States. The company operates exclusively in the Permian Basin. At the end of 2021, the company reported net proven reserves of 1.8 billion barrels of oil equivalent. Net production averaged about 375,000 barrels per day in 2021, at a ratio of 60% oil, 20% natural gas liquids, and 20% natural gas.

(Source: Morningstar)

DISCLAIMER for General Advice: (This document is for general advice only).

This document is provided by Laverne Securities Pty Ltd T/as Laverne Investing. Laverne Securities Pty Ltd, CAR 001269781 of Laverne Capital Pty Ltd AFSL No. 482937.

The material in this document may contain general advice or recommendations which, while believed to be accurate at the time of publication, are not appropriate for all persons or accounts. This document does not purport to contain all the information that a prospective investor may require.  The material contained in this document does not take into consideration an investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on the advice, investors should consider the appropriateness of the advice, having regard to the investor’s objectives, financial situation, and needs. The material contained in this document is for sales purposes. The material contained in this document is for information purposes only and is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to the subscription for, purchase or sale of securities or financial products and neither or anything in it shall form the basis of any contract or commitment. This document should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment and recipients should seek independent advice.

The material in this document has been obtained from sources believed to be true but neither Laverne and Banyan Tree nor its associates make any recommendation or warranty concerning the accuracy or reliability or completeness of the information or the performance of the companies referred to in this document. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Any opinions and or recommendations expressed in this material are subject to change without notice and, Laverne and Banyan Tree are not under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. References made to third parties are based on information believed to be reliable but are not guaranteed as being accurate.

Laverne and Banyan Tree and its respective officers may have an interest in the securities or derivatives of any entities referred to in this material. Laverne and Banyan Tree do and seek to do business with companies that are the subject of its research reports. The analyst(s) hereby certify that all the views expressed in this report accurately reflect their personal views about the subject investment theme and/or company securities.

Although every attempt has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in the document, liability for any errors or omissions (except any statutory liability which cannot be excluded) is specifically excluded by Laverne and Banyan Tree, its associates, officers, directors, employees, and agents.  Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Laverne and Banyan Tree, its directors, employees and agents accept no liability or responsibility for any loss or damage of any kind, direct or indirect, arising out of the use of all or any part of this material.  Recipients of this document agree in advance that Laverne and Banyan Tree are not liable to recipients in any matters whatsoever otherwise; recipients should disregard, destroy or delete this document. All information is correct at the time of publication. Laverne and Banyan Tree do not guarantee reliability and accuracy of the material contained in this document and are not liable for any unintentional errors in the document.

The securities of any company(ies) mentioned in this document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to all categories of investors. This document is provided to the recipient only and is not to be distributed to third parties without the prior consent of Laverne and Banyan Tree.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Xylem Raises Full-Year Guidance After Solid First Quarter; Increasing Fair Value Estimate

Business Strategy & Outlook

Xylem is one of the leading water technology companies in the world. Its extensive portfolio spans a wide range of equipment and solutions for the water industry, including the transport, treatment, testing, and efficient use of water for public utilities as well as industrial, commercial, and residential customers. Xylem operates three business segments: water infrastructure, applied water, and measurement and control solutions. 

After several strategic acquisitions, including Sensus in 2016, Xylem can offer utilities a comprehensive portfolio of solutions aimed at addressing the problem of nonrevenue water, including pumps, sensors, smart meters, and leak detection, as well as a data management platform to monitor and analyse data from all these products. The ability to cross-sell these products and link them together will make Xylem a one-stop shop for utilities and will help widen the firm’s economic moat by increasing switching costs and customer loyalty. The Xylem is poised to benefit from long-term trends, including global population growth, water scarcity in developing countries, and the need to replace aging water infrastructure in developed countries. Furthermore, revenue synergies from the Sensus acquisition have already exceeded management’s initial targets. The company will continue to capitalize on cross-selling opportunities, as Xylem has traditionally held a strong position in the wastewater and outdoor water sectors, while Sensus has established a strong presence on the clean water side.

The firm has room for further margin expansion. Management is implementing multiple initiatives aimed at expanding adjusted EBITDA margins by 50-75 basis points per year, including business simplification, global procurement, and lean initiatives. The margin expansion to be driven by operating leverage and the mix shift to digital solutions as well.

Financial Strengths

Xylem owed roughly $2.4 billion of short-term and long-term debt as of Dec. 31, 2021, while holding approximately $1.3 billion in cash and equivalents. Debt maturities are reasonably well laddered over the next few years, with a $586 million note due in 2023. The company also relies on commercial paper to meet short-term borrowing needs and has a $1 billion revolving credit facility that augments its liquidity. The company will have a net debt/adjusted EBITDA ratio of roughly 1.0 times in 2022. The Xylem will generate average annual operating cash flow of approximately $900 million over the next five years. Management has indicated it will prioritize organic growth, continued dividend growth (increasing roughly in line with earnings growth), and strategic acquisitions, with excess capital allocated to share repurchases.

Bulls Say

  • Growing demand for fresh water in developing countries and the need to replace aging infrastructure in developed countries will create long-term growth opportunities for Xylem.
  • After recent acquisitions of smart meter and leak detection companies, Xylem can offer utilities a comprehensive portfolio of products aimed at addressing the problem of nonrevenue water.
  • The company has room for further margin expansion, with management targeting cost savings from business simplification, global procurement, lean initiatives, and synergies from recent M&A deals.

Company Description

Xylem is a global leader in water technology and offers a wide range of solutions, including the transport, treatment, testing, and efficient use of water for customers in the utility, industrial, commercial, and residential sectors. Xylem was spun off from ITT in 2011. Based in Rye Brook, New York, Xylem has a presence in over 150 countries and employs 16,200. The company generated $6.2 billion in revenue and $611 million in adjusted operating income in 2021.

(Source: Morningstar)

DISCLAIMER for General Advice: (This document is for general advice only).

This document is provided by Laverne Securities Pty Ltd T/as Laverne Investing. Laverne Securities Pty Ltd, CAR 001269781 of Laverne Capital Pty Ltd AFSL No. 482937.

The material in this document may contain general advice or recommendations which, while believed to be accurate at the time of publication, are not appropriate for all persons or accounts. This document does not purport to contain all the information that a prospective investor may require.  The material contained in this document does not take into consideration an investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on the advice, investors should consider the appropriateness of the advice, having regard to the investor’s objectives, financial situation, and needs. The material contained in this document is for sales purposes. The material contained in this document is for information purposes only and is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to the subscription for, purchase or sale of securities or financial products and neither or anything in it shall form the basis of any contract or commitment. This document should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment and recipients should seek independent advice.

The material in this document has been obtained from sources believed to be true but neither Laverne and Banyan Tree nor its associates make any recommendation or warranty concerning the accuracy or reliability or completeness of the information or the performance of the companies referred to in this document. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Any opinions and or recommendations expressed in this material are subject to change without notice and, Laverne and Banyan Tree are not under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. References made to third parties are based on information believed to be reliable but are not guaranteed as being accurate.

Laverne and Banyan Tree and its respective officers may have an interest in the securities or derivatives of any entities referred to in this material. Laverne and Banyan Tree do and seek to do business with companies that are the subject of its research reports. The analyst(s) hereby certify that all the views expressed in this report accurately reflect their personal views about the subject investment theme and/or company securities.

Although every attempt has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in the document, liability for any errors or omissions (except any statutory liability which cannot be excluded) is specifically excluded by Laverne and Banyan Tree, its associates, officers, directors, employees, and agents.  Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Laverne and Banyan Tree, its directors, employees and agents accept no liability or responsibility for any loss or damage of any kind, direct or indirect, arising out of the use of all or any part of this material.  Recipients of this document agree in advance that Laverne and Banyan Tree are not liable to recipients in any matters whatsoever otherwise; recipients should disregard, destroy or delete this document. All information is correct at the time of publication. Laverne and Banyan Tree do not guarantee reliability and accuracy of the material contained in this document and are not liable for any unintentional errors in the document.

The securities of any company(ies) mentioned in this document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to all categories of investors. This document is provided to the recipient only and is not to be distributed to third parties without the prior consent of Laverne and Banyan Tree.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

TC Energy Reports Solid Q1 With Healthy Progress on Key Initiatives

Business Strategy & Outlook

TC Energy faces many of the same challenges as Canadian pipeline peer Enbridge but also offers important contrasts. Both firms offer a 5%-7% growth profile and a utilitylike 95%-98% of earnings that are highly regulated or contracted, with several years of project backlog, despite Enbridge largely focusing on oil assets, while TC’s focus is natural gas. However, anticipate that any major new pipeline project for either firm will face substantial stakeholder challenges from a legal, regulatory, or community perspective, raising the risks and costs.

The most critical differences between Enbridge and TC Energy arise from their approaches to energy transition. Canadian carbon emissions taxes are expected to increase to CAD 170 a ton by 2030

from CAD 40 today, meaning it is critical that TC Energy, with its natural gas exposure, follow Enbridge’s approach to rapidly reduce its carbon emission profile and continue to pursue projects like the Alberta Carbon Grid, which will be able to transport more than 20 million tons of carbon dioxide. These taxes potentially increase costs for Canadian pipes compared with U.S. pipes but also make

hydrogen a viable alternative to gas-powered electricity generation by 2030 in Canada, presenting an emerging threat. TC Energy recently introduced targets to reduce its Scope 1 and 2 intensity

by 30% by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050, which is a start.

In addition, Enbridge’s backlog is more diversified across its businesses already, and it already has a more material renewables business, including hydrogen, renewable natural gas, and wind efforts. While the renewables business lacks an economic moat today, it is an important area of investment for TC Energy that it needs to pursue. The renewables investments can compete for capital across the rest of the portfolio, generating reasonable returns on capital, allowing the overall enterprise to adapt to the markets as they evolve. This shift is especially the case as a CAD 170 per ton carbon tax in Canada opens the door for potentially sizable investments to reduce carbon emissions.

Financial Strengths

TC Energy carries significantly higher leverage than the typical U.S. midstream firm, with current debt/EBITDA well over 5 times. Its long-term target is in the high 4s, again materially higher than peers which are generally targeting leverage of 3-4 times. Still, the high degree of leverage is

supported by the highly protected nature of its earnings stream. As capital spending declines over the next few years to around CAD 4.7 billion, the TC Energy to currently reach the 4s in the latter half of the decade. Lower capital spending would move this date forward materially. Beyond

the high leverage, TC Energy is also unusual in that it will continue to rely on the capital markets to meet about 20% of its expected capital expenditures over the next few years, meaning that some projects on a regular basis will depend on the health of the capital markets. Midstream peers are

largely transitioning to generating free cash flow after distributions or dividends, and in some cases,  the shift to be permanent. TC Energy has outlined plans to spend about CAD 5 billion annually on a continued basis. About CAD 1.5 billion-CAD 2 billion is maintenance spending on its pipelines, and 85% of this is recoverable due to being invested in the rate base. Bruce Power and the U.S. and Canadian natural gas pipelines will consume about CAD 1 billion each annually. ESG-related opportunities such as using renewable power

to power its own operations or seeking carbon capture efforts would be on top of this spending. TC’s dividend growth remains prized by its investors, and 3% growth going forward is easily supportable under the firm’s 60/40 framework.

Bulls Say

  • TC Energy has strong growth opportunities in Mexican natural gas as well as liquefied natural gas.
  • The company offers virtually identical growth prospects and a protected earnings profile to Enbridge but allows investors to bet more heavily on natural gas.
  • The Canadian regulatory structure allows for greater recovery of costs due to project cancelations or

producers failing compared with the U.S.

Company Description

TC Energy operates natural gas, oil, and power generation assets in Canada and the United States. The firm operates more than 60,000 miles of oil and gas pipelines, more than 650 billion cubic feet of natural gas storage, and about 4,200 megawatts of electric power.

(Source: Morningstar)

DISCLAIMER for General Advice: (This document is for general advice only).

This document is provided by Laverne Securities Pty Ltd T/as Laverne Investing. Laverne Securities Pty Ltd, CAR 001269781 of Laverne Capital Pty Ltd AFSL No. 482937.

The material in this document may contain general advice or recommendations which, while believed to be accurate at the time of publication, are not appropriate for all persons or accounts. This document does not purport to contain all the information that a prospective investor may require.  The material contained in this document does not take into consideration an investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on the advice, investors should consider the appropriateness of the advice, having regard to the investor’s objectives, financial situation, and needs. The material contained in this document is for sales purposes. The material contained in this document is for information purposes only and is not an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to the subscription for, purchase or sale of securities or financial products and neither or anything in it shall form the basis of any contract or commitment. This document should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment and recipients should seek independent advice.

The material in this document has been obtained from sources believed to be true but neither Laverne and Banyan Tree nor its associates make any recommendation or warranty concerning the accuracy or reliability or completeness of the information or the performance of the companies referred to in this document. Past performance is not indicative of future performance. Any opinions and or recommendations expressed in this material are subject to change without notice and, Laverne and Banyan Tree are not under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained herein. References made to third parties are based on information believed to be reliable but are not guaranteed as being accurate.

Laverne and Banyan Tree and its respective officers may have an interest in the securities or derivatives of any entities referred to in this material. Laverne and Banyan Tree do and seek to do business with companies that are the subject of its research reports. The analyst(s) hereby certify that all the views expressed in this report accurately reflect their personal views about the subject investment theme and/or company securities.

Although every attempt has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in the document, liability for any errors or omissions (except any statutory liability which cannot be excluded) is specifically excluded by Laverne and Banyan Tree, its associates, officers, directors, employees, and agents.  Except for any liability which cannot be excluded, Laverne and Banyan Tree, its directors, employees and agents accept no liability or responsibility for any loss or damage of any kind, direct or indirect, arising out of the use of all or any part of this material.  Recipients of this document agree in advance that Laverne and Banyan Tree are not liable to recipients in any matters whatsoever otherwise; recipients should disregard, destroy or delete this document. All information is correct at the time of publication. Laverne and Banyan Tree do not guarantee reliability and accuracy of the material contained in this document and are not liable for any unintentional errors in the document.

The securities of any company(ies) mentioned in this document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to all categories of investors. This document is provided to the recipient only and is not to be distributed to third parties without the prior consent of Laverne and Banyan Tree.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Rolls-Royce Holdings reflects Strong Liquidity Position of £7.1bn, including £2.6bn in cash and £4.5bn in undrawn committed facilities

Investment Thesis:

  • Very high barriers to entry and Covid-19 is likely to improve industry structure (consolidation)
  • Consumer pent up demand for travel will return with a vaccine. 
  • Liquidity concerns have been addressed with the GBP5bn recapitalization program.  
  • Ongoing focus on R&D and innovation, which will drive further efficiencies.
  • Cost efficiency program to drive savings to support earnings. 

Key Risks:

  • Covid-19 impacts are deeper and more protracted than expected.
  • The Company fails to hit its near-term guidance. 
  • Defense and Power Systems fails to deliver organic growth. 
  • Economic downturn leading to reduced demand from airlines.  
  • Brexit uncertainty. 
  • Adverse currency movements outside hedging strategies. 
  • Regulatory / litigation risks. 

Key Highlights:

  • Revenue growth of low-to-mid single-digit, supported by a strong order book cover in both Defence and Power Systems and a continuation of gradual improvement in Civil Aerospace, along with an expected increase in spare engine sales, with long-term revenue growth driven by technology and innovation opportunities and rising global demand for sustainable power.
  • Operating profit margin to be broadly unchanged as underlying operational improvement is balanced with increased engineering spend to develop sustainable growth opportunities, with a gradual shift in spend towards New Markets, Defence and Power Systems, with an aim to spend ~75% of R&D investment on lower carbon growth opportunities in the medium term.
  • FCF to be modestly positive, representing a substantial improvement on pcp, despite the concession slips.
  • Balance sheet repair commenced with £2bn in proceeds from disposals (ITP Aero is progressing well and expected to complete in 1H22) together with strong underlying FCF generation to be used to reduce net debt (including leases was up +44.4% over pcp to £5.2bn and excluding leases was up +126.7% over pcp to £3.4bn) with the aim of returning to an investment grade credit profile in the medium term.
  • Strong liquidity position of £7.1bn, including £2.6bn in cash (post payment of €750m bond and the £300m Covid Corporate Financing Facility commercial paper) and £4.5bn in undrawn committed facilities.
  • No dividend payment for the year as some of loan facilities place restrictions and conditions on payments to shareholders, however, the Board will start recommending shareholder payments from FY23.
  • The restructuring program delivered £1.3bn run-rate savings target a year ahead of schedule, reducing the size of Civil Aerospace business by around a third and removing more than 9,000 roles from continuing operations, with focus now on ensuring the benefits are sustained.

Company Description:

Rolls Royce Holdings plc (RR) manufactures aero, marine and industrial gas turbines for civil and military aircraft. The Company designs, constructs, and installs power generation, transmission and distribution systems and equipment for the marine propulsion, oil and gas pumping and defense markets. The Company operates three main segments: (1) Civil Aerospace; (2) Defence Aerospace; and (3) Power Systems.

(Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

PG&E Investing Heavily in California Energy Policy Projects

Business Strategy and Outlook

PG&E emerged from bankruptcy on July 1, 2020, after 17 months of negotiating with 2017-18 Northern California fire victims, insurance companies, politicians, lawyers, and bondholders. The new PG&E is well positioned to grow rapidly, given the investment needs to meet California’s aggressive energy and environmental policies. PG&E is set to invest more than $8 billion annually for the next five years, leading to 8% annual growth. California’s core ratemaking regulation is highly constructive with usage-decoupled rates, forward-looking rate reviews, and allowed returns well above the industry average. Morningstar analysts expect California regulators to support premium allowed returns to encourage energy infrastructure investment to support the state’s clean energy goals, including a carbon-free economy by 2045. This upside is partially offset by the uncertain future of PG&E’s natural gas business, which could shrink as California decarbonizer its economy.

PG&E will always face public and regulatory scrutiny as the largest utility in California. That scrutiny has escalated with the deadly wildfires and power outages. Legislative and regulatory changes during and since the bankruptcy have reduced PG&E’s financial risk, but the state’s inverse condemnation strict liability standard remains a concern. CEO Patti Poppe faces a tall task restoring PG&E’s reputation among customers, regulators, politicians, and investors. 

Financial Strength 

Following the bankruptcy restructuring, PG&E has substantially the same capital structure as it did entering bankruptcy with many of the same bondholders after issuing $38 billion of new or reinstated debt. PG&E’s $7.5 billion securitized debt issuance would eliminate $6 billion of temporary debt at the utility and further fortify its balance sheet. The post bankruptcy equity ownership mix is much different. PG&E raised $5.8 billion of new common stock and equity units in late June 2020, representing about 30% ownership. Another $3.25 billion of new equity came from a group of large investment firms.  analysts expect PG&E to maintain investment-grade credit ratings. Morningstar analysts estimate PG&E will invest more than $8 billion annually during the next few years. Tax benefits and regulatory asset recovery should result in minimal new equity and debt needs at least through 2023.Morningstar analysts expect PG&E will be prepared to reinitiate a dividend in 2024 after meeting the terms of its bankruptcy settlement. 

Bulls Says

  • California’s core rate regulation is among the most constructive in the U.S. with usage-decoupled revenue, annual rate true-up adjustments, and forward-looking rate setting. 
  • Regulators continue to support the company’s investments in grid modernization, electric vehicles, and renewable energy to meet the state’s progressive energy policies. 
  • State legislation passed in August 2018 and mid-2019 should help limit shareholder losses if PG&E faces another round of wildfire liabilities.

Company Profile

PG&E is a holding company whose main subsidiary is Pacific Gas and Electric, a regulated utility operating in Central and Northern California that serves 5.3 million electricity customers and 4.6 million gas customers in 47 of the state’s 58 counties. PG&E operated under bankruptcy court supervision between January 2019 and June 2020. In 2004, PG&E sold its unregulated assets as part of an earlier post bankruptcy reorganization

 (Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

AGL Posted Strong 1H22 result with Potential Capital Management and Demerger initiative

Investment Thesis

  • Energy margins bottom out and could potentially start to improve (higher customer and volume numbers). 
  • Strong cash flow business which provided flexibility to deploy cash in growth opportunities and capital management.
  • On-going focus on costs and digitalization should support margins.
  • Potential capital management initiatives (e.g., buyback).
  • Demerger into AGL Australia and Accel may unlock shareholder value. 
  • Potential favourable changes to the regulatory environment. 
  • Potential M&A – AGL has already received a takeover bid at $7.50 per share which was rejected by the AGL Board. 

Key Risk

  • Competitive pressures leading to margin erosion.
  • Cost pressure and fuel supply issues leads to margin erosion. 
  • Increase in supply leading depressed prices. 
  • Regulatory risk (policy uncertainty), such recent regulation in electricity markets [ Victorian Default Offer (VDO) and Default Market Offer (DMO)]
  • Un-scheduled shutdowns impacting earnings. 

1H22 headline results

  • 1H22 group underlying profit after tax of $194m, was down -41% on pcp or down -23% excluding the non-recurrence of the Loy Yang outage insurance proceeds. In term of AGL Australia, the key drivers of performance were consumer energy margin was down predominantly due to the impact of milder weather on demand, higher cost of energy with increased residential solar volumes, and margin compression from customers switching to lower priced products. Further, supply and trading gas margin was lower as expected, impacted by lower priced legacy supply contracts rolling off, during the 2H21. With respect to Accel Energy, trading and origination electricity margin were lower due to lower contracted electricity prices and lower offtake sales to consumer electricity resulting from increased penetration of solar. Providing some positive offsets to underlying profit was positive movement in centrally managed expenses driven by cost-out initiatives, favourable movement in depreciation due to the asset impairments recognized in FY21 and lower tax expense (reflecting the fall in profit). 
  •  Underlying cash flow from operations was up +8% YoY, driven by a large inflow from margin calls versus an outflow pcp and positive working capital movements, which was able to more than offset the decline in underlying EBITDA
  • FY Q21 Results 
  • 1H22 headline result. C

Company Profile

AGL Energy Limited (AGL) is one of Australia’s leading integrated energy companies and the largest ASX listed owner, operator and developer of renewable energy generation in Australia. The company sells and distributes gas and electricity. Further, it also retails and wholesales energy and fuel products to customers throughout Australia. The business operates four main segments: Energy Markets, Group Operations, New Energy and Investments.

(Source: Banyantree)

  • Relative to the pcp: (1) 

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

NRG Narrows Winter Storm Uri Loss, Moves Forward With Capital Allocation Plan

Business Strategy and Outlook

NRG Energy has completed its latest strategic shift following the $3.625 billion acquisition of Direct Energy in January 2021, the sale of most of its Northeast power generation fleet, and the planned closure of four Midwest power plants. A higher share of retail energy earnings helps offset the long-term threat to NRG’s legacy fossil fuel generation fleet as renewable energy grows. NRG will benefit the most if electricity demand grows in its key markets, particularly Texas and the Northeast. In Texas, brief summer heat spells in 2018 and 2019 along with Winter Storm Uri in February 2021 show that growing demand can also create more energy price volatility and risk. Uri resulted in $1 billion of gross losses for NRG in just two weeks. 

Despite offsetting much of those one-time losses, it’s uncertain how energy market reforms in Texas will impact NRG in the long run. NRG’s transformation has taken twists and turns during the last five years, ultimately shrinking its wholesale generation business and increasing its retail energy business. Between 2016 and 2020, NRG divested half of its generation fleet, brought in nearly $3 billion of cash, and eliminated $10 billion of debt. In spring 2017, NRG sent subsidiary GenOn Energy into bankruptcy and in 2018, NRG sold its renewable energy business, its 47% stake in NRG Yield, and its South Central generation.

Financial Strength

NRG’s transformation, which started in mid-2017, simplified its balance sheet and improved its credit metrics. Before the Direct Energy acquisition, NRG had cut its recourse debt below $6 billion and was on track to reach investment-grade credit metrics by the end of 2020. The all-cash Direct Energy acquisition and losses from the Texas winter storm in February 2021 push that back slightly. Management is targeting 2.5-2.75 times net debt/EBITDA, a level it reached in 2019 but might not reach again until 2023 or later. The winter storm losses led management to scale back its 2021 debt reduction target to less than $300 million from the pre-storm $1.05 billion target. The board’s decision to initiate a $1 billion stock repurchase plan in late 2021 suggests NRG’s capital allocation focus has shifted away from balance sheet repair. Lower capital expenditures should boost cash flow as NRG adjusts to maintenance levels at its core business. The retail business requires little capital investment.  

The $3 billion of cash proceeds from the renewable energy, NRG Yield, and South Central business sales helped NRG finance the Direct Energy acquisition with no new equity. Management reset the dividend at $1.20 per share annualized in 2020, up from $0.12 in 2019. NRG plans to pay a $1.40 per share annualized dividend in 2022. Robust free cash flow and share buybacks should allow management to meet its 7%-9% dividend growth target easily. Before the 2017-18 restructuring, NRG carried $19.5 billion of consolidated debt at year-end 2015, but only $7.9 billion was recourse parent debt. The rest was nonrecourse debt at GenOn Energy, NRG Yield, or project financing. The GenOn bankruptcy eliminated $2.7 billion of debt, and the 2018 divestitures eliminated another $7 billion of debt. NRG used $2 billion of cash proceeds from its 2018 asset sales to pay down parent debt and repurchase $1.25 billion of stock. NRG bought back $1.6 billion of stock in 2019-20 before the Direct Energy acquisition.

Bulls Say’s

  • NRG’s transformation in 2017-20 cut the business in half, improved its credit metrics, and generated substantial cash to use for the dividend, stock buybacks, and acquisitions like Direct Energy. 
  • NRG’s match between its wholesale generation earnings and its retail supply earnings provides a hedge that stabilizes consolidated earnings. 
  • NRG’s primary operations are in Texas, which we think will have among the fastest electricity demand growth of any state during the next decade.

Company Profile 

NRG Energy is one of the largest retail energy providers in the U.S., with 7 million customers, including its 2021 acquisition of Direct Energy. It also is one of the largest U.S. independent power producers, with 16 gigawatts of nuclear, coal, gas, and oil power generation capacity primarily in Texas. Since 2018, NRG has divested its 47% stake in NRG Yield, among other renewable energy and conventional generation investments. NRG exited Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a stand-alone entity in December 2003.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Origin Energy Ltd signals to exit coal-fired power generation; Replacing the plant with a large-scale battery

Investment Thesis

  • Higher oil prices benefit ORG’s APLNG project (higher revenues).
  • Balance sheet position is being restored with management focused on getting the debt covenants back to an investment grade level.
  • Achieving milestones within the APLNG project.
  • On-going focus on operating cost and capital expenditure reduction.
  • Increasing dividend profile and with a restored balance sheet the Company can also consider other capital management initiatives. 
  • Rationalization of asset portfolio, including asset sales and the IPO of its conventional upstream business should help improve the balance sheet position.  

Key Risks

  • Exploration and production risks.
  • Lower energy prices, particularly oil prices (for its APLNG project). 
  • Structural change in energy markets & increased competition.  
  • Not meeting cost-out targets. 
  • Highly geared balance sheet, with the company not being able to reduce debt fast enough. 

1H22 Key Highlights

  • Underlying EBITDA declined -4.8% over pcp to $1,099m, as increased earnings from Australia Pacific LNG amid higher oil and gas prices were more than offset by expected lower earnings in Energy Markets reflecting lower retail tariffs (set in FY21 when wholesale electricity prices were at lows due to subdued economic activity and increased renewables penetration) and higher energy procurement costs. 
  • Underlying profit increased +18% over pcp to $268m, driven by strong commodity prices, however, the Company recorded statutory loss of $131m, reflecting the one-off impairment and net capital gains tax expense associated with the $2bn sale of its 10% interest in Australia Pacific LNG. 
  •  Operating cash flow was an outflow of $79m vs inflow of $669m in pcp, amid lower earnings from Energy markets, higher working capital primarily due to timing of LNG cargo delivery and oil hedging and LNG trading losses. FCF (including major growth projects of Octopus equity investment of $260m and Kraken licence implementation costs of $37m) was an outflow of $112m vs inflow of $594m in pcp. 
  • Adjusted net debt increased +10.6% over 2H21 to $5.133bn, driven by the consideration associated with the investment in Octopus and higher working capital associated with the payment for an LNG cargo partially offset by APLNG cash distributions. (5) The Board declared an unfranked interim dividend of 12.5cps, representing 66% of FCF (excluding major growth projects), with partial franking expected to be restored in FY23.

Sale of 10% interest in APLNG – expected to restore balance sheet flexibility

Management executed an agreement to sell 10% of APLNG for net proceeds of $2.12bn (ORG retains 27.5% of shareholding, existing two APLNG board seats and upstream operatorship), with sale expected to be completed in 3Q22 (first half of CY22) and proceeds used to restore balance sheet flexibility with post sale adjusted Net Debt/adjusted Underlying EBITDA and gearing ratio declining to lower end of the target ranges of 2-3x and 20-30% from current levels of 3.9x and 34%, respectively. It will also provide FY22 net interest saving of $45-65m

Coal-fired generation

Management has submitted notice to AEMO for the potential early retirement of Eraring Power Station in August 2025 (vs prior targeted closure in 2032) and plans to install a large-scale battery of up to 700 MW at the site.

Company Profile

Origin Energy (ORG) is an integrated energy company with operations in exploration, production, generation and the sale of energy to millions of households and businesses across Australia. The Company has extensive operations across Australia and New Zealand and pursuing opportunities in the fast-growing energy markets of Asia and South America. The Company has two main segments: (1) Energy Markets – retail sales of electricity, gas and other customer solutions; electricity generation; and wholesale trading of electricity and gas. (2) Integrated Gas – consists of upstream exploration, development and production; the segment also holds the 37.5% ownership in Asia Pacific LNG project (APLNG). 

  • Sale of 10% inte(Sourc                    (Source: Banyantree)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities

First Solar’s Sales Efforts Have Become Increasingly Focused On Select End Markets

Business Strategy and Outlook

First Solar’s strategy has pivoted back to its origins as a supplier of thin film solar modules following the exit of its North American development business, and its operations and maintenance business in 2021. The company’s development business supported profits during 2012-17 when First Solar’s module business faced challenges. However, margins in the business became compressed in recent years, and it is likely the company made a prudent decision to exit the business given increasing need for scale. The company retains modest development activities in Japan, but it is not seen, these as core to its long-term strategy. 

Upon taking the helm in 2016, CEO Mark Widmar has led the successful execution of the transition to its Series 6 module. This was a major transition for the company and came at a hefty price tag–$2 billion in capital expenditures–but has resulted in a better competitive position compared with its prior module generation (Series 4). Further, the company’s sales efforts have become increasingly focused on select end markets. The U.S. and India represent approximately 90% of booking opportunities, where trade policies leave the company in a more favorable competitive position. In particular, the company performs well in the U.S. utility-scale market, where it is projected, its market share to be approximately 30%. 

Financially, the company is focused on leveraging scale benefits to drive margin improvement. Given continued expectations for declining selling prices and a largely fixed operating expense profile (circa 80% fixed), the key lever to grow operating margins is through capacity additions. It is largely definite with many of the company’s strategic moves in recent years. However, it is questioned whether a pure module supplier can achieve consistent excess profits. It would be interesting to see the company seek adjacent revenue opportunities- for example, balance of system components- to complement its module business.

Financial Strength

First Solar’s financial strength stands alone relative to solar module peers. It is considered that this a competitive advantage because it allows First Solar more flexibility to take advantage of investment opportunities. The company carries essentially no debt besides project debt associated with its Systems business and holds more than $1 billion in cash and investments as of late 2021. First Solar’s financial strength is in part due to its conservative approach to expanding capacity, which is in stark contrast to the track record of the broader industry. Cash flow generation has been weighed down by working capital in recent years, but it is probable, this should normalize over the medium term. Capital expenditures will be elevated for the next few years, due to large-scale manufacturing expansions in the U.S. and India. It is likely, the potential for local debt (India) and potential incentives (U.S.) to help fund part of the associated capital expenditures. Given its robust level of cash and investments, combined with continued steady cash flow generation, It isn’t seen the elevated capital expenditures posing a threat to the company’s financial position.

Bulls Say’s

  • First Solar’s balance sheet strength has enabled it to persist through solar cycles when competitors have failed. 
  • First Solar’s thin film cadmium telluride technology is unique within the industry and benefits from its simple manufacturing process and supply chain. 
  • First Solar is well positioned to benefit from potential U.S. manufacturing incentives.

Company Profile 

First Solar designs and manufactures solar photovoltaic panels, modules, and systems for use in utility-scale development projects. The company’s solar modules use cadmium telluride to convert sunlight into electricity. This is commonly called thin-film technology. First Solar is the world’s largest thin-film solar module manufacturer. It has production lines in Vietnam, Malaysia, and Ohio. It plans to add a large factory in India. 

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Onsemi’s Sales Growth Above That Of The Broader Semiconductor Industry

Business Strategy and Outlook

It is seen Onsemi is a power chipmaker aligning itself to the differentiated parts of its portfolio in order to accelerate growth and margin expansion. It is probable Onsemi to outpace the growth of its underlying markets over the next five years as it tailors its portfolio of transistors, analog chips, and sensors to pursue secular trends toward electrification and connectivity that allow it to sell into new sockets. Specifically, Onsemi is the top supplier of image sensors to automotive applications like advanced driver-assist systems, or ADAS, and its semiconductors enable power management and conversion in electric vehicles, or EVs, and renewable energy–all of which is likely to keep Onsemi’s sales growth above that of the broader semiconductor industry. 

It is viewed onsemi will be vulnerable to modest cyclicality in the short term, but think its portfolio realignment will lend itself to more durable returns through a cycle. The firm’s increased focus on sticky verticals, as well as its differentiated sensor and silicon carbide technologies, contribute to Analysts narrow economic moat rating. Onsemi’s bread and butter historically was in more commodity like discrete power chips, but it is probable for it to focus on higher-value applications in the automotive and industrial end markets going forward and in turn earn more consistent returns on invested capital. 

It is seen Onsemi will focus on expanding margins over the medium term. Management invested heavily in pruning and improving its manufacturing efficiency in 2018 and 2019, and it is alleged it see the fruits of these efforts after 2022 when Onsemi fully acquires its first 12-inch fab. It is also alleged the firm will focus its investments on the automotive and industrial markets–higher growth and higher margin than its legacy consumer and smartphone markets. It is seen management faces execution risk in hitting its lofty goal of 48%-50% adjusted gross margin, but expect both a focus on higher-margin verticals and an improved manufacturing footprint to get it to the high-40% range in the next five years–from a previous midcycle margin below 38%.

Financial Strength

It is probable Onsemi’s primary financial focus in the medium term will be generating free cash flow and paying down debt after hefty investments over the last five years. Onsemi took on more than $2 billion debt for its 2016 Fairchild acquisition, and also committed over $1 billion in capital expenditures between 2018 and 2019 to improve its manufacturing footprint (shuttering inefficient fabs and purchasing equipment for its new 12-inch fab). Management has a stated goal of holding off on new share repurchases until the firm meets its 2:1 net leverage goal (net debt/adjusted EBITDA). As of the end of fiscal 2021, Onsemi held $1.4 billion in cash compared with $3.1 billion in total debt, putting its year-end net leverage at 0.88 times. It is projected Onsemi to generate an average of $2 billion in free cash flow through 2026-even while committing roughly 10% of sales to capital expenditures-and seen the firm can use its extra cash to resume repurchases. If Onsemi were to come into a liquidity crunch, it has $1.3 billion available (as of end-fiscal 2021) under its $2 billion revolving credit facility.

Bulls Say’s

  • Onsemi’s image sensors are best of breed in the automotive market, with a leading market share in high-growth, mission-critical applications like ADAS. 
  • It is viewed Onsemi will continue to outgrow its underlying markets and the broader semiconductor industry by selling greater dollar content into applications like cars and servers, which also helps stave off its vulnerability to market cycles. 
  • Onsemi is focusing its portfolio on the automotive, industrial, and cloud markets, which is seen, will expand margins and create stickier customer relationships.

Company Profile 

Onsemi is a leading supplier of power and analog semiconductors, as well as sensors. Onsemi is the second-largest global supplier of discrete transistors like insulated gate bipolar transistors, or IGBTs, and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors, or MOSFETs, and also has a significant integrated power chip business. Onsemi is also the largest supplier of image sensors to the automotive market, targeting autonomous driving applications. The firm is concentrated in and focused on the automotive, industrial, and communications markets, and is reducing its exposure to the consumer and computing markets.

(Source: MorningStar)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.