Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

A look at the most recent commodity expert opinions and forecasts: forecast for resources; coal and iron ore

China’s demand for commodities is expected to weaken in the second half of 2021, according to analysts, but this will be largely offset by stronger demand outside of China and the global shift to a low-carbon economy.

The development of the more virulent Delta strain of coronavirus has hampered mobility and growth forecasts, putting pressure on commodities in recent weeks. However, central banks have signalling more aggressive policy positions, with several announcing a reduction in bond purchases.

The vigourous drive in China to put inflationary pressure on industrial metals prices, such as steel, is a third issue. After the run-up that brought copper and iron ore prices to all-time highs, the situation in the second half will be more unpredictable.

Coal

Spot prices for coking (metallurgical) coal have risen since the start of May, but the CBA analysts believe a peak is building, as some steel product margins are now declining.

However, thermal coal prices have remained high due to supply concerns and seasonal demand from a warmer-than-usual summer in North Asia. Thermal coal prices have climbed thrice since the commencement of the pandemic, according to Longview Economics.

Over 2020, China’s coal power capacity increased by 3%, while additions outside of China totalled just 9GW and retirements were 25GW. While a result, China’s coal capacity continues to expand even as the rest of the world cuts back.

Iron Ore

China’s economic report for June is unlikely to allay fears of slowing growth. As a result, ANZ Bank analysts expect that downward pressure on iron ore prices will intensify.

Despite the fact that the market remains tight, a severe correction is unlikely. While demand outside of China may be able to compensate for some of the downturn, iron ore prices are projected to fall in the second half, albeit the decline will be limited.

Source: Factset

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Oil Prices Little Changed After Strong Overnight Gains

After a 2.3 percent increase the previous session, US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) futures were down 0.1 percent at $71.86.
After OPEC and allied nations signed a tentative deal to raise oil output, oil futures fell roughly 7% on Monday, owing to fears about the spread of the COVId-19 delta variant and concerns about oversupply.
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported earlier this week that gasoline stockpiles fell by 100,000 barrels last week, while distillate stockpiles fell by 1.3 million barrels.
The EIA report also showed a drop in crude stockpiles at the storage hub in Cushing, Oklahoma, to the lowest level in about seven months.

(Source: RTT News)
General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Energy continues to be the leading sector in the Q2

Even with the rally year to date, we have energy as fairly valued, with the median stock trading at a price/fair value ratio of 1. Opportunities exist across all segments, particularly services and integrated, which trade at a 29% and 10% discount to intrinsic value, respectively. Exploration and production stocks have surged in the last three months, and on average the group is 8% overvalued (though a handful of 4-star stocks are still underappreciated, in our view).

The ongoing mass rollouts of COVID-19 vaccinations in developed markets will be the main catalyst for year-on-year demand growth of 5.1 million barrels per day in 2021. Our updated demand estimates for 2021 and 2022 are 96.2 mmb/d and 100.4 mmb/d, respectively. While optimistic about demand improvements, producers remain hesitant on the supply end.

During its June 1 meeting, OPEC+ confirmed it will go ahead with modest volume increases of 350 and 450 mb/d in June and July, respectively (which means the group will still be withholding at least 2 mmb/d). And U.S. shale drillers—which have historically acted as swing producers, like OPEC—have steadfastly refused to increase capital budgets to take advantage of higher oil prices, preferring to prioritize free cash flows and distributions to shareholders.

As a result, we now anticipate global demand will outpace supply this year by 1.0 mmb/d. These dynamics have pushed oil prices to what we consider frothy levels, with the West Texas Intermediate benchmark currently 33% higher than our $55/bbl midcycle forecast. Without an abrupt change in strategy from OPEC or the U.S. shale industry, the oil markets will remain tight this year, and short prices could climb even higher.

(Source: Morningstar)

General Advice Warning
Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Drop in Crude Stockpiles is Causing Oil Future to Settle Higher

August West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures closed at $72.94 a barrel, up $0.74 or nearly 1%.

Brent crude futures were trading at $74.19 a barrel, up $0.76 or 1.03 percent.

Crude stocks in the United States declined by 6.866 million barrels last week, significantly more than the predicted reduction of 4.03 million barrels, according to data issued by the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) this morning.

Distillate stockpiles surged by 1.616 million barrels last week, much exceeding the 171,000 barrels projected gain, while gasoline inventories fell by over 6 million barrels, about three times the predicted reduction.

According to a report released late Wednesday by the American Petroleum Institute (API), oil stocks in the United States decreased by 8.0 million barrels last week.

Since demand fell during the corona virus outbreak, OPEC+ has been limiting supply for more than a year. Investors are now concerned that the lack of a new supply agreement will force big oil producers to ramp up output much more quickly.

(Source: Rtt News)

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Downer’s Transformation to Urban Services Business Continues with More Mining Sold Down

In the past, Downer has also underperformed from an operational perspective, but the firm now appears to have learned some hard lessons. The company is pursuing a more capital-light business model for the future, with an emphasis on urban services. In late October 2014, Downer acquired Tenix, a major provider of long-term operations and maintenance services to the power, gas, water, industrial, and resources sectors in Australia and New Zealand. In April 2017, it bought facilities manager Spotless Group.

Key Considerations

  • In late fiscal 2014, Downer completed a high-profile state government rolling stock contract that had weighed on the company’s reputation for the past five years.
  • Based on AUD 36 billion of work-in-hand, Downer has over two and a half years of revenue life, close to the 2.5 year five-year historical average. This is courtesy of Spotless’ additions, many of which are considerably longer dated than mining and EC&M contracts.
  • A key concern in relation to future earnings relates to increased uncertainty surrounding the level and timing of new domestic infrastructure projects by the federal and state governments.

Company Profile

Downer operates engineering, construction, and maintenance; transport; technology and communications; utilities; mining; and rail units. But the future of Downer is focused on urban services, and mining and high-risk construction businesses are being sold down. The engineering, construction, and maintenance business has exposure to mining and energy projects through consulting services. The mining division provides contracted mining services, including mine planning, open-cut mining, underground mining, blasting, drilling, crushing, and haulage. The rail division services and maintains passenger rolling stock, including locomotives and wagons.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.               

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Con Ed four natural gas storage facilities with a combined Capacity

The principal asset of the joint venture is three natural gas pipelines with a total capacity of 3 billion cubic feet per day and four natural gas storage facilities with a combined capacity of 41 Bcf. The pipelines and storage facilities are all located in New York and Pennsylvania. The sale of the joint venture for $1.225 billion was in line with our estimate and has no impact on our fair value estimate or EPS estimates. We had already assumed Con Ed would divest its gas transmission investments, following comments in the 2020 10-K that it was considering strategic alternatives for its interest in Stagecoach. Stagecoach is the primary operating asset for the Con Edison Transmission segment, or CET, contributing $0.17 per share in 2020, or about 4% of consolidated EPS.

In March, we reduced our EPS estimates from 2021-2024 by $0.04 to $0.06 per share due in large part to the dilutive impact of our assumption that Con Ed would exit the gas transmission business. At that time, we also established a 2025 EPS estimate of $5.00, resulting in a 4.1% average annual EPS growth rate near the bottom of ConEd’s EPS growth target of 4%-6%. CET also has a projected 8.5% ownership interest in the proposed 300-mile Mountain Valley Pipeline. In 2019, exercised its option under the MVP joint venture agreement to cap its cash contributions at $530 million. In May, MVP announced a six-month delay in the projected startup and an increase in the estimated cost to $6.2 billion from the previous estimate of $5.8 billion to $6.0 billion.

We remain concerned the MVP will never be completed due in large part to the ongoing delays and increasing uncertainty with respect to obtaining necessary permits for waterbody and wetland crossings because of ongoing court challenges. Dominion Energy and Duke Energy elected to abandon The Atlantic Coast Pipeline, a project also moving Appalachian shale gas to Virginia and North Carolina, last year after running into similar challenges.

Company Profile

Con Ed is a holding company for Consolidated Edison Company of New York, or CECONY, and Orange & Rockland, or O&R. These utilities provide steam, natural gas, and electricity to customers in south eastern New York–including New York City–and small parts of New Jersey. The two utilities generate roughly 90% of Con Ed’s earnings. The other 10% of earnings comes from investments in renewable energy projects and gas and electric transmission. These investments have resulted in Con Ed becoming the second-largest owner of utility-scale PV solar capacity in the U.S.       

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.               

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Cabot is the only natural gas producer to earn a narrow moat rating

Meats believes that the firm’s assets are ideally located in the northeast portion of the play fairway, which mainly yields dry gas with very little oil condensate or natural gas liquids content in the production stream. This geographic advantage not only allows the firm to keep costs low but also maintain very high daily production rates. These advantages have enabled the firm to be among the lowest-cost natural gas producers in the Appalachia region, and this competitive advantage enables it to consistently deliver very strong returns on invested capital. Meats do advise caution, however. The company has drilling opportunities in the Lower and Upper Marcellus. The opportunities in the Lower Marcellus are far more lucrative but are expected to last until the late 2020s. This means that the firm will eventually pivot to opportunities in the Upper Marcellus that are typically up to 30% less productive. Meats asserts that when the firm does pivot to the Upper Marcellus, it will be able to reuse existing roads and pad sites, and as there are no well configuration constraints in this undeveloped interval, it could enhance returns by drilling longer laterals. As a result, we expect well costs to decrease enough to offset the dip in flow rates, leaving potential returns unchanged.

Cabot is the only natural gas producer to earn a narrow moat rating. The main reason for this rating is the firm’s low operating and development costs in the Marcellus Shale, which puts Cabot at the lower end of the U.S. natural gas cost curve.

ESG is an important factor to consider when looking at exploration and production companies. This is due to the downside risk ESG factors possess for such companies due to reputational and regulatory risks. Meats does not think that these issues threaten the company’s economic moat due to the 5%-10% spread between projected returns and Cabot’s cost of capital that provides a comfortable margin of safety. The most significant ESG exposure for Cabot is greenhouse gas emissions. While greenhouse gas emissions are unavoidable for oil and natural gas producers, Cabot has taken steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensity in 2020 while also reporting zero flaring in the year. It is also worth noting that while consumers get more skeptical of fossil fuels, much of this aversion is directed toward coal. Natural gas, on the other hand, is less carbon-intense than coal but does not have the intermittency issues that plague wind and solar generators.

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.               

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

NiSource Accelerated Investment Should Lead to Growth

From the Best Ideas report:

“Natural gas utility share prices have lagged the Morningstar US Utilities Index as the economy recovers from COVID-19, due in part to environmental con-cerns about the long-term use of natural gas. However, we believe the electrification of building space and water heating has significant technical and economic obstacles and the market’s misperception of the future of nature gas results in an attractive price for NiSource shares.

“The fully regulated company derives about 60% of its operating income from its six natural gas distribution utilities and the remaining 40% from its electric utility business in Indiana. NiSource has accelerated the pace of gas pipeline restoration investment following a tragic natural gas explosion in 2018, and this will reduce risk and cut methane emissions. Its electric utility will close its last coal-fired power plant in 2028 and replace the capacity with wind, solar, and energy storage.

As a result of favorable regulation and renewable energy investments, we expect NiSource to step up its capital expenditures to almost $12 billion over the next five years, almost 40% higher than the pre-vious five years. The accelerated investment should result in better than 7% EPS growth, strong dividend growth, an improved ESG profile, and reduced risk for investors.”

NiSource Inc. is one of the largest fully regulated utility companies in the United States, serving approximately 3.5 million natural gas customers and 500,000 electric customers across seven states through its local Columbia Gas and NIPSCO brands

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Oil Market Update: Recovery progressing nicely.

Meanwhile, vaccination rates continue to rise in much of the developed world, where a nearly normal summer seems to be in the works. As such, our forecast for a full recovery in demand in 2022 looks safe.

At the same time, supply remains constrained. OPEC has reiterated its plan to bring back volumes in a measured way, which should allow for a resumption of Iranian volumes if a deal is reached to do so. In the United States, public companies have not shown a willingness to increase spending, meaning volume growth will remain tepid. The combined effect is a continued drawdown in inventories over the next 18 months. The market seems to agree, having pushed Brent prices back to $70/barrel. As supply typically lags demand, prices could be headed higher.

  • We have slightly lowered our 2021 demand forecast to account for India, but 2022 demand remains unchanged and above 2019 levels. In 2023, we expect record-high global oil demand of 101.7 million barrels a day.
  • At its June 1 meeting, OPEC+ reaffirmed planned supply additions of 350 thousand b/d in May, 350 mb/d in June, and 450 mb/d in July as it remains cautiously optimistic for a rear-end 2021 recovery.
  • The U.S. rig count increased in May to 372, twice the number in mid-August last year, but even with West Texas Intermediate crude prices approaching $70/bbl, further additions will be limited.

OPEC Wary of Pandemic Setbacks but Goes Ahead With Planned Increases

OPEC+ reaffirmed that it will proceed with the easing of production cuts that it proposed the meeting prior. The cartel will go forth with its planned additions of 350 mb/d in May, 350 mb/d in June, and 450 mb/d in July, while acknowledging pandemic-driven headwinds in many parts of the world. Members declined to adjudicate on production policy past July, but further upticks are likely (the group meets again on the first of the month). Despite vaccination shortages and mounting coronavirus cases throughout much of Asia and Latin America, OPEC remains cautiously optimistic for a rear-end 2021 recovery; its total oil estimate is unchanged from last month.

During April, the producers participating in the cuts produced 21.1 mmb/d, almost exactly in line with the combined target. These producers have held volumes flat for three straight months now, but the cartel expects to gradually ramp up output in the summer. De facto head Saudi Arabia is also expected to bump up its own production after enduring self-imposed incremental cuts. Overall, conformity with agreed production ceilings has been strong since the pandemic began, but it remains to be seen if OPEC members can be trusted to accelerate production at the agreed rate; historically, the cartel has struggled with producers willing to sacrifice group targets for their own benefit. We forecast an incremental 2.2 mmb/d and 4.2 mmb/d, respectively, in 2021 and 2022 from OPEC, Russia, and Kazakhstan combined.

Iran seem to be edging closer to a resolution as negotiations in Vienna motor onward and are optimistic that an agreement can be reached by August. If so, Iranian production, which has steadily increased in the past six months, could see the floodgates burst open. However, this sentiment was tempered by the International Atomic Energy Agency, which chastised the country in a June 1 report for failing to explain undeclared nuclear material at multiple locations. Iranian output fell over 1.5 mmb/d when the current sanctions came into effect, so an agreement could materially boost supply in the region. We’d argue, though, that the rest of OPEC would be willing to make sacrifices to accommodate these volumes (despite Iran-Saudi tensions). Otherwise, the cartel’s progress reducing inventories since the peak of the pandemic would be quickly undone, and the market would be thrown back into oversupply.

Source:Morningstar

Disclaimer

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.

Categories
Commodities Trading Ideas & Charts

Mineral Resources – Meets Expectations

Management has significantly improved disclosure, earnings streams have been materially diversified and the investment strategy has consistently generated high returns on invested capital. We expect a well-supplied lithium market in the longer term, coupled with weaker demand growth for steel, particularly from China, to drive lower prices and reduce the pool of available contracting work. Despite this, we think Mineral Resources can drive EPS growth on volume.

Key Considerations

  • Management has significantly improved disclosure, earnings streams have been materially diversified and the investment strategy has consistently generated high returns on invested capital.
  • We think the business model is demonstrably sustainable, centring on Mining Services around Australian bulk commodities.
  • Mineral Resources will selectively own and develop its own mining operations, though with the aim of subsequent sell down while retaining core processing and screening rights.
  • Mineral Resources grew strongly since listing in 2006. The chairman and managing director have been with the business for over a decade and have meaningful shareholdings.
  • Australian iron ore is mainly purchased by Chinese steel producers, meaning Mineral Resources offers leveraged exposure to Chinese economic growth.
  • Mineral Resources has a recurring base of revenue and earnings from processing infrastructure.
  • Mineral Resources’ balance sheet is very strong with net cash. This has opened up the opportunity for lithium investments selling into highly receptive markets.
  • Mineral Resources’ profits are exposed to volatile iron ore price. We expect future iron ore prices to be much less favourable than the decade-long boom to 2014.
  • Investments developing lithium bear fruit now in a booming market, but a strong third-party supply response into a small market risks hollowing out returns.
  • Mineral Resources has poor geographic diversification, with a high dependence on capital activity in Western Australia. Mineral Resources is highly dependent on likely Chinese demand for iron ore.

 (Source: Morningstar)

Disclaimer

General Advice Warning

Any advice/ information provided is general in nature only and does not take into account the personal financial situation, objectives or needs of any particular person.